The Church of Scientology works hard to keep its inner workings out of the public eye.

It has hired private detectives to keep tabs on straying members, and experts say its lawyers vigorously defend against legal incursions, arguing to judges that Scientology’s beliefs are not courtroom fodder.

But at a hearing last week in the rape case against actor Danny Masterson, church officials were unable to stop their practices from being debated in open court.

Three women took the stand to recount violent sexual assaults allegedly committed by the celebrity Scientologist, and each told similar stories of how church officials tried to stop them from reporting Masterson to police.

One woman testified that a church official instructed her to write a statement showing she would “take responsibility” for a 2001 assault, in which she alleges Masterson raped her while she was unconscious.

Another woman who was born into Scientology and planned to report Masterson to police in 2004, a year after she said he raped her at his Hollywood mansion, recounted how a Scientology attorney showed up at her family’s home. The lawyer, according to the woman, warned that she would be expelled from the church if she went to authorities.

“We’re going to work out how you can not lose your daughter,” the attorney told the woman’s father, according to her testimony.

The focus on Scientology during the preliminary hearing, which stretched over four days and included lengthy discussions of internal church texts and doctrine, wasn’t lost on Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Charlaine Olmedo.

In ruling that there was sufficient evidence against Masterson to allow the case to proceed toward trial, Olmedo concluded Scientology has “an expressly written doctrine” that “not only discourages, but prohibits” its members from reporting one another to law enforcement. The policy explained why several of the women did not report Masterson’s alleged crimes to the police for more than a decade, the judge found.

It was a type of public dissection that is unusual for the insular, enigmatic institution. The church, which counts a number of high-profile actors among its parishioners and operates a “Celebrity Centre” in the heart of Hollywood, has long been accused of going to extraordinary lengths to keep criminal allegations and other claims of wrongdoing in-house, experts said.

“The activities of Scientology have been so much a part of the evidence that’s being put forth as to why these women were not immediately going to law enforcement … that it’s sort of brought the dirty laundry out into public view, which is exactly what Scientology does not want to have happen,” said Mike Rinder, the church’s former top spokesman, who left the faith in 2007.

In statements to The Times, the church denied it has a policy that dissuades members from reporting crimes, despite repeated references to Scientology texts during the hearing that appeared to include the directive. Karin Pouw, the church’s top spokeswoman, said Olmedo’s comments were “flat-out wrong” and dismissed the allegations against Masterson as “nothing more than a money shakedown” by women who are also engaged in a civil suit against him.

The women, Pouw claimed without evidence, are parroting comments made by Leah Remini, an actress who became an outspoken critic of Scientology after breaking with it in 2015. Rinder is a co-executive producer with Remini of a Netflix series about Scientology.

“Church policy explicitly demands Scientologists abide by all laws of the land, including the reporting of crimes. This is blatantly clear in the documents we understand were put before the Court — and many others,” Pouw wrote, repeatedly noting the church is not a party in the criminal case. “The Court either did not read them in full or ignored them. It should have done neither. Interpretation of Church doctrine by the courts is prohibited and the ruling is evidence of why.”

The case against Masterson, who starred in the 2000s sitcom “That 70’s Show,” is a relatively rare example of a Scientologist facing criminal charges based on accusations from other church members, Rinder said.

The church’s doctrine generally dismisses government institutions like courts as invalid and directs members to deal with complaints internally, Rinder said. Knowing that contacting law enforcement can lead to excommunication and being cut off from family and friends who remain in the church, members often remain silent, according to Rinder and testimony delivered in court last week.

The case against Masterson, Rinder added, is also unusual for the outsize role the inner workings and rules of Scientology played at the preliminary hearing — a likely preview of what is to come if the case goes to trial. For the most part, Rinder said, cases involving the church have played out in civil court, where lawyers for Scientology have largely been successful in convincing judges that its practices are irrelevant.

“Scientology had managed to persuade courts … that you can’t inquire into our religious practices and beliefs and have managed to dissuade much discussion about Scientology,” Rinder said.

In a 2019 trial, lawyers for Scientology failed to shield the church from court scrutiny when defense attorneys for a man accused of beating his sister-in-law and her husband to death in Prescott, Ariz., argued that his belief in the religion drove him to commit the crime, according to a report in the Arizona Republic. In that case, a jury found Kenneth Wayne Thompson carried out the slayings to protect his nephew from receiving psychiatric treatment, which his attorneys argued is barred by the church’s doctrines.

The stories shaping California

Get up to speed with our Essential California newsletter, sent six days a week.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

Jurors heard testimony about the church’s origins, and how members use a polygraph-like “E-meter” during a process meant to lead to spiritual clarity. Both prosecutors and church lawyers opposed the strategy to involve Scientology in the case, but a judge allowed it. Attempts to subpoena church records and call former Scientologists to testify, including Remini, were unsuccessful, however.

Testimony at Masterson’s preliminary hearing at times was as much an explanation of the church’s processes and cryptic vocabulary as an accounting of the actor’s alleged sexual abuse.

One woman testified that she wrote a letter to an “International Justice Chief,” whom she described as the church’s ultimate authority on disputes between Scientologists, seeking permission to sue Masterson and report him to police. References were made in court to “knowledge reports,” “Things That Shouldn’t Be reports,” and “O.W. write-ups.” A prosecutor repeatedly evoked books and letters written by L. Ron Hubbard, the former science fiction author who founded the church, as official Scientology doctrine.

When a woman explained during her testimony that “wog-law” is the church’s disdainful term for police and courts, Olmedo asked if Scientologists refer to non-members as “wogs,” much like wizards in the fictional universe of Harry Potter call non-magical people “muggles.”

“I suppose,” the woman responded. “It’s not a nice thing.”

