Whether by default or by design, Liz Cheney has become the leader of the Republican resistance.

This may not be a cutting-edge issue outside the Beltway hothouse, but it’s become a proxy war for the party’s future.

Donald Trump has decided that the Wyoming congresswoman is the personification of what ails the GOP—most notably, her all-out opposition to Trump and Trumpism.

And, for good measure, they’re now calling each other liars.

These are two people who were never going to be backslapping buddies. Trump ran against Hillary Clinton in 2016, but he also ran against George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, especially on Iraq and endless wars. So he was always going to view Liz, who held top State Department posts in her father’s administration, as too much of a foreign policy hard-liner.

Liz Cheney didn’t run against Trump when she was elected to the House in 2016, after a disastrous earlier Senate bid. But she became an outspoken critic after the riot at the Capitol, and was one of 10 House Republicans to vote to impeach the president—all the more remarkable because she is the third-ranking member of the GOP leadership.

Whether she hangs onto that post is the melodrama of the moment, giving political reporters between elections a contest to obsess over. And her new role has scrambled the usual media alliances.

The deepening divide has hurt Cheney back home, where she faces a primary next year against two state lawmakers who are trying to appeal to the Trump base. And from Mar-a-Lago, the former president has slammed anyone he views as disloyal, such as calling for Mitch McConnell to be replaced as Senate Republican leader. But while McConnell mainly ignores him and Kevin McCarthy openly courts him, Cheney is punching back.

At the heart of this internecine warfare is how the country will view the tragedy that unfolded on Jan. 6.

BUZZKILL: WHY WE’RE NOT BEATING, AND MAY NEVER FULLY CONQUER, THIS VIRUS

In interviews and statements, Trump continues to say he was cheated out of a second term, despite the failure of his own Justice Department and dozens of lawsuits to prove any widespread fraud. The other side, mostly among Democrats and the media, have branded this the Big Lie.

In the latest round, the 45th president attempted to appropriate that term, emailing reporters that the last election “will be, from this day forth, known as THE BIG LIE!”  

That prompted this tweet from Cheney: “The 2020 presidential election was not stolen. Anyone who claims it was is spreading THE BIG LIE, turning their back on the rule of law, and poisoning our democratic system.”

Not surprisingly, Trump issued another statement hours later, calling her a “big-shot warmonger” and, for good measure, insisting that Wyoming residents “never liked her much.”

CNN reports that Cheney remained adamant at a private American Enterprise Institute conference on Monday, saying the party can’t swallow the “poison” of arguing the election was rigged.

“We can’t whitewash what happened on January 6 or perpetuate Trump’s big lie. It is a threat to democracy. What he did on January 6 is a line that cannot be crossed.”

On “Fox & Friends” yesterday, McCarthy said the angst over Cheney wasn’t about her impeachment vote: “I have heard from members concerned about her ability to carry out the job as conference chair, to carry out the message,” so “we can all work together instead of attacking one another.” That, of course, was a pretty clear message.

In a secret ballot in February, House Republicans voted to keep Cheney in her No. 3 post by a vote of 145 to 61. That showed she had more rank-and-file support than the public battle would have suggested.

But the animosity level has risen, and if a majority of the caucus is taking Trump’s side, they have the right to say she’s the wrong fit for the leadership.

All this has made Cheney an unlikely heroine for the media, most of whose members side with anyone who opposes Trump.

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF OF THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

On CNN, Jake Tapper said such Republican leaders as McCarthy and Steve Scalise are “willing to lie” about the election and other matters.

“Think of it,” tweeted L.A. Times columnist Mark Barabak. Cheney “is at risk of losing her leadership for telling the truth. And insisting on doing so. You can dress it up anyhow you’d like. But that’s the bottom line.”

For those who covered her father in the Bush administration, it’s a head-snapping moment to watch the media line up behind a Cheney.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/liz-cheney-becomes-lightning-rod-battling-trump-over-whos-lying-about-2020

Bill and Melinda Gates have hired big-name lawyers to represent them in their divorce proceedings, two of which helped negotiate the split of Jeff Bezos and Mackenzie Scott, according to reports. 

Bill Gates, co-founder and former CEO of Microsoft, and his wife, Melinda French Gates, announced their split via Twitter on Monday after 27 years of marriage. 

“We no longer believe we can grow together as a couple in this next phase of our lives,” Bill and Melinda Gates wrote in a joint statement. The two said they would continue to work together at their nonprofit Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 

Bill Gates is the world’s fourth-richest person, according to Forbes. Data company Wealth-X estimated his net worth to be at least $134.1 billion

A petition for divorce, filed Monday by Melinda Gates at King County superior court in Seattle, Washington, obtained by TMZ, said their marriage was “irretrievably broken.” 

It also showed that they didn’t sign a prenuptial agreement, which is a contract signed before getting married to specify the division of assets should the marriage fail. Instead, the divorce papers showed the Gateses had signed a separation agreement to divide their assets.

In addition, the papers showed they had each assembled a team of high profile lawyers to handle their divorce. 

One of the lawyers listed as representing Melinda Gates is Bellevue-based attorney Sherri Anderson. She also reportedly represented Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos in his split from MacKenzie Scott in 2019, which was the world’s most expensive divorce

Meanwhile, the attorney who was said to have represented Scott in the divorce, Ted Billbe, is listed as one of the lawyers on Bill Gates’ legal team. 

Ronald Olson of the firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, who is a director at Warren Buffett’s investment group Berkshire Hathaway, is also on Gates’ legal team.   

Olson has worked on business matters with a number of other high-profile clients, including Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, as well as Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.

The attorneys cited were not immediately available to comment when contacted by CNBC. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Breakthrough Energy were also contacted for comment.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/05/bill-and-melinda-gates-are-hiring-star-lawyers-for-their-divorce.html

OHIO (WJW/AP) — Within days, a couple weeks at most, trillions of cicadas of Brood X (the X is the Roman numeral for 10) will emerge after 17 years underground.

