Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg was grilled about his salary on Wednesday, the second day of congressional hearings about the company’s 737 Max jets, which were involved in two fatal crashes.

Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., questioned in a heated exchange whether Muilenburg was taking responsibility for the fallout from the crashes, which killed 346 people in total. Cohen asked if anyone at the company had taken a pay cut amid the grounding of the 737 Max.

“You’re saying you’re not giving up any compensation at all,” Cohen asked Muilenburg. “You’re continuing to work and make $30 million a year after this horrific two accidents that caused all these people’s relatives to go, to disappear, to die.”

Muilenburg earned total compensation of just under $23.4 million for 2018, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. He also cashed in delayed stock payouts from previous years, bringing his total actual compensation for the year to $30 million.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/30/boeing-ceo-grilled-over-salary-accountability-on-capitol-hill.html

SIMI VALLEY, Calif. (KABC) — A fast-moving vegetation fire erupted on the hillsides above Simi Valley on Wednesday morning amid extreme red-flag conditions, prompting evacuation orders and school closures as it spread to 972 acres.

The so-called Easy Fire began shortly after 6 a.m. near the 200 block of West Los Angeles Avenue. Homes in nearby residential neighborhoods were immediately threatened by the flames, even after winds initially seemed to be blowing the fire in a direction away from houses.

Helicopters were seen performing water drops on the blaze while at least one fixed-wing aircraft dropped a payload of Phos-Chek.

WATCH LIVE FULL COVERAGE HERE

Firefighters raced to protect the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library as a thin wall of flames approached from a nearby hillside. The facility was closed Wednesday.

Mandatory evacuation orders were issued for an area bounded by Tierra Rejada to the north, Madera Road to the east, Olsen / Madera Road to the south and Highway 23 to the west, according to an alert from the Ventura County Fire Department.

An evacuation shelter was established at the Thousand Oaks Community Center at 2525 N. Moorpark Road.

There were no immediate reports of injuries or structural damages.

MAP: Easy Fire evacuation zone

The cause of the fire was unknown.

The incident forced the California Highway Patrol to close California 23 (the Moorpark Freeway) in both directions between Avenida de los Arboles and Los Angeles Avenue.

All campuses in nearly a dozen school districts were closed Wednesday, as were several other educational facilities in the area, according to the Ventura County Office of Education.

Santa Ana winds were expected to reach speeds of 40-50 mph in the burn area on Wednesday, with gusts of up to 60 mph on ridgetops, the National Weather Service said. Single-digit humidity was forecasted throughout the day.

Source Article from https://abc7.com/live-simi-valley-brush-fire-burns-972–acres-in-red-flag-conditions/5658669/

With her brother, New York Knicks executive Craig Robinson, by her side, Obama said their family was doing everything they were supposed to do and sometimes better. “As we moved in white folks moved out, because they were afraid of what our families represented,” she said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/10/30/michelle-obama-white-flight-chicago-yall-were-running-us/

On Wednesday, Mr. Baden said Mr. Epstein had “three fractures in the hyoid bone, the thyroid cartilage.” He said those injures were “very unusual for suicide and more indicative of strangulation — homicidal strangulation.”

The autopsy also showed Mr. Epstein had several bones broken in his neck. But the city medical examiner said Mr. Epstein’s death was “hanging” and the manner was “suicide.”

Before that determination was made public, an article in The Washington Post noted Mr. Epstein’s injuries included a broken hyoid bone, an injury that could have been a sign of strangulation, as well as suicide by hanging.

The article helped fuel conspiracy theories that speculated Mr. Epstein may have been murdered in order to prevent him from ensnaring his coterie of rich and powerful friends into his legal woes.

At the time, several medical officials cautioned against relying solely on the broken hyoid as evidence of strangulation. “It’s not a slam dunk,” Marcella Sorg, a forensic anthropologist, said in an interview. She said a broken hyoid is “a sign of neck trauma” that can occur in both strangulation and hanging cases.

Dr. Burton Bentley II, the head of Elite Medical Experts, a consulting firm based in Arizona, echoed that skepticism. “It’s not a hundred percent,” he said. “It’s not even going to get us to ninety.”

The death led to several investigations into how a high-profile inmate apparently killed himself just weeks after he was placed on suicide watch after a failed attempt to take his own life.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/30/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-homicide-autopsy-michael-baden.html

Chile said it’s calling off the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Santiago in mid-November.

President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping were scheduled to meet at the gathering to discuss a possible “phase one” deal that the two countries are close to finalizing.

The cancellation was due to protests, according to Chilean President Sebastian Pinera.

“This has been a very tough decision … but it is based on the wise principle of common sense,” Pinera said in a media address Wednesday.

“A president must always put his compatriots above all else,” Pinera said. “Our main concern is reestablishing public order, our citizens’ safety and social peace along with pushing through a social agenda to respond to the main demands of our citizens.”

Chile’s government had extended a state of emergency to several cities across the country last week as a proposed hike in public transport fares sparked nationwide protests.

The decision by Chile to cancel the summit brings up the question of when the leaders of the U.S. and China will meet to sign a much-needed trade deal.