The three women who have accused Masterson of rape were identified in court by their first names and initials of their last names. The Times generally does not name victims of alleged sexual assault unless they choose to fully identify themselves.

The leader of the Church of Scientology, David Miscavige, is looking to stop the publication of a new tell-all memoir written by his father Ron Miscavige.

Masterson’s attorney, Thomas Mesereau, initially tried to minimize Scientology’s place in the case, asking Olmedo to issue an order limiting mentions of the church or its practices in court. He argued the restrictions were needed because of “religious bias” that investigators from the Los Angeles Police Department and Masterson’s accusers harbored against Scientology.

Olmedo slapped down the request, saying she found it “interesting” that Mesereau argued Scientology should have little to do with the case, but also referred to the church “88 times in a 29-page brief.”

As the hearing wore on, Mesereau appeared to change tactics, introducing church documents as evidence in an attempt to undercut the credibility of Masterson’s accusers.

While cross-examining one woman, he read from an “O.W. write-up” and suggested the church document amounted to an admission by the woman that her encounter with Masterson had been consensual and driven by her promiscuity. She fired back that the document had been written by church officials, who took comments she’d made to a Scientology counselor out of context and repurposed them to defend Masterson.

Mesereau also brought out a copy of “Introduction to Scientology Ethics,” a 528-page tome authored by Hubbard, as he cross-examined another alleged victim.

Get our daily Entertainment newsletter

Get the day’s top stories on Hollywood, film, television, music, arts, culture and more.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

When it was his turn to question the woman, Deputy Dist. Atty. Reinhold Mueller took the book from Mesereau and had it admitted into the court record. He and the woman read aloud passages that she said she understood were official church doctrine that discourages Scientologists from reporting fellow parishioners to law enforcement.

As he finished his questioning, Mueller handed the book back to Mesereau and thanked him, saying it was “very helpful.”

One of the women who testified at the hearing said that when she reported the alleged rape to church officials, she was told to read the chapter of “Introduction to Scientology Ethics” that instructs members not to go to police in such cases. In a one-on-one meeting, a church “ethics officer” told her “not to use the ‘R-word’” and said it would be a “high crime” to report another Scientologist to law enforcement, the woman testified.

She also said she was required to complete an “ethics course” because she had done “something to … deserve what [Masterson] did to me.”

Rinder — whose parents were Scientologists and who described himself as part of Hubbard’s inner circle from the mid-1970s until the author’s death in 1986 — said that in recent years, the church’s responses to media inquiries had become “hermit-like.” The fact that the church issued a detailed defense of its practices to The Times is a sign the Masterson case has become a significant problem for the church, he said.

“The fact that it’s Danny Masterson from ‘That 70’s Show’ … it’s not just local media reporting on a local case, it blows it up way bigger. It becomes part of Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein,” he said, referring to the #MeToo movement, which has outed several celebrities as sexual predators. “That instantly puts it into a different zone. Within Scientology, this becomes panic stations, high alert.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-27/danny-masterson-rape-trial-secretive-scientology-polices

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told CNBC the GOP could make additional offers after Thursday’s proposal.

“We’re going to keep talking, and I understand the president is willing to keep talking,” he told “Squawk on the Street” on Thursday. “We’d like to get an outcome on a significant infrastructure package.”

To reach a deal, the sides would have to resolve not only a gap in the price tag but also differing visions of how to offset the spending. In their counteroffer, Republicans again rejected Biden’s call to raise corporate taxes, contending they could cover infrastructure costs with funds already allocated by Congress or with transportation user fees.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment on the senators’ offer. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said it wasn’t “a serious counteroffer.”

“First of all, they don’t have ‘pay-fors’ for this, it’s not real,” the progressive Democrat told MSNBC. “They have this illusory notion of how we’re going to take money that’s already been committed to other places and other spending.”

The GOP proposal does not include Biden administration priorities such as $400 billion for home health care, $100 billion for electric vehicle consumer rebates or spending to upgrade housing and schools.

Republicans and the White House have moved closer to agreement on an infrastructure plan but still need to resolve fundamental issues about the scope of a package and how to pay for it, a GOP senator leading the talks said Thursday. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito said the sides are “inching closer” in negotiations ahead of Memorial Day, the date by which the White House wanted to see progress in bipartisan negotiations.

“We’re still talking. I’m optimistic, we still have a big gap,” the West Virginia Republican told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “I think where we’re really falling short is we can’t seem to get the White House to agree on a definition or a scope of infrastructure that matches where we think it is, and that’s physical, core infrastructure.”

“The White House is still bringing their human infrastructure into this package and that’s just a nonstarter for us,” she continued, referring to Biden’s plans to put money into programs including care for elderly and disabled Americans.

It is unclear if the two parties can overcome broad ideological differences over what constitutes infrastructure, and how to pay for improvements to it, to strike a bipartisan deal. If negotiations do not show promise, Democrats will have to decide whether to try to pass an infrastructure bill on their own using special budget rules.

The process would bring its own headaches. Senate Democrats would have to keep all 50 members of their caucus on board and comply with strict rules about what can go into a budget reconciliation bill.

The GOP senators who crafted the offer to Biden mentioned that lawmakers could redirect unused coronavirus relief funds for state and local governments to infrastructure, or implement user fees on transportation like electric vehicles. Those Republican solutions could put Biden in a bind.

The president has promised not to raise taxes on anyone who makes less than $400,000 per year. User fees or an increase to the gas tax would put an extra burden on many Americans whose incomes falls under the threshold.

Republicans have said they do not want to raise taxes to cover the costs of improving transportation, broadband and water systems. Biden has called to hike the corporate tax rate from 21% — the level set by the GOP after it cut taxes in 2017 — to at least 25%.

