Alexander Dugin attends a farewell ceremony of his daughter Daria Dugina, who was killed in a car bomb explosion in Moscow on August 23.

Dmitry Serebryakov/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Dmitry Serebryakov/AP

Alexander Dugin attends a farewell ceremony of his daughter Daria Dugina, who was killed in a car bomb explosion in Moscow on August 23.

Dmitry Serebryakov/AP

Earlier this week in Russia, there was a televised funeral for Daria Dugina, just days after she was killed in a car bombing in Moscow.

Dugina was a Russian propagandist who supported her country’s invasion of Ukraine, both on TV and online. Her death made global headlines, both for its violence and because of the political prominence of her father, Alexander Dugin.

It also signaled that Moscow’s elite may not be safe in their own city, said Marlene Laruelle, the director of the Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies at George Washington University.

“The war is progressively coming to them in the Russian territory,” she said.

“The message the killing is sending, even if we cannot interpret exactly who did that and who the actual target was, is that if you can have a terrorist act in Moscow, in the middle of the war, it means elites are suddenly not feeling secure anymore.”

Laruelle joined All Things Considered to discuss Alexander Dugin’s rise and waning influence, how he spread his ideology across the world, and what Daria Dugina’s death may mean politically.

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Interview Highlights

On Alexander Dugin’s origins

He was pretty famous in the ’90s because he was one of the first ones in Russia to formulate a kind of political language of Russia’s great power and empire. But in the 2000s, he really lost some of his prominence, and there are many other ideologies who appeared who are much more influential on the regime’s kind of strategy. He has been pretty marginalized inside Russia. He’s more famous abroad than in Russia itself.

Alexander Dugin rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Francesca Ebel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Francesca Ebel/AP

Alexander Dugin rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Francesca Ebel/AP

On his beliefs towards Ukraine

He has had very anti-Ukrainian ideology since the beginning, which is some of his most famous work in the mid-90s. He was saying that Ukraine doesn’t exist as a state, as a nation, that it’s a construction of the West as a kind of anti-Russian strategy.

And that’s something that was not so common at that time. But after that, he really has been working on many other countries, creating a big geopolitical vision for Russia as an empire, and he has always been very anti-Ukrainian, to the point that Ukraine has forbidden him from entering Ukrainian territory already for about 15 years. In the mid-2000s he was already persona non grata in Ukraine.

On whether there is any knowledge of Dugin’s influence on Vladmir Putin

No, we’re not even sure they have met. Putin has never quoted Dugin, Dugin is not part of any official institution, like several other ideologies. He’s only on the small internet channel, the far right, orthodox channel. So he’s not among the classic propagandists that are actually invited on talk shows.

His daughter was, and that’s what is interesting. His daughter was more mainstream in a sense, and she was able to be invited to all of these provocative talk shows. He has been pretty marginal, because his thinking is not an easy one to follow. It’s super philosophical, and religious, so it’s not something you can air on television very easily and get a big audience for.

Investigators work on the site of explosion of a car driven by Daria Dugina outside Moscow.

AP


hide caption

toggle caption

AP

Investigators work on the site of explosion of a car driven by Daria Dugina outside Moscow.

AP

On Dugin’s popularity among international far-right communities

He’s really a big name in contemporary far-right thinking. First, because he has been speaking a lot of foreign languages, so he was able to read all of the European far-right productions, to translate in Russia, and also to translate his own work in English, French, German, Italian, Arabic, and Iranian.

So he has really been able to develop networks of international, transnational, far-right people, up to Latin America. He was able to articulate a narrative of this new empire of conservative values against the so-called decadent West and liberal culture and so on. It’s really a narrative that has resonated with a lot of European interests among the far right groups.

On what Daria Dugin’s death may mean politically

I think her death will be used by the conservative reactionary groups to kind of create a martyr out of her. She was a young, good looking woman, so that will help to create the myth of her martyrdom. I think her death will be used globally, not only by the conservative circles but also by the regime, for some kind of domestic repression. The regime will have to showcase that it can answer to a terrorist act, and that will probably mean higher repression.

This story was adapted for the web by Manuela Lopez Restrepo.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/08/24/1119039271/russia-ukraine-putin-daria-dugina-alexander-dugin-car-bombing

The U.S. military said it carried out airstrikes on Tuesday targeting areas of eastern Syria controlled by Iran-backed militias.

The “precision strikes” in the oil-rich Deir ez-Zor province, near Syria’s border with Iraq, “targeted infrastructure facilities used by groups affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps,” according to Col. Joe Buccino, spokesman for the U.S. Central Command.

“Today’s strikes were necessary to protect and defend U.S. personnel,” Buccino said in a statement. “The United States took proportionate, deliberate action intended to limit the risk of escalation and minimize the risk of casualties.”

Buccino did not offer any casualty numbers from the strikes.

Neither Syria nor Iran immediately acknowledged the attack.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a U.K.-based war monitoring group, said the U.S. strikes targeted the Ayash Camp run by the Fatemiyoun Brigade, a militia made up of Afghan Shiite refugees sent by Iran to fight in the ongoing Syrian Civil War alongside Syrian government troops. At least six Syrian and foreign militants were reportedly killed in the strikes, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

According to Buccino, the strikes came at the orders of U.S. President Joe Biden in response to an attack on Aug. 15, when Iran-backed militias allegedly launched drones targeting the al-Tanf Garrison used by U.S. forces in the energy-rich Homs province in central Syria. At that time, U.S. Central Command described the attack as causing “zero casualties and no damage.”

“The United States does not seek conflict, but will continue to take necessary measures to protect and defend our people,” Buccino added. “U.S. forces remain in Syria to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS.”

The strikes came as Biden seeks to revive a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran that his predecessor abandoned.

Since 2014, the U.S. has led a coalition of countries conducting strikes targeting the Islamic State group in Syria. U.S. ground forces entered Syria in 2015. In more recent years, the American-led coalition has also launched strikes targeting the Syrian government’s forces and allies, mainly in defense of the Syrian Democratic Forces, a U.S.-backed alliance of Kurdish and Arab militias that was formed as part of the campaign against ISIS.