Earlier this month, Trump said the U.S. has come to a “very substantial phase one deal” with China, adding phase two will start “almost immediately” after the first phase is signed. The U.S. also ditched a planned tariff hike on $250 billion in Chinese goods that was set to take effect Oct. 15.

A White House spokesman told CNBC that APEC doesn’t have a secondary site prepared, but the U.S. and China will still be working to bring the partial deal to a conclusion.

“We look forward to finalizing Phase One of the historic trade deal with China within the same time frame, and when we have an announcement, we’ll let you know,” the spokesman said.

Trump had said the agreement would address issues such as intellectual property and financial services and include a pledge for China to buy $40 billion to $50 billion in American agricultural products.

The U.S. said Monday that it is considering extending certain tariff exclusions on $34 billion of imports from China as the two nations work toward a trade agreement. Exemptions on nearly 1,000 products are set to expire in December.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/30/chile-president-cancels-apec-summit-next-month-where-trump-xi-were-expected-to-meet.html

Freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar refused to back a resolution Tuesday that recognized the slaughter of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War I as a “genocide.”

The Minnesota congresswoman voted “present” at the vote Tuesday, telling CNN in a statement afterward that genocide “should not be used as a cudgel in a political fight.”

Rep. Ilhan OmarAP

“A true acknowledgment of historical crimes against humanity must include both the heinous genocides of the 20th century, along with earlier mass slaughters like the trans-Atlantic slave trade and Native American genocide, which took the lives of hundreds of millions of indigenous people in this country,” she said in the statement, according to CNN.

“For this reason, I voted ‘present’ on final passage of H.Res.296, the resolution Affirming the United States record on the Armenian Genocide,” she added.

The House passed the bill Tuesday with overwhelming support — 405 in favor, compared to 11 in opposition.

In addition to Omar, Reps. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas and Paul Gosar of Arizona voted present.

Democratic leadership praised the bill, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi calling the mass slaughter “one of the great atrocities of the 20th century.”

Joe Biden added: “By acknowledging this genocide, we honor the memory of its victims and vow: never again.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/10/29/ilhan-omar-one-of-three-house-reps-to-vote-present-on-armenia-genocide-bill/

LOS ANGELES — A tree branch crashing on to power lines ignited the wind-driven Getty Fire that forced evacuation of more than 7,000 homes, fire officials have confirmed.

“The fire was deemed an accidental start, caused by a tree branch that broke off and subsequently landed in nearby power lines during high wind conditions,” the Los Angeles Fire Department said in a statement. “This errant tree branch caused the sparking and arcing of the power lines, igniting nearby brush.”

Gusty winds were threatening to further spread wildfires that are already burning up and down California on Wednesday, putting thousands of residents on alert for another wave of evacuation orders.

The winds sweeping the parched state have been blamed for three deaths. The Madera County Sheriff’s Office said the bodies of Edward and Iva Poulson were found Monday in their Jeep after a tree toppled onto the vehicle in high winds. And And the Santa Cruz Sentinel reported that a homeless woman died Sunday after being crushed by a tree topped in high winds.

‘Here we go again’: Weary Californians seek shelter amid latest wildfire outbreak

In Los Angeles, officials stationed crews at fire-prone locations in an effort to quickly extinguish any new blazes. “Extreme” red-flag warnings took effect at 11 p.m. Tuesday and were expected to persist into Thursday night, bringing the potential for “rapid fire spread” and “extreme fire behavior,” according to the National Weather Service.

“It takes one ember, just one ember downwind, to start another brush fire, so I encourage all people in the city of Los Angeles and the neighboring communities to register for alerts,” said Los Angeles Fire Chief Ralph Terrazas.

Low humidity, dry fuel and sustained winds up to 55 mph conspired to test firefighters, who had contained 15% of the 656-acre Getty Fire by Tuesday evening. The flames had injured one firefighter and destroyed or damaged 18 buildings.  

Mandatory evacuation orders were still in place in some areas, and Terrazas warned nearby neighborhoods to be prepared to flee. 

In Sonoma County, north of San Francisco, firefighters battling the Kincade Fire faced another round of the “Diablo” winds. Sustained gusts between 20 and 30 mph could fan the 118-square-mile blaze, but pose less of a threat than winds recorded over the weekend. 

The wildfire had damaged or destroyed more than 200 buildings, including an 150-year-old winery, and was 15% contained Tuesday evening. Another 80,000 homes were threatened, prompting officials to keep 15 evacuation centers open. 

About 200,000 people had been forced from the area since the fire ignited last week, although officials have reduced some evacuation orders to evacuation warnings as firefighting efforts progressed. 

“Our hearts and prayers are with the firefighters out there doing a spectacular job, but with the situation so fluid, with the winds still blowing, we’re not through this yet,” said Sonoma County Supervisor David Rabbitt. 

Breathing smoke: As wildfires foul California air, residents need respirator masks

Preemptive power shutoffs also weren’t over for nearly 1.5 million Northern and Central California residents. Pacific Gas & Electric turned off power in 29 counties Tuesday, marking its fourth shutoff this month and third in the last week. 

Southern California Edison warned that crews may cut off power for an additional 300,000 customers — mainly in Los Angeles, Ventura, and San Bernardino counties — if conditions worsen this week.

The shutoffs, designed to reduce the risk of utility equipment sparking wildfires during strong wind events, have drawn criticism from residents and public officials. 

