CLOSE

Whistleblowers have been at time essential and detrimental to a country’s democracy, but what makes them different than a leaker? We explain.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – The inspector general who received the whistleblower’s complaint at the heart of the impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump and who found it credible testified privately Friday before the House Intelligence Committee.

Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, received the whistleblower complaint Aug. 12 that focused on Trump’s call urging Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to discredit a political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden.

Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., told USA TODAY that Atkinson provided no new documents on Friday, but walked through the step-by-step process he took to deem the whistleblower credible. Quigley said he couldn’t describe those steps in detail.

“I don’t believe there was anything new revealed today,” Quigley said. “After yesterday, we need a break,” he added, referring to the nine-hour interview with former Ukraine envoy Kurt Volker.

Several Republicans left the meeting accusing Democrats of working with the whistleblower before the complaint was released.

“The inspector general for the intelligence community could provide no information about the contact between the (committee) majority and the whistleblower prior to his involvement,” said Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas. “The only way we’ll be able to get that information is from the (committee) majority themselves.”

Ratcliffe appeared with GOP Reps. Chris Stewart of Utah and Brad Wenstrup of Ohio, but neither of them answered questions.

A representative for the whistleblower asked the committee for guidance about how to file a complaint, but a panel spokesman said staffers directed the whistleblower to hire a lawyer to file a complaint with the inspector general. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., has said he doesn’t know who the whistleblower is. And Mark Zaid, one of the lawyers on the whistleblower’s legal team, said no one from the committee helped craft the complaint.

As House Democrats worked to corroborate the complaint, Trump told reporters outside the White House on Thursday that both Ukraine and China should investigate Biden.

“Well, I would think if they were honest about it, they’d start a major investigation into the Bidens. It’s a very simple answer,” Trump said of Zelensky. “And by the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”

Biden, a leading candidate for the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, has forcefully denied wrongdoing with his son, Hunter Biden, who worked on the board of an energy company in Ukraine. Kate Bedingfield, the communications director for Biden’s campaign, called Trump’s statement “a grotesque choice of lies over truth and self over country.”

Ukraine texts: Read key text messages between diplomats on Trump, Ukraine president

Atkinson spent two weeks reviewing the whistleblower’s complaint that alleged Trump “used the power of his office” to solicit foreign help for the 2020 election and then restricted access to records of the call. Atkinson found that the complaint appeared credible Aug. 26, after a preliminary review.

But the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, prevented him from passing along the complaint to Congress within seven days, as is typically required for national-security whistleblower complaints. Maguire consulted with the White House and Justice Department in opting for the delay, he told the intelligence panel Sept. 26, the day after a summary of the call was released and the complaint was provided to the committee.

Maguire said he thought the complaint might be protected by executive privilege, despite being a conversation with a foreign leader. The Justice Department ruled that the complaint didn’t qualify as an “urgent concern” about “a serious or flagrant problem” requiring notification of Congress because the target – Trump – isn’t a member of the intelligence community.

Atkinson respectfully disagreed with that decision, saying in a letter Sept. 17 that the allegations related to “one of the most significant and important” of Maguire’s responsibilities to the American people. Atkinson warned lawmakers that withholding the information could lead to “a significant problem and deficiency” relating to Maguire’s intelligence programs.

Trump released a memo summarizing the calland Maguire provided the complaint to the House and Senate intelligence committees on Sept. 25. Lawmakers on those panels now want to hear from the whistleblower.

Schiff has characterized the call as sounding like a mafia shakedown, seeking the favor of an investigation of Biden in exchange for the release of military aid. He called Maguire’s decision to consult with the White House “bewildering” during the Sept. 26 hearing. And Schiff said Wednesday that lawmakers will have questions for Atkinson because they didn’t have the complaint when they last met with him.

“We certainly intend to ask (Atkinson) about the efforts that were made to corroborate that complaint, which we now know the inspector general found both credible and urgent,” Schiff said.

But the top Republican on the panel, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, said the whistleblower had arguable political motivation for the complaint and said Democrats were using it as ammunition in political warfare.

Trump has called the whistleblower “very inaccurate” and Schiff “a lowlife.”

“He should resign from office in disgrace and frankly they should look at him for treason,” Trump said of Schiff on Wednesday while meeting with the president of Finland.

Six House committees have been pursuing wide-ranging investigations of Trump since Democrats regained control of the chamber in January. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., announced a formal impeachment inquiry Sept. 24 based on reports about Trump’s Ukraine call.

The inspector general’s meeting comes amid a flurry of subpoenas for documents and depositions with State Department officials and associates of Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, who met with Ukraine officials to urge an investigation of Biden.

More about Congress investigating President Trump’s Ukraine call:

What’s going on with Trump and Ukraine? And how does it involve Biden and a whistleblower complaint?

How does Congress hear from anonymous witnesses? Trump whistleblower seeks protection from retaliation

‘Unique and unprecedented’: Intel chief Joseph Maguire cites executive privilege in delaying whistleblower report to Congress

Nancy Pelosi has put the Trump impeachment inquiry on a fast track. Here’s the plan, timeline and key players

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/04/trump-impeachment-intelligence-watchdog-testifies-whistleblower/3839670002/

NEW YORK (AP) — CNN says it has rejected two advertisements submitted by President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign because they weren’t factual, but will run a third ad that was submitted on Thursday.

Trump’s campaign likened CNN to a public relations firm for Democrats after rejection of its first advertisement, which discussed allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden that the network said had been proven false by several news organizations.

The ad accuses Democrats of trying to “steal” an election by opening an impeachment inquiry on the president, and says that “media lapdogs” fall in line. At that point, the screen flashes pictures of CNN’s Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, Jim Acosta and MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

CNN said disparaging its employees is grounds for rejection, too.

The network has been a frequent target of the president, who on Thursday suggested that “we ought to start our own network and put our own news out there.”

His campaign spokesman, Tim Murtaugh, said “CNN spends all day protecting Joe Biden in their programming, so it’s not surprising that they’re shielding him from truthful advertising too.”

Murtaugh wouldn’t discuss where the campaign had also submitted the Biden ad. It’s not uncommon for campaigns or advocacy groups to make ads they know will be rejected, hoping to get more publicity for that action than they would if the commercial actually aired.

Another ad submitted to CNN and its corporate cousin Turner Sports on Thursday was rejected. CNN said the ad contains assertions about the whistleblower complaint against Trump that have been disputed by the intelligence inspector general, and uses the word “coup” to describe the impeachment process set forth in the constitution.

A third ad was accepted. While the ad says “the swamp” hates Trump, flashing video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, it outlines actions taken in the president’s first term and asserts that it takes a “tough guy” to change Washington.

A Word to Our Loyal Readers

Support Snopes and make a difference for readers everywhere.

Most Snopes assignments begin when readers ask us, “Is this true?” Those tips launch our fact-checkers on sprints across a vast range of political, scientific, legal, historical, and visual information. We investigate as thoroughly and quickly as possible and relay what we learn. Then another question arrives, and the race starts again.

We do this work every day at no cost to you, but it is far from free to produce, and we cannot afford to slow down. To ensure Snopes endures — and grows to serve more readers — we need a different kind of tip: We need your financial support.

Support Snopes so we continue to pursue the facts — for you and anyone searching for answers.

Team Snopes

Source Article from https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/10/03/cnn-rejects-2-campaign-ads-from-trump-accepts-1/

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, was confronted at a town hall event Thursday by a constituent who repeatedly pressed her on when she and other Senate Republicans would draw a “line” on President Trump requesting help from Ukraine and China in investigating Joe Biden.

The Iowa resident, Amy Haskins, specifically asked Ernst about Trump’s comments earlier that day that he would like China to look into the business dealings of the former vice president’s son, Hunter Biden.

“How is that helping anybody?” Haskins challenged Ernst at the event in Templeton, Iowa, drawing a round of applause.

“Where is the line? When are you guys going to say, ‘Enough’ and stand up and say, ‘You know what, I’m not backing any of this’? … You still stand there, silent, and your silence is supporting him,” said Haskins.

