The mother of Jennifer Dulos, the Connecticut woman missing for more than a week, went to court Tuesday seeking custody of her five grandchildren.

Gloria Farber, Jennifer Dulos’ mother, cited the recent arrest of her daughter’s estranged husband and requested that the children remain in her care even if he makes his $500,000 bail.

Fotis Dulos and girlfriend Michelle Troconis were arrested Saturday and charged with hindering prosecution and tampering with evidence in connection with Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance.

FOTIS DULOS, ESTRANGED HUSBAND OF CONNECTICUT MISSING MOTHER, JENNIFER DULOS, AND HIS GIRLFRIEND ARRAIGNED

Farber has been caring for the Dulos children at her home in New York City since her daughter’s disappearance. Farber and her late husband also sued Fotis Dulos last year, claiming in court documents he did not repay a $1.7 million loan he borrowed to buy and redevelop high-end homes. The lawsuit claimed Fotis Dulos defaulted on a loan for a property in New Canaan and for the purchase of a home in Farmington, Conn., where he and Jennifer Dulos lived until separating in 2017.

The children — three boys and two girls, including two sets of twins — range in age from 8 to 13, and have been at the center of a contentious custody battle between the parents, court records show.

According to court documents, Jennifer Dulos said she was “terrified for [her] family’s safety … since my husband has a history of controlling, volatile and delusional behavior.” She also accused her husband of 13 years of threatening to kidnap their children and take them to Greece.

“In the past, my husband has made references to disappearing to a ski resort, ‘where everyone wears masks every day and are indistinguishable from one another,'” Jennifer Dulos claimed in court filings.

Fotis Dulos, a custom home builder, was born and raised in Greece but went to college at Brown University in the U.S. His current girlfriend, Michelle Troconis, has a 10-year-old daughter of her own. Troconis’ ex-husband is a former Olympic skier and lives in Argentina.

Troconis was released Monday on $500,000 bail and was ordered to wear an ankle monitor. Fotis Dulos remains incarcerated,

Jennifer Dulos was reported missing on May 24 and was last seen driving a black Chevy Suburban as she dropped off her children at their private school in New Canaan.

Dulos’ car was found abandoned behind Waveny Park, a popular 250-acre recreation spot that has jogging trails as well as picnic areas, soccer, baseball and softball fields.

Connecticut state police along with canine units have been sifting through trash at an energy plant in Hartford for the past two days. Authorities believe Dulos was the victim of a violent physical assault.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Surveillance footage of a man and woman matching the description of her estranged husband and his girlfriend in over 30 locations in Hartford across a four-mile radius show the individuals disposing of garbage bags, some of which contained clothing items, which have tested positive for the missing woman’s blood, and a kitchen sponge, according to a police search warrant.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/jennifer-dulos-missing-fotis-dulos-gloria-farber-custody-grandchildren

The father of a Texas woman who died along with her husband from a mysterious illness while on a dream vacation in Fiji says he wants the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct an independent investigation of the deaths to determine if his loved ones perished from an infectious disease.

Michelle and David Paul died last month just days after arriving in Fiji and being afflicted with an illness that caused them to experience vomiting, diarrhea, extreme weakness and eventually led to their demise, Michelle Paul’s father, Mark Calanag of Las Vegas, told ABC News.

Calanag said he has been in contact with the U.S. Embassy in Fiji and learned the autopsies on his daughter and son-in-law have been completed, but he has yet to be informed of the results.

Handout via WFAA
David and Michelle Paul died of a mysterious illness while vacationing in Fiji, their family said.

The Fiji Department of Health has agreed to send specimens from the autopsies to the CDC headquarters in Atlanta to analyze, he said.

“I gave them instruction not to do any cremation until I’m satisfied … because I would like the whole world to know if they died of infectious diseases,” Calanag told ABC News. “The CDC can confirm that and tell Americans and other people that these are the issues you’re going to face if you have to travel to Fiji. Be aware.”

He said his daughter and son-in-law were perfectly healthy when they dropped off their 2-year-old son with Calanag and his wife before embarking on their overseas journey.

Calanag said his daughter was a “world traveler,” and wanted to take her husband to Fiji because he hadn’t traveled much.

“They are much in love and they just bought a house in Fort Worth. And they were enjoying it and this tragic thing happened,” Calanag said.

ABC News
Marc Calanog, father of Michelle Paul, talks to ABC News about the death of her and her husband David Paul while on vacation in Fiji.