“We can do this without touching … those tax cuts,” Capito told CNBC.

Capito said she sees the potential for bipartisan agreement on transportation spending. She noted that the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee — where she sits as ranking member — advanced a roughly $300 billion surface transportation bill that she thinks could guide a broader infrastructure deal.

In trimming his original $2.3 trillion plan, Biden cut out funding for research and development and supply-chain enhancements. He also reduced proposed spending on broadband, roads and bridges.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/27/biden-infrastructure-plan-capito-discusses-republican-counteroffer.html

An employee who gunned down nine people at a California rail yard and then killed himself as law enforcement rushed in had talked about killing people at work more than a decade ago, his ex-wife said.

“I never believed him, and it never happened. Until now,“ a tearful Cecilia Nelms told the Associated Press on Wednesday following the 6.30am attack at a light rail facility for the Valley Transportation Authority.

“When our deputies went through the door, initially he was still firing rounds. When our deputy saw him, he took his life,” the Santa Clara county sheriff, Laurie Smith, told reporters.

The sheriff’s office is nextdoor to the rail yard, which serves the county of more than 1 million people in the heart of Silicon Valley.

The attacker was identified as 57-year-old Samuel Cassidy, according to two law enforcement officials. Investigators offered no immediate word on a possible motive but his ex-wife said he used to come home from work resentful and angry over what he perceived as unfair assignments.

“He could dwell on things,“ she said. The two were married for about 10 years until a 2005 divorce filing and she hadn’t been in touch with Cassidy for about 13 years, Nelms said.

It was the 15th mass killing in the nation this year, all of them shootings that have claimed at least four lives each for a total of 86 deaths, according to a database compiled by the Associated Press, USA Today and Northeastern University.

At the White House, Joe Biden ordered flags to be flown at half-staff and urged Congress to act on legislation to curb gun violence.

“Every life that is taken by a bullet pierces the soul of our nation. We can, and we must, do more,” Biden said in a statement.

‘What is going on?’: California governor reacts after nine people killed in shooting – video

Governor Gavin Newsom visited the site and then spoke emotionally about the country’s latest mass killing.

“There’s a numbness some of us are feeling about this. There’s a sameness to this,” he said. “It begs the damn question of what the hell is going on in the United States of America?”

The shooting took place in two buildings and killed employees who had been bus and light rail operators, mechanics, linemen and an assistant superintendent over the course of their careers. One had worked for the agency since 1999.

The Santa Clara county office of the medical examiner-coroner identified the victims as Paul Delacruz Megia, 42; Taptejdeep Singh, 36; Adrian Balleza, 29; Jose Dejesus Hernandez, 35; Timothy Michael Romo, 49; Michael Joseph Rudometkin, 40; Abdolvahab Alaghmandan, 63, and Lars Kepler Lane, 63.

A ninth victim, Alex Ward Fritch, age 49, was transported to Santa Clara Valley medical center in critical condition and died on Wednesday evening, the coroner’s office said.

Singh had worked as a light rail train driver for eight or nine years and had a wife, two small children and many family members, said his cousin, Bagga Singh.

“We heard that he chose the people to shoot, but I don’t know why they chose him because he has nothing to do with him,” he said.

The shooter had more than one gun, county district attorney Jeff Rosen said. It was not immediately clear whether he had obtained the guns legally.

In court documents, an ex-girlfriend described Cassidy as volatile and violent, with major mood swings because of bipolar disorder that became worse when he drank heavily.

Several times while he was drunk, Cassidy forced himself on her sexually despite her refusals, pinning her arms with his body weight, the woman alleged in a 2009 sworn statement filed after Cassidy had sought a restraining order against her. The documents were obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle.

The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted.

Cassidy had worked for Valley Transportation Authority since at least 2012, according to the public payroll and pension database Transparent California, first as a mechanic from 2012 to 2014, then as someone who maintained substations.

Officials were also investigating a house fire that broke out shortly before the shooting, Davis said. Public records show Cassidy owned the two-story home where firefighters responded after being notified by a passerby. Law enforcement officers cordoned off the area near the home and went in and out on Wednesday.

Doug Suh, who lives across the street, told the Mercury News in San Jose that Cassidy seemed “strange” and that he never saw anyone visit.

“I’d say hello, and he’d just look at me without saying anything,” Suh said. Once, Cassidy yelled at him to stay away as he was backing up his car. “After that, I never talked to him again.”

Wednesday’s attack was the deadliest shooting in the San Francisco Bay Area since 1993, when a gunman attacked law offices in San Francisco’s Financial District, killing eight people before taking his own life.

It also was Santa Clara county’s second mass shooting in less than two years. A gunman killed three people and then himself at a popular garlic festival in Gilroy in July 2019.
___

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/27/san-jose-shooting-gunman-talked-about-killing-people

The budget contains no new major policies from the White House and instead reflects the plans the White house has already introduced, including a $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal, a $1.8 trillion education and families plan, and $1.5 trillion in proposed discretionary spending. It projects budget deficits above $1 trillion for the rest of the decade, which would keep Washington’s spending imbalance at elevated levels. Even without new additional spending proposals, the annual federal budget is projected to include $5.8 trillion in spending in the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, 2021.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/05/27/white-house-budget-plan/

  • Facebook says it will no longer remove posts that claim the coronavirus was “man-made.”
  • President Joe Biden has asked for a new report into the virus’ origins. 
  • The dominant theory is the virus passed from bats to humans through an intermediary animal.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Facebook will no longer remove posts claiming the coronavirus is “man-made,” it said Wednesday.

In February, the tech giant said it would take down “debunked” claims that humans created the virus that causes COVID-19, but it has reversed its policy amid renewed interest in the virus’ origins from scientists and politicians.

