The north-eastern US was braced on Saturday for a powerful storm that forecasters said could bring 18in or more of heavy and wet snow to parts of the region.

Heavy and blowing snow expected in the afternoon in New England could result in near-blizzard conditions that would make travel difficult, forecasters said. Power outages were possible. It was also possible that the nor’easter could dump as much as a foot of snow on suburban Boston.

Gale warnings were in effect for the US coast north from the Carolinas. CNN reported that the storm could intensify fast enough to become a dramatically named “bomb cyclone”, a phenomenon characterised by a rapid pressure drop and increased precipitation and winds.

National Weather Service meteorologist Michael Clair of Gray, Maine said the storm was beginning as rain and was expected to turn to snow on Saturday afternoon. In some areas snowfall of up to 3in per hour was possible.

“This is the first big one,” Clair said of the beginning of the winter season. “There has been some snow up in the mountains, but this is the first one across where most people live.”

While localized totals of more than 18in were possible in the higher terrain, Clair said that in general, the region was expected to get hit hardest just inland, where forecasts called for about a foot of snow.

Areas south of New England, including New York, were expected to see heavy rain and strong winds. In Canada, the storm was expected to affect southern Quebec and New Brunswick.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/05/north-eastern-us-snow-storm-bomb-cyclone

Campgrounds at national and state parks in California will temporarily close when the governor’s stay-at-home order goes into effect in Northern California, the Bay Area, greater Sacramento, San Joaquin Valley and Southern California. The order announced Thursday imposes stricter rules to ease the toll the COVID-19 crisis is taking on hospitals. Certain areas of the state will shut down when capacity at intensive care units drops below 15%.

California State Parks will remain open for day use but not for overnight stays, according to a park press release Friday. Campgrounds will close 24 hours after a region dips below the allowed ICU capacity. People holding reservations will receive a refund from ReserveCalifornia, the state’s reservation system.

National parks in the state will remain open but will close campsites too. Spokeswoman Abby Wines at Death Valley National Park said campers would have two nights to leave the campground once the order goes into effect. Future reservations would be canceled, and lodgings in the park may also be affected.

Five counties in the Bay Area, which include the cities of San Francisco and Berkeley, will preemptively adopt the new order starting at 10 p.m. Sunday to address already overcrowded hospitals dealing with COVID-19. It is expected to last until Jan. 4.

In his speech about the order, Newsom emphasized that walking, hiking, running, skiing and other outdoor activities were vital for people to maintain their mental and physical health. Trails and beaches remain open, but you can’t gather with people outside your immediate household. Also social distancing and mask-wearing rules remain in place. State parks urge people to prepare for their day visits by bringing their own hand sanitizer and soap, and taking their trash with them when they leave. Some restrooms may not be open, and new parking rules may be in place, the release said. Check the state parks’ website before you go to make sure you know what to expect.

The order also requires Californians to stay home — allowing only essential travel — and shuts indoor and outdoor playgrounds, hair salons and barbershops, wineries, cardrooms, amusement parks and other businesses and activities. It also limits hotels and lodging to serving essential travelers, limits restaurants and eateries to take-out only, and limits stores and shopping centers to 20% capacity.

The order remains in effect for 21 days after the shutdown begins. Over the last week, California averaged 17,007 new cases of COVID-19 each day, according to Times data. That represents a 61.6% increase from two weeks ago. Read more on current case increases here.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/travel/story/2020-12-04/california-campgrounds-to-close-when-covid-19-stay-at-home-order-starts

Vice President Pence speaks Friday during a briefing on COVID-19 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

John Bazemore/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

John Bazemore/AP

Vice President Pence speaks Friday during a briefing on COVID-19 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

John Bazemore/AP

Vice President Pence traveled to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta on Friday for a briefing, saying America is “in a season of hope” and “help is on the way” with emergency use authorization for the first coronavirus vaccine potentially less than two weeks away.

But what Pence heard from some of the nation’s top public health officials was a grim assessment of the current state of the pandemic.

Pence noted new cases had declined somewhat in the upper Midwest states, asking for an update on the surge. Dr. Henry Walke, director of the CDC’s division of preparedness and emerging infections, told him the strain on hospitals was still growing.

“Hospitalizations are still rising. And it’s a real problem. Health care providers are overstretched, beds are full,” Walke said, providing the “very tough advice” for Americans to stay at home during the holiday season. Dr. Robert Redfield, the CDC’s director, said the focus now is just on trying to prevent the health care system from becoming completely overwhelmed.

Pence said the vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna could get preliminary authorization from the Food and Drug Administration the week of Dec. 14 and said doses could be delivered quickly. “Within 48 hours from the FDA approval, we could be vaccinating people literally in all 50 states and territories all across the country,” Pence said.

But Dr. Jay Butler, the CDC’s deputy director for infectious diseases, delivered a grim dose of reality. “The week of the 14th is only the beginning of the beginning,” Butler said. “This will be a marathon and not a sprint.”

Most vaccines will require two doses, and some must be kept at extremely cold temperatures, meaning it won’t be straightforward to vaccinate Americans, and will be far more challenging than seasonal flu campaigns or other past vaccination efforts.

States need more funding to help distribute vaccines, and CDC officials also highlighted the need for a concerted public information campaign to convince Americans they should get vaccinated and that the vaccines are safe.

Pence later asked whether the first 40 million doses, expected in late December and targeted for nursing home residents and front-line health care workers, would improve the situation in the United States. “When would you expect to see an impact on the pandemic as we roll the vaccine out?” Pence asked the experts.

Walke said the vaccine could begin to help people in long-term care and nursing homes in the foreseeable future, noting 40% of deaths are linked to those populations. But he cautioned there was not a quick fix.

“We’ll need to continue these mitigation measures — the spacing, washing our hands, wearing a mask — probably well into the spring until we get more widely available vaccine,” Walke said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/12/05/943291493/pence-says-its-a-season-of-hope-while-cdc-officials-warn-of-covid-19-surge

The Republican Party in Nevada vowed to appeal the Friday decision by Judge James Russell, dismissing claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election made by Trump’s legal team.

Trump’s campaign attorney Jesse Binnall presented claims of voter fraud, alleging 42,284 votes were counted twice; roughly 20,000 voters were found to have voted without a Nevada mailing address; 2,468 voters had changed their address to another state; and a supposed 1,506 votes were cast by deceased individuals.

