With a July 31 summer recess deadline looming, Senate Republicans have released a proposal for a second coronavirus stimulus package: the Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools (HEALS) Act.

Many Americans can expect another $1,200 payment from the federal government if and when the Senate’s relief proposal gets approved. Families with dependents may also see an extra payment, thanks to expanded payment rules offered by Republican leadership.

Here’s what the HEALS Act proposal offers for taxpayers with dependents.

What to Expect From the HEALS Act

Unlike the first round of economic impact payments, which restricted dependent payments to children under age 17, the newest Senate proposal calls for a $500 payment for dependents of all ages. 

The dependent payment would be added onto the $1,200 direct payments planned for individuals earning $75,000 or less. 

Payment calculations are again slated to be based on your most recent tax return. If you filed before the adjusted July 15 deadline, your payment would be based on your 2019 tax return; if you requested an extension, your 2018 tax return would be referenced to determine your payment.

While this stimulus plan is far from finalized, you can determine your eligibility for the expanded dependent payment with our HEALS Act stimulus check calculator.

How the CARES Act Excluded Some Dependents

The CARES Act, passed in late March, offered $500 per dependent, but was only available to dependent children under age 17. This excluded students and young adults who weren’t yet filing their own taxes, along with households with adult dependents. 

More than 15 million such dependents were excluded from the CARES Act payments, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities analysis of Census Bureau data. 

Young adult dependents excluded by the CARES Act have been particularly vulnerable to the economic impact of the pandemic. The unemployment rate for people ages 16 to 24 was 25.3% in May 2020, far higher than the rate for any other age group, according to the Pew Research Center

Other Options for Relief

The Democrats’ plan that passed in the House of Representatives in May (the HEROES Act) had called for payments of $1,200 per qualifying child with a cap of three on top of a repeat $1,200 payment for adults. 

But two other proposals discussed this summer also included enhanced payments for dependents: 

  • The Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act, proposed by Senate Democrats, sought to provide monthly stimulus payments, including $2,000 per child with a cap of three.
  • Representative Tim Ryan’s (D-OH) Emergency Money for the People Act in the House of Representatives also called for monthly stimulus payments, with $500 per dependent up to three children. 

Both proposals included higher thresholds for household income in order to be eligible for stimulus payments. The HEROES Act would have retained the $75,000 adjusted gross income limit before phasing out benefits.

Each of the previous proposals focused on providing dependent payments only to households with children under 17.

Why Dependent Payments Are Still Uncertain

An expanded dependent payment benefit may be a part of the plan for the second stimulus package, but it’s not yet a reality.

It’s uncertain whether Democrats and Republicans will come to an agreement in the Senate this week—let alone get approval from the House of Representatives and President Trump—prior to August 1, when Congress’s month-long recess begins. The House of Representatives’ recess begins August 1, with the Senate break starting August 7.

Although a full text of the bill hasn’t been released, the HEALS Act contains some items that may trip up the negotiations. Funding of $1.75 billion for a new Federal Bureau of Investigations headquarters is one head-scratcher as it relates to immediate coronavirus economic relief, but remains a priority for President Trump.

The reduction of weekly unemployment benefits provided by the federal government from $600 weekly to $200 is another point of concern. But if an agreement isn’t made by Friday, those benefits will lapse altogether.

Even if the HEALS Act is approved as is, there’s still the issue of distributing the anticipated direct payments to taxpayers. The first round of economic impact payments started to arrive via direct deposit about three weeks after the CARES Act was signed.

As of July 17, the IRS has delivered more than 159 million economic impact payments nationwide. But the process hasn’t been without its challenges. A report from the Government Accountability Office found that in the first month of stimulus payment delivery, as many as 365,000 low-income Americans didn’t receive the payments they expected for their dependent children.

Fortunately, the Treasury and the IRS have already established the system for sending out direct payments, so you may see yours more quickly in this second stimulus round.