There are many broods of periodic cicadas that appear on rigid schedules in different years, but this is one of the largest and most noticeable. They’ll be in 15 states from Indiana to Georgia to New York; they’re coming out now in mass numbers in Tennessee and North Carolina.

They’ll also emerge in Ohio.

Where, when to watch in Ohio

  • According to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the cicadas will begin to emerge when the soil, eight inches beneath the ground, reaches 64 degrees.
  • The soil typically reaches 64 degrees between late April and mid-May.
  • After emerging, the cicadas will climb a vertical surface, shred their exoskeletons and develop into winged adults. The exoskeletons may remain in place or on the ground for several weeks.
  • The cicadas mostly come out at dusk.
  • Scientists believe the big emergence is days away — a week or two, max.
  • The cicadas should be gone by early July
  • The largest concentrations are expected in Defiance, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Logan, and Montgomery counties.
RESON, VA – MAY 16: Dozens of exoskeletons belonging to newly emerged adult cicadas lie under a tree May 16, 2004 in Reston, Virginia. After 17-years living below ground, billions of cicadas belonging to Brood X begin to emerge across much of the eastern United States. The cicadas shed their larval skin, spread their wings, and fly out to mate making a tremendous noise in the process. (Photo by Richard Ellis/Getty Images)

When the entire brood emerges, backyards can look like undulating waves, and the bug chorus is lawnmower loud.

The cicadas will mostly come out at dusk to try to avoid everything that wants to eat them, squiggling out of holes in the ground. They’ll try to climb up trees or anything vertical. Once off the ground, they shed their skins and try to survive that vulnerable stage before they become dinner to a host of critters including ants, birds, dogs, cats.

It’s one of nature’s weirdest events, featuring sex, a race against death, evolution and what can sound like a bad science fiction movie soundtrack.

Some people may be repulsed. But scientists say the arrival of Brood X is a sign that despite pollution, climate change and dramatic biodiversity loss, something is still right with nature. And it’s quite a show.

Scientist Michael Raupp presents the narrative of cicada’s lifespan with all the verve of a Hollywood blockbuster:

“You’ve got a creature that spends 17 years in a COVID-like existence, isolated underground sucking on plant sap, right? In the 17th year these teenagers are going to come out of the earth by the billions if not trillions. They’re going to try to best everything on the planet that wants to eat them during this critical period of the nighttime when they’re just trying to grow up, they’re just trying to be adults, shed that skin, get their wings, go up into the treetops, escape their predators,” he says.

“Once in the treetops, hey, it’s all going to be about romance. It’s only the males that sing. It’s going to be a big boy band up there as the males try to woo those females, try to convince that special someone that she should be the mother of his nymphs. He’s going to perform, sing songs. If she likes it, she’s going to click her wings. They’re going to have some wild sex in the treetop.

“Then she’s going to move out to the small branches, lay their eggs. Then it’s all going to be over in a matter of weeks. They’re going to tumble down. They’re going to basically fertilize the very plants from which they were spawned. Six weeks later the tiny nymphs are going to tumble 80 feet from the treetops, bounce twice, burrow down into the soil, go back underground for another 17 years.”

“This,” Raupp says, “is one of the craziest life cycles of any creature on the planet.”

America is the only place in the world that has periodic cicadas that stay underground for either 13 or 17 years, says entomologist John Cooley of the University of Connecticut.

The bugs only emerge in large numbers when the ground temperature reaches 64 degrees. That’s happening earlier in the calendar in recent years because of climate change, says entomologist Gene Kritsky. Before 1950 they used to emerge at the end of May; now they’re coming out weeks earlier.

Though there have been some early bugs In Maryland and Ohio, soil temperatures have been in the low 60s. So Raupp and other scientists believe the big emergence is days away — a week or two, max.

Cicadas who come out early don’t survive. They’re quickly eaten by predators. Cicadas evolved a key survival technique: overwhelming numbers. There’s just too many of them to all get eaten when they all emerge at once, so some will survive and reproduce, Raupp says.

This is not an invasion. The cicadas have been here the entire time, quietly feeding off tree roots underground, not asleep, just moving slowly waiting for their body clocks tell them it is time to come out and breed. They’ve been in America for millions of years, far longer than people.

When they emerge, it gets noisy — 105 decibels noisy, like “a singles bar gone horribly, horribly wrong,” Cooley says. There are three distinct cicada species and each has its own mating song.

They aren’t locusts and the only plants they damage are young trees, which can be netted. The year after a big batch of cicadas, trees actually do better because dead bugs serve as fertilizer, Kritsky says.

People tend to be scared of the wrong insects, says University of Illinois entomologist May Berenbaum. The mosquito kills more people than any other animals because of malaria and other diseases. Yet some people really dread the cicada emergence, she said.

“I think it’s the fact that they’re an inconvenience. Also, when they die in mass numbers they smell bad,” Berenbaum says. “They really disrupt our sense of order.”

But others are fond of cicadas — and even munch on them, using recipes like those in a University of Maryland cookbook. And for scientists like Cooley, there is a real beauty in their life cycle.

“This is a feel-good story, folks. It really is and it’s in a year we need more,” he says. “When they come out, it’s a great sign that forests are in good shape. All is as it is supposed to be.”

Source Article from https://fox8.com/news/trillions-of-brood-x-cicadas-about-to-emerge-heres-where-when-you-can-expect-them-in-ohio/

If your day doesn’t start until you’re up to speed on the latest headlines, then let us introduce you to your new favorite morning fix. Sign up here for the ‘5 Things’ newsletter.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/05/us/five-things-may-5-trnd/index.html

Whether by default or by design, Liz Cheney has become the leader of the Republican resistance.

