“With families, businesses and local communities truly hurting from the impacts of this health and economic crisis, it’s unconscionable for Congress to go home without taking action,” said Representative Josh Gottheimer, Democrat of New Jersey. “Right now, there’s a huge amount of support from both sides of the aisle to finally get a new relief package over the finish line, and I’m hopeful that the legislation being announced today can help get the House and Senate to come to an agreement and that the president can sign it into law as soon as possible.”

After negotiating an agreement early last week to avoid a government shutdown when the new fiscal year begins on Thursday, Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Mnuchin agreed to resume conversations surrounding a broader relief package.

“I think we can find our common ground, and we’re ready when he comes back,” Ms. Pelosi said on MSNBC early Monday, before her call with Mr. Mnuchin. “We’re ready to have that conversation, but he has to come back with much more money to get the job done. So, I’m hopeful. I’m optimistic.”

Mr. Mnuchin, along with Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, has repeatedly urged Congress to provide more economic aid, with programs and funding approved in the $2.2 trillion stimulus law in March continuing to expire. But some Senate Republicans and some White House officials have warned against adding to the nation’s debt with another sweeping package, even as many economists have warned it is necessary to ensure a swift recovery from the economic toll of the pandemic.

“If Democrats are willing to sit down, I’m willing to sit down any time for bipartisan legislation in the Senate,” Mr. Mnuchin said in testimony this month before the Senate Banking Committee. “Let’s pass something quickly.”

The legislation unveiled on Monday would also delay deadlines for both the collection of census data and the submission of redistricting data to Congress, which the White House has been trying to speed ahead on and resisted including in the stopgap funding bill. It would provide $75 billion for coronavirus testing and tracing, offer funds for rental assistance, require a federal standard for worker protections against the coronavirus and revive a lapsed popular program for small businesses.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/28/us/politics/stimulus-bill-pelosi-mnuchin.html

The results suggest that warnings about ballot-counting delays from election administrators and voting rights advocates are breaking through to the broader public. The coronavirus pandemic is producing a sharp uptick in voting by mail — many times the previous mail voting rates in some states, according to polling and ballot request data. And counting mail ballots can be a more time-consuming process than counting Election Day votes cast at a polling place.

A POLITICO analysis of mail ballot processing rules in 13 swing states found that three Great Lakes swing states — Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — don’t allow for ballots to be processed or tallied before Election Day. Experts warn that those state laws simply don’t allow enough time to fully tally the expected glut of mail ballots in those states on the night of Nov. 3.

Michigan’s Republican-controlled legislature recently passed a bill, which awaits Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s signature, that would allow some local clerks to start processing ballots on the day before Election Day. Cross-party talks over a similar measure in Pennsylvania appear to have stalled, and observers in Wisconsin are not expecting any last-minute changes that would give clerks more time to process ballots.

Election experts also warn that, because of the lag processing mail ballots, results released on election night in some critical states may not be reflective of the final results once every vote is tallied. Significantly more Democrats are expected to vote via the mail than Republicans, while Republicans favor in-person voting, according to polls. This imbalance has led to fears that Trump could declare victory based on partial returns that aren’t definitive.

Trump has already been sowing distrust about the results of the election, saying that results should be final on the night of the election and repeatedly disparaging mail-in voting, which has been widely used in many states without significant problems, as ripe for fraud.

A majority of voters in the POLITICO/Morning Consult poll — 53 percent — said they were either very or somewhat concerned that Trump would prematurely declare victory for the election. One-third of respondents expressed the same concerns about Biden.

The poll also revealed fairly widespread anxiety about the election, with majorities saying they were concerned about everything from vote tampering to technical glitches.

The POLITICO/Morning Consult poll was conducted Sept. 25 to Sept. 27, surveying 1,986 registered voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points.

Morning Consult is a global data intelligence company, delivering insights on what people think in real time by surveying tens of thousands across the globe every single day.More details on the poll and its methodology can be found in these two documents: Toplines | Crosstabs

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/28/presidential-election-night-winner-poll-422679

Top Republicans in Pennsylvania are pushing back after a report by The Atlantic alleged that they are planning to potentially have the state legislature disregard the popular vote and appoint electors for the state in the case that election returns are disputed or delayed, saying the report took their comments out of context.

“What they wanted to do I guess is to get people excited and fire people up to fit their narrative that Trump’s trying to steal the election, which couldn’t be further from the truth,” Pennsylvania Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, a Republican, who was one people quoted by The Atlantic, said. “But there’s no role for the legislature in this process so how they got to this premise is beyond me other this is what they wanted to accomplish.”

The Atlantic story largely discusses President Trump, his comments on mail-in voting, potential litigation stemming from delays in counting mail-in ballots and predicts that Trump will not leave office if he loses the election — despite being asked repeatedly, Trump still has not unequivocally stated he will accept the result of the election.

BIDEN’S WHISTLE-STOP: DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE TAKING POST-DEBATE TRAIN SWING

But later in the story, The Atlantic makes the allegation that the Trump campaign and state Republican parties are preparing for the possibility that if there is no clear winner in a state ahead of the Dec. 8 “safe harbor” day — the day by which states must appoint their electors to ensure they are certified — state legislatures might appoint a slate of electors before that date, disregarding the ballots cast by state voters. It quotes an anonymous Trump campaign adviser as saying that such a move would be possible.

Further, The Atlantic alleges: “In Pennsylvania, three Republican leaders told me they had already discussed the direct appointment of electors among themselves, and one said he had discussed it with Trump’s national campaign.”

“I’ve mentioned it to them, and I hope they’re thinking about it too,” the story quotes Lawrence Tabas, the Pennsylvania Republican Party chairman, as saying about the legislature appointing electors.

But Vonne Andring, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania GOP, told Fox News that quote was taken out of context — that Tabas had been asked about the importance of meeting the safe harbor date and that he said he’d discussed meeting the date, not the state legislature appointing electors, with the Trump campaign.

“When they brought up the subject during the interview, the chairman explained to The Atlantic that meeting the safe harbor date was critical. He noted that he worked day and night to make sure it wasn’t missed in 2016, the Jill Stein recount. It came in just like a few days under. So The Atlantic then asked the chairman if the Trump campaign was aware of the importance of the safe harbor date. And it was to that prompt that the chairman responded he had talked to them about it,” Andring said in an interview.

Andring also said Tabas’ interview with The Atlantic happened in late July.

The Atlantic’s report continued to quote Tabas as saying, “I just don’t think this is the right time for me to be discussing those strategies and approaches, but [direct appointment of electors] is one of the options. It is one of the available legal options set forth in the Constitution.”

PENNSYLVANIA LAWMAKERS STRIP DOWN TO ADDRESS MAIL-IN VOTING

Andring said that line came later in the interview after Tabas, an election lawyer himself, brought up the possibility that the U.S. Congress might be forced to step in if Pennsylvania missed the safe harbor date.

“Then The Atlantic then advised the chairman that another possibility existed in which the state legislature could directly appoint electors. And they asked the chairman, they kept asking, ‘Well wouldn’t you like that? Wouldn’t that be a great strategy for Republicans? And that’s when the chair said, well, I wouldn’t discuss that kind of strategy with you guys,” Andring said.

The Atlantic then says Corman emphasized his desire for a quick and accurate vote count. But, the author writes, “If controversy persists as the safe-harbor date nears, he allowed, the legislature will have no choice but to appoint electors,” then quotes Corman as saying, “We don’t want to go down that road, but we understand where the law takes us, and we’ll follow the law.”

Corman said in an interview with Fox News that Pennsylvania specifically does not allow the state legislature to play any role in appointing electors.

“The election code very specifically lays out how electors are picked. Both parties submit electors to the Department of State prior to the election. When the Department of State certifies the winner, those electors from that party are now the electors. And that’s how it’s done,” Corman said. “And if there’s challenges in court and recounts and all that, that’s got to be a court process. The best of our knowledge, our best of our reading of the act, the legislature has no role.”