PG&E on Tuesday yielded to pressure from Gov. Gavin Newsom by announcing it will issue a bill credit for customers affected by the first shutoff this month. Residential customers will see a $100 credit in the next billing cycle and businesses will get $250, the utility said. Credits will not be issued for the subsequent shutoffs, PG&E said, because the company worked to improve how it notified customers. 

Why not just bury them? California power lines spark wildfires and prompt blackouts

“This is not an industry standard practice, nor approved as part of a tariff, but we believe it is the right thing to do for our customers in this case, given the challenges with our website and call center communications,” said the utility’s CEO and President Bill Johnson. 

The utility is also facing scrutiny amid Cal Fire’s investigation into the Kincade Fire’s origin. PG&E acknowledged last week a live, 230,000-volt transmission line malfunctioned minutes before the fire erupted Wednesday night. 

Contributing: Associated Press

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/30/getty-fire-kincade-fire-california-extreme-winds/2502402001/

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican and Democratic lawmakers clashed on Tuesday over questions about the identity of the whistleblower whose complaint led to the impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.

The skirmish revealed a growing dispute between the two sides, as Republicans say they need to hear from the intelligence official who initially raised the alarm over Trump’s attempts to get Ukraine to investigate his political rivals in order to assess the whistleblower’s credibility.

Democrats say the whistleblower’s testimony is not needed at this point because it has been corroborated by other witnesses. Bringing him or her forward after repeated attacks by Trump would only put the whistleblower’s safety at risk, they said.

“We have a long-standing concern that the president and his allies in Congress aren’t interested in the underlying act but are interested in risking the life of the whistleblower,” Representative Eric Swalwell told reporters.

Government personnel have been assigned to protect the whistleblower, according to sources familiar with the matter, after Trump has attacked the whistleblower and conservative news outlets and social-media activists speculated about the individual’s identity.

As many as five possible names for the whistleblower have circulated in political circles, according to sources familiar with efforts to protect the whistleblower.

“Such behavior is at the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless,” the whistleblower’s lawyers, Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, told Reuters on Tuesday.

In a closed-door hearing on Tuesday, Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff cut off a Republican line of questioning of a witness, Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, objecting that it was designed to reveal the whistleblower’s identity.

Republicans said they were trying to figure out who Vindman had spoken with after Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden in a July 25 phone call.

They said they do not aim to publicly reveal the whistleblower’s identity but need to assess his or her motivations.

“It’s tough to determine someone’s credibility if you can’t put them under oath and ask them questions,” Republican Representative Jim Jordan told reporters.

After Vindman’s testimony, Schiff accused Trump and his allies of seeking to “out,” or reveal the identity of, the whistleblower and insisted that his committee will not allow that to happen.

“We will make every effort to make sure that notwithstanding the president or his allies’ desire to out and exact political revenge on this whistleblower, that our committee is never used for that purpose,” Schiff said in a brief statement to reporters, not responding to questions.

In previous sessions, Republicans have asked witnesses whether they know the person they suspect to be the whistleblower and inquired about possible motives, according to a congressional aide.

The whistleblower’s lawyers have told congressional investigators their client is only interested in answering written questions.

Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Susan CornwellWriting by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Cynthia Osterman

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-identity/republicans-seek-whistleblowers-identity-in-us-impeachment-inquiry-idUSKBN1X82J6

Michelle Obama spoke out against “white flight” in a recent interview, saying she experienced it as a kid and that it remains a problem.

“As families like ours — upstanding families like ours who were doing everything we were supposed to do and better. As we moved in, white folks moved out because they were afraid of what our families represented,” the former first lady said Tuesday at the Obama Foundation Summit in Chicago.

“I want to remind white folks that y’all were running from us … This family, with all the values that you read about, you were running from us. And you’re still running because we’re no different than the immigrant families that are moving in,” she continued. “The families that are coming from other places to try to do better. But, because we can so easily wash over who we really were — because of the color of our skin, because of the texture of our hair — that’s what divides countries, artificial things.”

Obama, 55, said she grew up with a “sense of justice” and understood from a young age that white people were fleeing her neighborhood.

She talked about the issue of white flight in her bestselling book Becoming. Obama noted that she grew up in South Side of Chicago while her husband came to the South Side by choice.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/yall-were-running-from-us-michelle-obama-claims-white-folks-are-afraid-of-living-in-black-neighborhoods

  • Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told congressional investigators that he made efforts to add edits to the White House transcript of a July 25 call between President Donald Trump and the president of Ukraine, The New York Times reported.
  • Vindman said some of his edits were made, but those regarding adding a mention of Burisma by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the mention of recordings of Biden discussing Ukraine corruption by Trump did not appear in the transcript.
  • “The White House uses note-takers listening in on the call as well as voice recognition software to create a rough transcript that is a close approximation of the call. But names and technical terms are frequently missed by the software,” The New York Times reported.
  • The rough transcript of the call was given to Vindman to offer edits, The Times reported, as an official who listened in on the conversation.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

A top national security aide told House impeachment investigators Tuesday that the transcript of President Donald Trump’s call to Ukraine did not include phrases referencing Ukraine corruption and Burisma, a prominent energy company, on which former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, served on the board.