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/advisor/2020/07/28/heals-act-second-stimulus-checks-would-include-expanded-dependent-payments/

“)), n = v(f[r.size_id].split(“x”).map(function (e) {
return Number(e);
}), 2), i.width = n[0], i.height = n[1]), i.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce(function (e, r) {
return e[r.key] = r.values[0], e;
}, {
rpfl_elemid: s.adUnitCode
}), e.push(i)) : g.logError(“Rubicon: bidRequest undefined at index position:”.concat(t), c, d), e;
}, []).sort(function (e, r) {
return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0);
});
},
getUserSyncs: function getUserSyncs(e, r, t, i) {
if (!R && e.iframeEnabled) {
var n = “”;
return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? n += “?gdpr=”.concat(Number(t.gdprApplies), “&gdpr_consent=”).concat(t.consentString) : n += “?gdpr_consent=”.concat(t.consentString)), i && (n += “”.concat(n ? “&” : “?”, “us_privacy=”).concat(encodeURIComponent(i))), R = !0, {
type: “iframe”,
url: a + n
};
}
},
transformBidParams: function transformBidParams(e) {
return g.convertTypes({
accountId: “number”,
siteId: “number”,
zoneId: “number”
}, e);
}
};

function _(e, r) {
var t,
i = 0 e.length) && (t = e.length);

for (var r = 0, n = new Array(t); r ‘;
var r, n;
};
};

var a = function a(e) {
var r = 0 = e && r.innerWidth r.length) && (e = r.length);

for (var t = 0, n = new Array(e); t b ? a : b;
}
/**
* Fast loop through watched elements
*/

function onScroll() {
list.forEach(updateVisibility);
}
/**
* updates seen property
* @param {Visble} item
* @param {{}} evt
* @fires Visible#shown
* @fires Visible#hidden
*/

function updateSeen(item, evt) {
var px = evt.visiblePx,
percent = evt.visiblePercent; // if some pixels are visible and we’re greater/equal to threshold

if (px && percent >= item.shownThreshold && !item.seen) {
item.seen = true;
setTimeout(function () {
item.trigger(“shown”, new VisibleEvent(“shown”, evt));
}, 15); // if no pixels or percent is less than threshold
} else if ((!px || percent = 0 && rect.left >= 0 && rect.bottom 1) {
result += getLinearSpacialHash(remainder, Math.floor(stepSize / base), optimalK – 1, base);
}

return result;
}
/**
* @param {ClientRect} rect
* @param {number} innerHeight
* @returns {number}
*/

function getVerticallyVisiblePixels(rect, innerHeight) {
return min(innerHeight, max(rect.bottom, 0)) – min(max(rect.top, 0), innerHeight);
}
/**
* Get offset of element relative to entire page
*
* @param {Element} el
* @returns {{left: number, top: number}}
* @see http://jsperf.com/offset-vs-getboundingclientrect/7
*/

function getPageOffset(el) {
var offsetLeft = el.offsetLeft,
offsetTop = el.offsetTop;

while (el = el.offsetParent) {
offsetLeft += el.offsetLeft;
offsetTop += el.offsetTop;
}

return {
left: offsetLeft,
top: offsetTop
};
}
/**
* Create a new Visible class to observe when elements enter and leave the viewport
*
* Call destroy function to stop listening (this is until we have better support for watching for Node Removal)
* @param {Element} el
* @param {{shownThreshold: number, hiddenThreshold: number}} [options]
* @class
* @example this.visible = new $visibility.Visible(el);
*/

Visible = function Visible(el, options) {
options = options || {};
this.el = el;
this.seen = false;
this.preload = false;
this.preloadThreshhold = options && options.preloadThreshhold || 0;
this.shownThreshold = options && options.shownThreshold || 0;
this.hiddenThreshold = options && min(options.shownThreshold, options.hiddenThreshold) || 0;
list.push(this);
updateVisibility(this); // set immediately to visible or not
};

Visible.prototype = {
/**
* Stop triggering.
*/
destroy: function destroy() {
// remove from list
list.splice(list.indexOf(this), 1);
}
/**
* @name Visible#on
* @function
* @param {‘shown’|’hidden’} e EventName
* @param {function} cb Callback
*/

/**
* @name Visible#trigger
* @function
* @param {‘shown’|’hidden’} e
* @param {{}}
*/

};
Eventify.enable(Visible.prototype);

VisibleEvent = function VisibleEvent(type, options) {
var _this = this;

this.type = type;
Object.keys(options).forEach(function (key) {
_this[key] = options[key];
});
}; // listen for scroll events (throttled)