“It would go down to the courts to decide who the winner is,” Corman said of a potentially disputed count.

Fox News directly asked Corman if he could promise that the state legislature would not pick the state’s electors under any circumstance.

“By law, reading the law, I don’t see any format that allows us to do that. So, no, I would say we’re not going to pick the electors. Now, if some court says that somewhere along the way then I’ll listen to the court but I don’t see how that ever happens,” Corman said.

WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ABSENTEE VOTING AND UNIVERSAL VOTE-BY-MAIL

Outside of the brief quotes from Tabas and Corman, The Atlantic quotes an anonymous Trump campaign legal adviser as speculating state legislatures might say they are protecting the will of the people by appointing electors.

“The state legislatures will say, ‘All right, we’ve been given this constitutional power. We don’t think the results of our own state are accurate, so here’s our slate of electors that we think properly reflect the results of our state,’” the adviser said, according to The Atlantic, though the adviser is not quoted mentioning specific moves are being made to this effect in any state.

The U.S. Constitution says that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” Pennsylvania’s election law — its direction by the legislature — lays out the state’s elector-selecting rules. Parties choose their electors, not lawmakers, and the law delegates the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, the county in which the state capital Harrisburg resides, as the venue for deciding presidential election disputes.

Mail-in voting has been greatly expanded in many states, including Pennsylvania, during the coronavirus pandemic. Trump and many on the right have warned that it could lead to increased fraud, citing anecdotal examples like the election in Paterson, N.J., after which four people were charged with fraud and a redo election was called.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But there is little history of fraud in mail-in balloting, especially on the scale that could tip a statewide or national election. What experts worry about is the time it could take to count a deluge of mail-in ballots that states are not accustomed to counting, and disenfranchisement from large numbers of mail-in ballots being invalidated due to voter mistakes — 100,000 were tossed in California alone during the March presidential primary, according to The Associated Press.

“There are a number of places that have lengthy experience with voting by mail, and they’ve had no problems and there’s been almost no fraud associated with that,” Darrell West, the vice president and director of Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution told Fox News in an interview earlier this year.

“I think there is some question about the states that are doing it for the first time, whether they’re going to have procedures in place,” West added. “I think one of the big issues this year is going to be the signature verification … I think this is the thing people should be focused on, because that’s where the litigation is going to occur and where the controversy is going to be.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-republicans-report-alleges-plan-to-circumvent-popular-vote

But there was quiet concern within the campaign, where aides took note of daily tracking numbers from Rasmussen Reports, a typically rosy assessment of how the president is faring, that showed support falling after the tax story. Among Mr. Trump’s circle, there was finger-pointing about how the issue was handled and a hesitancy to discuss with him an issue they know he is sensitive about.

Many of the president’s advisers argued that such stories have never harmed his standing with core supporters in the past and that this would be no exception. They recognized, however, that Mr. Trump would have to have an effective response prepared for the debate, the first encounter between the two candidates, scheduled for 9 p.m. Eastern at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. Some aides suggested he try to finesse an answer similar to what he has said previously, that taking advantage of the tax code is simply “smart” for a business person, while also painting himself as a jobs creator.

Tim Murtaugh, the campaign spokesman, called the report inaccurate because the president has paid “tens of millions in taxes,” without specifying whether they were federal income taxes or directly denying that there were years he paid none. “This has been litigated in front of the voters before,” he said on Fox News. “The president released more than 100 pages of financial records. And Americans made their judgment in 2016 and elected him president. There’s nothing in there that changes anyone’s mind.”

Still, some of the details, particularly paying only $750 in federal income taxes two years in a row and deducting hairstyling expenses, among other things, could resonate in a visceral way. Democrats expressed hope that they could fuel a sense of injustice with everyday Americans who pay far more themselves and cannot write off hair expenses.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York tweeted that she paid thousands of dollars in federal taxes in 2016 and 2017 — when she was still working as a bartender in New York City. “He contributed less to funding our communities than waitresses & undocumented immigrants,” she wrote. The Biden campaign video showing the typical income tax paid by various workers amplified the attack.

Sign up for On Politics to get the latest election and politics news and insights.

The Biden campaign also began selling T-shirts, buttons and stickers that say, “I paid more income taxes than Donald Trump.” And the campaign on Monday launched an online “Trump tax calculator” allowing people to calculate how much more they paid in federal income taxes than Mr. Trump. “Mad? Us too,” the web page for the tax calculator said. “Join our campaign to elect Joe Biden and make ‘billionaires’ like Donald Trump pay their fair share.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/28/us/politics/trump-taxes-presidential-debate.html

A wildfire in northern California’s Napa Valley wine country that burned down the Chateau Boswell has more than quadrupled in size overnight to 11,000 acres and thousands of residents awoke to mandatory evacuation orders on Monday.

The blaze, since named the Glass Fire, ignited at 3.50am Sunday near Calistoga, about 60 miles north of San Francisco, and was fanned through the area’s famed vineyards by dry wind gusts. 

The subsequent Shady and Boysen fires merged with Glass, burning 17 square miles as of early Monday, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire. 

Video footage from the Napa Sheriff’s Office showed authorities driving through the area to make sure residents had evacuated to safety after more than a thousand firefighters have struggled to contain the flames.

 Two thousand people in California‘s Napa Valley wine growing area have been ordered to evacuate their homes, and another 3,000 have been told to prepare to.   

Chateau Boswell Winery is burned to the ground from wildfires in St Helena, California on Monday after it was engulfed Sunday

A before and after shot of the Chateau Boswell Winery after the Glass Fire came through, in Saint Helena, California

Boswell is one of the handful of family-run private wineries in the region and contributes to the Napa region’s quality wine reputation

The Chateau Boswell winery started 40 years ago by focusing on Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon but has since branched out

Out of hundreds of wineries in Napa the business is one of a few to sell direct to clients rather than through distributors

The subsequent Shady and Boysen fires merged with the initial fire, burning 17 square miles as of early Monday

A truck is seen melted into the ground after the wildfire ripped through the Northern California region on Sunday

The subsequent Shady and Boysen fires merged with Glass, burning 17 square miles as of early Monday, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire. Pictured, the stone winery building, Chateau Boswell Winery, Saint Helena, Napa Valley, Napa County, California, before the fire 

CHATEAU BOSWELL

The Chateau Boswell winery was opened in 1979 by the late Richard Boswell and is one of a handful of privately-owned family wineries amidst the 554 wineries in the Napa Valley.

When it launched 40 years ago it was unique in that it was one of only 71 wineries in the region at the time to behave like a boutique winery – it sold direct to clients when others sold through a distributor.

It used to focus on the Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon but has since branched out with its portfolio.

It’s currently under the helm of Susan Boswell and is enjoyed by customers who take advantage of its very limited bottling and green standards when it comes to water and energy use.

 The Glass Fire began Sunday but firefighters reported three other conflagrations in the area Monday morning, which they were dealing with as one large blaze that quickly burned more than 1,000 acres, destroying an unknown number of homes. 

The Chateau Boswell was established in 1979 by the late Richard Boswell and is currently run by Susan Boswell. It’s one of the handful of family-run private wineries in the region and contributes to the Napa region’s quality wine reputation.

As well as the destruction of Chateau Boswell in the town of St. Helena, a castle-style tourist attraction farmhouse winery Castello di Amorosa, plus Merus Wines and Davis Estates were under imminent threat from the fast-moving flames. The Black Rock Inn bed and breakfast was also up in flames.

Firefighters were deploying 133 engines, 22 water tenders, five helicopters and 35 bulldozers, the Napa Valley Register said.

The Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) company cut electricity to 65,000 homes in northern California as a precaution.

Early on Monday, new evacuation orders were issued in Sonoma and Napa counties, including parts of the cities of Santa Rosa – the most populated place in Sonoma County with 177,000 residents – and St. Helena. 

More than 8,500 homes and other buildings were threatened. 