What started as a local protest movement in Syria’s southern city of Dara’a expanded into a full-fledged civil war by 2012. ISIS, which grew out of al-Qaeda in Iraq, took root in northern and eastern Syria in 2013 after seizing swaths of territory in neighboring Iraq. The jihadist group is fighting to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and establish a caliphate.

The Syrian Civil War has pulled in the United States, Russia, Iran and almost all of Syria’s neighbors. It has become the largest humanitarian crisis since World War II, according to the United Nations.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/International/us-airstrikes-target-iran-backed-militias-eastern-syria/story?id=88780957

A U.S. Postal Service carrier in rural Florida was killed after being attacked by five dogs when her vehicle broke down, authorities say. 

In a news conference, the Putnam County Sheriff’s Office announced that 61-year-old Pamela Jane Rock died in the hospital Monday a day after a vicious attack that saw several neighbors – and the animals’ owners – try to fend off the dogs.

“One neighbor brought his firearm along and fired several shots in the air in an attempt to disrupt the attack,” Putnam County Sheriff’s spokesman Joseph Wells said at the news conference. “That was unsuccessful.”

Rock was attacked near Palatka, a small Florida city 45 miles from Jacksonville. 

When police arrived at the scene Sunday, they found the dogs behind a fence and Rock bleeding. t, Officers applied tourniquets to stem the loss of blood, but during the drive to the hospital, Rock went into cardiac arrest. She died the next day.

A local statute says owners may be held liable if they know their dogs are dangerous but fail to exercise due caution, Wells said. But the dogs were behind a fence and escaped, and the owner had cooperated with earlier calls to animal control. 

Failed rescue attempt:Beluga whale that captured worldwide attention in France is euthanized

“We believe there have been other calls for service regarding these dogs,” Wells said. The dogs will be seized and will be euthanized. No further information about the dogs, including size or breed, was released.

“We are deeply saddened at the loss of our employee,” the U.S. Postal Service said in a statement. “Our thoughts and prayers are with her family and her co-workers at this time.”

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/08/24/mail-carrier-dies-five-dogs-attacked/7882836001/

In New York’s primaries on Tuesday, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, prevailed in the redrawn 10th District contest that included another powerful Democratic lawmaker, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, and a younger candidate, Suraj Patel.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/24/biden-student-debt-ukraine-aid/

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday defeated Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) in the Democratic primary for New York’s 12th U.S. House District, according to the AP.

Why it matters: The result marks the end of Maloney’s three-decade-long congressional career, which culminated in her chairmanship of the powerful House Oversight Committee.

The backdrop: Maloney and Nadler, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, were drawn into a single House district by a court-appointed mapmaker after a judge rejected the New York state legislature’s maps as a Democratic gerrymander.

  • The race for the upper Manhattan district garnered national attention due to the showdown between two senior House Democrats.
  • Also running was attorney Suraj Patel, who has challenged Maloney twice in the past. At 38, he had hoped his youth would propel him to victory over his two septuagenarian rivals.

By the numbers: Maloney’s loss marks at least 13 incumbents who have lost their primaries this cycle, the result of years-long political realignments in both parties.

What’s next: Nadler is all but guaranteed to be re-elected in November — the 12th District voted for President Biden in 2020 by over 70 points.

Source Article from https://www.axios.com/2022/08/24/new-york-primary-results-carolyn-maloney-jerry-nadler

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-24/desantis-seeks-convincing-victory-as-he-eyes-potential-2024-bid

Some of the final pieces of the midterm puzzle came into focus as Tuesday primaries in New York, Florida and Oklahoma locked in key parts of the November election slate.

Democrats in Florida on Tuesday picked Rep. Charlie Crist to take on Gov. Ron DeSantis in the fall, CNN projected. Crist’s challenge comes as DeSantis seeks both a second term and a boost ahead of a rumored presidential bid in 2024. CNN also projected that Democratic Rep. Val Demings would take on Republican Sen. Marco Rubio in November.

New York, Florida and Oklahoma elections

Meanwhile, in New York, where a protracted redistricting process pushed back the US House and state Senate elections, CNN projected that one of the Democratic delegation’s longest-serving members’ run has come to a dramatic end.

A special election upstate offered new clues about the political impact of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade after CNN projected that Democrat Pat Ryan, who cast his campaign as a referendum on the ruling, would win.

And in Oklahoma, Republicans decided on a nominee to fill out the remainder of retiring Sen. Jim Inhofe’s term ahead of special general election.

Here are the key takeaways from August’s final primary day.

Crist looks to derail DeSantis in the fall

For the second time in eight years, Democratic voters elected Charlie Crist as their nominee for governor, choosing the seasoned veteran over Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, who was vying to become the state’s first female governor. Crist now has just 11 weeks to unite his party, energize the Democratic base and convince independent voters that the state needs a new direction.

See full results in Florida here.

The stakes for Democrats are high, and not just in Florida, where DeSantis has already pushed through an aggressively conservative agenda, vowing that a second term will bring new action to further restrict abortion and to make it easier to carry a gun in public. But national Democrats are also now looking for Crist to slow DeSantis’ rise before an anticipated campaign for the White House in 2024.

Florida Democrats to decide Tuesday who would be best to take abortion fight to DeSantis

The task will not be easy. DeSantis has amassed $132 million for the general election, a record sum for a gubernatorial candidate who isn’t self-funded, and he has animated the Republican base more than any other GOP politician not named Donald Trump. His party has surpassed Democrats in registered voters in Florida for the first time. And he can point to a state economy that appears to be booming, with more people moving there than anywhere in the country, record tourism numbers, and an unemployment rate of 2.7%, almost a full point below the national level.

But Democrats have argued that the prosperity has not been shared by all. With some of the country’s fastest rising home prices and rents, Florida has become a paradise that many can no longer afford. A property insurance crisis has threatened coverage for millions of homeowners just as hurricane season reaches its zenith. LGBTQ Floridians say the DeSantis administration has made the state more hostile to them and women say new restrictions on abortion eliminate autonomy over their bodies and force them to see through medically risky pregnancies.

Crist’s argument against another four years of DeSantis is also predicated on Floridians longing for a less divisive tone from its leader. Throughout the primary, Crist and Fried depicted DeSantis as a bully and a despot who is far more focused on positioning himself to run for the White House than he is on governing the country’s third largest state. Time and again, they have noted, DeSantis has forced the state’s other branches to bend to his will, eliminating any checks on his executive power.