This may not be a cutting-edge issue outside the Beltway hothouse, but it’s become a proxy war for the party’s future.

Donald Trump has decided that the Wyoming congresswoman is the personification of what ails the GOP—most notably, her all-out opposition to Trump and Trumpism.

And, for good measure, they’re now calling each other liars.

These are two people who were never going to be backslapping buddies. Trump ran against Hillary Clinton in 2016, but he also ran against George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, especially on Iraq and endless wars. So he was always going to view Liz, who held top State Department posts in her father’s administration, as too much of a foreign policy hard-liner.

Liz Cheney didn’t run against Trump when she was elected to the House in 2016, after a disastrous earlier Senate bid. But she became an outspoken critic after the riot at the Capitol, and was one of 10 House Republicans to vote to impeach the president—all the more remarkable because she is the third-ranking member of the GOP leadership.

Whether she hangs onto that post is the melodrama of the moment, giving political reporters between elections a contest to obsess over. And her new role has scrambled the usual media alliances.

The deepening divide has hurt Cheney back home, where she faces a primary next year against two state lawmakers who are trying to appeal to the Trump base. And from Mar-a-Lago, the former president has slammed anyone he views as disloyal, such as calling for Mitch McConnell to be replaced as Senate Republican leader. But while McConnell mainly ignores him and Kevin McCarthy openly courts him, Cheney is punching back.

At the heart of this internecine warfare is how the country will view the tragedy that unfolded on Jan. 6.

BUZZKILL: WHY WE’RE NOT BEATING, AND MAY NEVER FULLY CONQUER, THIS VIRUS

In interviews and statements, Trump continues to say he was cheated out of a second term, despite the failure of his own Justice Department and dozens of lawsuits to prove any widespread fraud. The other side, mostly among Democrats and the media, have branded this the Big Lie.

In the latest round, the 45th president attempted to appropriate that term, emailing reporters that the last election “will be, from this day forth, known as THE BIG LIE!”  

That prompted this tweet from Cheney: “The 2020 presidential election was not stolen. Anyone who claims it was is spreading THE BIG LIE, turning their back on the rule of law, and poisoning our democratic system.”

Not surprisingly, Trump issued another statement hours later, calling her a “big-shot warmonger” and, for good measure, insisting that Wyoming residents “never liked her much.”

CNN reports that Cheney remained adamant at a private American Enterprise Institute conference on Monday, saying the party can’t swallow the “poison” of arguing the election was rigged.

“We can’t whitewash what happened on January 6 or perpetuate Trump’s big lie. It is a threat to democracy. What he did on January 6 is a line that cannot be crossed.”

On “Fox & Friends” yesterday, McCarthy said the angst over Cheney wasn’t about her impeachment vote: “I have heard from members concerned about her ability to carry out the job as conference chair, to carry out the message,” so “we can all work together instead of attacking one another.” That, of course, was a pretty clear message.

In a secret ballot in February, House Republicans voted to keep Cheney in her No. 3 post by a vote of 145 to 61. That showed she had more rank-and-file support than the public battle would have suggested.

But the animosity level has risen, and if a majority of the caucus is taking Trump’s side, they have the right to say she’s the wrong fit for the leadership.

All this has made Cheney an unlikely heroine for the media, most of whose members side with anyone who opposes Trump.

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF OF THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

On CNN, Jake Tapper said such Republican leaders as McCarthy and Steve Scalise are “willing to lie” about the election and other matters.

“Think of it,” tweeted L.A. Times columnist Mark Barabak. Cheney “is at risk of losing her leadership for telling the truth. And insisting on doing so. You can dress it up anyhow you’d like. But that’s the bottom line.”

For those who covered her father in the Bush administration, it’s a head-snapping moment to watch the media line up behind a Cheney.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/liz-cheney-becomes-lightning-rod-battling-trump-over-whos-lying-about-2020