MSNBC’S CHUCK TODD SOUNDS THE ALARM ON TRUMP: ‘THE NATIONAL NIGHTMARE IS UPON US’

President Trump said Thursday that China should investigate Hunter Biden’s business dealings, as he doubled down on his prior call for Ukraine to do the same. Trump struck a characteristically defiant tone while speaking to reporters on the White House South Lawn, en route to Florida.

CNN ANCHOR SLAMS PENCE ON RESPONSE TO TRUMP-UKRAINE CALL: ‘WE ALL KNOW’ THAT HE’S ‘LYING’

In the controversial Juy 25 telephone call, President Trump requested his Ukrainian counterpart for help with a probe into Hunter Biden’s dealings with gas company Burisma Holdings, where Hunter served on the board, and the elder Biden’s role in ousting a prosecutor who had been looking into that company.

The phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky prompted a whistleblower complaint and Democrats have deemed the request an impeachable offense.

“Whistleblowers should be protected,” Sen. Ernst said, agreeing with her Iowa Republican colleague, Sen. Chuck Grassley, who said this week that the whistleblower “ought to be heard out and protected.”

Ernst told Haskins that Trump is “going to say whatever the president is going to do” and that she cannot “speak for him.”

“I know you can’t speak for him, but you can speak for yourself,” Haskins fired back.

CLICK HERE FOR THE ALL-NEW FOXBUSINESS.COM

“And I do,” Ernst replied.

Haskins asked Ernst whether Trump should be “encouraging other countries to investigate his political rivals.”

Ernst answered that “corruption, no matter where it is, should be ferreted out.”

Fox News’ Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/joni-ernst-confronted-town-hall-trump

Mounted police in Quito advance on demonstrators protesting Ecuadorian President Lenín Moreno’s move to scrap fuel subsidies, in a clash near the government palace late Thursday.

Dolores Ochoa/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Dolores Ochoa/AP

Mounted police in Quito advance on demonstrators protesting Ecuadorian President Lenín Moreno’s move to scrap fuel subsidies, in a clash near the government palace late Thursday.

Dolores Ochoa/AP

Large protests have triggered a state of emergency in Ecuador, after President Lenín Moreno moved ahead with his plan to end fuel subsidies. Moreno says he’s ending the “perverse” gasoline subsidy after 40 years because it was distorting Ecuador’s economy.

“I want to manifest that the measures we take together are completely firm,” Moreno said Thursday, declaring a “state of exception” — essentially, a state of emergency — after intense protests flared up. Moreno added that there is no chance to change policies now, “especially those related to a perverse subsidy that was causing harm to the country.”

The fuel plan, part of broader economic reforms, triggered anger and mass protests, with demonstrators facing off with police wearing riot gear in Quito and other cities.

The intense protests and street clashes resulted in hundreds of people being arrested and 28 police officers injured, according to Reuters, which cites the government’s figures.

The news agency adds, “Diesel prices rose from $1.03 to $2.30 per gallon on Thursday, while gasoline rose from $1.85 to $2.39.”

Some roads remain blocked on Friday, after indigenous rights groups, students and unions all worked to shut down traffic and disrupt commercial activities, aided by truck, bus and taxi drivers.

On Friday morning, Interior Minister María Paula Romo announced that the national police have arrested Jorge Calderón, president of the Federation of Taxi Drivers of Ecuador — a group closely tied to the mass protests.

In addition to the impact on their livelihoods and pocketbooks, critics of Moreno’s fuel plan and other policies complain that austerity measures are being imposed on their country because of a multi-billion-dollar loan agreement with the International Monetary Fund.

In his response to the protests, Moreno accused the organizers of being in league with his political opponents and seeking to destabilize his government.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/04/767164081/ecuador-in-state-of-emergency-end-of-fuel-subsidies-sparks-mass-protest

“It’s not a question of saying no,’’ Mr. Sondland said of the Zelensky government. ‘‘It’s a question of saying when. There are certain things that they have to do. There are preconditions to anything.”

Mr. Sondland also spoke to Ukraine’s state-run news agency after the call and said: “The conversation was very successful. They found a common language immediately.” He said the two leaders discussed Ukraine’s war, energy security and “the rule of law.”

Mr. Sondland, 62, arrived in Brussels as ambassador to the European Union in June of last year, having raised a lot of money for Mr. Trump after building a lucrative hotel chain in the Pacific Northwest.

He sees his job as pressing Mr. Trump’s agenda, which is tightly focused on trade and the impediments that lead to a $151 billion trade deficit in goods with the European Union, a figure Mr. Sondland often cites.

Mr. Sondland has said that his grandparents were from Ukraine. His parents were both refugees from the Nazis, and he was the first in his family to be born in the United States.

In September 2018, Mr. Sondland posted a video to introduce himself and his family to Europeans, featuring shots of him making coffee, relaxing at home, showing off his collection of art, climbing into a jet that he likes to pilot, and walking his dogs on the beach with his wife, Katherine Durant, a businesswoman, and introducing his son Max and daughter Lucy.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/world/europe/trump-ambassador-ukraine-sondland.html

October 4 at 12:46 PM

President Trump said Friday that Democrats “unfortunately have the votes” to impeach him in the House but predicted he would “win” in a trial in the Republican-led Senate.

“The Republicans are very unified,” Trump said, as he again insisted he had said nothing inappropriate during the July call in which he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Trump’s comments to reporters at the White House came as fallout continued Friday from the late-night release of text messages by House investigators, while another key figure, the inspector general of the intelligence community, testified on Capitol Hill behind closed doors.

The texts released late Thursday show how State Department officials coordinated with Zelensky’s top aide and Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani to leverage a potential summit between Trump and Zelensky on a promise from the Ukrainians to investigate an energy company, Burisma, that had employed Hunter Biden.

Early Friday, Ukraine’s chief prosecutor also said he would conduct an “audit” of an investigation related to Burisma.

●Trump publicly calls on China to investigate Bidens

●Trump’s removal would require Republican dissidents. But those who speak out become targets of viral disinformation.

●Trump wanted Ukraine’s president to launch investigations before face-to-face meeting, State Department texts show

Read the whistleblower complaint | The rough transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky | House Democrats’ letter on State Department texts

Chat live with Post reporters: The latest on impeachment and Ukraine

12:20 p.m.: Romney criticizes Trump’s ‘brazen and unprecedented’ appeals to Ukraine, China

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) on Friday condemned Trump’s efforts to get Ukraine and China to investigate the Bidens as “wrong and appalling,” breaking ranks with most Republicans on Capitol Hill who have largely avoided criticizing the president.

In a pair of tweets, Romney referenced that fact that Biden is running for president.

“When the only American citizen President Trump singles out for China’s investigation is his political opponent in the midst of the Democratic nomination process, it strains credulity to suggest that it is anything other than politically motivated,” Romney said in one tweet.

“By all appearances, the President’s brazen and unprecedented appeal to China and to Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden is wrong and appalling,” he added in another.

12:05 p.m.: E.U. Ambassador Gordon Sondland gave $1 million to Trump inaugural committee through LLCs

Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union who’s become a key figure in the Ukraine controversy, has been a longtime donor to the Republican Party, previously supporting the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney.

In the 2016 campaign, he supported Jeb Bush’s campaign and the super PAC supporting Jeb Bush.

When Trump became the party’s presumptive nominee, Sondland signed on to the joint finance operation between the campaign and the party as a major fundraiser, or a “bundler” who collects big checks on behalf of the nominee.

Sondland was announced as the Oregon and Washington state co-chair of Trump Victory in July 2016. He was listed as a co-host of an August 2016 fundraiser in Seattle in his capacity as Trump Victory co-chair, according to an invitation. Tickets for that fundraisers cost as high as $100,000 per couple.