Florida’s latest contentious Senate race formally takes shape

The Senate race between Republican incumbent Sen. Marco Rubio and Democrat Rep. Val Demings is on.

Demings won her primary on Tuesday and Rubio was unopposed, setting up a race that Republicans believe they should easily win but one that offers Democrats yet another chance to show they can win statewide in a place that has crept right for years.

Five things to watch as Democratic primaries in New York and Florida take center stage

The two have been focused on each other for months – their primaries were not competitive – but on Tuesday night, the contours of the race were clear: Rubio plans to brand Demings a “Pelosi Puppet” who is inextricably linked to President Joe Biden, while Demings plans to attack Rubio as ineffective, selfish and wedded to a Republican Party dominated by Trump.

The onus is on Demings to prove she – or any Democrat – can win statewide in a state that has overwhelmingly backed Republicans for years. But Democrats got a morale boost recently: The National Republican Senatorial Committee came in with an ad campaign for Rubio while Demings was widely outspending the Republican.

Like many Democrats, Demings is also hoping the anger in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade will propel her to an unlikely victory.

“I dream of an America where we protect constitutional rights like a woman’s right to choose. I’ve said it along this campaign trail, let me say it again. We’re not going back. We’re not,” Demings said on Tuesday night.

Demings has the fundraising advantage – she has consistently outraised Rubio and pulled in $12.2 million in the second quarter of 2022 – but central to her campaign will be her ability to push back against attacks linking her to the “defund the police” movement. Demings, the former Orlando police chief, has already put out her own ad refuting the criticism and has long had her campaigns identify her as “Chief Demings,” not Rep. Demings, in a not-so-subtle response to the attacks.

Democrat who campaigned on ‘referendum on Roe’ wins NY special election

Three weeks after voters in Kansas shot down a ballot measure that would have allowed the state to ban abortion, New Yorkers in a swing district special election broke for a Democrat who cast his campaign as a “referendum on Roe.”

Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan’s victory offered Democrats another clear sign that the Supreme Court’s decision to end federal abortion rights is shaping up as a powerful tool for juicing their base – and perhaps winning over some wavering Republicans – ahead of the midterms.

Ryan defeated Dutchess County Executive Marc Molinaro, a moderate Republican who repeatedly said he would not support a nationwide ban, but also stopped short of backing legislation to protect abortion rights at the federal level.

The seat they campaigned for, in the current 19th District, became open when Antonio Delgado, a Democrat, left to become lieutenant governor. Ryan will serve out Delgado’s term while both he and Molinaro run for full terms in neighboring districts under the state’s new congressional maps.

The current district, though, has long been a bellwether of politics beyond its upstate borders. It has voted for the eventual winner in every presidential election since 1996 (it only missed the mark in 1992, its first under the present borders).

Ryan set the terms of the contest early on – within an hour of the Supreme Court’s June 24 ruling with an ad that, after touting his military service, pivoted to a direct-to-camera message: “Freedom includes a women’s right to choose,” Ryan says. “How can we be a free country if the government tries to control women’s bodies?”

Molinaro, who has deep ties to and a long political career in the district, received significant backing from the National Republican Congressional Committee, which put more than $1 million into the race. The DCCC spent less, but Ryan’s campaign said it brought in more than $2 million in grassroots donations – a large chunk of it arriving in the aftermath of the Kansas referendum.

Nadler emerges in clash of Upper Manhattan Democratic titans

Reps. Jerry Nadler and Carolyn Maloney are about the same age, share nearly identical ideological views and both chair powerful committees in the House, where they both arrived in 1993.

But it will be Nadler, bolstered by endorsements from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and The New York Times editorial board, that will return to Capitol Hill next year after he defeated Maloney in one of the most contentious primaries in recent New York history.

Nadler wins Democratic primary for New York’s redrawn 12th District in clash between incumbents, CNN projects

It was a race neither wanted and, according to Maloney, Nadler urged her to run in another district after their parallel strongholds on Manhattan’s Upper East and West Sides were drawn together at the conclusion of a long redistricting process.

Maloney tried to tap into Democratic primary voters’ anger over the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade and vowed, if reelected, to make the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment her main focus. She also accused Nadler of taking undue credit for his part in major local projects, like the construction of the Second Avenue subway, and – at the bitter end – suggesting on camera that he might be “senile.”

But Nadler, despite a disappointing debate performance, shored up the district’s progressive base. A key piece of validation came from Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who cut an ad for Nadler highlighting his support from Planned Parenthood and NARAL, declaring New Yorkers “lucky to have Jerry in Congress.”

Though the full tally is yet to be finalized, it appears Nadler’s margin of victory could exceed Maloney’s lead – if it holds – over a third candidate, Suraj Patel, who argued on the trail that the new district needed a new voice. But the 38-year-old, who unsuccessfully challenged Maloney in the last two cycles in a different district, again fell short.

New York’s 10th District results still up in the air as moderate takes lead

New York City progressives appear to have fumbled away a prime opportunity to send one of their own to Congress next year, as moderate former federal prosecutor Daniel Goldman held a narrow lead as of early Wednesday in the new 10th District’s chaotic Democratic primary.

Goldman came into the race with money – his own: he’s an heir to the riches of Levi Strauss & Co. – and broad name recognition from his role as the party’s lead counsel in former President Donald Trump’s first impeachment. But he had almost no political roots in the new district, which stretches from Lower Manhattan down into Brooklyn, making it one of the most liberal in the country.

Still, he is on a path to win the nomination with less than 30% of the vote because his top rivals – state Assembly Member Yuh-Line Niou; City Council Member Carlina Rivera; and US Rep. Mondaire Jones, who moved into the city district rather than run against US Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney – appear to have split the progressive vote.

It’s not that Goldman’s opponents, or local progressive groups, didn’t see it coming. They just failed to do much of anything to stop it. Last Monday, Niou and Jones held a joint news conference to denounce Goldman for trying to buy the seat, but demurred when asked if there had been any talks about a given candidate dropping out and endorsing another. By Friday, it was Rivera standing side-by-side with former US Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman, who praised Rivera but did not stand down or endorse her.