“)),c=l(y[i.size_id].split(“x”).map(function(e){return Number(e)}),2),s.width=c[0],s.height=c[1]),s.rubiconTargeting=(Array.isArray(i.targeting)?i.targeting:[]).reduce(function(e,t){return e[t.key]=t.values[0],e},{rpfl_elemid:f.adUnitCode}),t.push(s)):r.logError(“Rubicon: bidRequest undefined at index position:”.concat(o),n,e),t},[]).sort(function(e,t){return(t.cpm||0)-(e.cpm||0)})},getUserSyncs:function(e,t,n,r){if(!D&&e.iframeEnabled){var i=””;return n&&”string”==typeof n.consentString&&(“boolean”==typeof n.gdprApplies?i+=”?gdpr=”.concat(Number(n.gdprApplies),”&gdpr_consent=”).concat(n.consentString):i+=”?gdpr_consent=”.concat(n.consentString)),r&&(i+=””.concat(i?”&”:”?”,”us_privacy=”).concat(encodeURIComponent(r))),D=!0,{type:”iframe”,url:”https://”.concat(b.syncHost||”eus”,”.rubiconproject.com/usync.html”)+i}}},transformBidParams:function(e){return r.convertTypes({accountId:”number”,siteId:”number”,zoneId:”number”},e)}};function h(e,t){var n=o.b.getConfig(“pageUrl”);n=e.params.referrer?e.params.referrer:n||t.refererInfo.referer;return e.params.secure?n.replace(/^http:/i,”https:”):n}function _(e,t){var n=e.params;if(“video”===t){var i=[];return n.video&&n.video.playerWidth&&n.video.playerHeight?i=[n.video.playerWidth,n.video.playerHeight]:Array.isArray(r.deepAccess(e,”mediaTypes.video.playerSize”))&&1===e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length?i=e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0]:Array.isArray(e.sizes)&&0e.length)&&(t=e.length);for(var n=0,r=new Array(t);n’;var i,o}},h=function(e){var t=0=e&&t.innerWidthe.length)&&(t=e.length);for(var n=0,r=new Array(t);ne.length)&&(t=e.length);for(var n=0,r=new Array(t);n=e.length?{done:!0}:{done:!1,value:e[r++]}},e:function(e){throw e},f:i}}throw new TypeError(“Invalid attempt to iterate non-iterable instance.\nIn order to be iterable, non-array objects must have a [Symbol.iterator]() method.”)}var o,a=!0,s=!1;return{s:function(){n=e[Symbol.iterator]()},n:function(){var e=n.next();return a=e.done,e},e:function(e){s=!0,o=e},f:function(){try{a||null==n.return||n.return()}finally{if(s)throw o}}}}(o);try{for(u.s();!(a=u.n()).done;){var f=a.value;01e3*e.config.storage.refreshInSeconds),!i||s||r||null!=(d=n)&&d!==B(t)?o=e.submodule.getId(e.config,t,i):”function”==typeof e.submodule.extendId&&(o=e.submodule.extendId(e.config,t,i)),c.isPlainObject(o)&&(o.id&&(U(e,o.id),i=o.id),”function”==typeof o.callback&&(e.callback=o.callback)),i&&(e.idObj=e.submodule.decode(i,e.config))):e.config.value?e.idObj=e.config.value:(u=e.submodule.getId(e.config,t,void 0),c.isPlainObject(u)&&(“function”==typeof u.callback&&(e.callback=u.callback),u.id&&(e.idObj=e.submodule.decode(u.id,e.config))))}function Y(){var e,t,n,r=(e=D,t=j,Array.isArray(e)?e.reduce(function(e,n){return!n||c.isEmptyStr(n.name)||(!n.storage||c.isEmptyStr(n.storage.type)||c.isEmptyStr(n.storage.name)||-1===t.indexOf(n.storage.type))&&!c.isPlainObject(n.value)&&(n.storage||n.value)||e.push(n),e},[]):[]);r.length&&(n=k.filter(function(e){return!i()(P,function(t){return t.name===e.name})}),P=n.map(function(e){var t=i()(r,function(t){return t.name===e.name});return e.findRootDomain=z,t?{submodule:e,config:t,callback:void 0,idObj:void 0}:null}).filter(function(e){return null!==e}),!x&&P.length&&(Object(u.a)().requestBids.before(G,40),c.logInfo(“”.concat(S,” – usersync config updated for “).concat(P.length,” submodules: “),P.map(function(e){return e.submodule.name})),x=!0))}function $(e){i()(k,function(t){return t.name===e.name})||(k.push(e),Y())}function X(e){P=[],x=!(D=[]),y=void 0,-1!==(j=[w.localStorageIsEnabled()?O:null,w.cookiesAreEnabled()?A:null].filter(function(e){return null!==e})).indexOf(A)&&w.getCookie(C)?c.logInfo(“”.concat(S,” – opt-out cookie found, exit module”)):-1!==j.indexOf(O)&&w.getDataFromLocalStorage(C)?c.logInfo(“”.concat(S,” – opt-out localStorage found, exit module”)):(e.getConfig(function(e){var t=e.userSync;t&&t.userIds&&(D=t.userIds,h=c.isNumber(t.syncDelay)?t.syncDelay:I,_=c.isNumber(t.auctionDelay)?t.auctionDelay:E,Y())}),Object(u.a)().getUserIds=V,Object(u.a)().getUserIdsAsEids=K,Object(u.a)().refreshUserIds=H)}X(o.b),Object(p.c)(“userId”,$)}},[894]),pbjs.processQueue();
}, {}];
window.modules[“visibility.legacy”] = [function(require,module,exports){“use strict”;DS.service(“$visibility”,[“$document”,”$window”,”_throttle”,”Eventify”,function(e,t,n,i){var o,r,h=[];function s(e,t){return et?e:t}function d(e,t,n){!e.preload&&e.preloadThreshhold&&function(e,t,n,i){return t.top=e.shownThreshold&&!e.seen?(e.seen=!0,setTimeout(function(){e.trigger(“shown”,new r(“shown”,t))},15)):(!n||i1&&(h+=e(r,Math.floor(n/o),i-1,o)),h},this.getVerticallyVisiblePixels=f,this.getViewportHeight=function(){return t.innerHeight||e.documentElement.clientHeight||e.body.clientHeight},this.getViewportWidth=function(){return t.innerWidth||e.documentElement.clientWidth||e.body.clientWidth},this.isElementNotHidden=u,this.isElementInViewport=function(n){var i=n.getBoundingClientRect();return i.top>=0&&i.left>=0&&i.bottom= o.length) return { done: true }; return { done: false, value: o[i++] }; }, e: function e(_e) { throw _e; }, f: F }; } throw new TypeError(“Invalid attempt to iterate non-iterable instance.\nIn order to be iterable, non-array objects must have a [Symbol.iterator]() method.”); } var normalCompletion = true, didErr = false, err; return { s: function s() { it = o[Symbol.iterator](); }, n: function n() { var step = it.next(); normalCompletion = step.done; return step; }, e: function e(_e2) { didErr = true; err = _e2; }, f: function f() { try { if (!normalCompletion && it.return != null) it.return(); } finally { if (didErr) throw err; } } }; }

function _unsupportedIterableToArray(o, minLen) { if (!o) return; if (typeof o === “string”) return _arrayLikeToArray(o, minLen); var n = Object.prototype.toString.call(o).slice(8, -1); if (n === “Object” && o.constructor) n = o.constructor.name; if (n === “Map” || n === “Set”) return Array.from(o); if (n === “Arguments” || /^(?:Ui|I)nt(?:8|16|32)(?:Clamped)?Array$/.test(n)) return _arrayLikeToArray(o, minLen); }

function _arrayLikeToArray(arr, len) { if (len == null || len > arr.length) len = arr.length; for (var i = 0, arr2 = new Array(len); i

Source Article from https://slate.com/technology/2021/05/donald-trump-social-media-desk-twitter-facebook-lol.html

Utah Senator Mitt Romney expressed his support for Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney amid growing speculation that she could soon be voted out of her position as the highest-ranking Republican woman in the House. 