A State Department official confirmed the couple’s deaths in a statement to ABC News on Monday, but could not offer details about how the trip had turned deadly. The department said it is monitoring the on-going local investigation.

A CDC spokeswoman told ABC News on Monday that the agency is helping investigate the deaths.

“Our condolences go out to the family – this is a tragic loss. The Ministry of Health in Fiji has requested CDC assistance and we are working with the government to investigate,” said Kristen Nordlund, a CDC spokeswoman.

Five people who came in contact with Michelle and David Paul in Fiji have been admitted to Nadi Hospital in Nadi, Fiji, for observation, the Fiji Sun newspaper reported on Tuesday. Those under medical observation are two security guards, two medical staffers and a police officer who have shown similar symptoms that the American couple experienced, the Sun reported.

Another ten workers at the property in Fiji’s Denarau Island where Michelle and David Paul were staying, including a duty manager, porters and housekeepers, have been placed on paid leave, the Sun reported, citing an unnamed source. ABC News has yet to confirm the report.

Calanag said Michelle and David Paul traveled to San Francisco on May 19 and spent one night there before going to Los Angeles the following day to catch their flight to Fiji. He said he believes the couple reached the South Pacific archipelago of more than 300 islands on May 21.

He said that soon after they arrived in Fiji, his daughter sent him a message via WhatsApp, complaining of contracting a violent illness.

“They were experiencing vomiting, both of them, and diarrhea,” Calanag said. “And then the last text I got from my daughter was that her hands were numb.”

Handout via WFAA
David and Michelle Paul died of a mysterious illness while vacationing in Fiji, their family said.

He said the numbness in his daughter’s hands, according to doctors he has spoken to, suggests that she was severely dehydrated.

He said his brother, who is an Army doctor, reached the couple by phone to find out more information about their health.

Calanag said his daughter died on May 25, and that his son-in-law perished a soon after.

He said he was able to speak to his son-in-law by phone but never got a chance to speak with his daughter before she died.

He said his David Paul was in a separate hospital from his wife. He said his son-in-law was released after being examined and went back to his hotel.

“Then, later on, I don’t know how much time, he was back in the hospital and from there on it became more serious,” Calanag said.

He said doctors had been planning to evacuate him to a medical facility in Australia, but were concerned that he was too weak to make the nearly 3,000-mile trip.

“His condition deteriorated very fast,” Calanag said.

He said the U.S. Embassy in Fiji told him that they will send him the death certificates and autopsy reports on the couple as soon as they receive them.

Calanag said he was also told that in order to fly the bodies back to the United States, his daughter and son-in-laws’ remains would have be shipped in hermetically sealed containers because of the possibility they died from an infectious disease.

“I assume on the death certificates the reason they died is there, but I’m not confident of getting the information only from Fiji,” Calanag said. “I’d really like to have the U.S., especially the CDC to confirm it because they are the experts.”

ABC News’ Karma Allen contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/International/father-calls-us-probe-daughter-son-laws-mysterious/story?id=63475288

“I think it’s more likely that the tariffs will go on,” President Donald Trump said. READ MORE: https://abcn.ws/2EQbgu8

SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.com/ABCNews/
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/abc
GOOD MORNING AMERICA’S HOMEPAGE:
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/

#Trump #TheresaMay #Brexit #London #Tariffs #Politics #News #ABCNews

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA26j7sGYDg

House Democrats are upping the ante in their attempt to get special counsel Robert Mueller’s full, unredacted report by threatening to hold at least two Trump administration officials in contempt of Congress.

The full House will hold a vote next Tuesday on whether to hold both Attorney General William Barr and former White House counsel Don McGahn in contempt of Congress, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer announced Monday night. And more Trump officials could still be added, he said.

“I see every name who has refused to respond to congressional subpoenas or documents, or has been instructed by the president not to respond, [being] subject to being on that list,” Hoyer told reporters Tuesday. “I’m not going to try to name all of them.”

Frustrated by months of missed subpoena deadlines and pushback from the Trump administration, the House Judiciary Committee first passed a contempt resolution along party lines last month, at the end of a lengthy and contentious hearing. The vote came after Barr failed to deliver Mueller’s complete, unredacted report by a Monday deadline.

As a small but growing number of House Democrats call for an impeachment inquiry, the contempt resolution is a shift back to focusing Democratic ire on both Barr and McGahn.