$document.addEventListener(“scroll”, _throttle(onScroll, 200)); // public

this.getPageOffset = getPageOffset;
this.getLinearSpacialHash = getLinearSpacialHash;
this.getVerticallyVisiblePixels = getVerticallyVisiblePixels;
this.getViewportHeight = getViewportHeight;
this.getViewportWidth = getViewportWidth;
this.isElementNotHidden = isElementNotHidden;
this.isElementInViewport = isElementInViewport;
this.Visible = Visible;
}]);
}, {}];
require=(function e(t,n,r){function s(o,u){if(!n[o]){if(!t[o]){var a=typeof require==”function”&&require;if(!u&&a)return a(o,!0);if(i)return i(o,!0);var f=new Error(“Cannot find module ‘”+o+”‘”);throw f.code=”MODULE_NOT_FOUND”,f}var l=n[o]={exports:{}};t[o][0].call(l.exports,function(e){var n=t[o][1][e];return s(n?n:e)},l,l.exports,e,t,n,r)}return n[o].exports}var i=typeof require==”function”&&require;for(var o=0;o

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/07/facebook-twitter-youtube-remove-trump-viral-video-coronavirus-conspiracies.html

A tactical team of border agents deployed to Seattle last week to help protect federal property has departed the city, officials said Tuesday.

Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan said the Department of Homeland Security informed her of the move. The Special Response Team was sent to the city last week as the Trump administration continues to defend the intervention of the federal government as an effort to restore law and order amid ongoing protests in several cities.

“@DHSgov notified me that federal forces deployed to Seattle have demobilized & left,” Durkan tweeted. “The President’s actions to target Democratic cities with federal forces is chilling and increased violence in Portland, Seattle & other cities – exactly what the President intended.

SEATTLE MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS SEE OFFENSIVE MESSAGES WRITTEN OUTSIDE HOMES: ‘RESIGN BI—‘

In a follow-up tweet, Durkan said policing decisions should be made by Police Chief Carmen Best, not President Trump. The agents were deployed to Seattle to protect federal property in the wake of unrest following weeks of demonstrations and the occupation of a so-called autonomous protest zone where police officers and other first responders were denied entry.

In his testimony to the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Attorney General Bill Barr claimed “violent rioters and anarchists” have hijacked legitimate protests, while specially mentioning the ongoing unrest in Portland, Ore., where clashes between Black Lives Matter protesters and authorities have occurred nightly.

Durkan, along with other big-city mayors, has denounced the presence of federal agents in her jurisdiction. Opponents argue the alleged heavy-handed tactics used by federal agents have only inflamed tensions between protesters and authorities.

The move, they said, was made without the consent or consultation of state and local officials.

“The President’s actions to target Democratic cities through the use of federal forces is chilling and increased violence in Portland, Seattle (and) other cities – exactly what the President wanted,” Durkan wrote in another tweet.

Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, also praised the withdrawal of federal forces.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“That means Washingtonians no longer have to worry about the White House’s aim to provoke confrontation and undermine peaceful protests,” he tweeted.

Over the weekend, a total of 80 Seattle police officers were injured, with one requiring hospitalization, according to the city and local reports. Other injuries included bruises, abrasions, burns and a torn meniscus, but many officers were able to return to work. Some rioters set fire to a portable trailer and threw an explosive device at a police precinct, while authorities used blast balls, sponge rounds and OC spray to disperse protesters.

Nearly 50 people were arrested.

Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer and Stephen Sorace contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-forces-seattle-demobilized-left-mayor

A variety of MSNBC and CNN hosts made cameos during Attorney General William Barr’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday when Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, used his opening statement to put an emphasis on mainstream media’s efforts to paint sometimes violent protesters as “peaceful.”

“I want to thank you for defending law enforcement, for pointing out what a crazy idea this defund the police policy … whatever you want to call it, is, and standing up for the rule of law,” Jordan said. “We have a video we want to show that gets right to this point.”

JONATHAN TURLEY. BLASTS CNN’S BRIAN STELTER OVER SANDMANN RETWEET 

Jordan then played a powerful video montage featuring a variety of mainstream media members referring to recent protests as “peaceful,” which included everyone from CNN’s Don Lemon to NBC News’ Chuck Todd dismissing violence amid images of burning buildings and attacks on law enforcement.

The video — which irked House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. — featured MSNBC host Ali Velshi famously declaring he was covering a “mostly a protest” despite a building burning right behind him.

“It is not, generally speaking, unruly,” Velshi said.

Rachel Maddow, Chris Cuomo and Willie Geist also appeared in the Republican exhibit.

The words “peaceful protest” were uttered by more than a dozen pundits before footage of the widow of retired St. Louis police Capt. David Dorn speaking about her husband’s tragic death began.

Dorn was murdered amid riots and looting on June 2 while working to protect a pawn shop. His widow spoke about the senseless death as additional footage of law enforcement officers being attacked by protesters played as part of Jordan’s video.