The National Weather Service has issued a Red Flag Warning through to the end of Monday, forecasting low humidity and gusts of wind up to 55 miles per hour through certain canyons.

Napa Sheriff’s Office said that warning means there’s a potential threat to life and/or property.

The fire also prompted the evacuation of the 151-bed Adventist Health St. Helena hospital on Sunday for a second time in a few weeks after lightning-sparked blazes swept through the area in August.

It was the latest inferno in a historically destructive year throughout the US West. 

In California alone, wildfires so far have scorched more than 3.7 million acres, far exceeding any single year in state history. 

Since August 15, 8,100 fires in the state have killed 26 people and destroyed more than 7,000 structures. Climate change has contributed to wildfires’ growing intensity, scientists say.

A general view of the remains of the Chateau Boswell Winery on Monday after the Glass Fire came through 

The fires ripped through Chateau Boswell and other wineries midway through grape picking season in the lead-up to winter

Early on Monday, new evacuation orders were issued in Sonoma and Napa counties, including St. Helena

Wineries and vineyards near Calistoga, California, are destroyed by wildfires. Venge Vinyards is pictured

Wineries and vineyards near Calistoga, California were destroyed by wildfires. The Venge Winery mail box is pictured

Video footage from the Napa Sheriff’s Office showed authorities driving through the area to make sure residents had evacuated to safety

A fire hose lays on the ground in front of a home that was destroyed in Santa Rosa, California

A San Bruno firefighter puts out hotspots in a home that was destroyed by the Glass Fire on September 28 in Santa Rosa

Firefighters pour water on a burning structure after the Glass Fire moved through the Oakmont neighborhood on Monday

The fast-moving Glass Fire has burned over 11,000 acres in Sonoma and Napa counties

More than 8,500 homes and other buildings were threatened and it’s unclear how many have already been destroyed

Much of Northern California is under a red flag warning for high fire danger through Monday evening

Flames consume an Oakmont neighborhood home as the Glass Fire burns in Santa Rosa

The remains of a home that was destroyed by the Glass Fire on September 28, 2020 in Santa Rosa, California

The remains of a home that was destroyed by the Glass Fire is seen on Monday

High winds, gusting at 55mph, were hampering attempts to put out the Glass Fire, which broke out at 3:50am on Sunday and has so far burned 2,500 acres near St. Helena.

St. Helena, around 15 miles north of Napa, has been the site of prized wineries since the 1860s. The area is home to Beringer, one of California’s oldest continuously operating wineries, founded by Jacob Beringer and his brother Frederick in 1875. Some wines produced in the region sell for more than $460 a bottle. 

‘We saved the winery last night, but everything else was lost,’ Tuck Beckstoffer, president of a 20-acre vineyard near St Helena, told Wine Spectator magazine on Monday. 

The wine country has been scarred by terrible fires in recent years, including the 2017 Tubbs Fire that killed 22 people and destroyed more than 5,600 homes and other buildings. 

The area is also flanked by the LNU Lightning Complex, which was sparked on August 17 and has destroyed 363,000 acres. It is now 98 per cent contained – unlike the Glass Fire, which is entirely uncontained. 

County emergency management officials say 743 homes and 1,857 people are within the Glass Fire evacuation zone, the Press Democrat reported.

A further 1,370 homes and 3,425 people are in the larger evacuation warning zone. 

Some were evacuated from their homes before dawn, and evacuations continued throughout the day.

Residents at the Oakmont Gardens retirement community are evacuated by bus during the fast-moving Shady Fire 

Chateau Boswell was the first winery to be certified Napa Green, in recognition of their environmental protection efforts

Chateau Boswell’s roof was in flames as the blaze ripped through the region in the latest terrifying wildfire

A plane is seen dumping fire retardant chemicals on the hillsides above the vineyards of Napa Valley

Chateau Boswell, a winery founded 40 years ago, was engulfed by flames on Sunday afternoon

A Marin County firefighter is seen battling the Glass Fire in Calistoga as the flames ripped through fields and homes in the area

A vineyard was destroyed by the horrific fire which illuminated the sky orange and decimated much of the beautiful landscape

Among those evacuated were 50 patients at Adventist Health St. Helena hospital in Deer Park. 

It was the second wildfire-related evacuation of the 151-bed hospital in a month, after a massive cluster of lightning-sparked blazes that swept several counties north of the San Francisco Bay region in August. 

Fourteen sheriffs deputies from Napa County went door-to-door telling people to evacuate, using high-low sirens to alert residents.

The cause of the fire is being investigated and there were no immediate reports of injuries.

The blaze erupted midway through the traditional grape-harvesting period in the Napa Valley, world renowned as one of California’s premiere wine-producing regions. 

The area’s 475 wineries account for just 4 per cent of the state’s total annual grape harvest but half of the retail value of all California wines sold, according to the Napa Valley Vintners trade group.

Of Napa’s 16 wine-growing districts, or sub-appellations, the Howell Mountain area may have faced the greatest threat, said Lisa Covey, a spokeswoman for Hall Family Wines, which kept open during the day all its three tasting rooms in the county.

Napa and other wine-growing regions have been hit by wildfires in and around the Bay area for several years. Susan Krausz, co-owner of Arkenstone Estate Vineyards in the Howell Mountain community of Angwin, said it would take days or weeks to assess the impact of the latest blaze on valley vintners.

‘Most people have harvested,’ she said, but added, ‘Any time’s a bad time for a fire.’

The Glass Mountain Inn is engulfed by flames after a blaze broke out in St Helena, California, on Sunday, destroying a number of homes

The Glass Fire burns behind Merus Wines vineyards in Napa Valley after a heatwave and dry winds created the perfect storm for the blaze to take hold

Vines from the Viader Vineyards were engulfed in smoke on Sunday afternoon as the Glass Fire blazed out of control

A large region of northern California was battling the raging fires as many homes were destroyed in the inferno

The hillsides above the Davis Estates vineyard were ablaze on Sunday, and firefighters were working to protect the site

Tom Kaljian, 78, a realtor who owns a house about halfway between Calistoga and St. Helena, defied evacuation orders to spend the day with his wife hosing down their home and dry brush along a fence line separating their property from the Silverado Trail, a key north-south roadway.

‘We were told to get out of here, but I was trying to protect our little abode, so we stayed,’ he told Reuters by telephone.

After firefighters told him the house was no longer in danger, he added, ‘I stopped watering at that point, and came in and took a nap.’ 

‘We are very concerned tonight about red flag conditions,’ said Janet Upton, spokeswoman for the Napa County Office of Emergency Services.

She said that many of the communities were isolated and reached via narrow, winding mountain roads, which made the decision to evacuate more pressing.

Upton said the dry conditions and high winds were worrying firefighters. 

‘There’s been discussion of relative humidity in elevations in the fire area as low as 0 per cent — and kiln-dried wood is at 9 per cent,’ Upton said. 

‘That factor alone, without the winds, would drive dangerous fire behavior.’ 

A Cal Fire fire engine drives into the Louis Stralla Water Treatment Plant during the Glass Fire

The moon rises behind burning trees along the famous Silverado Trail road, home to dozens of celebrated wineries

Firefighters protect a residence from the encroaching Glass Fire at a vineyard in Deer Park

The spectacular 100-year-old Davis Estate winery, with its beautiful wooden tasting room, was considered under threat. 

So too was Reverie, founded 25 years ago on a lush Napa hillside.

Photos posted on social media showed planes flying above the Davis Estate, dropping fire retardant chemicals to try and protect the property.

Cal Fire used a DC10 plane, which was capable of dropping almost 10,000 gallons of retardant in eight seconds on each pass. 

The wine country has been scarred by terrible fires in recent years, including the 2017 Tubbs Fire that killed 22 people and destroyed more than 5,600 homes and other buildings. 