“In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made from our apps,” a Facebook representative told Insider in an emailed statement.

“We’re continuing to work with health experts to keep pace with the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge.”

President Joe Biden said Wednesday that he had asked the US intelligence community to “redouble their efforts” to find a definitive answer to the virus’ origins. He gave investigators 90 days to report back.

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that three scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — which studies coronaviruses in bats — went to the hospital in November 2019 with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 and other seasonal illnesses. The report cited a US intelligence report viewed by The Journal.

The first documented cases of COVID-19 were in Wuhan, a city in central China, in December 2019. So far, the dominant theory has been that the virus passed from bats to humans through an intermediary animal host. But some still question whether the virus escaped from the WIV in an accidental lab leak.

Claims that the COVID-19 virus is “man-made,” or was created deliberately as a bioweapon, are different from the lab-leak theory, but these claims will now be allowed to circulate on Facebook.

A World Health Organization report released in March said the lab-leak theory was “considered to be an extremely unlikely pathway” but could not be ruled out.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO director-general, said at the time that he did “not believe the assessment was extensive enough” and that the team behind the report faced difficulties in accessing valuable data from the WIV.

Many scientists still believe that a spillover from animals to humans is the most plausible explanation — three-quarters of emerging infectious diseases come from other species, and the COVID-19 virus shares a lot of its genetic code with other coronaviruses in the region.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-man-made-covid-19-virus-origin-wuhan-china-biden-2021-5

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/05/27/amy-cooper-who-called-911-black-birdwatcher-sues-franklin-templeton/7464086002/

President Biden’s choice to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) struggled under questioning from Republican senators at his confirmation hearing Wednesday, declining to identify which guns he would want banned as assault weapons.

“You have called for an assault weapons ban,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) told David Chipman during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. “I have a simple question for you: What is an assault weapon?”

“Senator,” Chipman answered, “an assault weapon would be, in the context of the question you asked, what Congress defines it as.”

“So you’re asking us to ban assault weapons,” Cotton answered. “We have to write legislation. Can you tell me, what is an assault weapon? How would you define it if you were the head of the ATF? How have you defined it over the last several years in your role as a gun control advocate?”

Citing firearm sale reports on the southwestern border, Chipman claimed the ATF defines an assault rifle as “any semi-automatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine above the caliber of .22, which would include a .223, which is, you know largely the AR-15 round.”

“So you believe that every weapon that takes a detachable magazine, that can take a .22 round — or 5.56 in military parlance — should be defined as an assault weapon?” asked a visibly incredulous Cotton.

As Chipman stumbled over his response, Cotton attempted to confirm his earlier answer.

“A detachable magazine that takes a .556 or .22 round should be defined as an assault weapon?” the Republican asked.

“Senator, you asked me if ATF had used this term, and I was sharing with you my knowledge of a program in which ATF has defined this term,” Chipman responded.

“I’m amazed that might be the definition of assault weapon,” Cotton said. “That would basically cover every single modern sporting rifle in America today.”

There is no legal definition of the terms “assault weapon” or “assault rifle.” The National Rifle Association (NRA) uses the military definition of assault rifle, describing it as “a selective-fire rifle chambered for a cartridge of intermediate power.

“If applied to any semi-automatic firearm regardless of its cosmetic similarity to a true assault rifle, the term is incorrect,” the definition on the NRA website continues.

Chipman, a former ATF special agent and senior policy adviser for the gun control organization Giffords, was less ambiguous about the AR-15. He told Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) that “I support a ban” on the rifle, which he was issued as a member of an ATF SWAT team.

“It’s a particularly lethal weapon, and regulating it as other particularly lethal weapons, I have advocated for,” said Chipman, who added, “as ATF director, if I’m confirmed, I would simply enforce the laws in the books and right now, there is no such ban on those guns.”

Sen. Tom Cotton grilled ATF nominee David Chipman on the specific definition of assault rifles.
Pool/Getty Images

Chipman also walked back incorrect claims he made during a Reddit Q&A that members of the Branch Davidians sect members shot down two government helicopters during the FBI and ATF siege of their compound at Waco, Texas, in the spring of 1993.

“I could have done a better job by describing them as being ‘forced down’ because of the gunfire as opposed to shot down, which might have left the impression that they were blown out of the sky, which they were not,” Chipman said. “And I regret that confusion I added.”

Cotton also pressed Chipman on whether he would have the ATF investigate reports that first son Hunter Biden violated federal law by lying about his history of drug use in order to purchase a firearm in 2018.

“Hunter Biden has … published a book and gone on a nationwide book tour conducting numerous interviews stating that he was, in fact, very much addicted to drugs at the same time that he purchased this firearm,” Cotton said.

“This would mean that by his own admission Hunter Biden lied on that form, and by your earlier testimony, committed a serious felony. Should Hunter Biden be prosecuted for breaking this law? … Can I get your commitment that if you are confirmed you will, in fact, look into this matter and refer it for prosecution if you find that Hunter Biden violated the law?”

“I will ensure that all violations of law are investigated and referred to,” said Chipman, who went on to say, “I’m not sure that it has not been investigated.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/05/26/biden-atf-pick-david-chipman-botches-assault-rifle-definition-at-hearing/

Extra tax refund money for some who lost jobs in 2020 isn’t arriving soon enough for some taxpayers.

Many taxpayers who filed early could be owed a few thousand dollars now because the tax rules relating to a portion of 2020 jobless benefits changed dramatically when President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan into law March 11. 

It’s quite a lucrative new, limited tax beak designed specifically to help those who lost jobs in the coronavirus-induced recession last year. 

The Internal Revenue Service said May 14 that it was beginning to correct those tax returns that involved the new exclusion. The IRS also said then that it would begin issuing some refunds that week to eligible taxpayers.