Barr looked on as the dramatic footage was played, portraying chaos in many of America’s major cities since George Floyd was killed in police custody in May.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

When the video ended, Nadler, snarked, “I hope that Mr. Jordan will never complain about the length of my opening statement.”

Nadler then complained the video was not within the committe’s protocol.

“Without objection, I am going to insert committee’s audio-visual policy into the record of this hearing, and note that the minority did not give the 48 hours notice required,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/don-lemon-chuck-todd-barr-hearing-jim-jordan

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump returned to the briefing room Tuesday to tout his administration’s deal with camera company Kodak to manufacture pharmaceuticals and dismissed Senate Republicans’ economic stimulus proposal as “semi-irrelevant.”

The administration plans to give Eastman Kodak Co. a $765 million loan to launch a pharmaceuticals division. The loan from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation is the first of its kind under the Defense Production Act.

“It’s a breakthrough in bringing pharmaceutical manufacturing back to the United States,” Trump told reporters, adding that members of his administration are in Rochester, New York, where the camera company is based, to “finalize this groundbreaking deal.” 

Trump said it was the 33rd time his administration had used the Korean War-era law to spur production of medical equipment needed to combat the virus. Trump said that in many instances, the White House used the DPA as a “threat” to pressure companies to voluntarily increase production for ventilators, masks and other items. 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/07/28/coronavirus-trump-addresses-media-congress-debates-new-stimulus/5525204002/

Georgia is among 21 states with outbreaks serious enough be placed in the “red zone,” according to a new federal report obtained by The New York Times. Distributed to state officials by the White House Coronavirus Task Force, the report recommends that officials in Georgia “mandate use of masks in all current and evolving hotspots — optimally a statewide mandate.”

The governor, who has encouraged but not required masks, argues cities and counties are barred from enforcing rules that are more or less restrictive than his own. Kemp’s lawsuit also targets the city’s guidelines concerning the pandemic, including those that encouraged new limits on restaurants and other businesses for containing the disease.

As part of his request for an emergency injunction, Kemp asked the court to suspend the mayor’s executive orders and prevent her from “issuing press releases, or making statements to the press, that she has the authority to impose more or less restrictive measures” than him.

The city filed its court response Monday, saying Kemp’s legal challenge is prohibited by sovereign immunity, the legal doctrine that bars lawsuits against government officials. Atlanta’s attorneys added that blocking the mayor from talking to reporters or issuing press releases would violate the Constitution, saying “speech on public policy issues is a core free speech right that is entitled to the ‘broadest protection’ under the First Amendment.”

More than a dozen cities and counties have defied Kemp by adopting mask requirements, including Athens, Augusta and Savannah. Others have sought to avoid legal battles with the governor. On Monday, for example, Macon-Bibb County Mayor Robert Reichert vetoed an ordinance requiring face masks in public, saying he respects the “governor’s authority.”

“I truly believe we should do everything within our power to convince individuals to follow all preventative measures to slow the spread of COVID-19,” he wrote in a letter to the Macon-Bibb Commission. “But I believe we have gone as far as we can, legally, to get people to wear their masks, practice socially distancing, avoiding large groups, and more.”

Source Article from https://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-governor-withdraws-request-for-emergency-injunction-against-atlantas-mask-mandate/DA3ETDFP2RELHEOUX2KZX4PYSE/

Washington — Attorney General William Barr on Tuesday faced the House Judiciary Committee for the first time in a contentious hearing that covered a range of matters involving the Justice Department, from its treatment of cases involving two of President Trump’s associates, to the federal response to protests in Washington, D.C., and Portland, to election integrity and vote-by-mail in the November election.
 
Barr was peppered with questions from the committee for more than five hours, across which exchanges between the attorney general and Democrats became laden with sarcastic quips and partisan jabs.
 
“You are a real class act,” Barr sarcastically told Chairman Jerrold Nadler after the congressman denied his request for a five-minute break as the hearing neared its end.
 
“Reclaiming my time” was employed frequently by Democrats as they pressed Barr on whether he was doing Mr. Trump’s bidding in federal cases involving Roger Stone and Michael Flynn and questioned him on the deployment of federal officers to U.S. cities to quell unrest.
 
Barr made clear his displeasure with Democrats from the outset, saying in his written opening statement that they “have attempted to discredit me by conjuring up a narrative that I am simply the president’s factotum who disposes of criminal cases according to his instructions.”