The New York Times reported Tuesday that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told congressional investigators that he made efforts to add his edits to the transcript after the call, which he listened in on.

He said he was successful in adding some details, but his additions regarding the mention of Burisma — which he alleges Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky referenced on the July call — and the mention of recordings of Biden discussing Ukraine corruption — which he alleges Trump spoke about on the call — did not appear in the transcript, The Times reported. It is unclear why some edits were made and others were not.

Although the mention of Burisma was not directly made in the reconstructed transcript released by the White House, The Times reported that note-takers and voice recognition software may have just missed the reference, simply calling it “the company.”

Vindman’s testimony also cleared the fog surrounding some of the ellipses that appear on Trump’s side of the conversation. In one of the instances, Vindman told investigators that the president mentioned tapes of Biden talking about Ukraine corruption, The Times reported. It was likely a reference to a 2018 video of the former vice president talking about pressuring the country into ousting former prosecutor Viktor Shokin, leveraging a billion dollars in loan guarantees, The Times reported. At the time, multiple Western governments were pushing to have Shokin removed over concerns that he wasn’t pursuing corruption cases among Ukrainian politicians.

Earlier this month, diplomat George Kent told congressional investigators that Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani pushed the State Department to grant Shokin a visa to the US after the Ukrainian prosecutor promised info on Democrats.

Vindman is the first White House official who listened in on the call to testify in the impeachment inquiry, given the White House has been steadfast in its refusal to comply with subpoenas. Vindman said that he felt “a sense of duty,” in his opening statement released Monday, citing the notion that Trump’s actions would “undermine US national security.”

“I am a patriot, and it is my sacred duty and honor to advance and defend our country irrespective of party or politics,” he said in the opening statement.

While his testimony to investigators isn’t pivotal to the understanding of the call, it does fill in some holes in the transcript. The July call is the subject of a whistleblower complaint that was filed by an intelligence official in August. A reconstructed transcript was late declassified and released by the White House. The whistleblower complaint was the impetus for the launching of an impeachment inquiry. The House is set to vote on the inquiry’s procedures on Thursday.

“There is no recording of the July 25 call by the American side,” The Times reported. “The White House uses note-takers listening in on the call as well as voice recognition software to create a rough transcript that is a close approximation of the call. But names and technical terms are frequently missed by the software, according to people familiar with the matter.”

The rough transcript of the call was given to Vindman, The Times reported. He offered edits, as an official who listened in on the conversation and gave his edits to his boss on the NSC.

Following the call the call he also flagged the conversation as concerning, The Times said, and sought out the National Security Council’s legal adviser John Eisenberg — one of the times he said he raised the issue with his superiors. It was Eisenberg who moved the transcript to a secure server that had limited access, according to The Times. Its placement in the secure server could have been why the edits were not made.

Read the full New York Times story here »

Read more:

Source Article from https://www.insider.com/white-house-not-include-key-phrases-trump-call-ukraine-expert-2019-10

CLICK HERE if you are having a problem viewing the photos or video on a mobile device.

SANTA ROSA — The dreaded North Bay winds whipped up again Tuesday, raising the stakes in the fierce battle against the Kincade blaze as firefighters from around the state raced to try and keep the fire from spreading and incinerating more Wine Country homes.

Fanned by winds reaching speeds of up to 40 mph Tuesday afternoon and forecasted to grow stronger overnight, the fire in Sonoma County had burned more than 76,000 acres — making it to the edge of the 2017 Tubbs Fire — and still was only 15% contained. The blaze has destroyed 189 structures, of which 86 are single-family homes, seven are commercial buildings and 96 are sheds or outbuildings, and damaged another 39. About 90,000 structures remain threatened.

“The winds are what makes it difficult. It can change on you so quickly,” said Nathaniel Armstrong, battalion chief of the Hayward Fire Department, as he and his crew prepared for their fourth day of work on the fire.

Meanwhile, power outages and air quality issues persisted throughout the Bay Area. As of Tuesday evening, 540,000 PG&E customers were without power as a result of planned outages intended to prevent PG&E equipment from starting wildfires, Mark Quinlan, PG&E senior director of emergency preparedness and response, said during a media call. The utility expected to receive the “all-clear” to restore power to Northern California customers by 8 a.m. Wednesday.

On Tuesday, PG&E notified Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office that it’s planning to issue rebates to customers affected by a public safety power, or PSPS, shutoff earlier this month. More details on the plans were not immediately available. Newsom earlier this month pressured the utility to provide $100 rebates for each residential customer who lost power, and $250 for business customers.

“We have carefully considered the governor’s request to provide reimbursement for our customers impacted by the Oct. 9 PSPS and we have agreed to move forward with a one-time bill credit for customers impacted by that event,” said PG&E Corp. CEO and President Bill Johnson in a statement.

“We believe it is the right thing to do for our customers in this case, given the challenges with our website and call center communications,” Johnson continued.

The California Public Utilities Commission on Monday announced it will open an investigation into the shutoffs.

At the same time, temperatures around the Bay Area are expected to drop significantly this week — to near or below freezing in some places — making it harder for residents without power to keep warm.