In a tweet, Romney praised Cheney for being a “person of conscience” because she “refuses to lie” about the events that occurred at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Cheney has also continued to criticize former President Trump for his role in the Capitol riot. 

“Every person of conscience draws a line beyond which they will not go: Liz Cheney refuses to lie,” tweeted Romney.

He continued, “As one of my Republican Senate colleagues said to me following my impeachment vote: ‘I wouldn’t want to be a member of a group that punished someone for following their conscience.'”

REPUBLICANS INCREASINGLY VOCAL ABOUT HOLDING ANOTHER CHENEY VOTE SOON

The Utah senator has a long history of criticizing the decisions of GOP leadership and going against the grain on internal Republican skirmishes.

Romney was one of only 10 Republican members of Congress who voted to convict Trump on a charge of inciting an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

On Monday, Trump issued a statement calling the 2020 election “fraudulent” and referring to his loss as “THE BIG LIE!”

Cheney rejected Trump’s position in a response on Twitter. 

“The 2020 presidential election was not stolen,” tweeted Cheney adding that “Anyone who claims it was is spreading THE BIG LIE, turning their back on the rule of law and poisoning our democratic system.”

As a result of her criticism of Trump, rank-and-file Republicans have increased calls for Cheney’s removal from her position as House GOP conference chair.

During an interview on Tuesday morning, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., reacted to calls for Liz Cheney to be removed.

McCarthy said, “I have heard from members concerned about her ability to carry out the job as conference chair, to carry out the message. We all need to be working as one if we’re able to win the majority.”

A Cheney spokesperson responded to McCarthy’s comments: This is about whether the Republican Party is going to perpetuate lies about the 2020 election and attempt to whitewash what happened on Jan 6. Liz will not do that. That is the issue.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

According to House GOP rules, in order to change leadership mid-Congress, 50 Republican members must sign a petition to put forth a motion.

Sources say that the vote would likely happen next week, when the House is back in session. 

Cheney is currently the third-highest ranking Republican in the House and also the most senior female GOP leader in Congress.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mitt-romney-goes-to-bat-for-liz-cheney-amid-possible-leadership-vote

“It really fucks the other ‘24 wannabes,” said one top GOP strategist, who predicted that all but a few top Republicans with established Facebook presences and fundraising networks would find it harder to raise cash online if Trump was once again tapping into that stream.

Not everyone in GOP circles was willing to concede that a Facebook-liberated Trump would suck up most of the conservative grassroots donor money. Others argued that Trump coming back on the platform would compel donors to give money not just to Trump but to multiple different political groups with which he was aligned or affiliated. That could include official Republican entities.

But there was widespread agreement that Trump being able to advertise again on the platform would further empower him specifically on the increasingly important turf of online campaigning. “A massive, massive deal,” is how one top Democratic digital operative put it. “Extraordinary.”

Online fundraising has become an increasingly bigger component of politics in recent cycles. And few politicians have taken more advantage of it than Trump, who raised more than $378 million in small dollar donations during the 2020 cycle. The 45th president has relied heavily on small dollar donors to propel his campaigns, even as he’s touted his ability to self-finance. He’s fostered that community predominantly through Facebook. During the 2020 campaign cycle, both Trump for President and Make America Great Again Committee jointly spent about $140 million on Facebook advertisements, according to figures compiled by Facebook. Some of that was for purposes of voter persuasion. But aides and digital campaign experts say the main purpose was to cultivate grassroots donor networks.

“He has the best fundraising list in the Republican Party but there’s a half life to that — people change emails, they change text messaging, whatever so you need to have access to voters via Facebook ads to keep reaching them and activating them to sign petitions and stay on your list,” said Eric Wilson, a Republican digital strategist who runs Startup Caucus, an incubator for campaign technology. “It’s important for them to sustain that.”

With Trump having been off the platform for four months, neither he nor any affiliated entities has been using Facebook to raise cash or — more importantly — to ensure that he is growing or has up-to-date information on his small dollar donor network. Trump’s Save America PAC, the entity that he launched after the election, had more than $85 million cash on hand at the beginning of April, according to reports. Those funds were mostly pulled in from direct email and grassroots fundraising appeals outside of Facebook or DonaldTrump.com.

That could change come Wednesday. If the Facebook Oversight Board reinstates Trump, it would instantly allow the biggest online fundraiser in GOP politics access to one of the most important money-raising vehicles in politics at one of the most fertile times for online fundraising.

The beginning of a new administration has proven to be a gold rush for politicians of the opposite party in the past. During the first three months of 2017, then Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Cali.) spent nearly $300,000 on Facebook ads even though she’d just won office. The rate of return was just too good to pass up — from her investment she brought in $738,459 from donors giving less than $200.

It definitely will help [Trump with] fundraising,” said David Kochel, a longtime Republican operative in Iowa who ran Jeb Bush’s 2016 campaign and has been a Trump critic. “Obviously they have a long track record of engagement. I think it will also be one of those things that for the media — every Tweet was catnip — the engagement numbers on Facebook will be insane, so it will be hard to look away for Trump-obsessed media.”

Facebook is also a key organizing ground for Republicans in particular. Although conservatives have declared war on “Big Tech,” including Facebook, the social media platform remains the most influential site for the right. Kevin Roose, a New York Times tech columnist, compiles a daily list of the 10 top-performing Facebook posts. Links shared by conservative commentators like Dan Bongino and Ben Shapiro or Fox News are consistently top performers on the site.