The IRS has not stated how much refund money has been issued yet. 

Who might see an extra check 

The group who could be owed more money involves those who filed their 2020 tax returns in February and early March and paid income taxes on all their unemployment benefits received in 2020.

The IRS began accepting 2020 tax returns Feb. 12 — a month before the change — and has estimated that more than 10 million taxpayers in this group filed returns before the law was changed. 

Source Article from https://www.freep.com/story/money/personal-finance/susan-tompor/2021/05/27/extra-tax-refund-money-jobless-isnt-arriving-soon-enough-some/7447074002/

(CNN)The nine victims of a mass shooting in San Jose on Wednesday have been identified as investigators begin the process of figuring out why such a fierce burst of violence happened during the early morning hours at a light rail yard.

Eight of the victims, who ranged from ages 29 to 63, were identified Wednesday by the Santa Clara County office of the Medical Examiner-Coroner as Paul Delacruz Megia, 42; Taptejdeep Singh, 36; Adrian Balleza, 29; Jose Dejesus Hernandez III, 35; Timothy Michael Romo, 49; Michael Joseph Rudometkin, 40; Abdolvahab Alaghmandan, 63; and Lars Kepler Lane, 63.

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/27/us/san-jose-shooting-thursday/index.html

    Republican senators grilled Dr. Anthony Fauci about grant funding provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of COVID-19 during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing Wednesday — as pressure mounts for him to be fired over his shifting positions on the issues.

    Fauci has come under fire from leading Republicans, who have blasted the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for his litany of shifting stances on how to combat the coronavirus, its origin and an investigation into the Wuhan Institute of Virology — with some calling for his resignation. 

    During Wednesday’s hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) raised questions about whether the funding provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology was used for its intended purposes and not for “gain of function” research, which Fauci has previously described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

    Fauci confirmed that $600,000 in grant funding to be used over the course of five years was provided to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, adding that he believes the funding was properly used, but can’t 100 percent confirm it was utilized for its intended purpose. 

    Dr. Anthony Fauci does not believe the funding was misused.
    Stefani Reynolds/Pool/REUTERS

    “You have no way of knowing whether they did or not, except you trust them. Is that right?” Kennedy asked, pressing on whether he could guarantee that the grantee has not lied to him.

    Fauci asserted that he believes the funding was not misused after reviewing the research produced by the scientists abroad, but “cannot guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us because you never know.” 

    “They’re very competent, trustworthy scientists, I’m not talking about anything else in China, I’m talking about the scientists that you would expect that they would abide by the conditions of the grant, which they’ve done for the years that we’ve had interactions,” he said. 

    A security official moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology after a World Health Organization team arrived for a field visit on Feb. 3, 2021.
    Ng Han Guan/AP

    Kennedy went on to raise concerns about the Chinese Communist Party’s level of influence over the World Health Organization, to which Fauci responded that he has confidence in the WHO’s independence.

    “My interaction with the WHO and for Dr. Tedros, the director general, has been one thing that I do believe he’s a person of a high degree of integrity,” he said. 

    Republicans have also been highly critical of Fauci following his recent remarks that it is possible COVID-19 could have originated out of a lab, after GOP lawmakers came under fire last year for repeatedly raising the possibility. 

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) questioned the timeline in which it would be determined the virus came from a lab if an intermediate host is not found, and who should be leading that investigation. 

    Fauci said it’s hard to provide a timeline since they still have not found the intermediate host for Ebola, which they are confident did not originate from a lab, adding that he would like the WHO to continue its probe. 

    Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC, rear) and John Kennedy (R-La.) questioned Fauci about the grant funding to the Wuhan lab.
    Stefani Reynolds/Pool/AP

    “[T]he WHO did what they’re referring to now as phase one of an investigation, which they felt was not completely adequate. As you know, you’ve heard me and Dr. Collins and others in the administration calling for a continuation of the investigation,” Fauci said, referring to Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health. 

    And Sen Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) raised concerns about China’s “history of lab accident,” adding that the “outbreak happened in a city that happened to be the home, coincidentally, of a lab which we know is involved in extensive research and what they do is they take this naturally occurring virus, and they manipulate it, and they change it to make it infectious to humans.”

    The Florida Republican questioned why Fauci previously tamped down speculation that the virus could have been artificially manufactured. 

    “I have always said that the high likelihood is that this is a natural occurrence. I didn’t dismiss anything, I just said it’s a high likelihood that this is a natural occurrence, from the environment of an animal reservoir that we have not yet identified,” Fauci said. 

    Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) asked Fauci why he had tamped down speculation that the virus could have been artificially manufactured.
    Stefani Reynolds/Pool/REUTERS

    “Well, I still maintain that, but as I just mentioned to the response to other questions that since you don’t know 100 percent about that because no one knows, including me, 100 percent what the origin is, is the reason why we’re in favor of further investigation.”

    In May 2020, Fauci said “the scientific evidence is very, very strongly leaning toward” the virus having evolved in nature, adding that he did not believe it came from a lab.

    “If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated,” Fauci told National Geographic in an interview at the time.

    He added that he didn’t believe “an alternate theory — that someone found the coronavirus in the wild, brought it to a lab, and then it accidentally escaped.”

    “Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species,” the doctor said at the time.

    Graham said that if it is found that the deadly virus did originate in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, he feels it is critical there be significant consequences. 

    “I think we should send a clear signal to China, it seems to be a source of a lot of pandemics, that if this did occur in the lab, expect something to happen, because if we don’t, we’re just going to reinforce this in the future,” he said. “And what that something is I’m open-minded to, but I’m closed-minded to the idea of doing nothing.”

    Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/05/26/gop-senators-grill-fauci-on-wuhan-lab-funding-origins-of-covid/

    “As the climate warms, we’ll get more months above 1.5C, then a sequence of them, then a whole year on average above 1.5 and then two or three years and then virtually every year,” Prof Hawkins said.

    Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57261670

    Amy Cooper, the white woman who called 911 over an encounter with a Black man while walking her dog in Central Park last year, has sued her former employer for alleged racial and gender discrimination.

    The footage of the incident went viral on social media and sparked outrage. The following day, Amy Cooper was fired from her job at the Franklin Templeton investment firm. In a statement, the company said it terminated Amy Cooper immediately following an “internal review” of the incident and that “we do not tolerate racism of any kind.”

    The lawsuit alleged that Amy Cooper was “characterized as a privileged white female ‘Karen'” due to the company’s public statements and alleges that the company did not perform an investigation into the incident, as publicly stated, and did not speak with Christian Cooper or obtain the full 911 calls.

    “Even a perfunctory investigation would have shown that Plaintiff did not shout at Christian Cooper or call the police from Central Park on May 25, 2020 because she was a racist — she did these things because she was alone in the park and frightened to death after being selected as the next target of Christian Cooper, an overzealous birdwatcher engaged in Central Park’s ongoing feud between birdwatchers and dog owners,” the complaint stated.

    The dispute occurred after Christian Cooper asked Amy Cooper to leash her dog, which was off-leash in a part of the park known as the Ramble where that is not allowed.

    The lawsuit alleges that Franklin Templeton “perpetuated and legitimized the story of ‘Karen’ vs. an innocent African American to its perceived advantage, with reckless disregard for the destruction of Plaintiff’s life in the process” and charges that the company would not have fired her if she were a different race and gender.

    It also claims the company’s actions caused Amy Cooper to suffer “severe emotional distress” and that she was suicidal.

    The lawsuit is seeking damages for loss of wages, bonus and unvested funds as well as emotional distress damages for alleged racial and gender discrimination, defamation and negligence, among other counts, in an amount to be determined at trial.

    Franklin Templeton defended its actions in a statement to ABC News.

    “We believe the circumstances of the situation speak for themselves and that the Company responded appropriately,” a spokesperson said. “We will defend against these baseless claims.”

    A day after the confrontation, Amy Cooper issued a public apology in an interview with CNN.

    “It was unacceptable, and I humbly and fully apologize to everyone who’s seen that video, everyone that’s been offended … everyone who thinks of me in a lower light. And I understand why they do,” she said.

    “I’m not a racist. I did not mean to harm that man in any way,” she added. “I think I was just scared. When you’re alone in the Ramble, you don’t know what’s happening. It’s not excusable, it’s not defensible.”

    Christian Cooper accepted her apology in an interview with “The View” but said the incident was part of a much deeper problem of racism in the United States that must be addressed.

    In July, Amy Cooper was charged with falsely reporting an incident in the third degree. The charge was ultimately dismissed earlier this year after she completed a counseling program intended to educate her on the harm of her actions.

    Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/amy-cooper-sues-employer-racial-discrimination-viral-central/story?id=77923805

    If Mr. Biden’s plans were enacted, the government would spend what amounts to nearly a quarter of the nation’s total economic output every year over the course of the next decade. It would collect tax revenues equal to just under one fifth of the total economy.

    In each year of Mr. Biden’s budget, the government would spend more as a share of the economy than all but two years since World War II: 2020 and 2021, which were marked by trillions of dollars in federal spending to help people and businesses endure the pandemic-induced recession. By 2028, when Mr. Biden could be finishing a second term in office, the government would be collecting more tax revenue as a share of the economy than almost any point in modern statistical history; the only other comparable period was the end of President Bill Clinton’s second term, when the economy was roaring and the budget was in surplus.

    The documents also show the conservative approach Mr. Biden’s economic team is taking with regard to projecting the economy’s growth, as compared to his predecessor’s. Mr. Biden’s aides predict that even if his full agenda were enacted, the economy would grow at just under 2 percent per year for most of the decade, after accounting for inflation. That rate is similar to the historically sluggish pace of growth that the nation has averaged over the past 20 years. Unemployment would fall to 4.1 percent by next year — from 6.1 percent today — and remain below 4 percent in the years thereafter.

    Former President Donald J. Trump consistently submitted budget proposals that predicted his policies would push the economy to a sustained annual rate of nearly 3 percent for a full decade. In his four years in office, annual growth only reached that rate once. The final budget submitted by President Barack Obama, when Mr. Biden was vice president, predicted annual growth of about 2.3 percent on average over the span of a decade.

    The Biden forecasts continue to show his administration has little fear of rapid inflation breaking out across the economy, despite recent data showing a quick jump in prices as the economy reopens after a year of suppressed activity amid the pandemic. Under the Biden team’s projections, consumer prices never rise faster than 2.3 percent per year, and the Federal Reserve only gradually raises interest rates from their current rock-bottom levels in the coming years.

    Mr. Biden has pitched the idea that now is the time, with interest rates low and the nation still rebuilding from recession, to make large up-front investments that will be paid for over a longer time horizon. His budget shows net real interest costs for the federal government remaining below historical averages for the course of the decade. Interest rates are controlled by the Federal Reserve, which is independent of the White House.

    Even if interest rates stay low, payments on the national debt would consume an increased share of the federal budget. Net interest payments would double, as a share of the economy, from 2022 to 2031.

    A spokesman for the White House budget office declined to comment on Thursday.

    Administration officials are set to detail the full budget, which will span hundreds of pages, on Friday in Washington. On Thursday, Mr. Biden is scheduled to deliver an address on the economy in Cleveland.

    Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/business/biden-budget-federal-deficit.html

    More than half of Americans support the move of some states to end a $300 weekly supplement to unemployment benefits months before it officially expires, according to a Quinnipiac University poll issued Wednesday.