Read more:

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/barr-testifies-before-house-judiciary-committee/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/politics/republican-reaction-gop-stimulus-plan/index.html

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/politics/daca-trump-administration/index.html

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, seen here on July 21, has unveiled the fourth plank of his “Build Back Better” agenda to address racial inequities.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, seen here on July 21, has unveiled the fourth plank of his “Build Back Better” agenda to address racial inequities.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, on Tuesday detailed a proposal to advance racial equity in the United States.

The plan is the fourth and final pillar of his “Build Back Better” agenda for economic recovery, crafted in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

“[Biden] believes in an economy where every American enjoys a fair return for their work and an equal chance to get ahead. An economy more vibrant and more powerful precisely because everybody will be included in the deal. An economy where Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and Native American workers and families are finally welcomed as full participants,” the campaign proposal says.

Biden will outline the plan Tuesday afternoon during remarks in his hometown of Wilmington, Del. Biden has significantly curtailed his campaign travel amid the pandemic.

Biden’s proposal seeks to address the country’s racial wealth, opportunity and jobs gaps through what the campaign says would be a “historic effort to empower small business creation and expansion in economically disadvantaged areas — and particularly for Black, Latino, [Asian American and Pacific Islander] and Native American-owned businesses.”

The 26-page plan centers around the bolstering of small business opportunities for minority communities, reforming “opportunity zones,” investing in affordable housing and homeownership, and expanding access to resources for entrepreneurs of color.

Many of the policy proposals detailed Tuesday have been released earlier by the campaign and reflect the priorities of the other three pillars of his plan to revitalize the economy, including a major expansion of access to child care, a $2 trillion climate agenda and a boost to manufacturing through a “Buy American” proposal.

The racial equity plan would devote $30 billion — 10% of the $300 billion Biden aims to invest in research and development to stimulate the economy — to a small business opportunity fund. The campaign suggests the investment would yield $150 billion in venture capital and low-interest business loans.

The housing plan includes an up-to-$15,000 refundable tax credit for first-time homebuyers to combat racial inequality in housing markets, along with an investment to construct 1.5 million homes and public housing units, and the elimination of housing regulations thought to perpetuate discrimination.

The plan also focuses on providing relief from student debt and would make public colleges and universities — and private historically Black schools — tuition-free for families with incomes under $125,000, something the campaign estimates would apply to about 90% of Black, Latino and Native American households.

Additionally, the plan reads: “As President, Biden will enact legislation to ensure that every person can go to community college for up to two years without having to pay tuition.”

Last week, during a virtual town hall organized by the Service Employees International Union, Biden controversially described President Trump as the country’s “first” racist president, which was first reported by the The Washington Post.

“No sitting president has ever done this,” he said, mentioning that Trump often refers to the coronavirus as the “China virus.” Biden said: “We’ve had racists, and they’ve existed. They’ve tried to get elected president. He’s the first one that has.”

Various American Founding Fathers, including George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, enslaved Black people. Still more presidents held racist beliefs, including President Woodrow Wilson, who segregated the federal government. The Biden campaign later clarified to the Post that while there have been other racist presidents, Trump “stands out — especially in modern history — because he made running on racism and division his calling card and won.”

Trump dismissed Biden’s comments during a White House press briefing, citing his administration’s efforts at passing criminal justice reform and the low unemployment rate for Black people before the pandemic.

“I’ve done more for Black Americans than anybody with the possible of exception of Abraham Lincoln,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/07/28/896132054/biden-details-proposal-to-advance-racial-equity-in-america

A second round of $1,200 stimulus checks could be coming, thanks to Senate Republicans’ new stimulus proposal.

The terms of the new payments were outlined in the HEALS Act introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnelly, R-Ky., on Monday. Democrats also called for another round of $1,200 payments in their HEROES Act that was passed by the House in May.

The second set of stimulus checks is one issue both sides of the aisle seem to agree on, as they work to compromise on other items such as expanded unemployment, more government Paycheck Protection Programs loans to small businesses and aid to help schools reopen.

More from Personal Finance:
Why unemployment is a broken system
How to build an emergency fund
GOP propose second round of $1,200 stimulus checks

“This is an area, sort of an exception here, where there is broad understanding for the need for these payments,” Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, said of the stimulus payments.

Much of the size of the payments and scope of who will be eligible is the same in the Republicans’ proposal as the first set of payments authorized by the CARES Act this spring.