Both in the race and outside of it, influential progressives and aligned groups who might have been able to broker a consolidation were largely quiet on the question. Asked at his press conference with Niou if he would welcome some outside intervention from figures like Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, or Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Jones all but issued an invitation.

“If the people you just named want to help clarify those stakes for the people in this district, then I personally would welcome them amplifying this information,” Jones said.

Alas, none did.

Sean Patrick Maloney holds off progressive challenger

The progressive insurgency that dominated downstate New York politics in 2018 and 2020 was dealt another blow on Tuesday, when state Sen. Alessandra Biaggi lost her bid to unseat US Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, the powerful head of the party’s House campaign arm.

Biaggi – who became a hero on the left in 2018, when she ousted the leader of a turncoat pack of state Democrats who collaborated with Republicans in Albany – moved north of the city to take on Maloney, who also shifted districts following a drawn out redistricting process.

These 3 New York races highlight Democrats’ ideological and generational divides

But Biaggi couldn’t keep up with Maloney on the fundraising front and, even though he left behind a big chunk of his old electorate to run in the 17th District, benefited from greater familiarity among primary voters.

Outside groups also flexed in support of Maloney. The Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York’s PAC spent nearly $500,000 against Biaggi. A new PAC, called Our Hudson, also chipped in to undermine Biaggi, who was endorsed by Ocasio-Cortez. (Ocasio-Cortez, though, mostly stayed out of the fray, never campaigning for Biaggi in the district.)

Maloney, a former White House and campaign aide to former President Bill Clinton, who endorsed him, also got a boost from his colleagues on Capitol Hill in the form of Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act. The passage of the historic climate, health care and tax law calmed the nerves – and, possibly, the appetite to deliver a harsh message – of Democratic primary voters.

Markwayne Mullin to become the favorite in race to fill Inhofe’s Senate seat

Republican Rep. Markwayne Mullin will be the GOP nominee for the special election to fill Sen. Jim Inhofe’s Oklahoma Senate seat, CNN projected. As the Republican nominee, Mullin is in a strong position to win the general election this fall in the conservative state. He will face off against former Democratic Rep. Kendra Horn.

Inhofe, a veteran of the Senate, announced in February that he would retire in January 2023, sparking the special election.

Mullin, who represents Oklahoma’s 2nd Congressional District, defeated former Oklahoma House Speaker T.W. Shannon in Tuesday’s runoff. Mullin advanced to the runoff after leading the first round with 44% of the vote, and that was before an endorsement from former President Donald Trump.

Mullin’s campaign website highlights his support for the former President, saying, “In Congress, he fought the liberals trying to stop President Trump.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/23/politics/florida-new-york-oklahoma-election-takeaways/index.html

As another deadline nears on the restart of payments for America’s $1.7 trillion in federal student loans, President Joe Biden is poised to decide whether to cancel debt for a subset of Americans and continue to keep a pandemic-era pause on the repayments — a sweeping move he has openly weighed in some form or another since his time as a candidate.

Without action, numerous Americans will — for the first time in two years — have to start paying their student loans on Sept. 1.

But multiple people familiar with White House policy discussions told ABC News that the loan pause, first put in place under President Donald Trump during the disruptions of COVID-19’s onset, is expected to be extended. Talks about debt cancellation, which were still underway Tuesday, have so far coalesced around forgiving approximately $10,000 for people who make less than $125,000 a year — though details are still being worked out.

An announcement on the federal student loans could come as early as Wednesday, sources familiar with the plan said.

In an interview on Tuesday afternoon, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona told ABC News that the much-anticipated decision on loan forgiveness would come “soon” but was vague on details.

“We recognize it’s an important issue for many families. And we want to make sure that they get the information directly from the president,” Cardona said.

The White House did not confirm any further details, saying only that the president would have more to say on this before Aug. 31.

“As a reminder, no one with a federally-held loan has had to pay a single dime in student loans since President Biden took office, and this Administration has already canceled about $32 billion in debt for more than 1.6 million Americans — more than any Administration in history,” White House spokesman Abdullah Hasan said, referring to debt relief for people who went to fraudulent universities and a restructured program to forgive debt for people who work in public service for 10 years.

But more specific details on how much money will be forgiven and for who are in high demand for the more than 45 million Americans who still have federal student loan debt.

One-third of federal loan borrowers have less than $10,000, meaning they could see their debts completely wiped out should this policy come to fruition. Another 20% of borrowers, around 9 million people, would have their debt at least slashed in half.

Such a major cancelation may seem like a big step for Biden to take without Congress, but legal and policy experts say it’s clearer: The move would be well within the president’s authority — it just hasn’t been wielded before because of the political implications.

“The president has some pretty broad authority under the Higher Education Act,” said John Brooks, a law professor at Fordham University who focuses on federal fiscal policy.

“A lot depends on the size of the cancellation. The smaller the amount of cancellation, the easier the question is,” Brooks said. “Wiping out all student debt with a single stroke might be tougher, but the president through the secretary of education does have the power to adjust the amount of loan principle that any borrower has.”

Still, Biden could get taken to court — possibly by loan servicing agencies who would lose revenue or by members of Congress who may believe Biden is spending money in a way that hasn’t been appropriated by legislators.

Outside experts also wonder how long the processes would take to cancel student loans once a policy is announced — and how complicated it would be for borrowers to work their way through it, which are details that have yet to be released.

Some fear that people might fall through the cracks if applications to cancel debt become too labor-intensive because of the prospective income cap.

“The White House is about to ask the Education Department to do something that is extraordinarily difficult, and that is going to have the effect of denying debt relief to low-income folks, economically vulnerable folks, who have the hardest time navigating these complicated paperwork processes,” Mike Pierce, executive director and co-founder of the Student Borrower Protection Center, a think-tank that advocates for universal debt cancellation, told ABC News in an interview.

Pierce and other supporters for more progressive debt cancellation, including the NAACP, said the smoothest path would include full and universal cancellation for everyone.

“If the rumors are true, we’ve got a problem. And tragically, we’ve experienced this so many times before,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement Tuesday, reacting to the details of the potential policy announcement.

“President Biden’s decision on student debt cannot become the latest example of a policy that has left Black people – especially Black women – behind. This is not how you treat Black voters who turned out in record numbers and provided 90% of their vote to once again save democracy in 2020,” Johnson said.