Democrats are feeling the pressure to make a big statement against the Trump administration, especially after the president asserted executive privilege last month to block the House from accessing the entire Mueller report and its underlying documents — the first time Trump has used his executive powers to protect portions of Mueller’s findings.

“I am concerned the department is heading in the wrong direction,” House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said at the time, calling it a “clear escalation” from Trump’s DOJ.

Barr’s main objection to releasing the full report is regulations that prohibit releasing grand jury material to members of Congress. The attorney general has offered Democrats a less redacted version of Mueller’s report, but they’ve so far rejected the offer. They want the full thing.

Contempt is another way for Congress to get subpoenaed documents, by asking the US attorney for the District of Columbia or the Department of Justice to charge Barr with criminal contempt for not complying with a congressional subpoena. In theory, a charge of contempt could result in a fine or jail time for the attorney general (though in reality, that likely won’t happen).

As serious as contempt sounds, the vote itself realistically won’t amount to more than Congress sending a powerful message — unless Democrats pass a different resolution to authorize suing Barr and the Trump administration to try to get the Mueller report. They plan to do that as well, continuing to battle the Trump administration in the court.

Democrats will now try to start the process of charging Barr and McGahn with a crime. They may wind up stuck in a long, drawn-out court battle.

Here’s how contempt of Congress works

A House vote on a contempt of Congress citation isn’t coming out of nowhere; the Trump administration has blocked the Judiciary Committee’s subpoena for the Mueller report, as well as many other House subpoena requests.

Contempt of Congress citations are a tool the House or Senate can use in cases where their subpoena requests are repeatedly denied. Congress is essentially arguing that the executive branch is stonewalling and getting in the way of its ability to conduct its constitutionally obligated oversight.

But it’s crucial to remember Congress is just making another a request here, albeit a more strongly worded one. Actually getting the executive branch to comply can be difficult, precisely because the executive branch is the one with the power to prosecute the individual who isn’t complying with the subpoena request.

Here’s how Congressional Research Services legislative attorney Todd Garvey explains it in a recent summary:

First, the criminal contempt statute permits a single house of Congress to certify a contempt citation to the executive branch for the criminal prosecution of an individual who has willfully refused to comply with a committee subpoena. Once the contempt citation is received, any prosecution lies within the control of the executive branch.

How this will work on a practical level: If the full House passes the contempt resolution, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will issue the citation for Barr to be held in contempt. She’ll pass that citation along to the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia or the Department of Justice. Either the US attorney or the DOJ will likely say they don’t plan to move forward with prosecuting Barr.

That would be the end of the matter, unless Democrats pass a separate resolution to authorize going to court with Barr and the Trump administration over the Mueller report, and getting the courts to decide their subpoena request and contempt citation.

Democrats plan to take that next step, which they would likely do before using their own power of inherent contempt to fine or jail the attorney general.

“We need to do the contempt parts before House counsel goes to litigate in court,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) told reporters last month. “The first option would be to win in court; we have a very strong case.”

Democrats are feeling confident because the Trump administration has moved to block or deny every single subpoena request of theirs, not just the one for the Mueller report. At least one former Justice Department official in the George W. Bush administration thinks Trump’s broad refusal could potentially hurt his legal argument.

“The thing that’s unusual is the blanket refusal,” John Yoo, the former deputy assistant US attorney general in the Bush DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, told the New York Times. “It would be extraordinary if the president actually were to try to stop all congressional testimony on subpoenaed issues. That would actually be unprecedented if it were a complete ban.”

That itself is risky. If a judge rules against Congress and in favor of the Trump administration, it could set new legal precedent that could make it easier for future presidential administrations to withhold information from future congressional committees.

But if the court rules in Democrats’ favor, it could strengthen Congress’s legal standing and could compel the Trump administration to comply with the subpoenas, with more serious consequences for noncompliant officials. For instance, a judge could hold administration officials in contempt of court, rather than contempt of Congress.

Democrats have already had some success in the courts; two federal judges have upheld their subpoenas of Trump’s financial information in the House Oversight and Financial Services committees. Feeling emboldened by these early wins, Pelosi wants Democrats to keep pushing forward on investigations.

Congress’s inherent contempt power, explained

Congress technically has another option that gives it much more power to prosecute noncompliant individuals, called inherent contempt power. But the lawmakers probably won’t use it.