But once media outlets reported plans of that fundraiser, Sondland and another Portland hotelier, Bashar Wali, said their names were added without their approval and declined to participate as co-hosts, the Willamette Week reported at the time. The two men said through a Provenance Hotels spokeswoman that they refused to participate due to Trump’s anti-immigrant stance.

Sondland eventually donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural committee through four limited-liability companies, state and federal records show. Buena Vista Investments LLC and BV-2 LLC gave $350,000 each, and Dunson Cornerstone Inc. and Dunson Investments LLC gave $150,000 each, inaugural committee records show.

All four companies are registered in Washington, under Sondland’s name. Sondland was among at least 47 people or corporations who gave $1 million or more to the Trump inaugural committee, which drew $107 million. Sondland’s donations were first reported in 2017 by the Intercept, the Center for Responsive Politics and other outlets.

— Michelle Ye Hee Lee

12 p.m.: Cornyn tweets that Justice is investigating Biden ‘conflicts of interest’

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) tweeted Friday morning that the Justice Department is “investigating foreign government influence, VP Biden conflicts of interest, and possible corruption.”

A spokesman for Cornyn clarified that the senator was referring to the ongoing investigation being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham into various activities surrounding the FBI’s Russia probe, but he declined to say whether he had been informed if that investigation included an examination of Biden.

A spokeswoman for the Justice Department did not immediately respond to messages, and an FBI spokeswoman declined to comment.

When asked by a reporter later Friday morning if the Justice Department was looking into Biden, Trump said, “Well, that you’d have to ask Attorney General Barr, but I can tell you just as an observer that what I saw Biden do with his son, he’s pillaging these countries, and he’s hurting us.”

The Biden family’s Ukraine dealings would seem far afield of what has been publicly revealed about Durham’s work. When it was first announced that Barr had tapped Durham to conduct the review, a person familiar with the matter said the prosecutor was seeking to determine if the U.S. government’s “intelligence collection activities” related to the Trump campaign were “lawful and appropriate.”

A Justice Department spokeswoman said more recently that Durham was “exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.”

“While the Attorney General has yet to contact Ukraine in connection with this investigation, certain Ukrainians who are not members of the government have volunteered information to Mr. Durham, which he is evaluating,” the spokeswoman said.

— Matt Zapotosky

11:45 a.m.: Trump won’t say whether he’s asked countries to investigate any nonpolitical opponents

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday, Trump said he didn’t know if he had ever asked a foreign leader to investigate a person who wasn’t his political opponent, though he said he had a right to do so.

“You know, we would have to look,” Trump said. “But what I looked for and will always ask for is anything having to do with corruption.”

Reporters asked him several times if that included enlisting Russian President Vladimir Putin’s help, but Trump ignored the question.

“I’ll tell you what’s okay,” he continued. “If we feel there is corruption, we have a right to go to a foreign country.”

11:30 a.m.: Trump says Democrats have votes to impeach him in House

Trump told reporters Friday that it appears House Democrats have the votes to impeach him but predicted that he would be acquitted in a trial in the Republican-led Senate.

“The Democrats unfortunately, they have the votes,” Trump said as he prepared to leave the White House. “They can vote very easily, even though most of them, many of them, don’t believe they should do it.”

“If they proceed, they’ll just get their people, they’re all in line, even though many of them don’t want to vote, they have no choice,” Trump added. “They have to follow their leadership. And then we’ll get it to the Senate, and we’re going to win. The Republicans have been very unified.”

Trump said Democrats would “pay a tremendous price at the polls” for impeaching him.

He continued to insist that he had done nothing inappropriate during his July call in which he pressed Zelensky to investigate the Bidens.

“When I speak to a foreign leader, I speak in an appropriate manner,” Trump said.

10:30 a.m.: Trump shares purported employer of whistleblower in a tweet

In the midst of several midmorning tweets, Trump identified the purported employer of the whistleblower as the CIA.

In the tweet, Trump quoted longtime Republican operative Ed Rollins from an appearance on Fox News.

“I think it’s outrages that a Whistleblower is a CIA Agent,” Trump quoted Rollins as saying, misspelling “outrageous.”

Federal laws offer only limited protection for those in the intelligence community who report wrongdoing — even when they follow all the rules for doing so.

“If he wants to destroy this person’s life, there’s not a lot to stop him right now,” whistleblower attorney Bradley P. Moss told The Washington Post last week.

Both The Post and the New York Times have published stories identifying the whistleblower as a CIA officer, drawing objections from the whistleblower’s lawyers, who say he is entitled to anonymity under the law.

10 a.m.: Trump camp to air anti-Biden ads in key early primary states

Beginning this weekend, the Trump campaign is airing more than $1 million worth of TV ads in early primary states that accuse Joe Biden and his son Hunter of corruption in Ukraine, according to Brad Parscale, Trump’s campaign manager.

The commercials will air in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada, Parscale tweeted.

The anti-Biden ads are part of a larger $8 million ad buy focused on impeachment, which the Trump camp is trying to spin to its advantage.

CNN said Thursday it would not run the ad because the allegations of corruption against the Bidens highlighted in the ad are unsubstantiated.

9:50 a.m.: Intelligence community inspector general meeting with Congress about whistleblower complaint

Michael Atkinson, the inspector general of the intelligence community, will appear before the House Intelligence Committee on Friday to discuss the complaint from a whistleblower that touched off the impeachment probe against Trump.

He arrived on Capitol Hill shortly before 10 a.m. for a scheduled 10:30 a.m. hearing.

The hearing is necessary “to establish additional details, leads and evidence” in the probe, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) wrote in a letter to colleagues last week. The hearing will not be public.

“We have to flesh out all of the facts for the American people. The seriousness of the matter and the danger to our country demands nothing less,” Schiff wrote.

Atkinson alerted Schiff and other congressional committee leaders to the whistleblower’s complaint last month, but at the time, acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire would not allow Atkinson to share the full complaint with the committees.

Read more here.

— Shane Harris, Rachael Bade and Karoun Demirjian

9 a.m.: House Republicans object to White House subpoena

Republicans on the House Oversight Committee on Friday made public a letter to Chairman Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.) in which they objected to his threatened subpoena of White House records related to Trump’s call with Zelensky.

“You decided to issue this subpoena without consulting Republicans and without allowing Members to debate the terms of the subpoena,” the Republicans wrote in the letter, dated Thursday. “Your memorandum cherry-picks and misstates information to propagate a misleading narrative about the President’s actions. We object strongly to the issuance of this subpoena and your stated reasons for issuing it.”

Cummings said earlier this week he would issue a subpoena if the White House didn’t reply with document requests by Friday.

8:50 a.m.: Trump seizes on unemployment rate in arguing against impeachment

Trump seized the release of new unemployment numbers Friday morning to argue against his impeachment.

“Breaking News: Unemployment Rate, at 3.5%, drops to a 50 YEAR LOW,” he tweeted. “Wow America, lets impeach your President (even though he did nothing wrong!).”

Trump made no mention that the same report showed the economy adding a modest 136,000 jobs in September, in what is likely to be interpreted as further evidence that the country is headed for a slowdown.

8:25 a.m.: Schiff says Republicans must decide if Trump has ‘absolute right’ he claims

In a morning tweet, Schiff responded to Trump’s late-night assertion that he has an “absolute right” to enlist foreign countries in corruption investigations.

Trump’s contention, in a tweet, came at the end of a day in which he publicly urged both Ukraine and China to investigate the business dealings of Hunter Biden.

“It comes down to this,” Schiff tweeted. “We’ve cut through the denials. The deflections. The nonsense. Donald Trump believes he can pressure a foreign nation to help him politically. It’s his ‘right.’ Every Republican in Congress has to decide: Is he right?”

Minutes after Schiff’s tweet, Trump doubled down on his assertion.

“As President I have an obligation to end CORRUPTION, even if that means requesting the help of a foreign country or countries,” he tweeted. “It is done all the time. This has NOTHING to do with politics or a political campaign against the Bidens. This does have to do with their corruption!”