But for many borrowers and advocates for canceling student debt — particularly the nearly half of people with federal student loans who would see their debt extinguished or cut significantly — Biden’s policy would still be cause for major celebration and be seen as a start to reforming the college and university system, where rising costs have become a major area of focus.

For Michigan teacher Nick Fuller, a possible Biden announcement on student loans could come just before the financial crunch of winter, when his heating bills skyrocket.

Though Fuller worked hard his first few years out of school to pay down his school debt, and then had his loan frozen for much of the pandemic, he’s concerned that restarting payments on top of monthly living costs could put him over the edge.

“I think things will get really tight in the winter because my utility bills are higher,” Fuller told ABC News. “I mean for January and February — the highs are zero and the lows are -20 [degrees] for almost two months.”

The frozen temperatures might sting a little bit less if Biden forgives $10,000 of Fuller’s remaining student loan bills, he said.

“It’s about two-thirds of the debt that I have left,” he said.

That would make payments “a lot more affordable and a lot more manageable in my situation,” he said.

Easing the student debt crisis — which is also how Trump Education Secretary Betsy DeVos described the issue in 2018 — could also aid a crippling teacher shortage that has caused thousands of staff vacancies at the start of the latest school year, something Fuller has seen himself.

Pinched salaries and rising inflation have had many teachers on edge with the loan forgiveness deadline approaching.

And because Black students are among the fastest growing group of people taking on debt, advocates argue that canceling some student loans could also begin to address racial inequities.

Shareefah Mason, the dean of Educator Certification at Dallas College, feels this impact firsthand as a Black woman with student debt. She leads the apprenticeship component of a program that pairs students with residency partners to ensure they earn while they learn, effectively reducing education debt for aspiring teachers.

“I bear the weight of $70,000 in student loans,” Mason told ABC News. “The data shows that student loan debt exponentially impacts and disproportionately impacts Black women.”

The average amount of student debt accrued by Black women is more than any other group at $38,800, according to Education Trust, a nonprofit focused on education reform.

But Mason’s program, the very first full-time paid teacher apprenticeship in the state of Texas, allows students to earn one of the cheapest bachelor’s degrees in the state, Mason said.

The goal, she said, is to aid future educators in breaking the generational barriers that she has faced as a Black woman.

Mason said “they will not have to worry about student loan debt,” which could open more doors for minority communities that have historically lacked the means to access higher education. “My students will be able to earn, as a first year teacher in the city of Dallas, upwards of $60,000,” Mason said.

For the nation’s most impacted borrowers, Mason said, “there needs to be a space created for them to make enough money to pay their student loans without having to sacrifice their ability to create generational wealth for their families.”

ABC News’ Mariam Khan and Benjamin Siegel contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-biden-poised-announce-form-student-loan-forgiveness/story?id=88736949

On Tuesday, Florida Democratic voters also chose Val Demings, a congresswoman and former Orlando police chief, to take on Republican Senator Marco Rubio, a former presidential hopeful, in November.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62655157

Source Article from https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/crime/2022/08/23/breonna-taylor-case-ex-louisville-cop-pleads-guilty-coverup/65406249007/

WASHINGTON—Boxes recovered from Donald Trump’s Florida home in January contained more than 700 pages of classified material, including documents marked as extremely sensitive, according to correspondence between the National Archives and the former president’s legal team.

The letter, written by Acting Archivist of the United States Debra Steidel Wall and dated May 10, shows that months before the Aug. 8 Federal Bureau of Investigation search at Mar-a-Lago, the intelligence community and the Justice Department had become alarmed by Mr. Trump’s handling of presidential records, which by law are the property of the government.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/letter-to-trump-lawyer-highlights-national-archives-concern-over-sensitive-materials-before-mar-a-lago-search-11661271403

Kristin McGuire, 40, said that $10,000 would not make an enormous difference in what she owes for the bachelor’s degree in public administration she earned at California State University in 2005. Ms. McGuire borrowed $24,000, but with interest and fees, her debt has ballooned to $50,000.

That is a common story among the Black classmates she studied with, said Ms. McGuire, the executive director of Young Invincibles, a young-adult political advocacy group. “All of us owe more now than when we started,” she said.

Still, the payment pause has given her and her husband — who also owes $50,000, for loans he took for an associate degree from a for-profit school — financial breathing room. The $400 a month she saved by not paying her loans for the past two years let her put more money into paying her mortgage, allowing her to refinance at a lower rate.

“It let us really start to save and build the generational wealth that we’d been blocked out of,” Ms. McGuire said.

Republicans have called any debt cancellation a handout to largely high-income college graduates. Some economists warn it could lead colleges and universities to raise tuition prices, in anticipation of future loan relief.

Congressional offices, outside groups and even the companies that service federal student loans have been left to guess at Mr. Biden’s eventual move. Officials at two loan servicers — which have been fielding calls all month from borrowers seeking guidance about whether they will have bills due again in September — said that they had not received any guidance from the Education Department as of Tuesday about the administration’s plans.

“I don’t know what the plan is, nor have servicers even been consulted about how they would do that and what’s possible to implement,” said Scott Buchanan, the executive director for the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, a trade group. “That’s my deep fear — that they announce something here and it’s not doable.”

Erica L. Green contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/23/us/politics/biden-student-loan-debt.html

“The question in this case is not a close one,” Steidel Wall wrote. “The Executive Branch here is seeking access to records belonging to, and in the custody of, the Federal Government itself, not only in order to investigate whether those records were handled in an unlawful manner but also, as the National Security Division explained, to ‘conduct an assessment of the potential damage resulting from the apparent manner in which these materials were stored and transported and take any necessary remedial steps.’”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/23/trump-classified-documents-national-archives/

MIAMI (AP) — Polls have closed across much of Florida on Tuesday as Gov. Ron DeSantis waits to learn the identity of his general election opponent in a matchup that could have presidential implications.

Florida Democrats are choosing between Charlie Crist, a 66-year-old Democratic congressman who served as the state’s Republican governor more than a decade ago, and 44-year-old Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, who hopes to become the state’s first female governor while leaning into the fight for abortion rights.

While most polling places are closed, voting across the Florida Panhandle is scheduled to continue until 8 p.m. EDT.