County emergency management officials say 743 homes and 1,857 people are within the Glass Fire evacuation zone

Trees surrounding the famous Silverado Trail went up in flames on Sunday as the Glass Fire raged

Chris Maschauser rides an ATV to cut off a heard of goats from Mascauser Vineyards and Ranch which had been hired to eat underbrush in order to protect it from the advance of the fire

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8782111/Napa-Valley-Chateau-Boswell-winery-pictured-destroyed-Glass-Fire-California.html

President Trump and Judge Amy Coney Barrett walk to the Rose Garden of the White House on Saturday.

Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump and Judge Amy Coney Barrett walk to the Rose Garden of the White House on Saturday.

Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump has made no secret of his intentions regarding the U.S. Supreme Court and abortion rights. During a presidential debate in 2016, Trump vowed to appoint justices who’d vote to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

“That will happen automatically, in my opinion, because I am putting pro-life justices on the court,” Trump said. “I will say this: It will go back to the states, and the states will then make a determination.”

Trump has followed through on naming conservative judges to the federal courts. But nominees for judicial appointments – including his latest, Judge Amy Coney Barrett – tend to be a bit more reserved when speaking about their views on reproductive rights.

During her Senate confirmation hearings for her seat on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017, Barrett — who has spoken openly about her Catholic faith — was asked about her personal views on Roe v. Wade. She gave a version of what’s become a standard answer to that question for people in her position, saying, “All nominees are united in their belief that what they think about a precedent should not bear on how they decide cases.”

Barrett, 48, has written and spoken about the issue before, including during an appearance at Jacksonville University in Florida shortly before the 2016 election, while a law professor at the University of Notre Dame. Barrett was asked about ways a hypothetical future Supreme Court might allow states to pass more restrictions on abortion.

“I think don’t think the core case – Roe‘s core holding that, you know, women have a right to an abortion – I don’t think that would change. But I think the question of whether people can get very late-term abortions, how many restrictions can be put on clinics – I think that would change,” Barrett said at the time.

Her record as a federal appeals court judge offers some potential clues to her views. In two cases where a lower court ruled to block Indiana laws imposing limits on abortion, Barrett voted to hear arguments that could have potentially overruled the lower court.

But in a third case, involving buffer zones designed to protect abortion patients from protesters outside clinics, Barrett voted to uphold precedent allowing for those zones.

Barrett’s colleague, Notre Dame law professor Carter Snead, said it’s difficult to predict exactly how she would rule on abortion-related cases on the Supreme Court. Snead described Barrett as “someone who understands the complexity of the question that’s gonna come before the court, and who understands the stakes … and is going to be very thoughtful about how she proceeds.”

To Katie Watson, an attorney and bioethicist at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, Barrett’s record seems pretty straightforward.

“I’d expect her to overrule Roe, and she appears to have four other sitting justices who are willing to join her,” Watson said.

While there is only so much you can read into Barrett’s past judicial record, Watson said you don’t really have to.

“I think the best evidence of her position on Roe v. Wade is that President Trump has said he will only appoint justices who are committed to reversing Roe, and there’s no reason not to believe him,” she said.

On that question, activists on both sides of the abortion debate also seem to believe Trump. Barrett is receiving widespread praise from anti-abortion-rights groups, and opposition from reproductive rights advocates, such as Fatima Goss Graves, president of the National Women’s Law Center.

“When you pair her record with the context that this issue is coming in, it paints this extraordinary picture that even though we’re in a situation where the vast majority of people in this country support access to abortion, that we are gonna have something pushed through where the Supreme Court may leave us without that right,” she said.

While a majority of Americans favor some limitations on abortion, most also support Roe v. Wade. If Barrett is confirmed and the court indeed overturns that precedent, the issue would be left to the states – setting up intense fights in legislatures, and legal observers said, leading to an even more patchwork system, where abortion rights hinge almost entirely on where a person lives.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/09/28/917827735/a-look-at-amy-coney-barretts-record-on-abortion-rights

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., urged her congressional colleagues to bolster their support for Democratic candidates in an attempt to shore up the type of majority the party would need if the 2020 presidential election reached her chamber.

According to the 12th Amendment, congressional delegations decide the next president in the unlikely event that neither candidate wins a majority (270) in the Electoral College. Going into the election, Trump has the upper hand as his party controls more state delegations (26 vs. Democrats’ 22), even though Democrats outnumber Republicans in total representatives.

But because Congress doesn’t declare election results until after new members are sworn in, November’s results could theoretically allow Democrats to win enough state delegations prior to Congress certifiying the election results on Jan. 6.

“We must achieve that majority of delegations or keep the Republicans from doing so,” Pelosi said in a letter to colleagues Sunday. “Because we cannot leave anything to chance, House Majority PAC is doing everything it can to win more delegations for Democrats. It’s sad we have to have to plan this way, but it’s what we must do to ensure the election is not stolen.”

COULD THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE BE DECIDED BY NEBRASKA’S SECOND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT?

She added: “That’s why it’s so important that we support House Majority PAC right now.  We have outstanding candidates in these key districts and they have built strong campaigns, but we must forcefully ensure they win. Simply put, this strategy to protect our democracy and elect Joe Biden will take an all out effort and resources.”

Pelosi’s comments underscored the tension surrounding an election where polling showed narrowing margins between the two candidates just weeks before voters are set to cast their ballots.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

While the election could be a close call, the scenario outlined by Pelosi hasn’t occurred since 1876. But in the unlikely event that it does, Pelosi wants her caucus to be prepared.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-12th-amendment-2020-election

Donald Trump heads into the first US presidential debate against Joe Biden on Tuesday night trailing in opinion polls and now reeling from dramatic newspaper revelations detailing his chronic financial losses and years of tax avoidance.

Trump paid just $750 in federal income taxes in 2016, the year he ran for and won election, the New York Times reported. In 2017, he paid only $750 again. And he paid no federal income tax at all in 10 out of the previous 15 years.

Evidence that Trump is paying much less than many of his working-class supporters is likely to be weaponized by Biden, his Democratic rival, when the two men go head to head for the first debate in Cleveland, Ohio.

The Biden campaign was quick to seize on the report, releasing an attack ad contrasting Trump’s $750 payment with elementary school teachers (who typically pay $7,239), firefighters ($5,283), construction managers ($16,447) and registered nurses ($10,216).

Biden is hoping to persuade voters who had voted for Barack Obama but switched to Trump in 2016 that the president is a conman whose connection with working people is illusory. As the county barrels toward the election on 3 November, Biden has portrayed the contest as “Scranton v Park Avenue,” pitting his home town in Pennsylvania against wealthy Manhattan, where Trump built his branding empire and reality television career.

Other Democrats amplified Biden’s criticism. Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer tweeted an emoji calling on followers to raise their hands “if you paid more in federal income tax than President Trump.”

Chris Murphy, a Democratic senator for Connecticut, tweeted: “SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS. That’s why he hid his tax returns. Because the whole time, he wasn’t paying taxes. But you were.”

About half of Americans pay no federal income taxes, but the average income tax paid in 2017 was nearly $12,200, according to the IRS.

The supporters who attend his campaign rallies often cite his business acumen, and the sacrifice they say he made to go into politics, as reasons to vote for him.

But the New York Times report also showed that Trump has lost more money than he made, denting the successful entrepreneur image that he cultivated on the reality TV show The Apprentice. He even chose “mogul” as his secret service code name.

“Ultimately,” the New York Times wrote, “Mr Trump has been more successful playing a business mogul than being one in real life.”


Trump ‘paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017’ – video report

More than $300m in loans for which he is personally responsible will come due within the next four years, the paper said. “Should he win re-election, his lenders could be placed in the unprecedented position of weighing whether to foreclose on a sitting president.”

The identity of the lenders remains unknown, raising questions over who might exert influence over Trump and whether he has conflicts of interest.

The president – the first since the 1970s to refuse to release his tax returns – initially resorted to his instinctive cry of “totally fake news” when the story broke.