Russell gave the Trump campaign until 10 a.m. Friday to submit evidence supporting its claims, saying he would not make a decision until he was able to review the evidence.

The Nevada judge then announced Friday afternoon that he was dismissing the case, saying the campaign failed to provide evidence to validate their claims.

“Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell said Friday afternoon.

 “Reasonable doubt is one based on reason, not mere possibility,” he added.

But the Nevada GOP, which posted a video to Twitter showing 20 binders it claimed were filled with evidence, pushed back on the judge’s decision, vowing to appeal.

“While we appreciate the court’s consideration of evidence submitted, we disagree with the dismissal of the contest,” the GOP said in a statement.

TRUMP FILES LATEST LAWSUIT IN GEORGIA CHALLENGING ELECTION RESULT

“The case and evidence we presented was compelling and overwhelming,” the statement continued. “President Donald J. Trump’s Nevada Electors will immediately appeal this denial to the Nevada Supreme Court. The fight continues for clean and fair elections.” 

Rudy Giuliani, the personal attorney to President Trump, pushed back too. He told Fox Business’s Lou Dobbs that the judge should assume that the evidence is true.

“He doesn’t have the ability at this stage to prove that it’s not true because he hasn’t really heard the whole thing,” Giuliani added, without acknowledging the Friday morning deadline.

Giuliani’s comments come after a week’s worth of hearings in various states. GOP legislators listened to complaints and allegations of witnessed voter and election fraud, although election results in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Arizona all have been certified. 

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Based on this testimony, the Court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud,” Russell said.

 

 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nevada-gop-appeal-judge-trump-campaigns-lawsuit

The Trump administration must accept new applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, also known as Daca, which protects some young immigrants from deportation, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

The ruling by Judge Nicholas Garaufis means that the administration must reopen the program to first-time applicants and return the period of protections to two years.

In July, the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf, issued a memo that suspended Daca for new applications and reduced how long renewals were valid from for – from two years to one year.

Friday’s ruling follows one from November, in which Garaufis said Wolf had assumed his position unlawfully, and his suspension of the Daca program was therefore invalid.

Garaufis said the government had to post a public notice within three days that new Daca applications were being accepted. Garaufis also ordered the government to put together a status report on the Daca program by 4 January.

The Daca program was created in 2012 under Barack Obama and allows people brought to the US unlawfully as children the temporary right to legally live, study and work in America, rather than living in fear of deportation. The program allowed young immigrants to do basic things like get driver’s licenses, apply for colleges or get work permits.

Those protected under Daca are known as “Dreamers”. About 650,000 people are currently enrolled in the program.

Daca became a major flashpoint under the Trump administration. During the 2016 election, Trump promised to rip up Daca immediately, triggering a legal battle that continued throughout his presidency, winding up in the supreme court this year.

The supreme court in June blocked Trump’s bid to end Daca, calling it “arbitrary and capricious” and saying that it violated federal law. His administration, however, continued its policy of not accepting new applications for the program.

Joe Biden has pledged to make Daca permanent via legislation when he takes office.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/04/daca-program-restored-reopen-trump-administration-court

In the hearing on the federal case Friday, Ludwig questioned why Trump wasn’t going directly to the Legislature if he wanted lawmakers to get involved with naming electors. Bill Bock, the Trump campaign attorney in the federal lawsuit, said Trump needed the court to rule that the election was “invalid” so the Legislature could get involved. He also said that the term “remand,” which is typically used to describe when one court sends a case to a lower court, was “inartful.”

Source Article from https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/state-supreme-court-rejects-move-to-nullify-election-federal-judge-calls-idea-bizarre/article_f5930551-9704-524b-b57e-cb34d9e47b01.html

People demonstrate in June in Los Angeles in favor of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Immigrant rights advocates hailed a Friday court ruling allowing new applications as a “huge victory for people who have been waiting to apply for DACA for the first time.”

Damian Dovarganes/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Damian Dovarganes/AP

People demonstrate in June in Los Angeles in favor of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Immigrant rights advocates hailed a Friday court ruling allowing new applications as a “huge victory for people who have been waiting to apply for DACA for the first time.”

Damian Dovarganes/AP

A federal judge has reversed the Trump administration’s latest round of rules placing further limits on the Obama-era program that shields undocumented immigrants who came to the country as children from deportation.

Under the order filed Friday, Judge Nicholas Garaufis of U.S. District Court in Brooklyn instructed the Department of Homeland Security to begin accepting new applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program as soon as Monday.

In his ruling, Garaufis said the terms of the federal program must be immediately restored to what they were “prior to the attempted rescission of September 2017” when the White House began a series of maneuvers to dismantle the program.

The judge also instructed officials to reinstate two-year permits for qualifying applicants. Over the summer, the administration had begun issuing one-year permits.

DACA currently protects about 640,000 undocumented young immigrants. As of July, an estimated 300,000 young people living in the U.S. are eligible for the program and still waiting for a chance to apply. That includes 55,000 who have aged into eligibility over the last three years.

“The ruling is a huge victory for people who have been waiting to apply for DACA for the first time,” Veronica Garcia, staff attorney at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, said in a statement.

She added that acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf’s “decision to suspend the program was just another attempt by the Trump administration to wield its extremely racist and anti-immigrant views and policies.”

Garaufis’ decision is the latest court ruling against the administration.

In June, the Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration’s 2017 attempt to end DACA, saying the administration’s reasoning was “arbitrary and capricious.” In July, a federal court in Maryland also ordered the administration to start accepting new applicants.

But 11 days later, Wolf issued a memorandum cutting renewal permits from two years to one and blocking all new applications.

That prompted a November ruling by Garaufis saying that Wolf was not lawfully serving as DHS acting secretary when he issued the changes “because the Department of Homeland Security failed to follow its order of succession, as it was lawfully designated under the Homeland Security Act.”

As a result, Garaufis vacated the changes initiated by Wolf.

Wolf has been serving as acting secretary since November 2019; he has not been confirmed by the Senate. Kirstjen Nielsen, who resigned in April 2019, was the last DHS secretary to be confirmed by the Senate.