“It’s on the little details that things have changed,” said Janet Holtzblatt, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/28/how-the-1200-stimulus-checks-in-the-heals-act-could-differ-from-the-first-payments.html

The incident happened at 3:37 p.m., according to the Coast Guard, prompting USCG officials to launch a rescue boat from south Portland. However, before rescuers arrived at the scene, two kayakers were able to reach the victim and help that person back to shore.

Source Article from https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/officials-identify-woman-who-died-following-apparent-shark-attack-maine/KLX2MTVGTNCYPGHBZUA2GERUTQ/

Barr’s opening statement, published Monday evening by multiple outlets, did not directly address Berman’s ouster. Rather, Barr accused Democrats on the panel of using the hearing to further their attempts “to discredit me by conjuring up a narrative that I am simply the President’s factotum who disposes of criminal cases according to his instructions.”

He said Trump “has not attempted to interfere” in criminal matters under the attorney general’s purview. “From my experience, the President has played a role properly and traditionally played by Presidents,” he said.

Barr’s statement focused in large part on Floyd, a Black man whose death while unarmed at the hands of a white police officer in Minneapolis sparked a massive wave of protests across the U.S.

Floyd’s killing “understandably jarred the whole country and forced us to reflect on longstanding issues in our nation,” Barr’s statement said. “Given our history it is understandable that, among black Americans, there is at least some ambivalence, and often distrust, toward the police.”

But events like Floyd’s death are “fortunately quite rare” nowadays, Barr said. He warned that the “demonization” of police, and the “grossly irresponsible proposals” to defund them, are “gravely injurious to our inner city communities.”

Barr defended the deployment of federal law enforcement officers to cities like Portland, Oregon, where clashes between police and demonstrators have become increasingly violent.

“What unfolds nightly around the courthouse cannot reasonably be called a protest; it is, by any objective measure, an assault on the Government of the United States,” Barr said.

“To state what should be obvious, peaceful protesters do not throw explosives into federal courthouses, tear down plywood with crowbars, or launch fecal matter at federal officers. Such acts are in fact federal crimes under statutes enacted by this Congress.”

Barr’s statement urged all members of the House Judiciary Committee to “condemn violence against federal officers and destruction of federal property.”

“To tacitly condone destruction and anarchy is to abandon the basic rule-of-law principles that should unite us even in a politically divisive time,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/28/bill-barr-set-to-rail-against-bogus-russia-probe-violent-rioters-in-testimony.html

Portland — The mayors of Portland, Oregon, and five other major U.S. cities appealed Monday to Congress to make it illegal for the federal government to deploy militarized agents to cities that don’t want them.

“This administration’s egregious use of federal force on cities over the objections of local authorities should never happen,” the mayors of Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Kansas City, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Washington wrote to leaders of the U.S. House and Senate.

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler and City Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty later called for a meeting with Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf to discuss a cease-fire and removal of heightened federal forces from Portland. 

Earlier in the day, a U.S. official said militarized officers would remain in Portland until attacks on a federal courthouse cease — and more officers may soon be on the way.

“It is not a solution to tell federal officers to leave when there continues to be attacks on federal property and personnel,” U.S. Attorney Billy Williams said. “We are not leaving the building unprotected to be destroyed by people intent on doing so.”

Local and state officials said the federal officers are unwelcome.

Federal law enforcement officers block off a street after clearing protesters from the area during a demonstration against police violence and racial inequality in Portland, Oregon, July 27, 2020.

CAITLIN OCHS/REUTERS


Ohio State University law professor Peter Shane told CBS News’ Graham Kates that federal agents should only be deployed in U.S. cities to enforce local laws if they’re invited to do so by local authorities.

“There’s no kind of overarching statutory authority for federal agencies, in general, to send federal officers to assist in local law enforcement,” Shane said. “If there is a request for federal help, the federal government can provide that help, but there has to be a request.”

Portland has had nightly protests for two months since the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis in May. President Donald Trump said he sent federal agents to Portland to halt the unrest, but state and local officials said they are making the situation worse.


New video shows Floyd pleading with cops

02:01

Mr. Trump’s deployment of the federal officers over the July 4 weekend stoked the Black Lives Matter movement. The number of nightly protesters had dwindled to perhaps less than 100 right before the deployment, and now has swelled to the thousands.

Early Monday, U.S. agents repeatedly fired tear gas, flash bangs and pepper balls at protesters outside the federal courthouse in downtown Portland. Some protesters had climbed over the fence surrounding the courthouse, while others shot fireworks, banged on the fence and projected lights on the building.