6:45 a.m.: Ukraine’s new chief prosecutor to ‘audit’ Biden case

KIEV, Ukraine — Ukraine’s new chief prosecutor said Friday his office will conduct an “audit” of an investigation into Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company that had recruited Hunter Biden for its board.

A criminal probe of the company was closed in 2016, and Trump has alleged it was because of pressure by Hunter Biden’s father, Joe Biden, who was then vice president. Trump has insisted that Ukraine open a new investigation.

Ukrainian officials said previously that the probe was focused on the years 2010 to 2012, before the younger Biden joined the board. They also have said that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing on his part.

Prosecutor General Ruslan Ryaboshapka told a news conference that he is aware of at least 15 investigations that may have touched on Burisma, its owner Nikolai Zlochevsky, an associate named Serhiy Zerchenko, and Biden, and that all will be reviewed. He said no foreign or Ukrainian official has been in touch with him to request this audit.

Read more here.

— Will Englund

6:30 a.m.: Trump wanted Ukraine’s president to launch investigations before face-to-face meeting, texts show

House investigators released numerous text messages late Thursday night illustrating how senior State Department officials coordinated with the Ukrainian president’s top aide and Trump’s personal lawyer to leverage a potential summit between the heads of state on a promise from the Ukrainians to investigate the 2016 U.S. election and an energy company that employed Biden’s son.

The texts, which former special U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker provided investigators during a nearly 10-hour deposition Thursday, reveal that officials felt Trump would not agree to meet with Zelensky unless Zelensky promised to launch the investigations — and did so publicly.

Although the texts do not mention Biden by name, congressional Democrats leading an impeachment inquiry are pointing to them as clear evidence that Trump conditioned normal bilateral relations with Ukraine on that country first agreeing “to launch politically motivated investigations,” top Democrats said in a statement Thursday night.

“heard from White House — assuming President Z convinces trump he will investigate / ‘get to the bottom of what happened’ in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to Washington,” Volker texted Zelensky’s aide, Andrey Yermak, on July 25, hours before Trump and the Ukrainian president spoke via phone.

Read more here.

— Karoun Demirjian, Rachael Bade, Josh Dawsey and John Hudson

6 a.m.: Trump asserts ‘absolute right’ to investigate corruption

Trump on Thursday night asserted an “absolute right” to investigate corruption, which he said includes reaching out to foreign countries for assistance, and suggested that he might sue House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif).

He comments on Twitter came hours after he told reporters that he would like to see investigations of the Bidens not only by Ukraine but also China, prompting an uproar from congressional Democrats.

“As the President of the United States, I have an absolute right, perhaps even a duty, to investigate, or have investigated, CORRUPTION, and that would include asking, or suggesting, other Countries to help us out!” Trump wrote on Twitter.

Later, he took aim at Pelosi for standing by Schiff’s comments in a hearing last week.

Trump has called for Schiff to resign for remarks in which he embellished Trump’s phone call with Zelensky. Schiff later said his remarks were intended as a parody and that Trump should have recognized that.

Pelosi defended Schiff during an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that aired Thursday morning on “Good Morning America,” saying his remarks were “fair.”

“Nancy Pelosi today, on @GMA, actually said that Adam Schiffty Schiff didn’t fabricate my words in a major speech before Congress,” Trump said in his tweet. “She either had no idea what she was saying, in other words lost it, or she lied. Even Clinton lover @GStephanopoulos strongly called her out. Sue her?”

5 a.m.: Members of Congress getting pressed on developments back home

With Congress in recess, House and Senate members are getting pressed on developments in the Ukraine controversy while back home.

Here is a video of Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) responding to a constituent Thursday night at a town hall in Templeton, Iowa, who asked a pointed question about the president: “When are you guys going to say, ‘Enough?’”

5 a.m.: CNN declines to run Trump campaign ads

CNN said Thursday that it will not run two Trump campaign ads because they disparage the network’s journalists and make “demonstrably false” claims while discussing impeachment and pushing unsubstantiated allegations of corruption against Biden.

The network’s decisions come as the Trump administration escalates its attacks on congressional Democrats’ impeachment efforts and continues to lash out at media organizations it tries to discredit as “fake news.”

CNN’s move brought renewed ire from Trump’s reelection campaign, as Communications Director Tim Murtaugh called the news network a “Democrat public relations firm” that “spends all day protecting Joe Biden.”

Read more here.

— Hannah Knowles

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/10/04/9ff6d4a0-e627-11e9-a331-2df12d56a80b_story.html

President Donald Trump again suggested starting his own global news network to “put some really talented people and get a real voice out there. Not a voice that is fake.”

His remarks were yet another slam at CNN, but also existing media outlets that are funded by the U.S. government, the largest of which is Voice of America. VOA’s mission is to provide an “objective and reliable source of U.S., regional and world news and information,” and is set up with a “firewall” to be free of political interference.

Speaking to a crowd in Florida on Thursday, though, Trump criticized those entities, which are overseen by the U.S. Agency for Global Media. Trump said that “we used to have Radio Free Europe and Voice of America. We did that to build up our country, and that is not working out too well.”

Instead, he said that CNN “seems to be a voice that is a voice out there, and it is a terrible thing for our country.”

“CNN outside of the United States is much more important than it is inside the United States,” Trump said.

Trump has suggested starting a state-run network before. Last year, he wrote on Twitter that “Something has to be done, including the possibility of the United States starting our own Worldwide Network to show the World the way we really are, GREAT!”

Voice of America, which has a budget of about $235 million, employs more than 1,000, and programs in more than 40 languages.

Trump also ridiculed media fact-checking, arguing that they don’t spot his embellishments. He said that when he once said that California Gov. Gavin Newsom wanted to give everyone a Rolls Royce, CNN said, “The president isn’t telling the truth.”

Trump has nominated Michael Pack, a documentary filmmaker, to serve as CEO of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, succeeding John Lansing, who resigned last month to serve as CEO of NPR. Pack has been CEO of the Claremont Institute and is a former executive for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. He also has worked with Steve Bannon on two film projects and praised Bannon in an op ed that talked of the left’s monopoly on documentaries.

Jeff Shell, chairman of NBCUniversal Film and Entertainment, was on the Broadcast Board of Governors, which oversees the U.S. Agency, and resigned this week. A blog devoted to coverage of the broadcast entities, BBG-USAGM Watch, obtained Shell’s resignation letter to Trump, in which he wrote that the time was right to depart following Lansing’s resignation. He also wrote of the accomplishments they had made “while abiding by the ‘firewall’ that protects the full editorial independence of our journalists and networks, all of whom are required to at all times adhere to the highest professional standards of journalism.”

Trump’s longstanding gripes against the press and desire for his own news outlet prompted his establishment of a weekly webcast called Real News Update on July 30, 2017, garnering considerable attention, buzz and late-night TV jibes at the time. A version of the still-going Facebook webcast is hosted by daughter-in-law Lara Trump from a studio in Trump Tower and funded by the president’s re-election campaign.

Source Article from https://deadline.com/2019/10/donald-trump-cnn-voice-of-america-1202751660/

President Trump on Friday gave an ultimatum to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — demanding she hold a vote on impeachment and threatening to withhold White House documents and cooperation until she does.

“We’ll be issuing a letter. As everybody knows we’ve been treated very unfairly, very different from anybody else if you go over — not only history, I mean you go over any aspect of life you’ll see how unfairly we’ve been treated,” the president said outside the White House as he prepared to board Marine One to award Purple Hearts to wounded veterans at Walter Reed National
Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.

“The lawyers think they’ve never seen anything so unfair, so unjust,” he said about the impeachment effort.

The letter was expected to say officials won’t cooperate with the probe because it was initiated without a vote of the full House.

Without a vote, White House lawyers believe Trump can ignore lawmakers’ requests, meaning the federal courts would likely have to render a decision and potentially slow the march toward impeachment.

Trump also conceded that a vote in the Democratic-led House could go against him but that he was confident that the GOP-controlled Senate would clear him if they held a trial.