Court documents said that DHS has until Monday to post a public notice “displayed prominently on its website and on the websites of all other relevant agencies, that it is accepting first-time requests for consideration of deferred action under DACA.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/12/04/943355234/judge-orders-trump-administration-to-restore-daca-as-it-existed-under-obama

President-elect Joe BidenJoe BidenBiden says GOP senators have called to congratulate him Biden: Trump attending inauguration is ‘of consequence’ to the country Biden says family will avoid business conflicts MORE said Thursday he does not believe the coronavirus vaccine should be mandatory but added that he will strongly encourage Americans “to do the right thing.” 

“I don’t think it should be mandatory. I wouldn’t demand it to be mandatory,” Biden said at a news conference in Wilmington, Del. “Just like I don’t think masks have to be made mandatory nationwide.” 

“I’ll do everything in my power as president of the United States to encourage people to do the right thing and when they do it, demonstrate that it matters,” he said. 

The president-elect’s latest comments reflect his push to set an example for the American people in combatting the coronavirus pandemic. Biden revealed this week that he will ask Americans in his inaugural address to wear a mask for 100 days in an effort to stop the spread of the virus. He has also said he is willing to take the vaccine publicly. 

The first vaccine candidates for the virus are expected to receive emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. this month. Officials have said the first doses will go to front-line health care workers and at-risk populations.

Biden said he and his team have been in communication with the Trump administration on its distribution plan, but raised concerns over the strategy. 

“They’ve clued us in on their planning, on how they plan to distribute the actual vaccine to the states, but there is no detailed plan, that we’ve seen anyway, as to how you get the vaccine out of the container into an injection syringe and into someone’s arm,” he said. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/528834-biden-coronavirus-vaccine-should-not-be-mandatory

But well-heeled Republicans have erased much of the Democrats’ financial advantage with giant donations to a super PAC that raised $70 million in less than three weeks from a who’s who of Republican megadonors, including Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone ($15 million) and Ken Griffin of Citadel ($12 million). The media mogul Rupert Murdoch gave $1 million, as did his son, Lachlan, the chief executive of the Fox Corporation.

Ms. Loeffler, one of the wealthiest members of the Senate, put $23 million of her own money into her campaign to get to the runoff and her husband, Jeffrey Sprecher, the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange, has donated an additional $10 million to a pro-Loeffler super PAC.

Big contributions from Democratic donors are lagging the Republicans. The leading Senate Democratic super PAC raised a little more than $10 million in the 20 days after the general election, records show. The biggest donation — $2.5 million — came from the organization that Stacey Abrams created, Fair Fight, after her narrow loss in 2018 for the governor’s race.

As Ms. Abrams’s star power has increased, Fair Fight itself has emerged as a major magnet for Democratic giving, pulling in nearly $35 million in 40 days that ended Nov. 23. Ms. Abrams, widely credited with leading the Democratic renaissance in Georgia, also appeared in the virtual rally on Friday for the two Democratic candidates.

“We won this election decisively, and, despite the number of recounts, it keeps giving us the same answer: that Georgia Democrats showed up, that Georgians showed up and that we decided that we wanted to move this nation in the right direction,” Ms. Abrams said.

Mr. Ossoff voiced a major theme that both Democratic candidates were seeking to exploit: allegations that Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue benefited from questionable stock trades as they learned about the seriousness of the coronavirus pandemic. “We’re running against, like, the Bonnie and Clyde of political corruption in America, who represent politicians who put themselves over the people,” he said. Mr. Perdue and Ms. Loeffler have denied any inappropriate financial dealings.

On Friday, Mr. Pence rallied on behalf of Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue in Savannah, where he warned that Democrats would advance a liberal, big-government agenda if they were allowed to seize control of the Senate.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/04/us/politics/trump-georgia-senate-obama.html

During a Friday interview, MyPillow CEO Michael Lindell said that President Donald Trump would continue to be president for “the next four years,” even as Trump’s former counselor Kellyanne Conway said that it looks as if President-elect Joe Biden “will prevail” in being seated as the next president in January 2021.

“I want the word to get out that Donald Trump will be our president for the next four years,” Lindell said during a Friday Fox News interview, adding that he was 100 percent sure of it. He made his comments while demonstrating with “March for Trump” protesters demanding that Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp help overturn the state’s election results in Trump’s favor.

Lindell told Fox News that he talked to former Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell earlier this week, asserting, “So I know firsthand.” However, Powell was kicked off of Trump’s legal team after making allegations that Republican candidates nationwide had conspired with communist countries to fraudulently win their 2020 election races. She offered no evidence to back up these claims.

During a Friday interview, My Pillow CEO Michael Lindell said that President Donald Trump would continue to be president for “the next four years,” even as Trump’s former counselor Kellyanne Conway said that it looks as if President-elect Joe Biden “will prevail” in being seated as the next president in January 2021. In this February 3, 2020 photo, Lindell laughs during a “Keep Iowa Great” press conference in Des Moines, Iowa.
Jim Watson/Getty

“I want people to have the awareness of what went on because the mainstream media is not showing you this,” Lindell said at the protest. “All the corruption, by the time it’s all opened up here and they see it, even the Democrats are going to go, ‘Wow, at least my party tried to steal it.'”

Lindell’s belief in the inevitability of Trump’s second term stands at odds with that of Conway who said in an interview with Amanda Becker, a political reporter for the non-partisan gender and political news site The 19th, “If you look at the vote totals and the Electoral College tallies, it looks like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will prevail.”

Conway said that Trump “wants to exhaust all of his legal avenues,” adding “of course, that is his right.” However, she also noted that on November 23, Trump authorized the head of the General Services Administration (GSA) to begin the formal transition process for Biden’s incoming administration.

The head of the GSA, Emily Murphy, had delayed the process for weeks after the election had been called in Biden’s favor, preventing Biden’s team from receiving federal money, workspace and information related to his becoming president.

Regardless, Trump continues to claim without evidence that widespread voter fraud put the election in Biden’s favor, despite Biden holding a 306 to 232 Electoral College vote advantage over Trump and winning over 6 million more votes than the president nationally.

Newsweek contacted Lindell for comment.

p:last-of-type::after,.node-type-slideshow .article-body>p:last-of-type::after{content:none}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/mypillow-ceo-says-trump-will-remain-president-kellyanne-conway-admits-biden-won-1552559

A California assemblyman is warning that businesses and school-aged children could suffer under Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest coronavirus restrictions.

“Every state is experiencing a surge, which begs the question, how do these shutdowns actually reduce cases?” Republican Assemblyman James Gallagher told Fox News on Friday.