    At least 23 states have announced an early end to federal unemployment programs in recent weeks. Self-employed workers and the long-term unemployed will lose benefits entirely in most states.

    More from Personal Finance:
    New round of $1,400 stimulus checks brings total sent to about $391 billion
    Older Americans not delaying their retirement despite Covid-19
    Monthly child tax credit may arrive as states end $300 unemployment boost

    Fifty-four percent of Americans think the state governors are doing the right thing by ending the benefits ahead of schedule; 38% think they’re doing the wrong thing, according to the Quinnipiac poll.

    The states, all led by Republican governors, cite labor shortages as the motivating factor for the cuts, which start as early as June 12. (The American Rescue Plan offers them until Sept. 6.) State officials argue enhanced benefits offer an incentive for people to stay out of work.

    Many economists think the payments are not the primary contributor to hiring challenges. They say health risks are the main reason for a smaller labor pool, in addition to other pandemic-era factors such as child-care challenges and early retirements.

    Approval for the benefit cuts breaks starkly along partisan lines — 89% of Republicans think the states are doing the right thing, while that’s true for just 32% of Democrats, according to the Quinnipiac poll. It’s true for 54% of independents.

    Results also differ by sex and income, with men and wealthier Americans more likely to agree with the governors’ decision. Further, just 36% of Blacks and 46% of Hispanics think it’s the right thing, compared with 62% of whites, according to the poll.

    Minorities, low earners and women have been disproportionately impacted by job loss during the pandemic.

    Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/26/54percent-of-americans-support-state-cuts-to-300-unemployment-quinnipiac.html

    (CNN)The nine victims of a mass shooting in San Jose on Wednesday have been identified as investigators begin the process of figuring out why such a fierce burst of violence happened during the early morning hours at a light rail yard.

    Eight of the victims, who ranged from ages 29 to 63, were identified Wednesday by the Santa Clara County office of the Medical Examiner-Coroner as Paul Delacruz Megia, 42; Taptejdeep Singh, 36; Adrian Balleza, 29; Jose Dejesus Hernandez III, 35; Timothy Michael Romo, 49; Michael Joseph Rudometkin, 40; Abdolvahab Alaghmandan, 63; and Lars Kepler Lane, 63.

      Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/27/us/san-jose-shooting-thursday/index.html

      The intelligence on the three workers came from outside the United States intelligence agencies’ own collection, which means its veracity is more difficult to authenticate. The source of the information was unclear, but several American officials said they believed the report that the three researchers got sick.

      American intelligence officials do not know whether the lab workers contracted Covid-19 or some other disease, like a bad flu. If they did have the coronavirus, the intelligence may suggest that they could have become sick from the lab, but it also could simply mean that the virus was circulating in Wuhan earlier than the Chinese government has acknowledged.

      Also toward the end of Mr. Trump’s term, State Department officials began examining the origins of the virus and concluded that it was highly unlikely to have appeared naturally and thus was likely the product of laboratory work.

      CNN first reported the effort and suggested that the group’s efforts had been shut down by the Biden administration, prompting scathing Republican criticism. A State Department spokesman, Ned Price, denied that, saying that the team’s findings were briefed to senior officials in the department’s arms control bureau in February and March.

      “With the report delivered, the work was ended,” Mr. Price said.

      Mr. Trump issued a statement on Tuesday boasting of his early insistence that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus. “To me, it was obvious from the beginning,” he said. “But I was badly criticized, as usual.”

      Despite the absence of new evidence, a number of scientists have lately begun speaking out about the need to remain open to the possibility that the virus had accidentally emerged from a lab, perhaps after it was collected in nature, a lab origin distinct from a creation by scientists.

      “It is most likely that this is a virus that arose naturally, but we cannot exclude the possibility of some kind of a lab accident,” Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, told senators on Wednesday.

      Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/politics/biden-coronavirus-origins.html

      President Joe Biden on Wednesday urged Congress to “take immediate action” on gun legislation in the wake of a shooting in San Jose, California, that killed eight people earlier in the day, noting that he was ordering the flag lowered to half-staff just weeks after other mass shootings around the country.

      “Enough,” Biden said in a statement. “Once again, I urge Congress to take immediate action and heed the call of the American people, including the vast majority of gun owners, to help end this epidemic of gun violence in America.”

      A gunman killed eight people when he opened fire at public transit rail yard. The investigation is ongoing and officials have not released a possible motive. The shooter, an employee of the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), is also dead.

      Biden described the shooting as a “horrific tragedy” and said he and Vice President Kamala Harris had been briefed on the situation.

      “We are still awaiting many of the details of this latest mass shooting, but there are some things we know for sure. There are at least eight families who will never be whole again. There are children, parents, and spouses who are waiting to hear whether someone they love is ever going to come home. There are union brothers and sisters – good, honest, hardworking people – who are mourning their own,” Biden said.

      The President added: “Every life that is taken by a bullet pierces the soul of our nation. We can, and we must, do more.”

      Biden’s ordering of the flag to be lowered follows recent mass shootings in and around Atlanta, Indianapolis, Boulder, Colorado, and Rock Hill, South Carolina.

      The United States flag will be flown at half-staff at the White House and on all public buildings and grounds throughout the nation until sunset on Sunday, according to a proclamation signed by the President.

      “God bless all those whose lives were lost today, and all those who loved them,” Biden said.

      The President was briefed on the shooting by his Homeland Security adviser, Liz Sherwood-Randall, according to a White House official. The official said the White House is monitoring the situation and is in close contact with local officials.

      Earlier Wednesday, Harris described the shooting as “absolutely tragic.”