The race is ultimately a debate over who is best-positioned to defeat DeSantis, who emerged from a narrow victory four years ago to become one of the most prominent Republicans in politics. His relatively light touch handling the pandemic and his eagerness to lean into divides over race, gender and LGBTQ rights have resonated with many Republican voters who see DeSantis as a natural heir to former President Donald Trump.

His reelection effort is widely assumed to be a precursor to a presidential run in 2024, adding to a sense of urgency among Democrats to blunt his rise now.

“I have been in the trenches. I have taken on DeSantis,” Fried told The Associated Press. DeSantis “won’t have a 2024 because he won’t have a 2022. We are going to beat him in November, and we are going to kill all of his aspirations to run for president of the United States.”

Crist, in an interview, described DeSantis as a threat to democracy.

“He is the opposite of freedom. He is an autocrat. He is a demagogue. And I think people are sick of him,” Crist said of the sitting Republican governor, noting that DeSantis earlier this year admonished a group of high school students for wearing face masks at an indoor news conference. “Who is this guy? Who does he think he is? He is not the boss.”

The Florida contest wraps up the busiest stretch of primaries this year. Republicans from Pennsylvania to Arizona have supported contenders who have embraced Trump’s lies that the 2020 election was stolen, an assertion roundly rejected by elections officials, the former president’s attorney general and judges he appointed.

And for the most part, Democrats have avoided brutal primary fights. That could be tested Tuesday, however, as voters in New York participate in congressional primaries that feature two powerful Democratic committee chairs, Carolyn Maloney and Jerry Nadler, competing for the same seat and other incumbents fending off challenges from the left.

Democrats are entering the final weeks ahead of the midterms with a sense of cautious optimism, hoping the Supreme Court’s decision overturning a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion will energize the party’s base. But Democrats still face tremendous headwinds, including economic uncertainty and the historic reality that most parties lose seats in the first midterm after they’ve won the White House.

The dynamics are especially challenging for Democrats in Florida, one of the most politically divided states in the U.S. Its last three races for governor were decided by 1 percentage point or less. But the state has steadily become more favorable to Republicans in recent years.

For the first time in modern history, Florida has more registered Republicans — nearly 5.2 million — than Democrats, who have nearly 5 million registered voters. Fried serves as the only Democrat in statewide office. And Republicans have no primary competition for four of those five positions – governor, U.S. Senate, attorney general and chief financial officer — which are all held by GOP incumbents.

Democrats hope that U.S. Rep. Val Demings, who faces a little-known candidate in her Senate primary Tuesday, can unseat the state’s senior U.S. senator, Republican Marco Rubio, this fall. But for now, the party’s national leadership is prioritizing competitive Senate contests in other states, including neighboring Georgia, Arizona and Pennsylvania.

In Florida’s governor’s race, the Supreme Court’s abortion decision has animated the final weeks of the Democratic primary.

Fried has promoted herself as the only true abortion-rights supporter in the race, seizing on Crist’s appointment of two conservative Supreme Court justices while he was governor.

The conservative-leaning court will soon decide whether the Republican-backed state legislature’s law to ban abortions after 15 weeks is constitutional. Florida’s new abortion law is in effect, with exceptions if the procedure is necessary to save the pregnant woman’s life, to prevent serious injury or if the fetus has a fatal abnormality. It does not allow exemptions in cases of rape, incest or human trafficking.

Crist insisted he is “pro-choice” and highlighted a bill he vetoed as governor in 2010 that would have required women seeking a first-trimester abortion to get and pay for an ultrasound exam.

“It is a woman’s right to choose,” Crist told the AP. “My record is crystal clear. And for my opponent to try to muddy that up is unconscionable, unfair and unwise.”

DeSantis and Fried spent several hours together on Tuesday morning during a Cabinet meeting at the Tallahassee statehouse. They kept things cordial during the hourslong event, which placed Fried seats away from the governor as they heard reports from agency heads on state finances, contracting and other matters.

DeSantis shook Fried’s hand as the meeting concluded and told her “good luck” before criticizing her campaign and predicting her loss in brief remarks to reporters.

“I think that you know she had an opportunity as being the only Democrat elected statewide to exercise some leadership and maybe get some things done and instead she’s used her time to try and smear me on a daily basis, that’s all she does,” DeSantis said of Fried.

After the meeting, Fried told reporters she thought the governor had scheduled the meeting as a way to sideline her during her final day of campaigning.

“Of course it’s not a coincidence,” she said of the meeting’s timing. “I think that he is scared of me winning tonight so he’s doing everything in his power to keep me off the campaign trail today.”

___

Peoples reported from Washington, Farrington from Tallahassee. Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Tallahassee and Marc Levy in Pittsburgh contributed to this report.

___

Follow AP for full coverage of the midterms at https://apnews.com/hub/2022-midterm-elections and on Twitter at https://twitter.com/ap_politics.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/abortion-2022-midterm-elections-florida-primary-c7381cddbff112b8c65873b6a03250cd

  • Legal experts panned Trump’s lawyers as they continue grappling with fallout from the Mar-a-Lago raid.
  • One former prosecutor said they’re “either completely incompetent or out of their depth.”
  • Experts also mocked the Trump team’s latest lawsuit as a “crazy document” and a PR stunt.

Legal experts and former prosecutors are widely panning former President Donald Trump’s team of lawyers as they continue grappling with the fallout from the FBI’s unprecedented Mar-a-Lago raid.

“They appear to be either completely incompetent, or out of their depth,” Renato Mariotti, a longtime former federal prosecutor, told Insider. “That’s part of the reason why the former president has trouble finding lawyers: because he demands that they file documents and take positions that have no legal support whatsoever.”

This week’s mockery of Trump’s legal team comes after they filed a lawsuit Monday requesting the appointment of a special master to sift out potentially privileged materials seized in the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid earlier this month.

One attorney familiar with the Trump team’s thought process expressed skepticism that the former president’s lawyers are equipped to handle a case like this, adding that Trump’s main focus appears to be on waging a PR war against the Justice Department.

“He’s a big believer of the public relations assault, which I’ve never seen work,” the lawyer told Insider. “It says to me that they want to kill the messenger, which speaks to consciousness of guilt instead of dealing with the facts.”

They added: “I don’t see anybody with the experience it takes to represent a former president in a case like this. There’s a lot at stake here. He’s always playing it right up against the wind and he’s a high risk guy.”