Newsom announced new restrictions as the state suffers from a surge in coronavirus cases. If a region’s available intensive care unit capacity drops to below 15%, the rules would shut down businesses and activities there for at least three weeks. California had a record 20,759 new cases on Dec. 2, and COVID-19-related hospitalizations rose by 33% in the past week.

NEWSOM ORDERS MORE LOCKDOWNS, BUT DEM’S WIFE SAYS THEY’RE HURTING KIDS

“If we don’t act now our hospital system will be overwhelmed,” Newsom said of his plan.

But shutdowns are crippling small businesses and harming students who are struggling with virtual learning, Gallagher said.

“My restaurateurs, barbershops, hair salons, these are all small business folks who are trying to earn a living and they talk to me all the time about, ‘Hey why are we getting shut down? We can operate with safety protocols just like Lowe’s and Home Depot,’” Gallagher said. “And it’s a great point.”

A spokesman for Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

CELEBRITIES RIP CALIFORNIA GOV. NEWSOM OVER CORONAVIRUS THANKSGIVING RULES

Gallagher also argued that children subjected to distance learning are struggling and suffering from mental health effects — something that a study released by the nonprofit co-founded by Newsom’s wife suggested last week.

The California Partners Project study found prolonged social isolation may be damaging teenagers’ social growth.

“I’ve seen eight suicides in one of my counties among youths,” Gallagher said. “This is a public health crisis that no one is talking about. Our schools need to be reopened.”

Gallagher, who has five children, said he even noticed effects on his oldest, who is in high school.

One thing Gallagher said he agreed with under Newsom’s new rules is that schools that have already reopened don’t have to close down.

But rather than focusing on shutting down businesses and keeping other schools closed to try and slow the spread, Gallagher said the government should be rallying support and funding for health care workers and infrastructure.

“When you look out here in California, we’ve got a pretty blue state,” Gallagher said. “My area’s pretty red, pretty freedom loving, maybe people don’t follow these … orders as much — but even in the really blue areas, where people follow whatever directive they get, you’re seeing skyrocketing cases.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

He also took issue with the governor’s emergency powers, which he called autocratic, and floated the idea of new legislation to roll them back with time limits or to require public input.

“The governor and the state public health officer essentially get to make every decision on this front without any public input,” he said. “That looks more like a dictatorship … I think you can fully expect that myself and others to introduce legislation that gets us back to representative government.”

It’s not the first time the two have squared off over executive powers. Gallagher successfully sued Newsom for overstepping his gubernatorial authority earlier this month by ordering counties to mail all eligible voters mail-in ballots.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-james-gallagher-newsom-covid-lockdown

For more stories like this, check out The Chronicle’s weekly Travel newsletter! Sign up here.

Five Bay Area counties announced Friday that they would band together in enacting a regional stay-at-home order on Sunday, which comes with firm guidance barring non-essential travel.

Amid a resurgence in coronavirus cases statewide, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Marin, Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, plus the city of Berkeley, agreed to clamp down on public activity through at least Jan. 4. The move comes in advance of a new stay-at-home framework from Gov. Gavin Newsom was announced Thursday and a renewed urge from state health officials to avoid traveling.

The Bay Area counties’ decision comes in advance of the end-of-year holidays, typically one of the busiest travel times of the year. Many Bay Area residents had planned to forgo flights and long-distance trips this season, opting instead to stay local or go on shorter regional drive trips.

At press time, many details about how travel would be impacted were not yet clear. But the state’s COVID-19 information website encouraged residents to stay within their county and to not drive more than two to three hours. The site also encourages travelers to the state to quarantine for 14 days upon arrival.

While the new stay-at-home framework doesn’t take effect until Saturday, the state tourism bureau, Visit California, interpreted Newsom’s announcement in the strictest of terms, saying the new order “banned non-essential travel statewide.”

Here’s what we know so far about how local travel in and out of the Bay Area will change. This story will be updated as more information becomes available.

What is essential travel?

Essential travel pertains to business, critical infrastructure support and health and medical needs and excludes trips taken for recreation or tourism.

Will the stay-at-home order impact air travel?

It was not immediately clear how the new order would impact flights or air travel to and from the Bay Area. But the order discourages travel outside of counties, and health officials have been recommending that anybody entering California from out of the state quarantine for 14 days, including state residents.

Will the order impact driving across the state?

While it’s not clear what the consequence will be for traveling outside of county lines, the state is encouraging residents to not drive more than two to three hours away from their homes.

It’s also not yet clear what Bay Area counties who had not opted to participate in the new stay-at-home order will do about travel. At press time, many were still processing the news and what it means for regulating public life, including incoming and outgoing travel.

“At this time, we have not reached any conclusions but are considering all options,” read a note from the Santa Cruz County Health Services Agency. In the early months of the pandemic, the agency had all but closed Santa Cruz’s popular beaches as a means of dissuading regional tourists from traveling to the county.

What’s happening with hotels and other lodging?

Hotels in the five participating Bay Area counties will revert to being available for essential travelers only, similarly to how they functioned in the early months of the pandemic when California implemented its first shelter-in-place order.

Hotels had been widely open and hosting leisure travelers since June, when the state loosened its restrictions. To persuade people to return, many hotels had launched rigorous cleanliness protocols (some even opted to employ room-service robots).

However, about half of San Francisco’s hotels have remained closed during the pandemic due to the lack of demand. Room occupancy rates, which averaged out to 82% across the city in 2019, have hovered around 16-17% the past eight months, according to Joe D’Alessandro, president and CEO of the San Francisco Travel Association.

The association has halted its advertising campaigns, D’Alessandro said. “It’s hard to encourage people to travel when the governor is telling people to stay home,” he said.

“It’ll be hard on an already devastated industry,” he added.

In the first months of shelter-in-place in California, lodging-reservation platforms like Airbnb and VRBO allowed people to cancel bookings without penalty.

VRBO has not replied to requests for comment. In an email, an Airbnb spokesman said: “Reservations made after March 14 are subject to their host’s cancellation policy. Many are flexible, which means refunds are not a problem. We include this warning on the payment pages for every booking so that guest’s understand the policy.” The full policy can be found here.

For information on reservations and cancellations, contact hotels individually.

Is camping an option?