      “I have family that lives in San Jose. I’ve worked for many, many years with the mayor of San Jose and that police department, and my prayers and my thoughts are with all those families that have been affected,” Harris said.

      Last month, Biden unveiled several executive actions his administration would be taking on guns, including efforts to tighten restrictions on so-called ghost guns that can be built using parts and instructions purchased online. The actions were limited in scope and Biden said they are only initial steps to address gun violence.

      The President, who has called gun violence in America a “national embarrassment,” has called for the Senate to pass legislation strengthening background checks that already passed the House and to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

      Wednesday’s shooting in San Jose is the latest in a series of high-profile mass shootings that have rocked the nation, including one at an Indianapolis FedEx facility that killed eight people, one at a supermarket in Boulder, Colorado, that killed 10 people and a shooting rampage in the Atlanta area that killed eight people. The spate of mass shootings has led to increased calls for gun control measures, but gun legislation passing the Senate –where Democrats have a narrow majority – remains an uphill battle.

      CNN’s DJ Judd and Jason Hoffman contributed to this report.

      Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/26/politics/biden-san-jose-shooting/index.html

      A laboratory building at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, is seen on May 13, 2020.

      Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images


      hide caption

      toggle caption

      Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images

      A laboratory building at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, is seen on May 13, 2020.

      Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images

      President Biden said on Wednesday that he has asked the U.S. intelligence community to push to get closer to a “definitive conclusion” on how the pandemic started.

      In a statement, Biden said the intelligence community has “coalesced around two likely scenarios” — that the coronavirus either came from human contact with an infected animal, or from a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China.

      He said most intelligence entities don’t believe there’s sufficient information to reach a conclusion about the virus’ origins, and the three intel entities that lean toward one explanation or another only have “low or moderate confidence” in their conclusions.

      “As of today, the U.S. Intelligence Community has ‘coalesced around two likely scenarios’ but has not reached a definitive conclusion on this question,” Biden said in the statement. He added: “I have now asked the Intelligence Community to redouble their efforts to collect and analyze information that could bring us closer to a definitive conclusion, and to report back to me in 90 days.”

      He said he wants intel officials to identify “areas of further inquiry,” including from China, and the United States would continue to push China to provide access to data.

      “Back in early 2020, when COVID-19 emerged, I called for the CDC to get access to China to learn about the virus so we could fight it more effectively,” he said. “The failure to get our inspectors on the ground in those early months will always hamper any investigation into the origin of COVID-19.”

      “Lab leak” theory

      The first known cases of the novel coronavirus came from Wuhan, where there is a lab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, that works with bat coronaviruses.

      The notion that the virus had “escaped” from the lab — that there had been some sort of accident and then someone got sick — emerged in the early days of the pandemic, but was largely dismissed as highly unlikely by most scientists.

      Some researchers and far-right commentators latched onto the idea, however, and the theory spread, especially in conservative news circles and among Republicans.

      Former President Donald Trump, long a purveyor of right-wing conspiracies, also bought into the idea that the coronavirus had come from a lab accident and spent much of the remaining months of his administration criticizing China for allowing it to spread, occasionally employing racist language to describe the virus.

      Recent reporting from the Wall Street Journal, which cited a U.S. intelligence report that said three Wuhan Institute researchers became sick enough in November 2019 to seek hospital care, has refocused attention on the lab leak theory.

      “Now everybody is agreeing that I was right when I very early on called Wuhan as the source of COVID-19,” Trump said in a statement Tuesday.

      Most scientists continue to think the virus is more likely to be natural in origin.

      “I feel the likelihood is still high that this is a natural occurrence,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, Biden’s chief medical adviser, told Congress Wednesday, “but since we cannot know 100% whether it is or is not, other possibilities exist and for that reason, I and my colleagues have been saying that we’re very much in favor of a further investigation.”

      In a statement Wednesday, a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in the U.S. wrote the lab leak theory off as nothing more than a smear campaign.

      “Lately, some people have played the old trick of political hype on the origin tracing of COVID-19 in the world. Smear campaign and blame shifting are making a comeback, and the conspiracy theory of ‘lab leak’ is resurfacing,” the person said.

      “Since the outbreak of COVID-19 last year, some political forces have been fixated on political manipulation and blame game, while ignoring their people’s urgent need to fight the pandemic and the international demand for cooperation on this front, which has caused a tragic loss of many lives.”

      In March, following an investigation on the ground in China, the World Health Organization released a joint report with Beijing on the origins of the pandemic that concluded that the lab leak hypothesis was “extremely unlikely.”

      But WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus responded that he didn’t believe the team’s assessment of the lab leak possibility was extensive enough.

      Biden wants to “press” China

      Biden in his Wednesday statement said the U.S. would continue to work to ascertain the origins of the pandemic.

      He added: “The United States will also keep working with like-minded partners around the world to press China to participate in a full, transparent, evidence-based international investigation and to provide access to all relevant data and evidence.”

      Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chair of the House Intelligence Committee, said the panel continues to review the United States’ findings in relation to the origins of the virus and sharply criticized China for its “obstruction” of the investigation.

      “Beijing’s continued obstruction of a transparent, comprehensive examination of the relevant facts and data about the source of the coronavirus can only delay the vital work necessary to help the world better prepare itself before the next potential pandemic,” Schiff said in a statement. “Nonetheless, I am confident that the [intelligence community] and other elements of our government will continue to pursue all possible leads and provide an updated, evidence-based finding in line with the President’s 90-day requirement. It is critical that we allow the [intelligence community], and other scientific and medical experts, to objectively weigh and assess all available facts, and to avoid any premature or politically-motivated conclusions.”

      NPR’s Geoff Brumfiel contributed reporting.

      Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/26/1000642995/biden-asks-u-s-intel-to-push-for-stronger-conclusions-on-the-coronavirus-origins