The contempt of Congress citation the House will vote on next week is very different from inherent contempt power: Congress’s ability to arrest or jail people who don’t comply with subpoena requests.

As Garvey explained in his summary, this is how Congress used to make sure people complied with its subpoena requests if they refused, beginning in the 1850s and ending in the 1930s. Congress can do this (the Supreme Court has upheld its ability to do so), but it hasn’t since the 1930s because, well, throwing people in jail is a bit harsh:

Upon adopting a House or Senate resolution authorizing the execution of an arrest warrant by that chamber’s Sergeant-at-Arms, the individual alleged to have engaged in contemptuous conduct is taken into custody and brought before the House or Senate. A hearing or “trial” follows in which allegations are heard and defenses raised.

If judged guilty, the House or Senate may then direct that the witness be detained or imprisoned until the obstruction to the exercise of legislative power is removed.

As Garvey writes, Congress detaining these people isn’t meant to be a punishment so much as an added incentive to produce the information more quickly.

Lately, some Democrats have been talking about it as a way to put some more teeth into their subpoena requests.

“We have the power to detain and incarcerate,” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), a member of the House Oversight Committee, told reporters last month. “We don’t use it. … Doesn’t mean we can’t, and I’m all for reviving it.”

When asked where Congress would put members of the Trump administration, Connolly pointed to DC’s jail.

“We have, as you know, jurisdiction over the District of Columbia,” he said. “And they have a beautiful jail with plenty of room. So I think that would be just perfect for some of these people to contemplate their actions and judgment.”

To be clear, there’s no real indication that Democrats are ready to revive their inherent contempt power for Barr and McGahn, and it likely would be a tool of last resort. The attorney general is likely not headed to jail, especially if the department he oversees is in charge of deciding whether to prosecute him. What matters now is Democrats deciding to pursue a court case against the attorney general and former White House counsel, and if a judge holds them in contempt of court instead.

Passing a contempt of Congress citation is just the first step.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/6/4/18652183/house-vote-contempt-of-congress-barr-mcgahn

With the exception of a seemingly sulking Prince Harry — whose wife, Meghan Markle, was insulted by Donald Trump in a recorded interview — and complaints that Ivanka Trump didn’t do her patriotic duty, the president’s visit to Buckingham Palace on Monday more or less went off without a hitch.

But according to media present, Trump made a royal faux pas during the state banquet, when he appeared to “lightly touch” Queen Elizabeth II’s back as she stood to give a toast, despite royal protocol dictating that the monarch should not be touched unless she initiates contact.




The Washington Examiner reports that video footage shows Trump also touching the queen’s elbow as he finished his own speech and thanked her.

The queen, however, didn’t seem visibly annoyed by the gaffe. And Trump is certainly not the first to break protocol. In 2009, Michelle Obama wrapped her arm around the monarch, who responded by embracing the then-first lady back.

In her 2018 memoir, BecomingObama wrote about the incident and the resulting criticism that she was “uncouth.”

“Forget that she sometimes wore a diamond crown and that I’d flown to London on a presidential jet; we were two tired ladies oppressed by our shoes,” Obama recalled of her time with Elizabeth during the G20. “I then did what’s instinctive to me anytime I feel connected to a new person, which is to express my feelings outwardly. I laid a hand affectionately across her shoulder.”

She continued, “I tried not to let the criticism rattle me. If I hadn’t done the proper thing at Buckingham Palace, I had at least done the human thing … I daresay the queen was okay with it, too, because when I touched her, she only pulled closer, resting a gloved hand lightly on the small of my back.”




Of course, that pales in comparison to President Jimmy Carter’s 1977 faux pas, where he notoriously kissed the Queen Mother on the lips.

There’s also some debate as to whether Trump also broke protocol by clinking his glass against the queen’s after her toast. While etiquette experts cited this as inappropriate, the official Twitter account for the royal family shared a photo of the moment, suggesting that no harm was done.

Twitter, meanwhile, is having a field day. While critics say Trump “disrespected” the royal, his supporters hailed him for “not bowing down before all the other world leaders.”

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2019/06/04/donald-trump-accused-of-breaking-royal-protocol-by-touching-the-queens-back/23741548/

President Trump on Tuesday, in a press conference with outgoing U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May, ripped into his British left-wing critics, saying that the anti-Trump politicians are a “negative force” — and confirmed that he had snubbed the leader of the opposition Labour Party when he sought a sit-down.