“We want to warn individuals, in particular our unsheltered population, that they can seek shelter at many of our evacuation shelter sites,” said Barbie Robinson, director of the Sonoma County Health Services Department. “And we want to encourage folks that are living in tents or living in their cars to please come in and seek shelter during this cold weather advisory.”

And the region was hit with another “Spare the Air” alert for Wednesday — the third day in a row. While the air was expected to clear Wednesday morning, it likely will worsen again Wednesday afternoon as winds decrease and smoke drains south into the Bay Area, according to a news release from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

The fierce winds died down momentarily Monday, but the fire continued its eastward push, and a spot fire that ignited in Lake County continued to grow. As the sun went down Tuesday in Sonoma County, and the National Weather Service predicted wind gusts of up to 60 mph overnight before subsiding Wednesday morning, firefighters were gearing up for the worst at three battlegrounds.

“This is going to be hopefully one of the final tests of these fire perimeters, especially on the western side of the Highway 101 corridor area,” said Cal Fire Division Chief Jonathan Cox.

At the fire’s western border, firefighters worried the blaze would jump Highway 101 and advance into a wooded, hilly area near the town of Windsor.

“If it crosses 101, we feel like we’re gonna lose this thing,” Sonoma County Battalion Chief Mark Dunne said Tuesday afternoon as he marshaled crews to watch for spot fires that could ignite from embers  smoldering after an epic battle there Saturday.

Map: For the latest fire and evacuation zone information in Sonoma County click here.

Firefighters also had their eye on Shiloh Road, about two miles south of Windsor. At the fire’s southern border, they were watching the unincorporated area of Mark West Springs, which was ravaged in 2017 by the Tubbs Fire. Strong northeast wind currents could push the fire down the canyon toward the Larkfield-Wikiup area and Santa Rosa — just as it did two years ago.

“To see how devastated our community was when that fire came through the town was hard. And two years later, here we go again,” Santa Rosa fire Capt. Jack Thomas said, peering over the hilltop from Pepperwood Preserve Road and into the smoke in the distance. “So we’re doing everything in our power to make sure that never, ever happens again. Or that we at least have some control over the fire compared to in 2017.”

As of 10 p.m.,the southern lines of the fire were holding strong under clear and starry skies. The strong winds expected earlier in the day appeared to be a no-show.

“I don’t think we’re going to get the wind,” Thomas said. “Our EOC got some pretty good intel that the wind event is not going to get here.”

The winds materialized elsewhere. Forest Lake recorded a peak gust of 64 mph about 4:20 p.m., according to the National Weather Service. Other peak gusts included 60 mph in Anderson Springs at 8:50 p.m. and 57 mph in Middletown at 9:10 p.m. But for the majority of Sonoma County, peak gusts ranged from 15 mph to 30 mph.

“It looks like the winds began a little bit earlier than we had anticipated today, so the front end of it coming in earlier might kind of make the tail end of it come through a little bit faster, too,” said weather service meteorologist Rick Canepa in a phone interview late Tuesday night. “We’re mostly on track here for the overnight hours, as forecast.”

By Wednesday morning, the worst — for now — was expected to be over. Winds were predicted to die down after midnight, said weather service meteorologist Ryan Walbrun.

“As we wake up tomorrow morning, we’ll notice the winds are much lighter,” he said.

Walbrun said conditions will continue to improve through the end of the week.

But shifting winds and changing conditions Tuesday added to the stress felt by some evacuees trying desperately to determine if their neighborhoods were in the fire’s path. In front of Finley Hall on the Sonoma County Fairgrounds, where evacuees with small pets are staying, Allison and Gail Baker peered at a map of the fire tacked to a wooden board, tracing their fingers from the southern tip of the fire to their home in Windsor.

It’s been confusing to follow where the blaze is moving and to know whether their home is facing a serious threat, said Allison Baker, though she was reassured by the efforts of both Cal Fire and the Red Cross.

“We (initially) thought we’d be here for three days, but we didn’t know the magnitude of the windstorm,” she said.

For some of the fire’s smallest evacuees, questions and worries abound. Jazmin Jacinto and Elias Dehmes, who evacuated to the fairgrounds from north Santa Rosa, tried to keep spirits high for Dehmes’ two daughters, Ezra, 2, and Nova, 3.

As fire trucks from across the country passed by the center, the family stood outside, waving and signaling for a honk from firefighters — and cheering when their efforts proved successful.

“I think we got that one,” Dehmes said, giving his daughter a high five after a truck full of Red Cross personnel reciprocated their vigorous waves and smiles.

“They’ve been asking a lot of questions, and sleeping was a bit hard last night,” Jacinto said about the girls. “But we just told them it was a giant sleepover, and they’ve been adjusting pretty well.”

We are providing free access to this article. Please consider supporting local journalism like this by purchasing a subscription. Click here for our 99-cent, 1-month trial offer.

Cox, the Cal Fire division chief, said fire crews have been working as hard as they can to get the fire contained and help the community recover.

“I think the best way to describe it is, we’re in a battle rhythm,” he said. “The shifts are very structured now. We have resources that are assigned to areas shift over shift, and I think firefighters are ready to turn the corner after this wind event and really put some closure and some stability back into the community.”

Cox confirmed that there was a minor medical emergency on the fire line Tuesday, but he did not have additional details.