“Now, in the House, they have the majority. They all vote with AOC plus three,” he said, referring to progressive freshmen Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Ayanna Pressley.

“Nancy Pelosi is petrified of them. She is afraid she is going to lose her position. Nancy Pelosi will lose her speakership right after the election when the Republicans take over the house,” he predicted.

The Senate, he added, was far friendlier territory.

“I think this. We have a great relationship in the Senate. I have a 95 percent approval rating in the Republican party. I believe the Senate and I haven’t spoken to that many senators, but I believe the senators look at this as a hoax, a witch hunt. It’s a disgrace. Should have never happened,” the president asserted.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California sent a letter on Thursday to Pelosi calling on her to suspend the impeachment inquiry until “equitable rules and procedures” are set up.

Intelligence community inspector general Michael Atkinson

REUTERS

President Trump speaks to the media on the South Lawn of the White House on Oct. 4.

AP

Rep. Adam Schiff

Getty Images

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

AP

4

View Slideshow

McCarthy criticized Pelosi for the “swiftness and recklessness” which House committee chairs have proceeded and pleaded with the Speaker to ensure Republicans can participate.

“Unfortunately, you have given no clear indication as to how your impeachment inquiry will proceed – including whether key historical precedents or basic standards of due process will be observed,” McCarthy wrote.

“In addition, the swiftness and recklessness with which you have proceeded has already resulted in committee chairs attempting to limit minority participation in scheduled interviews, calling into question the integrity of such an inquiry.”

Pelosi said in response that Democrats would not be slowing down their effort, which was sparked by revelations that Trump had asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Pelosi wrote that “existing rules of the House provide House Committees with full authority to conduct investigations for all matters under their jurisdiction.”

“We hope you and other Republicans share our commitment to following the facts, upholding the Constitution, protecting our national security, and defending the integrity of our elections at such a serious moment in our nation’s history,” she declared.

The commander in chief, meanwhile, also again defended his calls to Zelensky and request that China investigate the Bidens over Hunter Biden’s business dealings in the two countries.

He also portrayed himself as a dedicated corruption fighter, and said he wasn’t trying to hurt Joe Biden’s campaign but only to root out corruption wherever it takes place if Americans are involved.

“What I will always ask for is anything to do with corruption with respect to our country. If a foreign country can help us with respect to corruption and corruption probes — and I don’t care if it’s Biden or anybody else,” he declared.

“If we feel there is corruption we have a right to go to a foreign country just so you know.”

And he claimed that he was investigated by a number of countries prior to his 2016 victory.

“I was investigated, okay? Me. Me. In my campaign I was investigated and they think it could have been by [the] UK. Could have been by Australia. They think it could have been Italy. So when you get down to it, I was investigated, by the Obama administration, by the Obama administration. I was investigated. But as far as I’m concerned, what I want to look at and what we want to investigate, anything having to do with corruption. “

The president also struck a happy note when a reporter noted that House Intelligence Committee chair Adam Schiff — a former federal prosecutor who is leading the impeachment effort — for “four Pinocchios from The Washington Post for claiming he had not spoken to the whistleblower ahead of the release of his complaint.

“He should have gotten those two and a half years ago. That’s a nice question. Let me shake your hand, come here. That’s a very nice question, almost a surprise. I figured that was a trick question right,” said Trump, who has been awarded four Pinocchios himself a number of times.

The president then said that the impeachment effort was helping him politically.

“If you look at what’s happened with my polls through the roof. You know why? Because of this phoney witch hunt. If you look at what happened with the fundraising, we have set a record, the
Republicans, because people are sick and tired of it,” he said.
Evangelical Christians, he continued, were the most energized by the Democrats effort, he said.

“I got a call the other night from pastors, the biggest pastors, evangelical Christians saying we have never seen our religion or any religion so electrified. They say they have never seen
anything like it. Churches are joining, hundreds of thousands of people to a large extent because of you. and your partner the democrats,” he told reporters.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/10/04/trump-to-issue-ultimatum-to-pelosi-on-impeachment-vote/

SEATTLE — A campaign believed to be tied to the Iranian government attempted to identify, attack and breach email addresses belonging to a U.S. presidential candidate, government officials and journalists, according to new data unveiled by Microsoft, highlighting the continued global security threats that loom over the fast-approaching 2020 election.

The campaign observed by Microsoft, which it dubbed Phosphorus, made more than 2,700 attempts to identify email addresses that belonged to the company’s customers over a 30-day period between August and September, 241 of which were then attacked. Four were compromised, but they do not belong to presidential campaigns or government officials, according to the tech giant.

Microsoft said it notified the customers attacked and has worked with those whose accounts were compromised to secure them. It declined to disclose the names of the account holders. The company declined to comment beyond a blog post disclosing the news Friday.

According to Microsoft, Phosphorus hackers tried to figure out how to reset passwords or otherwise trigger account recovery features to take over accounts. In some instances, Microsoft found that the group gathered phone numbers belonging to its targets to try to authenticate password resets.

The attacks were not “technically sophisticated,” Microsoft vice president of customer security and trust Tom Burt wrote in the blog post. But he noted that they used significant amounts of personal information of the targets, suggesting that Phosphorus was willing to invest “significant time and resources engaging in research and other means of information gathering.”

For months, major tech companies have been warning about the rising Iranian threat, largely out of concern that malicious actors originating in the country were spreading disinformation online. In May, for example, Facebook and Twitter said they had removed a sprawling Iranian-based propaganda operation, including accounts that mimicked Republican congressional candidates and appeared to try to push pro-Iranian political messages on social media. Some of those accounts similarly took aim at U.S. policymakers and journalists, researchers said at the time.

This isn’t Microsoft’s first brush with Phosphorus. The company, which names hacking groups after elements on the periodic table, seized 99 websites in March it said were used by the group to launch cyberattacks against government agencies, businesses and users in Washington. Microsoft said it had been tracking the group for six years. Other researchers have tagged the group Ajax Security Team, APT 35 and Charming Kitten.

The Democratic National Committee warned campaigns about the Phosphorus attacks Tuesday, noting that the group has been targeting personal email accounts as well as work ones. The DNC recommended that members review logs for connection attempts in August and September.

“They create believable spear phishing emails and fake LinkedIn profiles as primary tactics,” according to the email from the DNC obtained by The Washington Post.

Spokespeople for the Trump campaign, as well as Democratic campaigns including former vice president Joe Biden, Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Kamala D. Harris and Cory Booker, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

For years, Iranian hackers have targeted U.S. officials through “large-scale intrusion attempts,” said John Hultquist, the director of intelligence analysis at the cybersecurity firm FireEye. But the aggressiveness of the country’s digital efforts have escalated as Tehran’s political standing with Washington as worsened, particular in recent months as President Trump has threatened sanctions over the country’s nuclear program.

“The Iranians are very aggressive and they could leverage whatever access they get for an upper hand in any kind of negotiations,” Hultquist said. “They could cause a lot of mayhem.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/04/iran-tried-hack-us-presidential-candidates-journalists-effort-that-targeted-hundreds-microsoft-finds/

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez held a town hall in Corona, New York, at the Queens Public Library on Thursday, which concluded with an alleged constituent in distress yelling, “Eat the babies!”

Like most town halls, Ocasio-Cortez reiterated her goals as the representative for New York’s 14th congressional district, alongside messaging about the Green New Deal, her new “Just Society” legislation and the impeachment of President Trump.

Toward the end of the town hall question-and-answer session, the alleged constituent stood up and spoke with fervor about the state of our world and climate change.

“We’re not going to be here for much longer because of the climate crisis! We only have a few months left! I love that you support the Green Deal but getting rid of fossil fuel is not going to solve the problem fast enough.”

“I think your next campaign slogan has to be this, we got to start eating babies.”

At that point, the woman removed her coat and pointed to her t-shirt, which said “Save the Planet, Eat the Children”. The t-shirt appeared to be homemade.

Ocasio-Cortez posted a couple of tweets in response to this incident, saying the person in question might have been suffering from a “mental condition”.