No, not in the five participating counties. “Overnight stays at campgrounds will not be permitted,” according to the state’s regional stay-at-home order, which the five Bay Area counties have adopted.

It wasn’t immediately clear how the order would be carried out at each of the various public lands around the region, which are managed by a mix of local, state and federal agencies.

In a Friday statement, California State Parks said it would close campsites in regions impacted by the state’s stay-at-home order, which takes effect Saturday. But plans for the Bay Area specifically are still being discussed. “Regarding specifics for Bay Area parks, we are still working out those details,” said information officer Adeline Yee in an email to the Chronicle.

Outside of the counties that are impacted by the order, California State Parks said in a statement that Gov. Newsom’s new stay-home framework “does not have any operational impacts to camping in California’s state parks.”

Are parks and beaches going to shut down?

In the five Bay Area counties enacting the joint stay-at-home order this weekend, playgrounds and zoos will be off-limits. Outdoor gatherings — including outdoor gym areas and fitness activities — will be limited to 12 people.

The Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which oversees Alcatraz Island, the Presidio, the Marin Headlands and other park areas in the region, is “still in the process of evaluating these changes” but would “closely follow any new guidelines established by our state and local government partners,” according to a spokesman.

The rest of the state doesn’t appear to be preparing to close off access to parks and beaches, though that could change. In the early months of the pandemic, state and county parks and beaches were shut down to discourage people who would have traveled to them from long distances.

San Mateo County, which is not one of the participating counties, issued a statement saying it would continue functioning in the state’s purple tier. Parks and beaches there remain open. But the county urged people to help by “stepping up vigilance about all health and safety measures — especially avoiding gatherings — to slow the spread of Covid-19.”

In his Thursday announcement, Gov. Newsom underscored the importance of getting outdoors to exercise as a means of de-stressing and staying healthy. He recommended that people in compromised regions go to their local parks and hike, run, bike, meditate, do yoga, walk their dogs and ski.

Are ski areas staying open?

Yes.

“We plan to remain open whether we’re in the stay-at-home framework or not,” said Michael Reitzell, president of the California Ski Industry Association. “We were specifically told (by the California Department of Public Health) that we were permitted to be open, even during shelter-in-place.”

The state’s premier ski areas in the Lake Tahoe region are either open or set to open on schedule in the next week. They are requiring people to buy day-tickets and book ski days online in advance this season to keep guest numbers low and allow for social distancing at base area and chairlift lines. For a full resort-by-resort breakdown of opening dates and new Covid-19 protocols, check out the Chronicle’s pandemic ski guide.

However, Tahoe is part of a region where Covid cases are climbing and capacity in intensive-care units is shrinking. If the state were to trigger a stay-at-home order for that region, it would mean that non-essential travel to the area would be off-limits.

Gregory Thomas is the Chronicle’s editor of lifestyle & outdoors. Email: gthomas@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @GregRThomas

Source Article from https://www.sfchronicle.com/travel/article/Bay-Area-travel-What-s-allowed-and-what-s-not-15777544.php

President-elect Joe Biden speaks about jobs Friday in Wilmington, Del.

Andrew Harnik/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/AP

President-elect Joe Biden speaks about jobs Friday in Wilmington, Del.

Andrew Harnik/AP

President-elect Joe Biden urged members of Congress to press ahead with their coronavirus relief bill negotiations in a statement that warned of “dire, dire dire” consequences if they fail.

“If we don’t act now, the future will be very bleak,” Biden told reporters in Wilmington, Del., where he and aides are preparing to assume power next month.

After months of inaction, House and Senate leaders said this week they feel like they’re inching closer on a roughly $900 billion relief package that Congress might enact relatively soon and send to the White House for President Trump’s signature.

Biden said Friday he’s sympathetic to criticisms from the left wing of the Democratic Party that the current relief bill isn’t generous enough, but he said Washington must do something now, even if it’s this, and then do more when the new Congress is seated and he and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris are in place at the White House.

Biden coyly avoided answering questions about the role he has played in the negotiations of the current deal, and he did not give details about what interaction — if any — he has had with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Although much has been made within Washington circles about the implications of Biden’s and McConnell’s longtime relationship, the men must act within the political boundaries set by their colleagues and the times. Biden declined to say how closely he or his team has been working with the majority leader so far.

“It would be kinda stupid to tell you what I did, wouldn’t it, because then I couldn’t do it again,” Biden said Friday.

The president-elect said that his own position is that Congress should be more generous — he agrees, for example, that this relief bill should provide for as much as $1,200 in direct payments to Americans, as a previous one did — but Biden also said he intends to try to do more.

“I’ve made it real clear. It’s just a down payment. This is not the end deal,” Biden said.

Restoring credibility

Biden warned in clear language that the United States is moving into a “very dark winter” as the raging coronavirus disaster only intensifies with new spiking cases and deaths.

He also suggested that plans aren’t yet complete for how, in practical terms, authorities are going to distribute the now-pending vaccines to the hundreds of millions of Americans who need them.

The outgoing Trump administration has plans for procuring the medicine and shipping it around the country, but Biden said his team hasn’t received anything about how to deploy it to individuals.

“There’s no detailed plan — that we’ve seen, anyhow, to get the vaccine out of the container and into a syringe and into somebody’s arm,” he said.

The vaccination program needed to help end the coronavirus disaster is a global health challenge of unprecedented magnitude; not only must more people be inoculated at once than in recent history, the early examples of the medicine must be handled carefully and preserved at super-cold temperatures.

Biden also acknowledged the widespread skepticism held by Americans, for various reasons, about the forthcoming vaccines. He vowed that he’d be open to being injected publicly, in the way some former presidents have, to show people the medicine is safe.

Biden didn’t mention Trump but did allude to what he called “eroded trust” over this era, including the president’s comments about the pandemic going away or the prospect for treating patients with disinfectants.

“It’s going to take some effort to rebuild confidence in science because it’s been so diminished by this administration,” Biden said.

Unusual inauguration

Biden responded to questions about Inauguration Day with questions of his own — he and members of Congress and other officials are still working out how to arrange his swearing-in.

The president-elect said this year’s virtual party conventions might serve as a template, and the inauguration would likely include some contributions from the many states and U.S. territories. But Biden said his goal above all is to keep mindful about the pandemic.