“On Facebook, on any given day, the right has anywhere from two to three times the engagement and reach of the left or news,” said Angelo Carusone, the president of Media Matters, a liberal group that monitors and studies conservative media. According to a study conducted by the organization, right leaning pages accounted for 45 percent of total interactions from political pages, compared to left leaning pages with 25 percent of total interactions.

Facebook played an outsized role in the rise of Trump as a candidate — from targeted spending by the campaign to the spread of ads by Russian troll farms boosting Trump. During the 2016 campaign, almost half of the Trump campaign’s nearly $200 million advertising budget was spent on Facebook. And the platform served as a conductor for donations throughout Trump’s presidency.

But while the site has boosted Trump’s fundraising efforts, it has not been the primary focus for Trump’s own outreach to supporters. One rarely gets the sense, for instance, that Trump himself is tapping out Facebook posts or dictating them to aides, whereas he’s dubbed himself the “Hemingway” of Twitter and boasted how individual tweets have driven entire news cycles. As a result, posts on Trump’s Facebook page feel less immediate and authentic — they tended to be primarily his own tweets, or live videos of political rallies or White House events.

Since his expulsion from Facebook and Twitter, Trump has continued to get his message out either through interviews with friendly outlets like Fox News or statements he dictates to aides and is shared through Save America PAC or presidential office press releases. Multiple advisers, and Trump himself, have said it is still an effective way for reaching supporters although it does not have the same reach.

“Every time I do a release, it’s all over the place. It’s better than Twitter, much more elegant than Twitter. And Twitter now is very boring. A lot of people are leaving Twitter. Twitter is becoming very, very boring,” Trump told Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

Trump, on Tuesday, launched a new website that closely resembled an old-school blog where he can post his thoughts in reverse chronological order without users having the ability to comment on them. It was quickly critiqued for lacking the type of engagement features that define social media platforms. And even before it was debuted, Wilson said, a re-institution to Facebook would prove extremely helpful for the former president regardless of whatever venture he launched.

“It’s important for his political future, whether that’s supporting candidates or running himself that he get access to Facebook,” said Wilson. About 60 percent of voters use Facebook on a daily basis — that’s more than watch local TV news.”

(Disclosure: The wife of a reporter for this piece, Sam Stein, is an employee at Facebook)

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/04/trump-facebook-social-media-return-485379

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/05/04/bidens-new-covid-goal-70-adults-partially-vaccinated-july-4/4940268001/

The political future of Rep. Liz Cheney, seen here on April 28 ahead of President Biden’s joint address to Congress, is increasingly in doubt as the Wyoming Republican refuses to back down from criticism of former President Donald Trump.

Melina Mara/Pool/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Melina Mara/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

The political future of Rep. Liz Cheney, seen here on April 28 ahead of President Biden’s joint address to Congress, is increasingly in doubt as the Wyoming Republican refuses to back down from criticism of former President Donald Trump.

Melina Mara/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Tuesday that Republican lawmakers have shared concerns with him over Rep. Liz Cheney’s ability “to carry out the message,” fueling speculation that the No. 3 House Republican may once again face an effort to oust her from party leadership.

“There’s no concern about how she voted on impeachment — that decision has been made,” the California Republican told Fox & Friends.

I have heard from members concerned about her ability to carry out the job as conference chair, to carry out the message. We all need to be working as one if we’re able to win the majority.”

His comments come a day after Cheney responded to a statement from former President Donald Trump once again perpetuating his false claim the presidential election was stolen from him.

“The 2020 presidential election was not stolen,” Cheney tweeted. “Anyone who claims it was is spreading THE BIG LIE, turning their back on the rule of law, and poisoning our democratic system.”

The Wyoming lawmaker, the highest-ranking woman in House Republican leadership, has faced intense backlash from her party since she voted to impeach Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection.

“There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution,” Cheney said in a statement at the time.

Her vote earned her a censure from the Wyoming Republican Party and a growing list of primary challengers, along with calls to throw her out of her leadership job. She was able to ward them off in a secret ballot vote in February with support from McCarthy.

But since then, the gulf between Cheney and the rest of GOP leadership has grown as McCarthy and Minority Whip Steve Scalise are embracing the former president to help Republicans in the next midterm elections.

“This idea that you just disregard President Trump is not where we are, and frankly he has a lot to offer still and has offered a lot. He wants to help us win the House back,” Scalise recently told Axios.

Last month, Cheney, who is responsible for party messaging, pointedly did not invite Trump to speak when Republicans gathered for their annual retreat in his home state of Florida. Once there, she told reporters that any Republican who objected to the Electoral College counts should not ever be considered a GOP candidate for president.

“I do think that some of our candidates who led the charge, particularly the senators who led the unconstitutional charge, not to certify the election, you know, in my view that’s disqualifying,” she told the New York Post.

Cheney has also broken with party leaders who are blocking an investigative commission into the Jan. 6 attack because they want it also to examine the violence around some of the racial justice protests last summer. Democrats said that’s a distraction, and Cheney agreed.

“I think that’s a different set of issues, a different set of problems and a different set of solutions,” she said at the retreat. “And so I think it’s very important that the Jan. 6 commission, focused on, what happened on Jan. 6 and then what led to that day.”

The strain between Cheney and GOP leadership was on full display at a press conference at the end of February when reporters asked McCarthy whether Trump should speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

“He should,” McCarthy answered bluntly. The question was then posed to Cheney, who answered from the back as McCarthy remained at the lectern.

“I’ve been clear in my views about President Trump and the extent to which following Jan. 6 I don’t believe that he should be playing a role in the future of the party or the country,” Cheney said, as McCarthy closed his eyes in apparent frustration.