Mr. Trump said on Twitter that federal properties in Portland “wouldn’t last a day” without the presence of the federal agents. In another tweet, late Monday night, the president called the protesters, “sick and deranged Anarchists & Agitators who our great men & women of Law Enforcement easily control, but who would destroy our American cities.”   

The majority of people participating in the daily demonstrations have been peaceful. But a few have been pelting officers with objects and trying to tear down fencing protecting the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse.

Williams, whose office is inside the courthouse, called on peaceful protesters, community and business leaders and people of faith to not allow violence to occur in their presence and to leave downtown before violence starts. He said federal agents have made 83 arrests.

Demonstrations in support of racial justice and police reform in other cities around the U.S. were marred by violence over the weekend. Protesters set fire to an Oakland, California, courthouse; vehicles were set ablaze in Richmond, Virginia; an armed protester was shot and killed in Austin, Texas; and two people were shot and wounded in Aurora, Colorado, after a car drove through a protest.


Weekend protests turn violent

02:41

The U.S. Marshals Service has lined up about 100 people they could send to hotspots, either to strengthen forces or relieve officers who have been working for weeks, agency spokesperson Drew Wade said.

Kris Cline, principal deputy director of Federal Protective Service, said an incident commander in Portland and teams from the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice discuss what force is needed every night.

Cline refused to discuss the number of officers currently present or if more would be arriving.

Some protesters have accused Wheeler of hypocrisy for speaking out against the federal presence because, under his watch, Portland police have used tear gas and other riot-control weapons on protesters, including peaceful ones.

Cline said Portland police should take over the job of dispersing protesters from the courthouse area from the federal officers.

“If the Portland Police Bureau were able to do what they typically do, they would be able to clear this out for this disturbance and we would leave our officers inside the building and not be visible,” Cline said.

He said relations between the federal officers, some of whom live in Portland, and city police were good.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/portland-protest-mayors-six-cities-congress-ban-federal-police-law-enforcement/

California police on Monday arrested around a dozen protesters who chained themselves to the front gate of a house owned by Gov. Gavin NewsomGavin NewsomProtesters chain themselves to gate outside Newsom’s home to call for release of prisoners Rep. Bass says LA opened ‘a little too quickly’ GOP governors in Texas, Arizona, Georgia, Florida see approval sink MORE (D) in Fair Oaks, Calif., over the transfer of prisoners to the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers.

A spokesman with the California Highway Patrol told the Sacramento Bee that 10-14 demonstrators would be arrested for trespassing. Those arrested reportedly included undocumented activists as well as immigrant rights attorneys.

“There was 10 to 14 people that were chained to themselves and the gate that were obstructing public access,” Greg Zumstein, CHP public information officer, told the newspaper. “All of those people are going to be arrested for trespassing.”

The protests come amid rising numbers of new coronavirus cases in the state and outbreaks specifically occurring in detention facilities within California including the San Quentin State Prison, where 537 cases of the virus are currently active among inmates and more than 2,600 cases have been confirmed since the beginning of the pandemic.

Activists are also calling for mass clemency for many inmates in the state, arguing that the ongoing coronavirus pandemic is endangering their lives in the prisons’ close quarters.

“Gov. Newsom, you are responsible for the COVID crisis that’s happening in prisons and jails,” said one demonstrator, according to the Sacramento Bee. “You must act now to save lives.” 

Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the arrests or the activists’ demands from The Hill.

Dozens of state and local leaders called on Newsom to halt the transfer of undocumented immigrants to ICE officials in an open letter released in early July.

Updated at 10:35 a.m. on 7/28 to correctly reflect infection numbers in San Quentin State Prison.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/509261-protesters-chain-themselves-to-gate-outside-newsoms-home-to-call-for

Yesterday, Senate Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced the HEALS Act on the Senate floor and a number of Senators proposed their respective parts.

One of the most await parts of the future bill is the next stimulus check, which fell under the purview of Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

Senator Grassley’s office would later release the legislative text for the American Workers, Families, and Employers Assistance Act, which provides for the second recovery rebate.

In many ways, the second stimulus check is a repeat of the first. In some ways, it’s slightly more generous. Let’s take a closer look.

How The Next Stimulus Check Is The Same

The Base Amount of the Check

The amount of the check is the same – single filers get $1,200 and joint filers get $2,400. You get an additional $500 per dependent, though the definition of a dependent was expanded (more on that below in the section on differences).