On Monday he followed up with a series of tweets that said: “The Fake News Media, just like Election time 2016, is bringing up my Taxes & all sorts of other nonsense with illegally obtained information & only bad intent. I paid many millions of dollars in taxes but was entitled, like everyone else, to depreciation & tax credits…..

“…..Also, if you look at the extraordinary assets owned by me, which the Fake News hasn’t, I am extremely under leveraged – I have very little debt compared to the value of assets.”

The defense contained an apparent contradiction: that the tax returns were both fake and illegally obtained.

Then, in an attempt to deflect attention with a manufactured controversy, the president tweeted about the debate: “Joe Biden just announced that he will not agree to a Drug Test. Gee, I wonder why?”

There is no evidence that Biden is taking drugs.

Kate Bedingfield, Biden’s deputy campaign manager, has responded to such claims in unusually blunt terms by stating: “Vice President Biden intends to deliver his debate answers in words. If the president thinks his best case is made in urine he can have at it. We’d expect nothing less from Donald Trump, who pissed away the chance to protect the lives of 200K Americans when he didn’t make a plan to stop Covid-19.”

Despite the endless dramas of the campaign, Biden has held a remarkably steady lead of around eight to 10 percentage points in most national surveys. He holds varying leads in battleground states. With some people already using early voting, the debate may not change many minds.

It comes amid a coronavirus pandemic that has killed 200,000 Americans, ongoing protests against racial injustice and a fresh uproar over Trump’s refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power and and rapid nomination of conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett to the supreme court to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The move earned widespread approval from Christian evangelicals and other conservatives. Barrett looks set to be confirmed by the Senate a week before election day despite fierce Democratic opposition. Trump’s taxes, however, appear to have changed the conversation on debate night.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/28/trump-tax-returns-new-york-times-biden-debate

HBO’s John Oliver called President Trump nominating Amy Coney Barrett a “f—ing travesty” because the Supreme Court “is about to lurch to the right for the foreseeable future.” 

“We’re at the end of a generational battle and the heartbreaking thing is — we lost,” Oliver said during a lengthy rant on Sunday’s “Last Week Tonight.”

“It’s going to hurt for a long time for a lot of people,” he added.

AMY CONEY BARRETT ACCEPTS PRESIDENT TRUMP’S NOMINATION TO THE SUPREME COURT, PLEDGES TO ‘FAITHFULLY AND IMPARTIALLY’ DISCHARGE DUTIES 

Barrett on Saturday accepted the nomination, filling the seat vacated by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. If she’s confirmed by the Senate, the move would significantly shift the nation’s highest court to the right — and clearly Oliver isn’t a fan.

HBO’s John Oliver called President Trump nominating Amy Coney Barrett a “f—–g travesty” because the Supreme Court “is about to lurch to the right for the foreseeable future” during a lengthy rant on Sunday.
(HBO)

“Trump is about to replace a liberal icon with an extremely conservative justice who has been called ‘the female Antonin Scalia,’ and she could serve for a long time,” Oliver said. “If, and almost certainly when, Barret is conformed to the Supreme Court, impacts could be dire.”

BIDEN SAYS SENATE SHOULD NOT ACT ON AMY CONEY BARRETT SUPREME COURT NOMINATION UNTIL AFTER ELECTION

The far-left HBO host listed the Affordable Care Act, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and abortion as issues that he’s concerned about with Barrett’s potential confirmation on the horizon. He then took a shot at Senate Republicans, saying they’re hypocrites for rushing to confirm Barrett in an election year.

WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS GRAPHIC LANGUAGE

“There is clearly no point holding on to hope that conservatives might choose to respect the precedent they set by refusing to even consider Merrick Garland in an election year, because that was always in bad faith, as was obvious at the time,” Oliver said.

Oliver bashed Sen. Mitt Romney for suggesting that Americans are largely “center right” these days and critics from the left got too used to the Supreme Court leaning to the left.

BIDEN SAYS SENATE SHOULD WAIT ON TRUMP SUPREME COURT NOMINEE DESPITE PAST COMMENTS

“What the hell are you talking about, Mitt? Set aside the notion that a court that gutted the Voting Rights Act is a ‘liberal court,’ since when is this nation naturally center-right? Did we all take a BuzzFeed quiz I’m not remembering like, ‘Chose your four favorite lasagna ingredients to tell you which direction the nation’s electorate leans,’” Oliver said. “For the record, more Americans say they align more with the Democratic Party than the Republicans.”

Oliver was particularly worked up and wasn’t finished attacking Republicans and Barrett in the 20-plus minute segment.

“So, our country isn’t so much center-right as Mitt Romney is center-wrong. Look, this has been a very dark week for lots of people. The Supreme Court is about to lurch to the right for the foreseeable future, and if things seem hopeless right now, it’s because, to be completely honest, they basically are,” Oliver said before launching into a vulgar rant about “how the f—k” American ended up in this situation.

TRUMP CAMPAIGN KEEPS PRESSURE ON BIDEN TO RELEASE LIST OF POTENTIAL SUPREME COURT PICKS

Oliver then slammed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the “deeply undemocratic nature” of America’s institutions.

“The unavoidable truth is that the system is already rigged and it’s rigged in a way that has allowed a party without popular support to drastically reshape an entire branch of government for the foreseeable future by appealing almost exclusively to white voters in some of the least populous parts of the country,” Oliver said.

“That is not a mandate,” he continued. “That is not democracy.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/hbo-john-oliver-amy-coney-barrett-liberals-lost

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is warning Democrats of an exceedingly rare scenario where the House may need to decide the presidential election in January.

Jose Luis Magana/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jose Luis Magana/AP

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is warning Democrats of an exceedingly rare scenario where the House may need to decide the presidential election in January.

Jose Luis Magana/AP

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is warning Democrats that they must win the majority, not just of the House of Representatives but a majority of each state delegation, in case the House is called upon to decide the election in January.

If the outcome of the election is not clear by Jan. 6, the decision goes to the House. But the vote is not as straightforward as Democrats having the majority of seats overall. Each state would get a single vote, which would be determined by the party that has the majority of members from that state.

Pelosi outlined the once far-fetched scenario in a letter to Democrats over the weekend. She called on her members to shift money to House Democrats’ fundraising arm, House Majority PAC, to help shore up campaign funds in battleground districts.

“We cannot leave anything to chance. House Majority PAC is doing everything it can to win more delegations for Democrats,” Pelosi said in the letter, sent from her campaign email. “It’s sad we have to have to plan this way, but it’s what we must do to ensure the election is not stolen.”

Pelosi said the letter is a response to comments President Trump made at a weekend rally in Pennsylvania where he discussed the possibility of Congress deciding the election.

“I’ve been working on this for a while, I’ve been working on almost every scheme he might have to steal the election,” Pelosi said Monday on MSNBC. “Anything we do to increase our numbers in the House, whether it’s state delegations or members of Congress wherever they are, will help us hold the House and enlarge our size, win the Senate and elect Joe Biden president of the United States on Election Day — or the few days that it takes to count thereafter.”

Trump told his supporters that he wants to avoid the election being decided by the Supreme Court or Congress.

“I don’t want to go back to Congress either, even though we have an advantage if we go back to Congress,” Trump said. “It’s counted one vote per state. So we actually have an advantage.”

Trump was referencing the current balance of state representation in the House. Republicans represent the majority of House members from 26 states; Democrats have the majority in 22 states. Another two, Michigan and Pennsylvania, are tied.

Congress hasn’t been called on to intervene in a presidential election at any time in modern history and only twice since the ratification of the 12th Amendment in 1804. The most recent congressional vote to decide the presidency was in 1877.

Pelosi called on Democrats to prepare for the exceedingly rare circumstances, arguing that they cannot ignore any possibility in this election.

“Simply put, this strategy to protect our democracy and elect Joe Biden will take an all-out effort and resources,” Pelosi said in the letter. “I’m asking you to help with this delegation strategy as well.”