An awkward pause followed, with McCarthy abruptly ending the press conference with “on that high note, thank you very much.” The pair left walking in separate directions and have rarely appeared together since then.

Professor Jim King of the University of Wyoming said Cheney’s opposition to Trump hasn’t yet ruined her political fortunes, but it has changed them.

“She may not any longer be on track to be speaker, but I don’t see that she’s in a position where she’s going to lose in Wyoming,” he said.

Fundraising for her reelection bid has been robust, and she continues to enjoy support from Republicans such as former House Speaker Paul Ryan as well as fellow Republicans who also supported Trump’s impeachment.

“Every person of conscience draws a line beyond which they will not go: Liz Cheney refuses to lie,” Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, tweeted Tuesday.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/04/993080859/mccarthy-comments-fuel-speculation-of-liz-cheneys-removal-from-house-gop-leaders

The Federal Aviation Administration said Tuesday it is experiencing a spike in reports of unruly airplane passengers and has received about 1,300 such reports since February.  

The agency said it has begun the process of fining passengers in about 20 cases. The agency continues to investigate and may bring additional cases, a spokesman said.  

It is the second federal agency to identify a problem with misbehaving passengers.  

CNN was first to report the Transportation Security Administration is approaching 2,000 reports of travelers not complying with the federal mask requirement. Those reports include passengers on airplanes, buses, boats, and trains, and people in transportation hubs like airports and train stations.  

The FAA reports include mask non-compliance as well as passengers disturbing other passengers, assaulting flight crews, and drinking their own alcohol on flights. CNN has previously reported on multiple cases where passengers have been fined. 

Federal prosecutors also brought charges recently against a passenger who they say assaulted a flight attendant and did not comply with the face mask requirement. 

The FAA did not previously track the number of disruptive passenger reports it received, the spokesman said. But it said it historically brings between 100 and 180 enforcement actions each year.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-vaccine-updates-05-04-21/h_c3edf79ad5c0b18332d38c367a726874

The city’s advancement permits some types of businesses to reopen for the first time since the start of the pandemic, including indoor bars, indoor family entertainment such as roller skating rinks, and libraries at limited capacity.


Marin has been on the brink of moving into the yellow tier for weeks now. The county’s Health Director Matt Willis urged residents to not be discouraged.

“I know some are disappointed by this, but it’s important to remember why we are taking these measures in the first place,” Willis said. “It’s to prevent serious illness and death mainly, and we’ve been very successful there. Our hospitalization and death rates are among the lowest they’ve been in a year. All Marin schools are open, public and private. We have high vaccination rates.”

A key metric in determining tier level is a county’s adjusted-case rate, which changes based on the number of tests performed. Willis said that while the county has seen a slight uptick in cases, a decline in the number of people getting tested in the county is the main factor keeping the county in the orange. 

“I think it highlights the limitation of a process based on a single metric measured on a single day,” Willis said; the county currently has 62% of those 16 and over fully vaccinated. “In our case, our testing rate is declining significantly. As the most highly vaccinated county, there’s local and CDC guidance that people who are vaccinated don’t need to access testing.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom announced last month the state will fully reopen its economy June 15 and dissolve the so-called Blueprint for a Safer Economy, where tier levels dictate which businesses can open based on the severity of virus spread in a county. In the meantime, the state will continue to operate under the blueprint that was adopted in August.

In the Bay Area, most counties are in the orange tier, with the exceptions of San Francisco in the yellow tier and Solano in the red tier, the second-most-restrictive tier.

The state’s color-coded reopening framework assigns a tier to each county, dictating which business sectors and activities can operate. There are four tiers with “purple” indicating widespread pandemic; “red,” substantial; “orange,” moderate and “yellow,” minimal.

The state announced new tier assignments on Tuesdays, and counties can move forward with reopenings as early as Wednesday. Counties can move at a slower pace than the state, and San Francisco will allow the new reopenings beginning Thursday, May 6.

Here’s a look at some of the reopenings S.F. will allow beginning Thursday. 

– Indoor bars, breweries and wineries may open to 25% capacity up to 100 people.  

– The three-household table limit on indoor dining is lifted and up to eight people are allowed per table.  

– Ice-skating and roller-skating rinks, arcades, golf and playgrounds can open at up to 50% capacity. 

– Mini-golf, pool halls and bowling alleys can expand to 50% capacity.

– Outdoor small gatherings can expand to 75 participants, even if food and beverages are consumed. Masks may be removed as long as six feet of distance is maintained between participants. Unvaccinated people are encouraged to wear facial coverings.

– Indoor small gatherings can expand to 50% capacity, or up to 50 people, with face coverings (unless everyone is fully vaccinated or there is one unvaccinated household that is low-risk).

– Libraries can open to 50% capacity. 

– Offices can expand to 50% capacity, not counting fully vaccinated personnel. 

– Indoor live audience venues may expand to 50% capacity, and those events in which food and beverages are served may host groups of less than 200 people, without requiring proof of vaccinations or negative tests. Events of up to 300 people or those that take up less than 25% of the venue capacity do not require an approved health and safety plan or proof of vaccination or negative COVID-19 test. 

– Outdoor live audience venues may expand to 67% capacity and those events in which food and beverages are served may host groups of less than 300 people, without requiring proof of vaccinations or negative tests. 

– Outdoor arts, music and theater festivals permitted to expand to up to 100 people. 

– Indoor fitness and athletic recreation youth and adult facilities can expand to 50% capacity and classes may expand to 50% capacity up to 200 people. 

– Indoor swimming pools can increase capacity to 50%. 

– Saunas, steam rooms and indoor hot tubs may reopen at 25% capacity. 

– Adult day programs and senior community centers can expand to 50% indoor capacity, up to 50 people. 