“It’s highly unlikely there’ll be a million people on the [National] Mall going all the way down to the [Lincoln] Memorial,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/04/943272993/biden-urges-action-on-covid-relief-now-with-hopes-for-more-in-new-year

Tallapoosa, Georgia (CNN)Sixty miles west of Atlanta, Haralson County sits a world away from Georgia‘s largest and booming metro area. Here, in the small towns that sit in the foothills of the Appalachian mountains, Republican roots run generations deep. In November, the county voted for Donald Trump over Joe Biden, 87% to 13% — making it one of the most Republican-leaning areas in the state.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/04/politics/georgia-county-trump-supporters/index.html

President Donald Trump has not yet indicated whether he will attend the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden. If he is absent, he would join only a handful of incumbents who have not witnessed the formal handing over of power.

Biden has said that Trump’s presence at the U.S. Capitol on January 20 would be an important signal, telling CNN: “It is totally his decision and it’s of no personal consequence to me,” but adding, “I do think it is for the country.”

However, as Trump continues to dispute the election result, the chances of his becoming a no-show are growing. NBC reported that Trump does not plan to attend and may even announce a campaign to retake the White House in 2024 on the same day.

The most recent one-term president, George H.W. Bush told his supporters after losing to Bill Clinton in 1992 that he was committed to working “closely with his team to ensure the smooth transition of power.”

President Donald Trump after his inauguration on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. He may become the fourth incumbent president not to attend the inauguration of his successor.
Alex Wong/Getty Images

But not all transitions have been quite so cordial. If he insists on staying away, Trump would be the fourth incumbent to refuse to attend the inauguration of his successor, Thomas Balcerski, associate history professor at Eastern Connecticut State University, told Newsweek.

The first incumbent no-show was John Adams in 1801, who faced a challenge from his own vice president Thomas Jefferson.

At the time, electors voted twice, with the vice presidency and presidency going to the candidates with the second-highest and highest number of votes. A tie between Jefferson and running mate Aaron Burr was followed by the House of Representatives choosing Jefferson and ending Adams’ tenure. Before the ceremony, he left Washington at 4 a.m. on March 4, the date for inaugurations until 1933.

His son John Quincy Adams followed suit, leaving Washington before the celebrations of Andrew Jackson in 1829. Meanwhile in 1869, Andrew Johnson, who like Trump had survived an impeachment trial, refused to attend the inauguration of Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, preferring instead to stay in the White House to sign legislation.

Circumstances rather than point-blank refusals were behind the inauguration absences of three other incumbents.

In 1921, poor health prevented Woodrow Wilson from attending Warren G. Harding’s inauguration, although they did ride from the White House to the Capitol together.

On August 9, 1974, Richard Nixon resigned at noon and flew off in Marine One, after which Gerald Ford took the oath of office in the White House.

Another presidential no-show occurred on March 4, 1841 when President-elect William Henry Harrison rode to the Capitol on a white charger. Incumbent Martin Van Buren was nowhere to be seen, although his vice president, Richard Mentor Johnson, did attend Harrison’s inauguration. However, Van Buren was probably not invited by Harrison to participate so it would not be qualified as a snub, Balcerski said.

Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham thinks the president should attend the event, telling reporters this week, “I just think it’s good for the country. It’d be good for him.”

But Trump’s attendance is looking increasingly unlikely if it means granting legitimacy to Biden’s win.

“Trump’s choice will likely be met with a sigh of relief from the Biden team, since it avoids at least one potential distraction,” Thomas Gift, director of the Centre on U.S. Politics at University College London told Newsweek.

“Of course, Trump is reportedly mulling over the possibility of holding his own rally during Biden’s inauguration—so his presence may be felt even if he’s not physically present on the Capitol steps,” he added. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment.

The graphic below from Statista shows the tightest presidential races over the last 124 years.

STATISTA

Correction 12/4/20, 1:40pm. ET: This article has been updated to correct the surname of President Andrew Johnson.

p:last-of-type::after,.node-type-slideshow .article-body>p:last-of-type::after{content:none}]]>

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-inauguration-joe-biden-refuses-fourth-history-1552375

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave an optimistic assessment of the prospects for a mid-sized COVID-19 relief bill and a separate $1.4 trillion government-wide spending bill on Friday, teeing up expectations for a successful burst of legislative action to reverse months of frustration on pandemic relief.

Pelosi told reporters that she and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are in sync on a plan to reach agreement on the massive omnibus spending bill and to add COVID-19 relief to it.

Pelosi said a bipartisan, middle-of-the-road plan being finalized by a diverse gaggle of senators that she has endorsed as a foundation for the relief bill is a good effort, even though it’s a significant retreat from where Democrats stood before the election.

“It’s a good product,” Pelosi said. “It’s not everything we want.” Pelosi had dismissed an even larger package floated by moderates in September as inadequate, but said that the looming arrival of vaccines and President-elect Joe Biden’s victory are a “game changer” that should guarantee more aid next year and the elimination of the pandemic. She called the bill a bridge “until the inauguration and the emergence of the vaccine.”

When asked by a reporter why she would consider an aid bill for less than $1 trillion when she had previously reject Republican proposals she deemed “half a loaf,” Pelosi shot back, “Don’t characterize what we did before as a mistake as a preface to your question if you want an answer.”

The California congresswoman said the decision “was not a mistake,” reiterating that “with a Democratic president committed to a scientific solution for this, with the idea that we will have a vaccine, it’s a complete game changer.”

Pelosi and McConnell often fight and snipe at each other, but they are an unstoppable force when their interests align. They spoke on the phone Thursday, a conversation that came the day after Pelosi signaled a willingness to make major concessions in search of a COVID-19 rescue package in the $1 trillion range.

“We had a good conversation. I think we’re both interested in getting an outcome, both on the omnibus and on a coronavirus package,” McConnell said Thursday.

The pace of the economic recovery has slowed, COVID-19 caseloads are spiraling and the daily death toll is equaling records, a toxic statistical stew that shows the mandate for a second major relief package after months of failed promises. It’s also a promising moment after Biden rallied behind the bipartisan measure and top congressional Democrats began beating a retreat to endorse the $908 billion bipartisan framework as a way to build an agreement.

Some conservatives, including Republicans from COVID-19 hot spots like North Dakota and Iowa, said they were comfortable with an aid package carrying the almost $1 trillion price tag. The $908 billion cost is what many Republicans, McConnell included, signaled they were willing to accept this summer before scaling back their ambitions to maintain GOP unity.