AOC responds with a plea for compassion.

Twitter, of course, had a lot to say about this outburst.

President Donald Trump and his son, Donald Trump, Jr. weighed in on the incident, with the President calling Ocasio-Cortez a “Wack Job!”

Many opponents of Ocasio-Cortez used this peculiar event to push the idea that the U.S. Representative and her constituents condone the eating of babies as an actual solution to climate change. Others believed the woman in distress was planted by the GOP.

“By 2024 a conservative candidate will be able to legit use ‘Don’t Eat The Babies’ as a campaign slogan,” tweeted @lerias1968.

“I mean…[Ocasio-Cortez]’s right…woman is either totally insane or a troll…I’m a Trump guy but this crazy eat the babies lady doesn’t mean anything” @stringer_jarrod tweeted in a conservative-leaning Twitter thread.

During the woman’s outburst, people in the crowd seemed surprised by her unconventional solution to climate change, which harkened back to Jonathan Swift’s 1729 satirical essay, A Modest Proposal, wherein he suggested the Irish could solve their famine problem by eating their own children, essentially killing two birds with one stone: fewer mouths to feed and more food to go around.

The response to Ocasio-Cortez’s plea for compassion in this case was mostly positive, though some blamed her for the outburst by “pushing” climate change in the first place.

“And this is how you decently treat someone who is in the middle of a breakdown and does so publicly. Thank you,” tweeted Pennsylvania State Representative Mike Schlossberg.

p:last-of-type::after, .node-type-slideshow .article-body > p:last-of-type::after {
content: none
}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/eat-babies-twitter-reacts-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-town-hall-meeting-1463114

Both parties wasted no time digging in on Thursday following Congress’s first witness interview related to President TrumpDonald John TrumpTop US diplomat suggested he could ‘quit’ over Ukraine dealings READ: Trump officials’ texts discussing Ukraine House Democrats release Trump officials’ text exchanges discussing Ukraine MORE‘s dealings with Ukraine, the topic that now stands at the forefront of the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

Emerging from a nearly 10-hour deposition in the Capitol basement, Republican and Democratic members offered decidedly different takes regarding testimony from Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerVolker met with adviser for Ukrainian firm at center of impeachment inquiry The five Trump officials Democrats want to depose Tillerson appoints ex-NATO ambassador to lead Ukraine talks MORE, who resigned last week as Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine.

Democrats said Volker validated previous claims from a government whistleblower that the president had sought to pressure his Ukrainian counterpart into investigating Joe BidenJoe BidenTop US diplomat suggested he could ‘quit’ over Ukraine dealings House Democrats release Trump officials’ text exchanges discussing Ukraine Sasse breaks with Trump’s call for probe: ‘Americans don’t look to Chinese commies for the truth’ MORE, a leading Democratic presidential contender, while withholding military aid to the country. 

“We saw further evidence that there was a shadow shakedown going on,” Rep. Eric SwalwellEric Michael SwalwellBoth sides dig in after marathon Trump-Ukraine briefing House questions Volker as impeachment probe ramps up The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Trump defends call as Ukraine controversy deepens MORE (D-Calif.), an Intelligence Committee member, told reporters afterward.

Republicans, meanwhile, rushed to Trump’s defense. They argued that Volker had not only exonerated the president of any wrongdoing, but also provided damning new evidence regarding Biden’s son, Hunter, who had served on the board of a Ukrainian energy company.

“The allegations of a quid pro quo, basically today just blew a massive hole throughout the entirety of that argument,” said Rep. Lee ZeldinLee ZeldinTop US diplomat suggested he could ‘quit’ over Ukraine dealings House Democrats release Trump officials’ text exchanges discussing Ukraine Both sides dig in after marathon Trump-Ukraine briefing MORE (R-N.Y.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

“The administration is in an even stronger place today than they were this morning as a product of Ambassador Volker coming to testify.”

The conflicting accounts reflect much of the stark partisanship that has come to dominate Capitol Hill while signaling the sharp tenor of a looming impeachment debate, with Democrats pressing ahead with their inquiry in the face of fierce opposition from Trump’s GOP allies.

Trump has vehemently denied any threat to make aid to Ukraine contingent on the country’s willingness to investigate the Bidens. But he’s embraced the idea that he did urge a probe into his political rival — and he doubled down on that entreaty Thursday by publicly encouraging Ukraine and China to investigate the former vice president. 

“I would think that if they were honest about it they’d start a major investigation into the Bidens,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

The remarks led to a rebuke from the head of the Federal Election Commission, Ellen Weintraub, who tweeted an unsubtle reminder that it’s illegal for campaigns to accept foreign help. And House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffTop US diplomat suggested he could ‘quit’ over Ukraine dealings House Democrats release Trump officials’ text exchanges discussing Ukraine Sasse breaks with Trump’s call for probe: ‘Americans don’t look to Chinese commies for the truth’ MORE (D-Calif.) said Trump had committed a “fundamental breach” of presidential decorum — one that threatened national security.

Most Republicans who attended Thursday’s deposition with Volker claimed to have not seen details of Trump’s comments, but none pushed back on Trump encouraging foreign governments to investigate a political rival.

“You’re not above law by being either a member of Congress or an elected official or a candidate for office,” Zeldin said. “If there is illegality to investigate, it should be investigated.”

Democrats — led by the Intelligence, Oversight and Foreign Affairs committees — are trying to demonstrate that they are trying to gather as much evidence as possible before moving to potentially drafting articles of impeachment. They are also still working to build public support for such an effort.

Swalwell suggested that Trump’s public statements encouraging foreign governments to investigate Biden could speed up Democrats’ investigations.

“I think every time he confesses to a crime, it limits the number of other witnesses we probably have to talk to,” Swalwell said.

Democrats pounced on newly revealed text messages, which Volker reportedly shared Thursday with the lawmakers, showing deep concern from a top diplomat toward Trump’s Ukraine dealings. In the exchange, William Taylor, the leading U.S. ambassador in Ukraine, said “it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”

The remark received pushback from Gordon Sondland, the United States ambassador to the European Union, who said Taylor was “incorrect about President Trump’s intentions.” 

“The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelenskiy promised during his campaign,” Sondland wrote.

“You have more and more evidence that the president of the United States was improperly using his office, using our taxpayer dollars to leverage help from an ally in our upcoming 2020 election,” Swalwell said of the exchange.

Yet Republicans saw the remarks in a different light, saying they proved that Trump was not dangling aid to secure an investigation into Biden. 

“There are text messages that make it absolutely, crystal clear — without any shadow of a doubt — that there was no quid pro quo whatsoever, and it was known as a policy of the United States government,” Zeldin said. 

Republicans are urging Democratic leaders to release the full transcript of Thursday’s deposition, which they say will only reinforce Trump’s case.

“If we release the transcripts it will have a very chilling effect on impeachment,” said Rep. Mark MeadowsMark Randall MeadowsBoth sides dig in after marathon Trump-Ukraine briefing Schiff: Trump requests to China, Ukraine are ‘fundamental breach’ of office House questions Volker as impeachment probe ramps up MORE (R-N.C.).

“The facts we learned today undercut the salacious narrative that Adam Schiff is using to sell his impeachment ambitions. We hope the American people get to read the transcript of today’s testimony and see the truth,” Reps. Jim JordanJames (Jim) Daniel JordanBoth sides dig in after marathon Trump-Ukraine briefing Volker warned Giuliani’s information on Ukraine wasn’t credible: report House questions Volker as impeachment probe ramps up MORE (Ohio) and Devin NunesDevin Gerald NunesBoth sides dig in after marathon Trump-Ukraine briefing Nunes files M lawsuit over Esquire story about ‘secret’ Iowa dairy NBC’s Holt on impeachment: ‘This will only get uglier’ MORE (R-Calif.), the respective ranking Republicans on the Oversight and Intelligence committees, said in a joint statement. 