“I don’t know Jeremy Corbyn, never met him, never spoke to him, he wanted to meet today or tomorrow and I decided I would not do that,” Trump told reporters at the London press conference.

TRUMP BABY BLIMP FLIES IN LONDON AS PROTESTS GREET PRESIDENT

Corbyn, the leader of the opposition Labour Party and a veteran left-wing activist, was attending an anti-Trump protest as the press conference was ongoing. Trump also took another shot at longtime foe and London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who had also opposed Trump’s visit to Britain.

“I don’t think he should be criticizing a representative of the United States that can do so much good for the United Kingdom,” Trump said. “He’s a negative force, not a positive force.”

Of the mayor, Trump said: “He’s done a poor job, crime is up, a lot of problems.”

May was similarly critical of the left-wing critics, and noted the important of the special relationship between the two countries: “That is a relationship that we should cherish, that we should build on and should be proud of.”

The press conference comes amid a three-day state visit for Trump, which has included a meeting with Queen Elizabeth II and a state dinner at Buckingham Palace. He will mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day in Portsmouth, before traveling to France to take part in celebrations there.

But while the visit has included a fair amount of pomp and circumstance, it has not stopped Trump from bringing his own brand of bare-knuckle politics to Blighty — with him calling Khan a “stone cold loser” on Monday.

“Kahn reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, [Bill] de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job — only half his height,” he said.

Trump has also brushed aside diplomatic norms in weighing in on the race to succeed May as prime minister. May will step down from Number 10 on Friday and a leadership contest will begin days later.

TRUMP DOUBLES DOWN ON BACKING BORIS JOHNSON AS NEXT UK PM

Britain was due to leave the bloc in March, but that has been delayed until Oct. 31 after Parliament rejected three times the withdrawal agreement May thrashed out with European leaders last year.

Trump has thrown most of his backing behind former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, a hardline Brexiteer born in New York who has warmed to Trump in recent years.

“I actually have studied it very hard. I know the different players,” Trump said in an interview with The Sun on Saturday. “But I think Boris would do a very good job. I think he would be excellent.”

Trump told the British outlet that he also likes current Foreign Secretary and leadership candidate Jeremy Hunt. The Daily Telegraph reported that Johnson turned down a one-on-one meeting with the president because it clashed with a leadership debate, but that the two will speak by phone.

Beyond the race to succeed May, Trump has also given his support to Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, whom he praised for finishing first in the recent European Parliament elections.

“Nigel’s had a big victory, he picked up 32 percent of the vote starting from nothing, and I think they’re big powers over there — I think they’ve done a good job,” Trump said last week.

The American president’s visit comes at a critical time for the U.K. Should Brexit go ahead, a U.S.-U.K. trade relationship will be key to Britain’s post-Brexit success. Trump has repeatedly expressed his support for such a deal on Monday said a deal was possible “once U.K. gets rid of the shackles.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But Trump will also face a significant protest in the capital on Tuesday, where left-wing activists and politicians are due to march in protest of the visit — similar to a large protest that took place during Trump’s working visit to the country last year.

Opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who refused an invitation to Monday’s banquet, is expected to speak at the rally.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-holds-press-conference-with-uk-pm-theresa-may-tells-her-to-stick-around-for-trade-deal

Although there is a sea of over 20 Democratic candidates for the 2020 presidential election, one in particular stands a chance at beating President Donald Trump, according to billionaire Mark Cuban. That individual is former Vice President Joe Biden.

Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, made the remarks to Yahoo Finance Editor-in-Chief Andy Serwer on an episode of “Influencers with Andy Serwer,” a weekly interview series with leaders in business, politics, and entertainment.

“There’s now and then there’s November of 2020,” Cuban said. “If the election were held today, I think Trump would win. I don’t think that there’s somebody that has the momentum or just the value of the incumbency that Trump has.”

But, he added, “at the same time, between now and then, I think Joe Biden has got a good chance. And we’ll see what happens with any of the other of the field of 97 to see if anybody emerges or if anybody new comes in. I think Biden is capable of beating him, but we’re not there yet.”

In a recent poll from Republican firm Echelon Insights, Biden is the clear Democratic frontrunner, with a 22-point lead over the next closest candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

And, in May 2019, a Quinnipiac University poll found Biden beating Trump in a head-to-head matchup by 11 points in Pennsylvania, a swing state that Hillary Clinton narrowly lost in the 2016 election. Just a few days later, another poll showed the two men locked in a tie among Florida voters if the election were to happen today.