– Eating or drinking in cafes or restaurants in grocery and other retail stores will be allowed, following indoor dining rules. 

Source Article from https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/2021-05-yellow-tier-San-Francisco-Marin-16150936.php

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before a Senate panel in April 2018. On Wednesday, Facebook’s independent Oversight Board is set to decide whether the company should keep its indefinite ban on former President Donald Trump.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before a Senate panel in April 2018. On Wednesday, Facebook’s independent Oversight Board is set to decide whether the company should keep its indefinite ban on former President Donald Trump.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Facebook’s independent Oversight Board on Wednesday is expected to announce its biggest decision yet: whether to uphold or reverse Facebook’s indefinite ban on former President Donald Trump.

The decision to ban Trump from both Facebook and Instagram, which the company owns, came after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. But it was precipitated by the months that Trump spent on social media both amplifying disinformation and casting doubt on his loss in the presidential election in violation of Facebook’s rules.

“We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote at the time.

“We believe we took the right decision. We think it was entirely justified by the unprecedented circumstances on that day,” the company’s vice president for global affairs and communications, Nick Clegg, later told NPR.

And yet both Zuckerberg and Clegg have expressed concerns about any one company having so much power over online speech — especially when it comes to whether or not an elected leader can reach the social network’s billions of users — which is why Facebook has asked the board to weigh in.

Facebook created the Oversight Board a year ago to make final calls on the most difficult decisions the social network makes about what users can post. Each case is decided by five members of the 20-person board. They consider Facebook’s rules and international human rights principles and seek out the views of outside experts and members of the public.

In the Trump case, the board received more than 9,000 public comments. The final decision must be approved by a majority of the full board, and Facebook has agreed to abide by its ruling.

The Trump case is the biggest test so far of the board’s legitimacy: whether it’s seen as independent from the company that created and funds it, or whether it’s seen as a cover to let Facebook duck responsibility.

The decision is also expected to set a precedent for how Facebook will treat the accounts of other world leaders and politicians. And it could be a model for other tech platforms grappling with the question of control over free speech.

“We know that they care a lot about international human rights law, and we know that they care a lot about freedom of expression,” says Kate Klonick, an assistant professor of law at St. John’s University, of the Oversight Board members. “But we don’t know how that’s going to impact when you have special circumstances like the one that they’re dealing with in the Trump case.”

Klonick is an expert in internet law and the author of a recent New Yorker article about the making of the Facebook Oversight Board. In an interview that aired Tuesday on NPR’s Morning Edition, she said it’s hard to know if the board will simply vote up or down to reinstate Trump, or whether it will consider letting him back on the site with some sort of restrictions. But either way, Klonick says, it will be “setting the tone here for what they’re going to do going forward — how much power they’re going to have.”

Interview Highlights

The independent Oversight Board, this was created through this $130 million investment from Facebook. Who’s on the board? How much weight do the board’s decisions carry?

The board is comprised right now of 20 people. They are a wide range of experts in freedom of expression and international human rights. And they’re everyone from [the] former prime minister of Denmark to the former editor-in-chief of The Guardian to a Nobel Peace Prize winner to former circuit court judges. So it’s a really kind of blue-ribbon panel.

So the board has so far reviewed only a handful of cases, overturning four of five Facebook decisions. What do those decisions tell you about the board’s potential ruling in a Trump case, if anything?

Yeah, that’s a great question. It’s pretty much the only thing that we have to go on as to what the decision is going to be [Wednesday] in Trump’s suspension. So far, we know that the board cares a lot about what we call in the law proportionality — the proportion of kind of the underlying offense to the punishment that they’re going to have from Facebook, from censorship. And we know that they care a lot about international human rights law, and we know that they care a lot about freedom of expression. But we don’t know how that’s going to impact when you have special circumstances like the one that they’re dealing with in the Trump case.

Is the choice just to reinstate or keep the ban? Or does the board have leeway to choose letting Trump back on Facebook, but with some kind of restrictions?

Yeah, that’s a really interesting question. And we have no idea. I know it’s a very unsatisfying answer, but basically the board is setting the tone here for what they’re going to do going forward — how much power they’re going to have, how much power they’re not going to have, whether they’re even going to be constrained by how the question was posed to them with Facebook. And Facebook just spent one $130 million and a year and a half, two years, constructing this board to deal with questions like this independently and reliably and with transparency. And so if they don’t pay attention to what the board has to say, it’s going to be a very difficult position that they’re going to be in.

How might Wednesday’s decision create some kind of precedent that other social media platforms would follow?

Yeah, I think that’s going to be the most interesting thing, honestly, because you have Twitter, who has decided also to take Trump off the platform, and [Twitter CEO] Jack Dorsey saying that it’s going to be a permanent suspension. You have Facebook with their indefinite suspension, and then sending it to the board. But Twitter obviously doesn’t have something like the Oversight Board. They’ve gone a different way. They’re working on Birdwatch and other types of … modifications to their platform to deal with the content moderation problem. And it’ll be really interesting to see if Twitter decides to use this as basically a differentiation from Facebook in the marketplace and to basically make a pitch like, “We won’t let him back on our platform,” or “We will let him back on our platform. We’re not going to be like Facebook.”

You have spent a lot of time investigating Facebook and the Oversight Board. What’s your gut tell you on the decision?

I think that if they decide to go with what I think everyone’s expecting, which is an up-or-down decision, they’re going to reinstate him. But if they decide to go a little bit bigger, I think this could be a very important procedural case from a legal perspective and one that sets a longer-term tone.

Editor’s note: Facebook is among NPR’s financial supporters.

The audio for this story was produced and edited by Lilly Quiroz and HJ Mai.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/04/993451278/facebook-board-readies-for-its-biggest-decision-yet-whether-to-reinstate-trump