The coronavirus pandemic has upended this year’s election. With many more voters voting by mail, there is a greater likelihood that results will not be clear on Nov. 3. There is also a higher chance of litigation this year, given many changes to state voting laws.

Trump has further muddied the waters by casting doubt on the integrity of the election and suggesting he won’t necessarily agree to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/09/28/917730388/pelosi-prepares-democrats-for-rare-possibility-the-house-may-decide-the-election

A new poll of North Carolina shows Democrat Joe BidenJoe BidenNew Biden campaign ad jabs at Trump’s reported 0 income tax payments Biden campaign sells ‘I paid more income taxes than Trump’ stickers Trump, Biden have one debate goal: Don’t lose MORE with a razor-thin lead in the battleground state of North Carolina, which is close to a must-win state for President TrumpDonald John TrumpNew Biden campaign ad jabs at Trump’s reported 0 income tax payments Ocasio-Cortez: Trump contributed less in taxes ‘than waitresses and undocumented immigrants’ Third judge orders Postal Service to halt delivery cuts MORE.

The Meredith College poll published Monday found the former vice president holding support from 45.7 percent of likely voters polled, barely leading Trump at 45.4 percent.

The president’s competitiveness is fueled by an advantage among independents, who break for him 43.1 percent to 39.8 percent in the poll.

Former President Obama won North Carolina in the 2008 presidential race, but it went Republican in 2012 and 2016.

“North Carolina is shaping up to be the key battleground everyone thought it would be heading into the election cycle. Although Trump has gained some ground with key groups like Hispanic voters, he is running behind Biden among suburban voters and women voters, two key groups that will determine the outcome of the presidential race in North Carolina,” said Meredith’s poll director David McLennan.

The state is also home to a key Senate race that could decide the next majority. 

The poll found Democrat Cal Cunningham (D) leading incumbent Sen. Thom TillisThomas (Thom) Roland TillisGraham neck and neck with challenger in South Carolina Senate race: poll Trump’s Teflon problem: Nothing sticks, including the ‘wins’ Netflix distances from author’s comments about Muslim Uyghurs but defends project MORE (R), 43.1 percent to 41.8 percent. It’s a gap within the poll’s margin for error.

Gov. Roy Cooper (D) holds a double-digit lead over Lt. Gov. Dan Forest (R) in his race, 49.6 percent to 39.3 percent.

McLennan said Cooper’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic had put Republicans at a disadvantage in terms of recapturing the governorship, which the GOP held before Cooper took office in 2017.

“The election is about the governor’s response to the pandemic and, as long as most citizens in the state seem to approve how the governor has handled that, it makes Dan Forest’s task very difficult,” said McLennan.

Meredith College’s poll contacted 705 likely voters in North Carolina Sept. 18-22, with a credibility interval of 3.5 percentage points.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/518576-poll-biden-trump-tied-in-north-carolina

Louisville was virtually deserted Sunday evening amid curfews to control protests after a grand jury declined to charge officers in the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor.

Mayor Greg Fischer had urged people to begin heading home about an hour before the curfew was set to begin at 9pm as the protesters continued to gather.

Taylor, 26, was shot multiple times March 13 after her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired at officers who had entered her home during a narcotics raid, authorities said. Sgt Jonathan Mattingly, Detective Myles Cosgrove and Officer Brett Hankison burst down the door to Taylor’s home during a ‘no knock’ search warrant. 

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron said Wednesday there was no evidence to support that Mattingly, who was shot, was hit by friendly fire from other officers.

But the ballistics report seems to contradicts that finding, Vice reports. It states the 9mm bullet that hit Mattingly was neither ‘identified nor eliminated as having been fired’ from Walker’s gun ‘due to limited markings of comparative value’. 

Walker’s attorney Steve Romines said records show Hankison, the only officer facing charges for wanton endangerment, had also been issued with a weapon matching fellow officer’s gunshot wound, The Courier Journal reports.   

Louisville was virtually deserted Sunday evening amid curfews to control protests after a grand jury declined to charge officers in the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor 

Streets in downtown were empty aside from a few cyclists after cops put restrictions in place

A CVS pharmacy opposite a hotel was boarded up after four nights of unrest over the death of Breonna Taylor 

Protesters gather outside a local bar in defiance of a city-wide curfew on Sunday in Louisville, Kentucky. The mandatory 9:00pm to 6:30am curfew followed Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron’s announcement of charges against an officer involved in the death of Breonna Taylor

Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer urged people to begin heading home about an hour before the curfew was set to begin at 9 pm

A crowd had earlier marched in Louisville’s streets chanting ‘Breonna Taylor, say her name’ on Sunday. 

The Kentucky city that has seen more than 120 days of demonstrations over the death of the 26-year-old black woman in a police raid gone wrong. 

Earlier in the day, people were gathered at Jefferson Square Park, which has come to be called ‘Breonna’s park’ by demonstrators, as speakers condemned the grand jury’s decision, The Courier Journal reported. 

As a crowd gathered outside the First Unitarian Church late Saturday, fires were set in a street nearby after 11 p.m. Police said fireworks burned a car, and windows had been broken at Spalding University and Presentation Academy buildings close by.

Some demonstrators were seen with makeshift shields made of plywood. Others took shelter inside the church, which closed its doors around midnight.   

As of the 2:20 a.m. tweet, 28 people had been arrested, the police department said. Later, police corrected the number of people arrested to 25.

A previous protest on Friday night was peaceful though police arrested 22 people for curfew violations. A police spokesman said some also were charged with failure to disperse.

There was also little traffic on the Louisville streets amid a heavy police presence 

Breonna Taylor, 26, left, was shot multiple times March 13 after her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired at officers who had entered her home during a narcotics raid, authorities said. Sgt Jonathan Mattingly, Detective Myles Cosgrove and Officer Brett Hankison, right, burst down the door to Taylor’s home during a ‘no knock’ search warrant

The Kentucky city that has seen more than 120 days of demonstrations over the death of the 26-year-old black woman in a police raid gone wrong

It comes amid reports the police officer facing wanton endangerment charges over Taylor’s death was ‘visibly shaking after the shooting’.

Former police chief Steve Conrad, who was also fired over the botched raid, said Det. Brett Hankison immediately feared losing his job in the wake of the incident. 

Conrad said he met Hankison at the hospital shortly after the shooting. In an interview five days after the raid he said: ‘You know, not kinda – not scared – not scared but that – that kind of nervous sort of energy that you have after – after something traumatic, you know, happens.’

He said he reassured Hankison, who was worried about losing his job, ‘we’ll work through this’.   

Conrad said seeing Hankison at the hospital was ‘so contrary from what I’ve seen in previous officer-involved shootings’, adding: ‘My experience is they are brought to the Public Integrity by, you know, members of – of this unit.’ 

Taylor’s boyfriend Walker said he didn’t know who was coming in and fired in self-defense

He said he was initially told that ‘the woman was in fact the shooter’, Fox News reports.  

Taylor’s boyfriend Walker said he didn’t know who was coming in and fired in self-defense. 

On Wednesday, Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron announced a grand jury indicted Hankison on wanton endangerment charges, saying he fired gunshots into a neighboring home during the raid that didn’t strike anyone. 

Hankison has been fired.

Sgt Mattingly and Detective Myles Cosgrove were not charged. 

Cameron said the other officers were not charged with Taylor’s killing because they acted to protect themselves. 

Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, visited a downtown park on Friday with family and her lawyers, and called on Kentucky officials to release all body camera footage, police files and the transcripts of the grand jury proceedings. 

Palmer said in a statement read by a family member that she felt the criminal justice system had failed her. Palmer marched at the head of Friday’s protest march.  

Footage – obtained by Vice magazine on Saturday – shows inside Taylor’s Louisville apartment after she was fatally shot. 

According to Vice, the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department has ‘insisted’ that no bodycam footage exists of the actual raid itself. 