THE VIEW – Joe Biden, the 47th Vice President of the United States, was the special guest, live, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25 (11:00 a.m.-12:00 noon, ET). The Vice President discussed the Affordable Care Act and the importance of signing up for health insurance through the marketplace before the March 31 deadline. Vice President Biden sat down with The View hosts Barbara Walters, Whoopi Goldberg, Sherri Shepherd and Jenny McCarthy as part of the shows continuing Red, White & View campaign, which is committed to political guests and discussions. ‘The View’ airs Monday-Friday (11:00 am-12:00 pm, ET) on the ABC Television Network.
(Photo by Lou Rocco/ABC via Getty Images)
SHERRI SHEPHERD, BARBARA WALTERS, VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, WHOOPI GOLDBERG, JENNY MCCARTHY

Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, left, and Michael Milken, chairman of the Milken Institute, arrive on stage at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., on Wednesday, May 3, 2017. The conference is a unique setting that convenes individuals with the capital, power and influence to move the world forward meet face-to-face with those whose expertise and creativity are reinventing industry, philanthropy and media. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images




‘Just the nature of the beast’

Although Cuban highlighted a potential spoiler for Trump’s re-election, he noted that he does get along with Trump, despite endorsing Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

“We didn’t have to make peace,” he said. “Like any other president, I agree with some things and disagree with other things. It’s not personal. There are things I would do differently, but it was the same with Obama, it was the same with Bush, it was the same with Clinton. That’s just the nature of the beast.”

Additionally, Cuban downplayed rumors that he is considering a presidential run.

“I don’t even want to get into it,” he said. “I did one quick interview, and then all of a sudden it blew up. I don’t want to feed the beast. … There is a certain set of circumstances that would push me to do it, but we’re not there yet.”

Adriana is an associate editor for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter @adrianambells.

READ MORE:

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, SmartNews, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit.

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/06/03/mark-cuban-says-joe-biden-has-a-good-chance-of-defeating-trump/23741058/


A school bus under a fallen tree on November 12, 2018 in Santurce, Puerto Rico. Extra disaster aid to Puerto Rico has come at the chagrin of the president. | Al Bello/Getty Images for Lumix

congress

House Democrats finally managed to pass a $19.1 billion disaster relief bill Monday, sending the measure on to President Donald Trump, who is expected to sign it.

The 354-58 vote came after Republican conservatives blocked the bill from advancing on three separate occasions while lawmakers were away on a week-long recess — an appropriately acrimonious legislative finale after months of partisan discord.

Story Continued Below

Once it’s signed into law, the bill will unlock billions of dollars in grant funding and reimbursement cash for communities still recovering from hurricanes, tornadoes, volcanic eruptions, extreme flooding, wildfires and typhoons.

“It’s been protracted. It’s so long — longer than I’ve ever heard,” Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) said Monday night about the process of negotiating the disaster aid deal. “A lot of people were waiting too long. I think we could do better. I don’t think it was our best show.”

As Trump dug in over the last few months with resistance to extra aid for Puerto Rico, the nation’s recovery tab steadily rose following disasters including the severe flooding that has slammed the Midwest in recent months. More disasters struck the longer the cross-party bickering dragged on, jacking up the legislation’s overall price tag and further complicating the task of enactment.

The measure makes $331 million in community development grants available to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, as well as $600 million in nutrition assistance to Puerto Rico and $25 million to the Northern Mariana Islands. That extra aid to Puerto Rico comes at the chagrin of the president, who has repeatedly argued the U.S. territory’s officials are “incompetent” and that the islands have received more than enough federal assistance since they were struck by a duo of catastrophic hurricanes in 2017.

Under the bill, USDA would mete out $3 billion to help defray the effects of lost crops, including for farmers who will miss planting season this year. Another $150 million goes to the USDA program that provides grants and loans to help rebuild rural facilities like health clinics, schools, police stations and town halls.

Areas recovering from disasters will also have access to more than $2.4 billion in cash through grants the Department of Housing and Urban Development doles out and nearly $1.7 billion for fixing damaged roads and bridges.

The Army Corps of Engineers will get nearly $3.3 billion to repair damaged projects and do work to reduce the effects of future disasters.