The scaled-back, bipartisan measure is the product of talks involving Republicans Susan Collins, R-Maine, Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Mitt Romney, R-Utah, along with Democrats like Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Dick Durbin of Illinois. Also lending credibility to the middle-of-the-road package is a well-intentioned “problem solvers” group that promises to deliver a bipartisan vote.

A key McConnell ally, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said he is negotiating with fellow Judiciary Committee member Durbin over a provision much sought by Republicans and McConnell in particular that would give a liability shield to businesses, universities and other organizations against COVID-19-related lawsuits.

McConnell himself said a huge drop in Democratic demands — from more than $2 trillion to less than $1 trillion — was “at least movement in the right direction.”

And Trump weighed in to support the idea. Obtaining his necessary signature can be a bit of a high-wire act, especially since any COVID-19 relief is likely to be added to a catchall spending bill.

“I think they are getting very close and I want it to happen,” Trump said.

At stake is whether to provide at least some COVID-19 aid now rather than wait until Biden takes office. Businesses, especially airlines, restaurants and health providers, are desperate for help as caseloads spiral and deaths spike. Money to help states distribute vaccines is needed, and supplemental pandemic unemployment aid that provides additional weeks of jobless benefits expires at the end of the month.

Biden is supporting an additional aid package that’s as large as possible now. He said Wednesday that an aid package developed by moderates “wouldn’t be the answer, but it would be the immediate help for a lot of things.” He wants a relief bill to pass Congress now, with more aid to come next year.

The $908 billion measure would establish a $300 per week jobless benefit, send $160 billion to help state and local governments, boost schools and universities, revive popular “paycheck protection” subsidies for businesses, and bail out transit systems and airlines. A second round of $1,200 stimulus checks, pushed by both Trump and Pelosi, are not expected to be included in the $908 billion.

The statement was a significant concession by Pelosi and Schumer, who played hardball this fall during failed pre-election discussions with the administration on a costlier bill. They wanted a more generous unemployment benefit and far more for state and local governments. Their embrace of the $908 billion measure was a retreat from a secret $1.3 trillion offer the two Democrats gave McConnell just on Monday.

The new plan includes a liability shield for businesses and other organizations that have reopened their doors during the pandemic. It’s the first time Pelosi and Schumer have shown a willingness to consider the idea, a top priority of McConnell, and Durbin’s involvement suggests a level of seriousness that had not been previously seen.

McConnell had dismissed the bipartisan offer on Tuesday, instead aiming to rally Republicans around the $550 billion GOP proposal. But McConnell himself endorsed a $1 trillion-or-so plan this summer, only to encounter resistance from conservatives that prompted him to retrench. He has acknowledged that another infusion of aid to states and local governments, a key Pelosi demand, probably will pass eventually.

“There is momentum,” Pelosi said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://fox4kc.com/news/stimulus-check-update-pelosi-says-there-is-momentum-toward-covid-19-relief/

Millions of people in the San Francisco Bay Area will go under a new stay-at-home order beginning this weekend as coronavirus cases surge and hospitals fill up, health officials announced on Friday.

On Thursday California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, launched a regional stay-at-home order pegged to intensive-care unit capacity at hospitals. Once the ICU capacity of a region falls below 15%, a stay-at-home order will be triggered, with the vast majority of California expected to meet that criteria within the next few days.

The Bay Area was not expected to hit that threshold until mid-December, but San Francisco and four other Bay Area counties – Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin and Santa Clara – as well as the city of Berkeley have decided to pre-emptively adopt the order in an effort to curb the surge.

The order represents the most serious restrictions the state has put in place since the spring. They require restaurants to close to indoor and outdoor dining. Bars and wineries must also close, along with hair and nail salons and playgrounds. Retail stores and shopping centers can operate with just 20% customer capacity. Gatherings of any size with people outside of one’s household are banned.

The changes will take effect on Sunday and last through 4 January. Officials said the region’s hospital system would have been overwhelmed before the end of December, when Newsom’s order would apply.

“We don’t think we can wait for the state’s new restrictions to go into effect later this month. This is an emergency,“ said Chris Farnitano, the Contra Costa county health officer.

“Given the steep increase in Covid-19 cases in San Francisco, we must do whatever is necessary in order to get the virus under control,” said London Breed, San Francisco’s mayor. “This is about protecting people’s lives. We see how quickly it moves and how devastating the effects. We need to do everything we can to prevent our hospital system from becoming overwhelmed and to save lives.”

The other four regions of the state – northern California, the greater Sacramento area, southern California and the San Joaquin valley – are expected to reach the below-15% threshold within the next few days.

The new stay-at-home order will cut sharply into the most profitable shopping season and threaten financial ruin for businesses already struggling after 10 months of on-again, off-again restrictions and slow sales because of the pandemic.

The Associated Press contributed reporting

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/04/san-francisco-bay-area-stay-at-home-order-covid-19

President Trump, his predecessor and soon-to-be successor in the White House, as well as Vice President Mike Pence, are all weighing in on Georgia’s two Jan. 5 Senate runoff elections, where the Republican majority in the chamber is up for grabs.

President-elect Joe Biden on Friday took to Twitter to urge people in Georgia who are not registered to vote to do so by Monday’s deadline.

OBAMA ZOOMING INTO GEORGIA A DAY BEFORE TRUMP’S TRIP

“Georgia — Our work isn’t over yet. Register to vote by December 7th, and let’s flip the Senate,” Biden tweeted as he linked to a video from Iwillvote.com, a website launched by the Democratic National Committee to help Americans learn more about how to register to vote.

Ron Klain, who Biden selected as his White House chief of staff in his incoming administration, said the president-elect planned to campaign in Georgia before the Jan. 5 elections, which will determine if the GOP holds onto its Senate majority or if the Democrats will control both houses of Congress as well as the presidency.

The balance of power for the next Senate coming out of last month’s elections is 50 Republicans and 48 Democrats. That means Democrats must win both of Georgia’s runoffs to make it a 50-50 Senate. If that occurs, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris would be the tie-breaking vote, giving her party a razor-thin majority in the chamber.

RUNOFF UPDATE: PENCE RETURNS TO GEORGIA ON FRIDAY; OBAMA STARS IN NEW AD

In Georgia, where state law dictates a runoff if no candidate reaches 50% of the vote, GOP Sen. David Perdue narrowly missed avoiding a runoff, winning 49.75% of the vote in the November election. Democratic challenger Jon Ossoff trailed by roughly 87,000 votes.