However, they were able to obtain vision recorded by other officers and SWAT team members who responded to the shooting. 

Louisville Metro Police issue a warning to protesters gathering at a local bar in defiance of a city-wide curfew on Sunday 

Earlier in the day, people were gathered at Jefferson Square Park, which has come to be called ‘Breonna’s park’ by demonstrators, as speakers condemned the grand jury’s decision, The Courier Journal reported

Heavily-armed officers were out in force earlier on Sunday as the city braced for another night of protests 

Police cordons surrounded boarded-up restaurants and bars as authorities imposed the strict curfew

A downtown Louisville hotel has its doors closed as the curfew is enforced 

The publication shared two short clips, with the first showing an officer threatening to release a barking narcotics dog on Walker as he stands outside the apartment complex.  

The footage then shows Officer Hankison and another policeman placing Walker in handcuffs. Walker was charged for attempted murder after striking Mattingly in the leg. The charge was later dropped.

Meanwhile, a second video – recorded on the same night – shows Hankison inside Taylor’s apartment after the shooting took place.  Vice claims that is a violation of police investigation procedure. 

In the clip, Hankison can be heard asking a SWAT team member about shell casings seen on the ground. 

The SWAT officer sounds uncomfortable and orders Hankison to leave the scene. 

‘I’d back out until they get PIU in here,’ he states, referring to the Public Integrity Unit, which is responsible for investigating officer-involved shootings.  

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8779791/Protests-continue-Louisville-fifth-night-Breonna-Taylors-name.html

New York City is bracing for another round of crippling shutdowns as eight neighborhoods experience ‘alarming’ surges in coronavirus infection rates.  

It comes as New York state recorded a positivity rate of 1.5 percent on Sunday – the highest it’s been since mid-July. 

Gov Andrew Cuomo announced the latest positivity rate at a press conference on Monday, saying that spikes in the Big Apple were a ‘big contributor’. 

He said that the state is ramping up efforts to keep the pandemic under control by sending in additional health department officers to high risk areas to ensure ‘additional testing and compliance measures’.  

‘It’s very targeted and focused on those clusters,’ Cuomo said of the state’s heightened efforts.  

Health officials warned about the emergence of COVID-19 clusters in several communities across Queens and Brooklyn last week, saying that they would begin rolling back reopenings in affected areas as early as Monday if the numbers don’t improve. 

As of Sunday, eight neighborhoods with large Orthodox Jewish populations were identified as potential targets for an ‘immediate scaling back of activities’, which may include bans on gatherings of 10 or more people, mask fines and the closure of non-essential businesses. 

New York City is bracing for another round of crippling shutdowns as eight neighborhoods experience ‘alarming’ surges in coronavirus infection rates. The map above shows the Sunday infection rate for each problem neighborhood

Top 8 New York zip codes for infection rate 

Governor Andrew Cuomo rattled off a list of eight zip codes with the worst coronavirus infection rates around the state at his press conference on Monday. 

Brooklyn:

11219 – Borough Park

  • 17 percent positive

11210 – Flatlands/Midwood

  • 11 percent positive

11204 – Bensonhurst/Mapleton

  • 9 percent positive

11230 – Midwood 

  • 9 percent positive

Queens:

11367 – Kew Gardens

  • 6 percent positive 

Rockland County:

10977 

  • 30 percent positive

10952

  • 25 percent positive  

Orange County:

10950

  • 22 percent positive 

The highest increase in infections came in the Borough Park neighborhood of Brooklyn, where the positivity rate hit 17 percent on Sunday, according to city data.  

Other problems areas include Edgemere / Far Rockaway (14 percent), Gravesend / Homecrest (12.14 percent), Flatlands/Midwood (11 percent), Gerritsen Beach / Homecrest / Sheepshead Bay (10.82 percent), Midwood (9 percent), Bensonhurst / Mapleton (9 percent), and Kew Gardens (6 percent).  

The average positivity rate across those eight neighborhoods – which now account for 23 percent of New York City’s more than 238,000 cases – is 3.3 percent higher than the city’s overall positivity rate, which came in at 1.3 percent on Friday.    

New York state’s positivity hovered around one percent for an entire month before seeing a troubling increase over the past week.  

From late July through the start of September the state was seeing an average of around 660 people test positive per day. 

In the seven-day period that ended Friday, the state had averaged 817 positive tests per day.

On Saturday the state reported more than 1,000 new cases for the first time since early June, prompting Cuomo to warn that the virus ‘remains a force to be reckoned with throughout the country’. 

In recent days Cuomo and his aides have highlighted the importance of containing clusters to ensure that they don’t spread to neighboring zip codes. 

In addition to the neighborhoods in Brooklyn and Queens, Cuomo said that surges in the mid-Hudson region were pushing up the state’s positivity rate. 

He outlined eight zip codes in the state with troubling rates. 

In Rockland County, 30 percent of tests came back positive in 10977 on Sunday and 25 percent came back positive in 10952. 

In Orange County, the 10950 zip code had a positivity rate of 22 percent.   

In Brooklyn, the worst zip codes were: 11219 (17 percent positive), 11210 (11 percent positive), 11204 (9 percent positive), 11230 (9 percent positive). 

In Queens, the worst zip code was 11367 (6 percent positive).

Cuomo said that zip codes ranking in the top ten ‘represent 2.9 percent of the state’s population and 25 percent of the cases’. 

DailyMail.com has reached out to the governor’s office about the two top 10 zip codes Cuomo did not mention during his press conference.   

New York Governor Andrew highlighted the importance of containing coronavirus clusters during a press conference on Monday, where he announced that the state’s positivity rate climbed to 1.5 percent on Sunday – reaching its highest point since mid-July

New York City has seen a slight spike in daily new cases over the past week as outbreaks have emerged in eight neighborhoods across Brooklyn and Queens

As of Sunday, New York City has recorded 238,338 cases, 19,178 confirmed deaths and 4,632 probable deaths

The map above shows cases per 100,000 people across all of New York City as of Sunday

New York state’s positivity rate climbed to 1.5 percent on Sunday – the highest point since mid-July. The chart above shows total tests (blue) versus total positive tests (yellow)

Once the epicenter of the US coronavirus crisis, New York City was quick to go into lockdown in the spring before slowly rolling back restrictions over the course of the summer.  

The city has taken several big steps to returning to normal this month, including by reopening public schools for in-person classes and preparing for the return of limited indoor dining on October 1. 

However emerging infection trends in parts of Brooklyn and Queens – compounded with fears of the forthcoming flu season exacerbating COVID-19’s strain on hospitals – have threatened to derail that progress.

As of Sunday, New York City has recorded 238,338 cases, 19,178 confirmed deaths and 4,632 probable deaths. 

Those tallies account for roughly half of the 455,626 cases and the majority of the 25,456 deaths across the state of New York. 

Many of the neighborhoods identified as having troubling infections rates are home to large numbers of Jewish residents.  

Many of the neighborhoods identified as having troubling infections rates are home to high proportions of Jewish residents. Three members of New York City’s Orthodox Jewish community died from COVID-19 just hours after presenting at the Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn (pictured) last week

Dr Mitchell Katz, the CEO of New York City’s public healthcare system, said the city would distribute masks, gloves and hand sanitizer while officials will ask religious leaders to reinforce key public health messages.  

Robocalls in English and Yiddish and sound trucks will urge residents to physically distance and wear a face covering, Katz said.  

Katz also stressed the importance of complying with limits on social gatherings, which were flagrantly ignored by attendees of a wedding in Woodside, Queens, on Friday night.  

Deputies arrived at Royal Elite Palace Caterers on Garfield Avenue just before midnight on Friday night and found about 284 people inside – exceeding the state limit of 50 people at social gatherings. 

The sheriff’s office said a live band was playing and food and alcohol were being served while guests ignored social distancing guidelines.  

The crowd was ordered to leave the event hall immediately, and the owner and manager of the venue were ticketed for misdemeanor offenses.  