Cal Fire resources kept on top of fires further afield, including a wildland fire that scorched nearly 10 acres of hilly terrain behind homes in rural Palermo, seven miles southeast of Oroville in Butte County, just before 4 p.m. A swift response from more than 100 firefighters stopped flames’ forward progress within hours, leaving it at 50 percent containment as of 8:45 p.m. with mop-up efforts due to continue into Wednesday. There were no reports of injuries or threatened or damaged structures, and its cause was under investigation.

Meanwhile, law enforcement was cracking down on behavior that could aggravate the already precarious situation in the North Bay. On Tuesday morning, California Highway Patrol Capt. Aristotle Wolfe, commander of the Santa Rosa area CHP, stopped a motorist on Highway 101 in Petaluma who had tossed a cigarette butt out the window.

“I’m in an unmarked car. I rarely make stops,” Wolfe said. “But I wasn’t going to let that one go — with smoke in the air and tinder on the highway” from winds blowing branches.

“This is an extremely dangerous time,” he said, “and unsafe or lawless behavior won’t be tolerated.”

Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick said at least three cases of looting have been reported in evacuation zones.

“The sheriff’s office is currently investigating all of these cases,” he said, “and I can assure you that if we are able to determine those responsible, arrests will be made and we will prosecute those people to the fullest extent.”

Staff writers George Avalos, Annie Sciacca and George Kelly contributed to this report. 

Do you have tips for how to keep your food safe, your devices charged and your life disrupted as little as possible during a public safety power outage? We’d love to hear about it.

Source Article from http://www.mercurynews.com/strong-winds-stoke-flames-fears-as-kincade-fire-rages-on

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican and Democratic lawmakers clashed on Tuesday over questions about the identity of the whistleblower whose complaint led to the impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.

The skirmish revealed a growing dispute between the two sides, as Republicans say they need to hear from the intelligence official who initially raised the alarm over Trump’s attempts to get Ukraine to investigate his political rivals in order to assess the whistleblower’s credibility.

Democrats say the whistleblower’s testimony is not needed at this point because it has been corroborated by other witnesses. Bringing him or her forward after repeated attacks by Trump would only put the whistleblower’s safety at risk, they said.

“We have a long-standing concern that the president and his allies in Congress aren’t interested in the underlying act but are interested in risking the life of the whistleblower,” Representative Eric Swalwell told reporters.

Government personnel have been assigned to protect the whistleblower, according to sources familiar with the matter, after Trump has attacked the whistleblower and conservative news outlets and social-media activists speculated about the individual’s identity.

As many as five possible names for the whistleblower have circulated in political circles, according to sources familiar with efforts to protect the whistleblower.

“Such behavior is at the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless,” the whistleblower’s lawyers, Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, told Reuters on Tuesday.

In a closed-door hearing on Tuesday, Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff cut off a Republican line of questioning of a witness, Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, objecting that it was designed to reveal the whistleblower’s identity.

Republicans said they were trying to figure out who Vindman had spoken with after Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden in a July 25 phone call.

They said they do not aim to publicly reveal the whistleblower’s identity but need to assess his or her motivations.

“It’s tough to determine someone’s credibility if you can’t put them under oath and ask them questions,” Republican Representative Jim Jordan told reporters.

After Vindman’s testimony, Schiff accused Trump and his allies of seeking to “out,” or reveal the identity of, the whistleblower and insisted that his committee will not allow that to happen.

“We will make every effort to make sure that notwithstanding the president or his allies’ desire to out and exact political revenge on this whistleblower, that our committee is never used for that purpose,” Schiff said in a brief statement to reporters, not responding to questions.

In previous sessions, Republicans have asked witnesses whether they know the person they suspect to be the whistleblower and inquired about possible motives, according to a congressional aide.

The whistleblower’s lawyers have told congressional investigators their client is only interested in answering written questions.

Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Susan CornwellWriting by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Cynthia Osterman

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-identity/republicans-seek-whistleblowers-identity-in-us-impeachment-inquiry-idUSKBN1X82J6

Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, accused the panel’s Democrat chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, of coaching a Trump impeachment inquiry witness during closed-door testimony on Capitol Hill.

“I have never in my life anything like what happened today,” Nunes, R-Calif., told “Hannity” on Tuesday, referring to the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman.

The scene was unprecedented, Nunes said.

“I mean, they’ve been bad at most of these depositions, but to interrupt us continually to coach the witness, to decide… what we’re going to be able to ask the witness.”

GOP REPS SAY SCHIFF STOPPED IMPEACHMENT WITNESS FROM ANSWERING CERTAIN GOP QUESTIONS

Nunes slammed Schiff, D-Calif., for refusing to allow Republicans to not yet call witnesses of their own, which he also said has never happened to him in Congress.

“And, to see someone coach a witness, this isn’t the first time that Schiff — Schiff is very good at coaching witnesses.”

More from Media

He said Schiff’s staff previously met with the yet-unnamed Ukraine whistleblower, again calling the entire impeachment inquiry process under Schiff and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., “unprecedented.”

In a fiery news conference earlier Tuesday, other GOP lawmakers said Schiff prevented a witness in the latest impeachment hearing from answering certain questions from Republican members.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Reps. Steve Scalise, R-La., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told reporters that Schiff shut down a Republican line of questioning toward Vindman.