The deposition from Volker, who served as Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine until his resignation last Friday, is the first of several that Democrats have requested of current and former State Department officials with knowledge of Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The intelligence community whistleblower alleged in the complaint that Volker visited Kiev with Sondland a day after Trump’s call with Zelensky and met with Ukrainian officials to discuss how to “navigate” Trump’s “demands.” 

The House Intelligence Committee will meet again behind closed doors on Friday with the intelligence community’s inspector general, which conducted a preliminary investigation of the whistleblower’s complaint and found it “credible.” 

Maggie Miller contributed. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/464329-both-sides-dig-in-after-ex-trump-envoy-briefs-on-ukraine

Hong Kong — Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam banned protesters from wearing masks Friday in a hardening of the government’s stance on the territory’s most disruptive crisis since it reverted to Chinese rule in 1997. Lam announced the ban at an afternoon news conference where she decried a recent escalation of violence after four months of anti-government demonstrations.

The mask ban, imposed under a colonial-era Emergency Ordinance, takes effect Saturday and applies to any procession of more than 30 people and any assembly over 50-strong, but exempts those who wear masks for “legitimate need,” according to Secretary of Security John Lee Ka-Chiu.

CBS News correspondent Ramy Inocencio said Lam invoked the Emergency Ordinance but insisted it “does not mean Hong Kong is in a state of emergency.” She said the decision was made with an objective “to end violence and return to peace,” but the move only angered pro-democracy protesters further. Thousands poured into Hong Kong’s streets wearing masks, eager to show defiance against the looming ban.

“People are asking can Hong Kong go back to normal? Is Hong Kong still a place where we can have our sweet home?” Lam said as she announced the ban. “We must stop the violence,” she said. “Now, it’s all over Hong Kong.”

Lam claimed the ban only targeted violent protesters and rioters and would “be an effective deterrent to radical behavior.”

The ban makes the wearing of full or partial face coverings, including face paint, at unauthorized gatherings punishable by one year in jail. A six-month jail term could be imposed on people who refuse a police officer’s order to remove a face covering for identification.

But as Inocencio reports, many in the pro-democracy movement view the ban as another move to impose authoritarian restrictions — like those that mainland Chinese residents live under — in Hong Kong. Even before Lam confirmed it, the ban was already fuelling anger on the streets, and her announcement set off a fresh wave of protests.

Thousands of masked protesters chanted slogans calling for greater democracy as they marched in the city’s business district before Lam spoke. They chanted “I want to wear face masks” and “Wearing mask is not a crime” as many cars, stuck in traffic due to the march, honked in support.

Pro-democracy protesters take part in a rally in Hong Kong’s Central district on October 4, 2019.

Getty


“Will they arrest 100,000 people on the street? The government is trying to intimidate us but at this moment, I don’t think the people will be scared,” one protester, who gave his surname as Lui, told an online live broadcast.

Asked by Inocencio whether her administration had come under pressure from Beijing to enact the mask ban, Lam insisted there was “no such thing” as “approval” by the central Chinese government for her to make such decisions. 

“There was absolutely no interaction, discussion, encounters whatsoever with any Central Peoples Government officials on this matter during my very brief stay in Beijing,” Lam insisted. She was in Beijing earlier this week to join other Chinese officials at ceremony’s marking the 70th anniversary of China’s Communist Party.

Many Hong Kongers view Lam, who was appointed by Beijing, as an instrument of the Chinese government’s power — a view she has been at pains to dispel since the protests began.

Lam wouldn’t rule out a further toughening of measures if violence continues. She said she would not resign because “stepping down is not something that will help the situation” when Hong Kong is facing “a very critical state of public danger.”

“We must save Hong Kong, the present Hong Kong and the future Hong Kong,” she said. “We can’t just leave the situation to get worse and worse.”

Analysts said the use of the Emergency Ordinance for the first time in over half a century set a dangerous precedent. The law, a relic of British rule enacted in 1922 to quell a seamen’s strike and last used to crush riots in 1967, gives broad powers to the city’s chief executive to implement regulations in an emergency.

“Even though the mask ban is just a small move under the Emergency Ordinance, it is a dangerous first step. If the anti-mask legislation proves to be ineffective, it could lead the way to more draconian measures such as a curfew and other infringement of civil liberties,” said Willy Lam, adjunct professor at the Chinese University.

The ban followed widespread violence in the city Tuesday that marred China’s National Day and included a police officer shooting a protester, the first victim of gunfire since the protests started in June over a now-shelved extradition bill. The wounded teenager was charged with attacking police and rioting.

Hong Kong police officer shoots protester as violence escalates

The movement has snowballed into an anti-China campaign amid anger over what many view as Beijing’s interference in Hong Kong’s autonomy. More than 1,750 people have been detained so far.

Activists and many legislators have said the mask ban could be counterproductive, impractical and difficult to enforce in a city bubbling with anger and where tens of thousands have often defied police bans on rallies.

Initial reaction from abroad to the ban struck a cautious tone on Friday, but did not directly criticise the move.

U.N. human rights spokeswoman Marta Hurtado said “any restriction must have a basis in law and be proportionate and as least intrusive as possible… Freedom of peaceful assembly is a fundamental right and should be enjoyed without restriction to the greatest extent possible.” 

In London, British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab told reporters political dialogue was the only way to resolve the standoff , “While governments need to ensure the security and safety of their people, they must avoid aggravating and instead reduce tensions,”

Honk Kong’s government last month withdrew the extradition bill, widely slammed as an example of the erosion of Hong Kong’s freedom, but protesters have widened their demands to include direct elections of the city’s leaders, an independent inquiry into alleged police brutality, the unconditional release of protesters and not characterizing the protests as riots.

“Five demands, not one less!” many protesters shouted during Friday’s rallies as they held up five fingers.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hong-kong-protest-emergency-law-ban-wearing-masks-carrie-lam-today-more-protests-2019-10-04/

Barneys finds $220 million bidder in bankruptcy court

A group of fashion executives, led by Sam Ben-Avraham, is preparing a bid of about $220 million, the Journal reported. At a bankruptcy hearing Thursday, Barneys’ lawyer said…

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/04/brexit-deadline-could-be-extended-again-says-uk-lawmaker.html

Facebook has removed several pages, groups and accounts on its platforms from the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia, citing “coordinated inauthentic behaviour” aimed at misleading social media users. 

A total of 443 Facebook accounts, 200 pages and 76 groups, as well as 125 Instagram accounts, were removed, the social media platform said on Thursday.

They were traced to three separate and “unconnected” operations, one of which was operating in three countries, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Nigeria; and two others in Indonesia and Egypt, to spread misleading posts and news articles.


Facebook, which owns one-time rivals Instagram and WhatsApp, said the accounts were engaged in spreading content on topics like UAE’s activity in Yemen, the Iran nuclear deal and criticism of Qatar, Turkey and Iran.

Those operations created “networks of accounts to mislead others about who they were, and what they were doing,”  Nathaniel Gleicher, head of cybersecurity policy said in the statement. 

In all, the accounts on Facebook and Instagram commanded an estimated 7.5 million followers.

The company added that it is taking down the accounts “based on their behaviour, not the content they posted”.

“In each of these cases, the people behind this activity coordinated with one another and used fake accounts to misrepresent themselves.”

Facebook defines coordinated inauthentic behaviour as “when groups of pages or people work together to mislead others about who they are or what they are doing.”

One account called USA Thoughts posted false information about Qatar developing a “Hate App”.

In Indonesia, accounts involved in “domestic-focused” issues were accused of spreading news about the deadly protests in the West Papua region.

“Although the people behind this activity attempted to conceal their identities, our investigation found links to an Indonesia media firm InsightID.”


As much as $300,000 was reportedly spent on Facebook ads paid in the Indonesian currency, rupiah.

Al Jazeera was not immediately able to contact InsightID.

During the April 2019 national elections, President Joko Widodo, who was seeking re-election, was also targeted with disinformation on social media, with some accusing him of being a communist and an underground Christian. 