Royal Elite owner Aba Cohen was cited for violating the mayor’s emergency coronavirus measure and unlawfully altering the nature or character of a business. 

Manager Paata Sichinava was cited for four similar offenses.    

Police broke up a wedding of nearly 300 people who were not complying with state and city coronavirus restrictions on Friday in the Woodside neighborhood of Queens

The wedding was held at Royal Elite Palace Caterers on Garfield Avenue (pictured)

Mayor Bill de Blasio warned of potential new lockdowns in neighborhoods with surges at a press conference on Friday, saying: ‘It’s something we have to address with a very aggressive public health effort right away.’ 

De Blasio said that the lockdowns could include the closure of schools in affected areas – throwing yet another wrench into the city’s disastrous road to reopening for in-person classes. 

New York City public schools began welcoming students back in the classroom on a rolling basis earlier this month, despite concerns from parents and educators. 

At least 150 district employees have already tested positive for the virus, including 108 who came in contact with infected colleagues, according to the New York Post.

The city’s Department of Education has refused to disclose the total number of teachers and administrators who have been quarantined for 14 days since returning to school buildings on September 8, but the Post came up with its estimate based on reports from teachers themselves.   

On Sunday, a union representing more than 6,4000 educators in New York City declared a unanimous vote of ‘no confidence’ in de Blasio and NYC Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza and demanded that they hand over control of the nation’s largest school district to the state.  

The stunning vote from the Council of School Supervisors and Administrators came two days before schools are set to resume in-person learning for students in grades K through 8 on Tuesday.

The union ripped into de Blasio and Carranza’s ‘failure to lead New York City through a safe and successful reopening of schools’ and demanded that they hand over control of the district to state officials. 

‘CSA calls on Mayor de Blasio to cede mayoral control of the Department of Education for the remainder of this health crisis and for Mayor de Blasio and Chancellor Carranza to seek the immediate intervention of the New York State Education Department,’ the union said in a statement. 

Mayor Bill de Blasio (left) and NYC Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza (right) are facing calls to abdicate control of the nation’s largest district after a union representing principals declared a unanimous vote of ‘no confidence’ in their handling of the coronavirus pandemic

The stunning vote from the Council of School Supervisors and Administrators, which represents more than 6,400 education leaders in the Big Apple, came two days before schools are set to resume in-person learning for students in grades K through 8 on Tuesday. Pictured: Children are greeted on their first day of pre-school in Queens on September 21

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8782027/NYC-braces-new-shutdowns-eight-neighborhoods-experience-alarming-surge-cases.html

ST. HELENA, Calif. (AP) — California firefighters battled destructive new wildfires in wine country north of San Francisco Monday as strong winds fanned flames in the already badly scorched state.

The new fires erupted Sunday in the famed Napa-Sonoma wine region and in far Northern California’s Shasta County, forcing hasty evacuations of neighborhoods.

Flames engulfed the distinctive Chateau Boswell Winery north of St. Helena, The Black Rock Inn in the small community of St. Helena and multiple homes in the city of Santa Rosa, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Residents of a senior home were among those evacuated.

The Adventist Health St. Helena hospital suspended care and transferred all patients elsewhere, according to a statement on its website.

The wine country inferno began with the Glass Fire at 3:50 a.m. Sunday and two subsequent fires merged with it, burning 17 square miles (44 square kilometers) as of early Monday, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire. More than 8,500 homes and other buildings were threatened.

The wine country has been scarred by terrible fires in recent years, including the 2017 Tubbs Fire that killed 22 people and destroyed more than 5,600 homes and other buildings.

Numerous studies in recent years have linked bigger wildfires in America to global warming from the burning of coal, oil and gas, especially because climate change has made California much drier. A drier California means plants are more flammable.

Evacuations were also ordered in Shasta County as the Zogg Fire spread over 23 square miles (59 square kilometers) . Residences are widely scattered in the forested area, about 10 miles (16 kilometers) southwest of the city of Redding in a region torched just two years ago by the massive and deadly Carr Fire — infamously remembered for producing a huge tornado-like fire whirl.

The causes of the new fires were under investigation.

The fires erupted as a giant ridge of high pressure settled over the West, producing powerful gusts blowing from the interior toward the coast while slashing humidity levels and raising temperatures, making vegetation ready to burn.

During the weekend, Pacific Gas & Electric turned off electricity to targeted areas where the winds raised the potential for arcing or other power equipment damage that could spark new fires. The utility’s equipment has caused previous disasters, including the 2018 Camp Fire that devastated the Sierra Nevada foothills town of Paradise and killed 85 people.

So far this year, more than 8,100 California wildfires have scorched 5,780 square miles (14,970 square kilometers), destroyed more than 7,000 buildings and killed 26 people.

Most of the losses occurred after a frenzy of dry lightning strikes in mid-August ignited a massive outbreak of fires.

Fire worries were also developing Monday across Southern California although it was unclear how strong predicted Santa Ana winds would be. Heat and extreme dryness were expected to be problematic nonetheless.

Conditions were also hot, dry and windy in parts of Arizona, where the Sears Fire in Tonto National Forest north of Phoenix has grown to more than 14 square miles (36 square kilometers) since it erupted Friday afternoon. Authorities reported zero containment.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/wildfires-san-francisco-evacuations-helena-fires-1a4c370f44b2181f18b8a3d4647ff10f

Newly released video shows officers walking through shell casings after Breonna Taylor was shot dead in her apartment by Louisville police — with the only officer charged in the deadly Kentucky raid calmly wandering back into the crime scene.

“Is that theirs?” fired detective Brett Hankison is heard asking as he walks among shell casings at the entry to Taylor’s apartment in bodycam footage obtained by Vice News.

Shining his flashlight down the hallway where 26-year-old EMT Taylor was fatally shot, Hankison is also heard asking if there are “any guns visible.”

“Like a long gun?” he asks after an investigator tells him they “did not see any,” according to the Vice report.

The presence of the officer — recently indicted for wanton endangerment for firing shots into a neighbor’s apartment during the botched raid — is just one of “multiple” violations of department policy, Vice said.

The agency’s policy dictates that the officers involved should have immediately been assigned an “escort officer” to take them to the Public Integrity Unit (PIU) office in order to verify that each officer “is isolated from all non-essential individuals for the remainder of the initial investigation,” according to the Lousiville Courier-Journal.

The Public Integrity Unit investigates officer-involved shootings.

“I’ve never seen anything like this,” a former LMPD narcotics officer, who reviewed parts of the footage, told Vice News. “This is not how it’s supposed to work.”

The footage obtained by the outlet also shows how SWAT officers at the scene were uncomfortable.

“I’d back out until they get PIU in here,” SWAT officer Sgt. Brandon Hogan tells Hankison.

Breonna TaylorFacebook

“This is a crime scene,” the investigator also warns, according to Vice.

Hankison later walks up to a SWAT team member standing on the sidewalk and asks if his body camera is on — with the video cutting out, Vice said.

The footage also showed other officers involved in the raid remaining on scene — with one even helping to interview neighbors and potential witnesses.

Detective Myles Cosgrove — who fired 16 rounds but was not charged — also roamed freely while still carrying a rifle, the report said.

Louisville officials have long insisted that no bodycam footage exists of the raid or the deadly shooting itself.

However, Vice said it obtained hours of footage from SWAT officers and others who arrived after the shooting.

Another clip shows Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, being threatened with a police K9 as he was arrested outside the apartment after he was accused of opening fire on the officers.

“Walk straight back or I will send this dog on you!” an officer yells, according to the report.

When he asked what he did, the footage apparently shows Hankison telling him, “You’re going to prison, that’s what’s going on. For the rest of your f—ing life.”

The LMPD, Hankison’s attorney, and the union attorney who was present for officers’ interviews did not immediately respond to Vice’s requests for comment on the footage.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/09/28/breonna-taylor-new-video-shows-cops-in-aftermath-of-shooting/