“When we asked [Vindman] who he spoke to after important events in July — Adam Schiff says, ‘no, no, no, we’re not going to let him answer that question,”‘ Jordan said.

Jordan went on to say that Schiff seemed to be breaking his own rules for the hearings, implying the chairman was acting almost as a “lawyer” for Vindman.

Fox News’ Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/adam-schiff-vindman-devin-nunes-impeachment

House Democrats on Tuesday unveiled a resolution to outline the next phase of their impeachment inquiry that will bring their case before the public after weeks of closed-door witness testimony.

The resolution, unveiled by House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), sets up procedures for open hearings by the Intelligence Committee and releasing witness testimony.

It also allows Republicans to request witness testimony and documents, similar to previous impeachment inquiries. But Democrats on the Intelligence panel still have the ability to block the requests.

Later Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee released a set of procedures for its impeachment hearings pursuant to the resolution. The procedures allow the president and his counsel to attend hearings, question witnesses and provide evidence. 

The resolution is expected to hit the House floor on Thursday.

All but a handful of House Democrats have formally backed the impeachment inquiry since it was launched last month, meaning the resolution is likely to pass easily.

But those Democrats represent competitive swing districts and have been wary of impeachment from the start.

At least one, Rep. Jefferson Van Drew (D-N.J.), said Tuesday that he expected to vote against the resolution.

“It’s going down the impeachment road more. I’ve always said originally I wasn’t for the impeachment hearing, that I thought it should just be an investigation. And I’m still in the same position, so why would I vote for something now that I said I wasn’t going to vote for before?” Van Drew asked.

Rep. Joe CunninghamJoseph CunninghamHouse to vote for first time on impeachment procedures Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian presses Congress for paid paternity leave Democratic lawmaker fires back after NRCC mocks him for getting marriage counseling MORE (D-S.C.), meanwhile, had avoided taking a position on impeachment up to now. But a spokeswoman confirmed Tuesday that he will vote for the resolution.

The other Democratic holdouts — Reps. Anthony Brindisi (N.Y.), Jared Golden (Maine), Kendra HornKendra Suzanne HornHouse to vote for first time on impeachment procedures Liberals keep foot on the gas on impeachment Here are the House Democrats who aren’t backing Trump impeachment inquiry MORE (Okla.) and Collin PetersonCollin Clark PetersonHouse to vote for first time on impeachment procedures The Hill’s Morning Report – Dem debate contenders take aim at Warren Here are the House Democrats who aren’t backing Trump impeachment inquiry MORE (Minn.) — have yet to say how they’ll vote.

The resolution is not meant to formally authorize the impeachment inquiry that is already ongoing, as Republicans and the White House had been demanding for weeks. Democratic leaders maintained that a vote was unnecessary because the committees already had subpoena power thanks to rules changes established when Republicans last held the House majority.

But the resolution does state that the relevant committees involved in investigating the Trump administration “are directed to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America.”

Democratic leaders stressed that the vote was needed for the transition from a closed-door series of witness depositions to the public stage of the inquiry.

The leaders of the committees involved in the impeachment process — Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffJudge schedules hearing for ex-Trump aide who refused to appear in inquiry Top Republicans say impeachment resolution is too little too late Ex-Trump official’s refusal to testify escalates impeachment tensions MORE (D-Calif.), Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot EngelEliot Lance EngelFormer White House official won’t testify, lawyer says This week: House to vote on Turkey sanctions bill House leaders threaten contempt if former White House official defies subpoena MORE (D-N.Y.), Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerOfficials say foreign governments should not investigate presidential political opponents Dem committee chairs blast Trump G-7 announcement Top Democrat holds moment of silence for Cummings at hearing MORE (D-N.Y.) and acting Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn MaloneyCarolyn Bosher MaloneyFormer White House official won’t testify, lawyer says House leaders threaten contempt if former White House official defies subpoena House passes bill aimed at reducing rape kit backlog MORE (D-N.Y.) — said the resolution will prepare lawmakers for the public phase.

“The evidence we have already collected paints the picture of a president who abused his power by using multiple levers of government to press a foreign country to interfere in the 2020 election. Following in the footsteps of previous impeachment inquiries, the next phase will move from closed depositions to open hearings where the American people will learn firsthand about the president’s misconduct,” they said in a joint statement. 

House Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem JeffriesHakeem Sekou JeffriesTop Trump administration officials hail al-Baghdadi raid but stress need for resolve in fighting ISIS Black lawmakers condemn Trump’s ‘lynching’ remarks Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle mourn Cummings MORE (D-N.Y.) dismissed the notion that forcing all Democrats to go on the record about the impeachment process would put the most vulnerable members in a tough spot.

“The overwhelming majority of the House Democratic Caucus are publicly on record supporting the impeachment inquiry,” Jeffries said. “That doesn’t seem to me to be a challenge.”

But centrist Democrats were frustrated by the lack of advance notice or a coordinated message from leadership on why a vote was necessary, according to sources close to the moderate wing of the party.

Those lawmakers had more consternation about the lack of a clear messaging strategy than about having to go on the record in a floor vote, given that most have already backed the inquiry. But it’s not a vote they are especially eager to take, either.