Sluggish response

The social media giant has recently cracked down on such accounts after its founder Mark Zuckerberg came under fire in the last few years for sluggishness in developing tools to combat “extremist” content and propaganda operations.

“We are making progress rooting out this abuse, but as we’ve said before, it’s an ongoing challenge,” the statement on Thursday said.


Earlier this year, Facebook removed accounts from Iraq, Ukraine, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Thailand, Honduras and Israel.

Facebook is also making attempts to prevent online abuses and spread of misinformation, including in political election campaigns.

In March, it removed 200 pages, groups and accounts linked to the former social media manager of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte for misleading people.

The accounts and posts in question posted about local news, elections and alleged misconduct by political candidates opposed to the Duterte administration.

Facebook said the accounts administrators tried to hide their identity but were linked to a network organised by Duterte’s 2016 campaign operative.

The spread of fake news and propaganda, however, is not limited to individuals and private companies.

According to a study conducted by the University of Oxford and published in late September, a “handful of sophisticated state actors” are using social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter to influence a global audience.

It listed China, India, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela for using Facebook and Twitter for “foreign influence operations”.

The report said that most recently, China has been “aggressively using” Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in a “global disinformation” campaign related to the ongoing protests in Hong Kong.

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/facebook-removes-accounts-uae-nigeria-egypt-indonesia-191004035538043.html

In signing an executive order to strengthen Medicare Thursday, President Trump positioned himself as the guardian of the government healthcare program for seniors that Republicans originally opposed as socialism and have long sought to overhaul.

The executive order, called Protecting and Improving Medicare For Our Nation’s Seniors, is meant to boost Medicare Advantage, an alternative to traditional Medicare that allows for private plans approved by the government. It will allow Medicare Advantage to cover even more services that traditional Medicare doesn’t cover, such as adult daycare, expand the use of telehealth so patients can reach their doctors through computers or iPads, and will allow the government to pay for newer technologies and treatments soon after regulators approve them.

The order is meant to offer a contrast between Trump and liberal Democrats who want favor the Medicare for All Act, which would upend the current healthcare system to enroll the entire population in a government plan. Trump called the idea “socialist” and on Thursday pledged that under his administration, “Medicare would never be taken away from you.”

“What the president is doing today is putting a stake in the ground, saying he’s going to be the one defending and protecting Medicare for our seniors,” Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said Thursday on Fox Business. “He’s going to be improving Medicare, and he’s not going to let anyone touch their Medicare. That hurts them.”

But this type of framing, of stressing the importance of protecting Medicare, is out of step with mainstream conservative policy thinking. Conservatives generally point out that Medicare faces significant funding problems and that it’s one of the biggest drivers of the country’s debt. The program pays out more than it takes in, particularly because so many baby boomers are aging into the program when they hit 65.

“Conservatives have for a long time argued that our entitlements, with Medicare first and foremost, are unsustainable, and we have to do something looking in the long run, and now even in the short run, to make sure these programs are even around to serve people,” said Christopher Holt, director of healthcare policy at the conservative American Action Forum.

Government forecasts show the part of Medicare that pays for hospital care is expected to run out of full funding in 2026. At that point, the program would pay a diminishing amount of reimbursement for medical costs. While Democrats would see such a crossroads as a reason to raise more revenue, Republican leaders have instead said the financing for plans should be revamped.

In rolling out the executive order Thursday, the administration steered clear of calling for Medicare spending reductions, which would largely have to go through Congress. When asked about how the Trump administration would help assure Medicare’s sustainability in the long term, something officials said was part of the president’s executive order, health officials pointed to reductions in premiums for prescription drugs and reductions in “burdensome” regulations. Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said on Twitter that overhauling regulations would save almost $6 billion over the next decade.

But the funding problems Medicare faces are far greater. Medicare is expected to rise steadily as a share of GDP from 3.7% in 2018 to 6% of GDP in 2043. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that net Medicare spending will increase from $630 billion in 2019 to $1.3 trillion in 2029. It faces a financing gap over the next 75 years of more than $40 trillion.

Republican healthcare rhetoric in recent years has focused on repealing Obamacare, but over several decades the party also sought to overhaul Medicare. Republicans fought its creation in 1965. At the time, Ronald Reagan, who was a rising star in politics, dubbed Medicare “socialism.” House Speaker Newt Gingrich said in the 1990s he believed Medicare would “wither on the vine,” and House Speaker Paul Ryan, who left office last year, bemoaned in June that he never fulfilled his goal of overhauling entitlements, including Medicare.

“Republicans have been on a multidecade crusade to tear down Medicare, from originally opposing its creation to repeated plans to cut it, to plans that would privatize it,” said Jesse Ferguson, a Democratic strategist.

Ryan wanted to address Medicare’s spending problems in 2018 but faced resistance from Trump and other Republican leaders who warned of the political consequences of going after the popular program during an election year. The political liability was on display in March, when Democrats blasted Trump’s budget as calling for Medicare cuts. (In fact, the budget had called for reducing spending on Medicare through curbing improper payments and though lowering the price of prescription drugs.)

“Medicare is a very popular program, and Democrats and Republicans are very sensitive to the anxieties people on Medicare have about the future of Medicare and the risks to their own financial security,” said Tricia Newman, director of the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Program on Medicare Policy.

As a candidate, Trump vowed not to cut spending on Medicare. He re-stated his promise to protect Medicare on Thursday, saying Democrats wanted to “take it away and give you lousy healthcare” and that under his watch “no one will lay a hand on your Medicare benefits.”

Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, suggested in an email that he saw the overall messaging about protecting Medicare as problematic.

“‘I want to protect Medicare’ means, ‘I would rather keep seniors dependent and frightened than provide them a better choice,'” he said.

The administration’s latest Medicare attack is similar to the one Republicans waged against the Obama administration. They often accused Obamacare of cutting Medicare — it did reduce how much the program reimburses hospitals and private insurers, although the Obama administration maintained that the change did not constitute a cut.

Over the past decades, however, Republicans have proposed changing Medicare so that its budget will become fixed and predictable, including by giving beneficiaries premium supports to help to buy private coverage, rather than getting coverage from the government.

“In the past, Republicans have been more likely than Democrats to push for fundamental changes to the Medicare program, including proposals like premium support or raising the age of eligibility,” Newman said. “Often these proposals were pushed within the context of budget negotiations.”

Despite past rhetoric, they haven’t overhauled Medicare when they’ve been in power, and the issue has taken a backseat since the Obama administration. Instead, Republicans passed the tax overhaul Trump signed into law, which had an indirect effect on Medicare by taking in less revenue and weakening its trust fund. Also, by boosting Medicare Advantage plans, the government will also end up spending more than it would have on traditional Medicare.

“I do think you’ll see people pivot back on the arguments post-Trump,” Hold said of Republicans, but added, “How do you credibly make those arguments when the last time you were in a position to do something you didn’t?”

Holt said it was important for Republicans to campaign on overhauling Medicare, as critics are likely to cast any policy proposals about restructuring the program as a cut. Charging that “Medicare for all” hurts Medicare has the consequence of undermining Republican efforts to overhaul the program in the future, Holt suggested.

“If you can’t win elections talking about it, then you can’t bring people around the table to work on it,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/trump-casts-himself-as-the-guardian-of-medicare-the-government-program-republicans-have-long-sought-to-overhaul

Ronny Tong, a member of the Executive Council, the top advisory body to the chief executive, said on Thursday that he had been wary of invoking the emergency regulations because he feared the stigma it would bring to Hong Kong internationally. But he said he would “reluctantly endorse” a face mask ban as an alternative to a general curfew, an idea recently suggested by some pro-Beijing hard-liners.

Enforcement, too, could be difficult. France has such a ban, but it has not prevented many so-called yellow vest protesters from wearing them anyway.

“The government has been weighing the pros and cons, and those who are against it argue it wouldn’t help much,” said Jasper Tsang, the founder of the biggest pro-Beijing political party and the president of the legislature until 2016.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/world/asia/hong-kong-emergency-powers.html