Trump’s current legal team includes Christina Bobb, a former host on the right-wing One America News; Lindsey Halligan, a Florida insurance lawyer; Alina Habba, who was once the general counsel for a parking garage firm; and Evan Corcoran and James Trusty, both of whom are former federal prosecutors.

“He would be a very difficult client to manage,” Shanlon Wu, a former federal prosecutor, told Insider of Trump. “Seems like he doesn’t like to pay attention to what the lawyers are telling them to do, and no lawyer likes to be in that situation because you can’t really control the strategy of the case.”

Ty Cobb, who worked as White House special counsel during the Mueller probe, echoed that view.

“As time has gone by, he’s gotten farther and farther ahead of his lawyers, to the point where it’s hard to tell if they’re following his advice or if he’s following theirs,” Cobb told Insider.

Then there’s the reputational damage that attorneys could suffer after working for Trump.

Alan Dershowitz, the conservative lawyer who defended Trump in his second impeachment, told Insider in a previous interview that his speaking engagements were canceled following the trial.

Mariotti also alluded to that risk, telling Insider that “if you represent the former president, you may lose your other clients.” He added that some lawyers may also be reluctant to work for Trump because of concerns that “he would ask you or try to force you to do things that are unethical or highly problematic.”

Mar-a-Lago one day after the FBI raid.

Kimberly Leonard/Insider


‘A long ranting tweet dressed up as a legal filing’

Within minutes of Trump’s lawsuit being filed Monday evening, legal scholars began picking it apart.

“The more I read Trump’s motion, the more I am completely confused and shocked he got three lawyers to risk their law licenses by filing this thing,” the national security lawyer Bradley Moss tweeted.

For some former prosecutors, the lawsuit read more like a press release in which Trump aired claims — long anticipated in the event of heightened scrutiny from the Justice Department — that the search was politically-motivated. Twice in the filing, Trump’s lawyers referred to the former president as the “clear frontrunner” in the 2024 Republican primary “should he decide to run.”

Barb McQuade, a University of Michigan law professor and former US attorney in Detroit, characterized the lawsuit as “just a long ranting tweet dressed up as a legal filing.”

“Everyone’s entitled to counsel, but lawyers who sign their names to a brief must first remove frivolous arguments and unsupported claims,” McQuade said on Twitter. “This one has loads.”

Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel who later worked on the special counsel Robert Mueller’s team, told MSNBC that the lawsuit is a “crazy document” that “in so many ways is incriminating of the former president.”

The filing also “opens a wide door for DOJ to walk through,” Weissmann tweeted. “AG Garland can now ‘speak in its filings’ and address all the factual lies and misrepresentations.”

“At its core Trump’s court filing is Alice in Wonderland as a legal argument,” Ryan Goodman, a professor at the NYU School of Law and a founding editor of Just Security, tweeted. “It’s central demand is for a special master to filter out all the documents for which there is executive privilege. But those are the very kinds of documents that belong in the National Archives.”

David Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of Florida, told Insider that the lawsuit reads to him “like a preemptive, premature motion to suppress” and that the issues they touched on would normally be raised after formal charges are filed, which hasn’t happened in this case.

Weinstein added that a special master is generally appointed when there are specific and factually supported allegations of a possible privilege intrusion.

In this case, however, Weinstein said that Trump’s lawyers appeared to make “conclusory statements and submit their own set of facts that are not supported by an affidavit or other sworn statement.”

“Much of what they allege can easily be rebutted by the government, to the extent that they are willing to do at this time,” Weinstein said.

Trump’s team also argued in the lawsuit that the warrant the FBI obtained for the Mar-a-Lago search was overly broad and violated the Fourth Amendment because it authorized the seizure of “any government and/or Presidential Records created” during the Trump administration.

But Orin Kerr, a professor at the UC Berkeley School of Law, pointed out that “in cases involving searches for documents, it’s the norm for the government not to know the exact form of every document they’re looking for.”

Trump’s lawyers may need to lawyer up

Former prosecutors said Trump’s own attorneys may need to lawyer up in light of a recent New York Times story detailing how Trump retained boxes containing classified documents at Mar-a-Lago even after the Justice Department subpoenaed the materials. According to The Times, Trump “went through the boxes himself in late 2021” and turned over 15 boxes to the National Archives in January.

But the Justice Department later launched an investigation into Trump’s handling of national security information and determined that he likely had additional documents at Mar-a-Lago that needed to be recovered. They issued a grand jury subpoena for the records in May, and in June, a top counterintelligence official at the DOJ went to Mar-a-Lago to collect the boxes.

Corcoran then drafted a statement, which was signed by Bobb, saying that to the best of Bobb’s knowledge, all remaining classified material at Mar-a-Lago had been returned.

As it turned out, that wasn’t the case. The FBI recovered 26 boxes of records when it searched Trump’s Florida residence earlier this month, including 11 sets of material marked classified or top-secret.

It’s unclear if Bobb knew Trump was still in possession of scores of government records when she signed the June letter, and legal experts pointed out that she may need to hire her own lawyer in the wake of The Times story.

“Both of them have a problem at this point, because they’ll have to be interviewed about the documents that were still there,” Wu told Insider. “They’re in a very bad position.” 

“As Melissa Murray says, MAGA also means Making Attorneys Get Attorneys,” Weissmann quipped.

Corcoran and Bobb did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/legal-experts-mock-trump-lawyers-lawsuit-doj-mar-a-lago-2022-8

Abortion rights activists chant slogans as the Indiana Senate debates during a special session in Indianapolis before voting to ban abortions.

SOPA Images/LightRocket via Gett


hide caption

toggle caption

SOPA Images/LightRocket via Gett

Abortion rights activists chant slogans as the Indiana Senate debates during a special session in Indianapolis before voting to ban abortions.

SOPA Images/LightRocket via Gett

WASHINGTON, D.C. — This week marks two months since the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision reversed decades of precedent guaranteeing abortion rights, and the effects of the decision are continuing to unfold as abortion bans take effect around the country.

Well before the opinion was issued on June 24, more than a dozen states had so-called “trigger bans” in place – laws written to prohibit abortion as soon as Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that had legalized the procedure for nearly 50 years, was overturned.