In the other race, appointed Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler captured nearly 26% of the vote in a whopping 20-candidate special election to fill the final two years of the term of former GOP Sen. Johnny Isakson. Democratic candidate Rev. Raphael Warnock won nearly 33% of the vote.

Biden’s tweet came a couple of hours before his old boss, former President Barack Obama, held a virtual rally with Ossoff and Warnock. The former president stars in an ad for Ossoff that started airing on TV earlier this week.

Stacey Abrams, the former Georgia House Democratic leader and her party’s 2018 gubernatorial nominee who was narrowly defeated by GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, also joined the virtual rally Friday, which comes just 10 days before the start of early in-person voting in the runoff elections.

Obama called Georgia the “center of our civic universe, because the special election in Georgia is going to determine ultimately the course of the Biden presidency and whether Joe Biden and Kamala Harris can deliver legislatively all the commitments they made.”

AD SPENDING IN GEORGIA’S TWIN RUNOFF ELECTIONS SKYROCKETS

Around the same time that Obama’s headlined the Democrats’ virtual rally, Pence joined Perdue for a “Defend the Majority Rally” in the coastal city of Savannah.

Loeffler cancelled at the last minute, after a staffer on her campaign was killed in an auto accident.

“President Trump and I need David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler back in the Republican majority in the United States Senate,” Pence emphasized. We need the Peach State to defend the majority. The road to the Senate Republican majority runs right through the state of Georgia.”

It was Pence’s second trip to campaign in Georgia. He made stops on a bus tour with Perdue and Loeffler in the northern Georgia cities of Canton and Gainesville on Nov. 20.

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST FOX NEWS REPORTING ON THE GEORGIA RUNOFFS

Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia was scheduled to join the vice president and the two GOP senators in Savannah, but cancelled due to what was described as a family emergency.

Pence’s visit on Friday came one day before Trump is scheduled to parachute into Georgia to campaign on behalf of Perdue and Loeffler.

The president will headline a rally at 7 p.m. Saturday at the airport in the southern Georgia city of Valdosta. The event will be carried live by Fox News.  

On Friday, the president promoted his stop, tweeting “Big Rally Saturday Night in Georgia!!!”

Saturday’s event will be Trump’s first stop in Georgia since he campaigned there on his own behalf in October, when he held a large rally in Macon.

The president’s visit comes as he and his allies continue to try and reverse the results of the presidential contest in Georgia, a once solidly red state that’s turned into a crucial battleground in recent years. Biden carried the state by roughly 12,000 votes in last month’s election.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-obama-pence-trump-georgia-runoffs

Winter storm warnings were issued for parts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine ahead of what’s expected to be a powerful nor’easter that will bring rain, wind and potentially lots of snow to New England this weekend.

The National Weather Service’s warning is in place for Middlesex and Worcester counties in Massachusetts from 7 a.m. Saturday to 7 a.m. Sunday. Various warnings were issued for parts of New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine; varying in length but generally from Saturday morning to Sunday afternoon.

The warnings refer to expected snow totals of at least 6 inches, and in some cases over a foot. See all active weather alerts in our area here.

TIMELINE: An Hour-by-Hour Look at This Weekend’s Nor’easter

The storm is coming together to our south, with rain turning to snow along with wind in the forecast Saturday, and into Sunday in Maine.

In the short-term, raindrops, not snowflakes, are in the forecast Friday evening and overnight, slowly expanding through Southern New England by Saturday morning. 

There are sources of uncertainty in the forecast, including the delicate merger of a northern and southern disturbance very close to New England that needs to happen just right for a big event in southern New England (but it looks like it should, and almost certainly will for Maine).

The marginal temperatures for snow start in the 40s and then drop through the 30s from midday to afternoon in central and eastern New England as the storm strengthens and pulls cooler air from northern and western New England. 

As long as the storm comes together as we’re thinking, the rain itself will be impactful Saturday morning, with over an inch falling through Saturday morning for big puddles and ponding of water on roadways. 

Of course, as rain changes to snow in the high terrain of central Massachusetts and across much of northern and western New England, roads will deteriorate, with standing water pounded by wet snow causing slush and icing on roads. Add snow accumulation on top of that and it will likely require plowing and treatment.

Farther east, the concern is not as long in hours, but may be intense for a short time Saturday afternoon. As the storm strengthens quickly in the east, a burst of heavy precipitation Saturday afternoon on the west side of the storm will move directly over eastern New England, sure to dump extremely heavy snow on much of Maine and eastern New Hampshire, and likely to produce at least a burst of a few hours of heavy snow Saturday mid-afternoon to evening in eastern Massachusetts (though not southeast Massachusetts), which would also cause road conditions to deteriorate quickly. 

If all comes together just right, that burst of snow will drop two to four inches per hour of snow from northeast Massachusetts all the way into Maine Saturday evening — and if were to come together sooner, that potential would extend to the South Shore. 

More on Saturday’s Nor’easter



That’s why, even though our First Alert Team is acknowledging some uncertainty and the need to follow our updates, we’ve also been encouraging all residents as far south as the South Shore to put in the driveway stakes, prep the snowblower and plow and be ready for tough travel and road treatments. That way if the burst of snow makes it south through Plymouth County, all will be prepared. 

Winds will howl at the coast Saturday afternoon and evening, first gusting to 60 mph out of the south on Cape Cod if the storm center moves directly over the Cape, then swinging to blow from the north and northwest, gusting to 60 mph briefly at Cape Ann and gusting over 45 mph for many others.

The wind could prompt some power outages where the heavy snow falls and puts extra strain on power lines. 

The storm departs Saturday night, leaving a blustery but dry day Sunday except for lingering pockets of snow and snow showers in the North Country, where over a foot of snow will fall in Maine and New Hampshire.

They’ll get a natural boost to start the ski and snowmobile season while Vermont will see lighter snow amounts, but everyone is in for a chilly week next week, perfect for ski areas to blast snow guns and continue building on nature’s snow base, opening trails up quickly in the week ahead.

Source Article from https://www.nbcboston.com/weather/stories-weather/first-alert-winter-storm-warning-for-parts-of-mass-vt-ahead-of-noreaster/2248826/