The income limits, which refer to adjusted gross income (AGI), are:

  • Single filers – $75,000
  • Joint filers – $150,000
  • Heads of Household – $112,500

If you have an AGI greater than those limits, your check is reduced by 5% of your AGI above the limit.

For example, a single filer with an AGI of $80,000 would see a reduction of their check of $250. 5% of $5,000, the amount over $75,000, is $250.

The Tax Year Used for Income Determination

The second stimulus check will also use the 2019 tax year income for calculating your check amount, if available. If they do not have that information they can still use 2018 tax year information as an alternative.

This is the same as with the Cares Act, except the Cares Act also extended the due date of your 2019 tax return to July 15th. This meant that when the IRS was sending out the checks, a lot of Americans hadn’t yet filed their tax returns.

Your second stimulus check may be for a different amount depending on how much your income changed from year to year.

The Tax Structure of the Check

Both checks are advances on a refundable tax credit for the 2020 tax year. This means that the bill would create a new refundable tax credit based on your income and will pay that to you now as an advance.

The credit is based on your 2019 tax return, if you filed one, otherwise it can use your 2018 tax return as a default. It is widely expected that if you don’t file a tax return, you can update your information on the IRS Non-Filers: Enter Payment Info Here form if you didn’t do so already for the first check.

It Is Protected Against Federal or State Debts

The second check will also be protected against federal or state debts, with the exception of past due child support payments.

How The Next Stimulus Check Is The Different

The key difference between the first and second check has to do with three areas.

Expanded Definition of a Dependent

With both stimulus checks, you get $500 for each dependent regardless of their age. In the Cares Act, you only received an extra $500 per dependent if they were a qualifying child for the purposes of the Child Tax Credit. This essentially only applied to children under the age of 17.

This left out a lot of dependents, most notably children in college who are still dependent on their parents but who are older than 16 and elder family members. The American Workers, Families, and Employers Assistance Act removes any age qualification.

Deceased & Incarcerated Explicitly Excluded

The second stimulus check will not be given to those who died before January 1st, 2020 or those who are in jail for the entirety of 2020.

The Cares Act didn’t include any language covering this but the Treasury Department took away payments, and canceled uncashed checks, to these two groups. The bill now clearly states that both groups are excluded from receiving this second check.

It is Protected Against Creditors & Debt Collectors

The Act would also add additional protections against bank garnishment or levy by debt collectors. In fact, the new law would amend the Cares Act to offer those protections to the first check as well.

How The Next Stimulus Check Differs from Heroes Act

Since Senator Grassley’s bill is, at this point, only a proposal – how will it be perceived by the Democrats?

The Heroes Act was passed by the House of Representatives in the middle of May and it also included a similar stimulus check. As we look towards the negotiations between the two parties, we can use this as a gauge of how contentious this aspect of the bill might be.

The Heroes Act offered up a identical base stimulus check of $1,200 for single filers ($2,400 for joint filers) with the same income limitations. It differed in that it offered a higher $1,200 per dependent addition, with a limit of three dependents.

As we monitor how both parties are responding to the HEALS Act proposals, it doesn’t appear that there is much controversy around the second stimulus check. Of the items proposed in the American Workers, Families, and Employers Assistance Act, the biggest argument appears to be over the reduced federal unemployment insurance benefits.

The proposed bill looks to reduce the federal benefit to 70% of an employed worker’s lost wages. Since this is going to be difficult for many states to implement, the bill would first provide a $200 per week bebefit through September as the states revamp their systems to support a percentage based benefit.

To make matters even more complicated, the bill is part of a series of bills that will make up the HEALS Act. This likely sets up a bit legislative battle that will be difficult to resolve before the Senate is scheduled to go to recess on August 7th.

Additional Resources

Next Stimulus Package Released Today: $1,200 Stimulus Check, Reduced Unemployment Aid In HEALS Act

Next Stimulus Package Showdown: The Three Key Conflicts In The Next Stimulus Bill

How Soon Could You Get A Second Stimulus Check?

Second Stimulus Check Income Limit Will Likely Be Higher Than $40,000

Next Stimulus Bill Will Likely Have These Three Major Changes

Second Stimulus Checks Should Be Recurring And Direct, Urge 156 Top Economists

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimwang/2020/07/28/how-the-second-stimulus-check-is-similar-yet-different-than-the-first-stimulus-check/