California communities hit by wildfires during the state’s most devastating blazes last year would be eligible for money through USDA rural development programs until 2020 census data is available. Nearly $16 million would go to the Interior Department to do fire remediation work and cover firefighting costs, while another $720 million will be used to repay unrelated U.S. Forest Service accounts pilfered last year to cover fire-related costs.

Billions of dollars will be spread across other federal departments and agencies like the Coast Guard, the Department of Labor, the National Weather Service, the EPA and the Education Department to both rebuild government facilities and provide cash to help disaster-wrought communities.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/03/house-disaster-bill-1352444

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexican officials have copied a page from President Donald Trump’s playbook in recent days, taking to Twitter to communicate that they are working flat-out to de-escalate tensions over immigration and avoid punitive tariffs on all Mexican exports to the U.S.

Announcements of meetings in Washington, selfies and carefully crafted messages of optimism for cool-headed discussions are some of the tactics on display in social media to respond to an economic and diplomatic emergency that few anticipated. Trump’s threat on Thursday to impose tariffs to pressure Mexico to do more to curb the flow of migrants came the same day that Mexico declared it would begin the process of ratifying the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade.

Many are questioning the legality of mixing immigration policy goals with trade retaliation, and U.S. business groups are already considering legal action against the proposed tariff, arguing that the countries both produce for each other and together. 

RELATED: Take a look at the products that are impacted by Trump’s tariffs: 

Fish and seafood:live fish including ornamental fish, trout, eels, tuna, and carp; chilled or frozen meat of various types of trout, salmon, halibut, plaice, sole, albacore, tuna, herring, mackerel, cobia, swordfish, pollack, whiting, catfish, rays, and more; various types of salted or smoked fish; other seafood including various types of lobsters, crabs, shrimps, prawns, oysters, scallops, mussels, clams, squid, octopus, conchs, abalone, sea cucumbers, and sea urchins.

Mill products: flours including those form wheat, corn, buckwheat, rice, rye, other cereals, potatoes, and bananas; groats and meal of various types including wheat, corn, oats, and rice; malt; starches of wheat, corn, potato, and more

Ores, slag, and ash: ores of iron, copper, nickel, cobalt, aluminum, lead, zinc, tin, chromium, tungsten, uranium, titanium, silver, other precious metals, and others; slag, various types of ash.

Inorganic Chemicals: chemicals such as chlorine, sulfur; carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and silicon; acids including sulfuric, nitric, and more; various types of fluorides, chlorides, sulfates, nitrates, carbonates, and more.

Raw hides and leather: animal skins including cow, buffalo, sheep, goats, reptile; various types of leather made from cow, buffalo, sheep, goats, reptile; leather trunks and suitcases; leather handbags; CD cases; gloves including ski, ice hockey, and typical use; belts; fur clothing, incluidng artificial fur.

Ships and boats: sailboats; motorboats; canoes; yachts.

Assorted items: buttons; stamps; paintings; collections of zoological, botanical, mineralogical, anatomical, historical, archaeological interest; antiques of an age exceeding one hundred years




“Almost everyone was caught flat-footed,” said Antonio Ortiz-Mena, an international trade consultant based in Washington with the Albright Stonebridge Group who represented Mexico as part of the team that negotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement in the early 1990s.

Ortiz-Mena said he spent much of the weekend on phone calls and crafting strategies to advise clients in the U.S.-Mexico supply chain on how to navigate the situation. His advice to Mexican officials would be to stay calm and show good faith by ratifying the USMCA trade deal.

“We’re neighbors. We’re not going anywhere,” Ortiz-Mena said.

Mexico overtook Canada to become the top trade partner for the U.S. in April.

Mexico’s message has been consistently friendly. President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said Mexico won’t panic, signing off on a letter to Trump as “your friend” and repeating that his country doesn’t want this confrontation, much less a trade war.

But on Monday, his top officials also strove to set some boundaries.

“There is a clear limit to what we can negotiate, and the limit is Mexican dignity,” said Mexico’s ambassador to the United States, Martha Bárcena, at a news conference in Washington. She added that her country has taken steps to offer migrants visas, and said that “without Mexico’s efforts, an additional quarter million migrants could arrive at the U.S. border in 2019.”

Foreign Relations Secretary Marcelo Ebrard said that any “safe third country” agreement that would require asylum seekers to apply for refuge in Mexico first would be unacceptable for Mexico.