“It’s not something that some of the Blue Dogs really want to be dealing with,” said Rep. Daniel LipinskiDaniel William LipinskiThe Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden camp faces new challenges Booker endorses Lipinski challenger The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by National Association of Manufacturers – Trump defends Ukraine motives while attacking Biden MORE (D-Ill.), a former co-chairman of the group. “They came here to get legislation passed and get things done.”

Brindisi, who hasn’t yet said how he’ll vote, also appeared to be caught off guard by the announcement of a floor vote.

“I was not ready to see a resolution come out,” he said. “I’d like to know what the rationale is for doing the resolution at this point in time. Is there some new information that members aren’t privy to, that we should know before we vote on that resolution? That’s a question I’m going to ask.”

Van Drew further questioned the wisdom of holding a vote as a way to counter GOP complaints about the process.

“The Republicans very much want it. So if they very much want it, it would mean that they want to help us a whole lot and really think it’s a good idea, or they think that it was going to put us in a tight spot,” Van Drew said.

House GOP leaders are urging their members to vote against the resolution. And White House press secretary Stephanie GrishamStephanie GrishamPress: Baby Donald throws a temper tantrum House to vote for first time on impeachment procedures SE Cupp presses ex-GOP lawmaker on Trump tweet: ‘Would you call me human scum?’ MORE said that the resolution “does nothing to change the fundamental fact that House Democrats refuse to provide basic due process rights to the Administration.”

The procedural discussion over Democrats’ impeachment inquiry came as a National Security Council official, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, gave the first direct account of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president in which Trump pushed for investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden, a current front-runner for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, and his son Hunter Biden.

Vindman is also the first current White House official to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

The resolution further outlines the format for the upcoming public hearings, which will provide for extended time for questioning and allow committee staff to cross-examine witnesses. Only Schiff and the panel’s ranking Republican, Rep. Devin NunesDevin Gerald NunesFormer Nunes staffer fueled Trump’s Ukrainian corruption claims: report 10 top Republicans who continue to deny the undeniable A Republican Watergate veteran’s perspective on a Trump impeachment MORE (Calif.), or committee employees are allowed to ask questions.

That would be a departure from the typical format of congressional hearings, in which members of each party alternate with five minutes of questioning.

The format is similar to how lawmakers on the three committees leading the impeachment inquiry have been conducting the depositions behind closed doors in a secure facility in the sub-basement of the Capitol for the past month. 

The resolution also directs the House Intelligence Committee to issue a report on its findings and recommendations.

Cunningham framed his decision to back the resolution as a way to ensure transparency in the impeachment inquiry.

“It’s something that my colleagues from across the aisle have been requesting for weeks now, so I hope this affords them some satisfaction, and overall it’s a good measure to shine some light on these hearings and make sure that we respect due process,” Cunningham told The Post and Courier

—Mike Lillis contributed. Updated at 7:54 p.m.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/467965-democrats-unveil-resolution-outlining-next-phase-of-impeachment-inquiry

Because of Santa Ana winds expected to continue late Tuesday evening through Thursday, Southern California could experience “an extreme fire weather threat, with conditions as dangerous for fire growth and behavior as we have seen in recent memory,” according to the National Weather Service.

Red-flag warnings are posted for large portions of California in anticipation of dry, gusty, northeast winds as a weather system drops into the Great Basin region. Red-flag warnings in Northern California generally are set to expire late Wednesday afternoon, but warnings in Southern California will remain in effect until 6 p.m. Thursday.

A red-flag warning means critical fire weather conditions exist or will commence shortly, and herald a combination of strong winds and low relative humidity that contribute to extreme and erratic fire behavior.

Such warnings often accompany Diablo winds in Northern California and Santa Ana winds in Southern California. Both are dry north to northeasterly winds that blow from high pressure, usually hundreds of miles inland, over mountains or through passes and canyons toward lower pressure at sea level.

The stronger the pressure gradient, the stronger the winds. The gradient is the difference between the high pressure inland and the lower pressure at the coast. Models show that the pressure gradient could break the record for late October and early November.

The winds that will arrive in Southern California this week will be cold Santa Anas. Usually, the winds warm up through compression heating as they blow downslope, but these winds are starting from an extremely cold air mass fed by cold-air advection from the Arctic Circle.

Gale-force gusts are expected off the immediate coast south of Point Conception, with choppy seas affecting Avalon Harbor and Two Harbors on Santa Catalina Island.

Winds are expected to weaken by Thursday, and are expected to be much lighter for Halloween on Thursday evening. Temperatures Thursday night and early Friday morning are expected to be the coldest of the next seven days. The Santa Anas are forecast to be over on Friday, but the air will remain bone dry and temperatures will begin their gradual climb back to normal. Offshore flow will keep the marine layer out of the picture until Sunday.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-29/extreme-fire-weather-could-be-the-worst-in-recent-memory

“I can’t remember how many times that we felt like, ‘Okay, we’ve got him,’ ” the official said. “The last couple of months, we felt it was coming together, but it wasn’t until about the last month where we felt, ‘Okay, this time it’s for real.’ ”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/islamic-state-turncoat-inside-baghdadis-hideout-critical-to-success-of-raid-officials-say/2019/10/29/e702c2fa-fa86-11e9-ac8c-8eced29ca6ef_story.html