Some took effect almost immediately; at least eight states have implemented total or near-total abortion bans, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Others were at least temporarily delayed by litigation, or by brief waiting periods written into the laws. This week, a new round of bans — in Tennessee, Texas, Idaho, and North Dakota – is set to take effect, barring intervention from the courts.

A cascade of “trigger bans” around the country

To a large degree, the impact of these laws already is a reality – even before they’re officially implemented – due to multiple layers of restrictions.

In Texas, where abortion has been prohibited after about six weeks of pregnancy since last September under a law that allowed private citizens to sue abortion providers, the shift was already well under way before the Dobbs decision. The state’s trigger ban – which prohibits the procedure almost entirely – takes effect this week. But already, there are no clinics providing abortions in Texas, and some have made plans to move out of state to places like New Mexico.

Idaho, too, has an abortion ban in place that relies on civil enforcement, where individuals can sue people accused of illegally providing abortions after about six weeks. The U.S. Department of Justice has sued in an effort to block another, even more restrictive law — Idaho’s trigger ban, which is set to take effect Aug. 25.

North Dakota’s only remaining clinic has – at least for now – moved its abortion services to Minnesota, where abortion remains legal. Lawyers for the clinic have asked a judge to block the law from taking effect on Friday.

In Tennessee, which already has very limited abortion access because of a ban on abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy, the law scheduled to take effect this week goes even farther, essentially banning all abortions, with no exceptions for rape or incest. The law also lacks explicit exceptions for medical emergencies, although it includes a provision that would allow doctors to mount a defense against felony abortion charges by arguing they intervened to save a pregnant woman’s life or avoid the “serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.”

Battles continue in state, federal courts

Abortion rights groups have been trying to argue that many state constitutions offer protections for abortion rights.

For groups opposed to abortion rights, like Alliance Defending Freedom, efforts are under way to push states to enforce abortion restrictions.

Erin Hawley, the group’s senior counsel, said she hopes to see courts in Wyoming, Arizona, and elsewhere allow abortion bans to take effect.

“I think we’ll see in a number of other states, that these laws will come online -– that intermediate courts of appeals and the state supreme courts will hopefully find that there is no state constitutional right to abortion,” Hawley said.

There are also federal court challenges. A federal judge is expected to take action this week in response to the Department of Justice suit, which challenges Idaho’s trigger ban under a federal labor law.

Post-Roe, state lawmakers consider new abortion laws

The Dobbs decision has prompted some Republican state officials to look at passing new laws. In early August, Indiana lawmakers approved a near-total abortion ban, which takes effect in mid-September.

Elisabeth Smith, state policy and advocacy director with the Center for Reproductive Rights, notes that some abortion rights opponents have proposed legislation designed to prevent people from seeking abortions in other states.

“I think it’s important to talk about the fact that we will also likely see novel criminal penalties for abortion providers and helpers, and some states trying to prevent people from crossing state lines,” Smith said.

That said, abortion rights advocates are encouraged by the results of a ballot initiative in Kansas earlier this month, in which voters strongly rejected a constitutional amendment that would have opened the door to allow state lawmakers to ban abortion. Smith notes that ballot questions related to abortion are slated to go before voters in several states — among them California, Vermont, Kentucky, and Michigan – in November.

Jennifer Driver is senior director of reproductive rights for the State Innovation Exchange, a group that works with lawmakers trying to increase abortion access, even in a post-Roe environment.

As new restrictions continue to take effect, Driver said more patients who have the means will rely on out-of-state travel or use abortion pills at home. She says doctors and other healthcare providers in many states will continue to face dilemmas when helping patients through medical crises.

“The chipping away at abortion rights didn’t happen overnight, and the fight to get them back won’t as well,” Driver said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/08/23/1118846811/two-months-after-the-dobbs-ruling-new-abortion-bans-are-taking-hold

A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump ordered him Tuesday to answer several key questions about his new lawsuit related to the FBI raid on his Florida home, including why her court should be the one hearing the case and to more precisely explain what he wants her to do.

Judge Aileen Cannon also ordered Trump to tell her how his suit affects another pending case involving the same search warrant before a federal magistrate judge in the same court, and whether the Department of Justice has been served with his lawsuit yet.

Cannon also wants to know if Trump is seeking any injunctions related to material seized in the raid until the lawsuit is resolved.

Cannon’s order came a day after Trump filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, asking her to appoint a so-called special master to review documents seized Aug. 8 in the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago resort residence in Palm Beach.

The judge, whom Trump appointed to that court in 2020, gave him and his lawyers until Friday to answer her questions.

Trump wants to block the DOJ from examining the seized documents until a special master looks at them. The step is typically taken when there is a chance that some evidence should be withheld from prosecutors because of various legal privileges.

The DOJ is conducting a criminal investigation related to the documents being removed from the White House when Trump left office in January 2021. By law, presidential records are required to be turned over to the National Archives.

A warrant authorizing the FBI’s search-and-seizure operation at Mar-a-Lago shows that the DOJ is probing potential violations of laws related to espionage and obstruction of justice. Multiple sets of documents marked top secret were seized in the raid.

Trump claims the raid was illegal and motivated by a desire to harm his chances of regaining the White House if he decides to run again.

Cannon in her order Tuesday wrote: “The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief.”

“To facilitate appropriate resolution, on or before August 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the Motion further elaborating on the following: (1) the asserted basis for the exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction, whether legal, equitable/anomalous, or both; (2) the framework applicable to the exercise of such jurisdiction;” Cannon wrote.

The judge also told Trump’s team to detail “the precise relief sought, including any request for injunctive relief pending resolution of the Motion; (4) the effect, if any, of the proceeding before Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart; and (5) the status of Plaintiff’s efforts to perfect service on Defendant.”

Reinhart signed the warrant authorizing the raid. He is considering requests by media outlets to unseal an affidavit that the DOJ filed, which laid out the need for the search and events leading up to it.

Earlier Tuesday, the National Archives posted online a letter that said classified material was found in boxes that Trump turned over to that agency in January.

The material, which spans 700 pages, includes ones related to top secret, sensitive compartmented information and special access programs, the National Archives letter said.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/23/judge-orders-trump-to-give-details-about-mar-a-lago-warrant-lawsuit.html