There has also been some expert trolling. Ebrard posted a picture of himself at a Mexican airport Friday waiting to depart for Washington via Houston, with a Huawei-branded cellphone charging station behind him. The subtle implication: If the U.S. pushes Mexico away, China, a geopolitical and economic adversary, could move in to fill that space.

Mexican Economy Minister Graciela Marquez said she would meet with Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in Washington on Monday. Ebrard said a delegation he is leading will hold talks Wednesday with one headed by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Ebrard said Mexican Agriculture Minister Victor Manuel Villalobos also is to meet with his U.S. counterpart, Sonny Perdue, as tariffs would “severely” affect the U.S. agricultural sector. The objective is for the U.S. to avoid “shooting itself in the foot,” Ebrard said.

Mexico is the top export market for U.S. corn and pork, and Mexico supplies one out of three fresh fruits and vegetables consumed in the United States. Tariffs on Mexican agricultural exports are seen raising the cost of avocados, tomatoes and berries for U.S. consumers.

Over the weekend, Mexico’s economy minister joined what Mexican Twitter users have dubbed the “Ebrard Selfie Challenge,” posting pictures of herself smiling next to the U.S. commerce secretary at the inauguration of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele.

The Mexican strategy of killing with kindness has been met with skepticism and increasingly harsh words from Trump.

“Mexico is sending a big delegation to talk about the Border,” Trump tweeted Sunday. “Problem is, they’ve been ‘talking’ for 25 years. We want action, not talk.”

That followed an earlier tweet in which Trump labelled Mexico an “abuser” that takes but never gives to the U.S. He threatened to lure U.S. companies and jobs back via tariffs unless Mexico stops what he called an “invasion” of drug dealers, cartels, human traffickers, people smugglers and immigrants.

The addition of drugs to the complaint adds another layer of complication to negotiations.

“It’s asking the impossible,” said Maureen Meyer, director for Mexico and migrant rights at the Washington Office on Latin America, a group that researches and advocates for human rights. “It certainly overlooks how much Mexico is trying to cooperate with the U.S.”

Mexican authorities have raided migrant caravans traveling through the country’s southern states of Chiapas and Oaxaca this year. They have deported thousands of migrants and frustrated thousands more who wait endlessly for permits that would allow them to travel legally through Mexico.

Meyer expects U.S. officials will again push this week for Mexico to sign onto a “Safe Third Country” agreement, which would designate Mexico as an adequate waiting spot for migrants wishing to claim asylum in the U.S. She said Mexico should stand firm and resist because it lacks the financial and human resources to process thousands of refugee cases, even if it were willing to do so.

A complete militarization of Mexican borders is also a very tall order. Just as the Mexican border with the U.S. has proven porous, Mexico’s southern border with Guatemala features dense jungle and a river that makes it difficult to patrol.

Over the weekend, The Associated Press witnessed migrants arrive in small batches by raft at Tapachula, a border town in Chiapas. Federal helicopters, boats and police were not patrolling the Suchiate River as they have in the past to halt caravans.

But the AP also has seen a migrant woman and two children pulled from a bus in recent days to be transported to a detention center. Residents of Tapachula are routinely asked to show ID while riding public transportation as officials search for migrants without permission to be in Mexico. There were few migrants in the streets or camping in the public parks of Tapachula.

Those passing through Mexico without transit visas have opted to maintain a low-profile over the past weeks as Mexico seeks to detain and deport more migrants — and to draw attention to those efforts.

The National Migration Institute tweeted a picture Saturday of a plane transporting 64 Cubans back to their country from the Gulf state of Veracruz.

Trump says he will impose a 5% tariff on Mexican goods beginning June 10 as a way to force the government of Mexico to keep mostly Central American migrants from crossing into the U.S. He says that until he is satisfied with Mexico’s results, the import tax will be increased five percentage points every month through October, topping out at a total tariff of 25%.

Yet there are no concrete benchmarks for Mexico to prove that it is stemming immigration flows.

Mick Mulvaney, acting White House chief of staff, said on “Fox News Sunday” that Trump is “deadly serious” about imposing tariffs on imports, adding that “there’s no specific target, there’s no specific percentage” that Mexico needs to hit.

“They have to get dramatically better and they have to get better quickly,” Mulvaney said.

López Obrador said Mexican officials will try to better communicate their immigration efforts in Washington this week. He issued a memo to “the people” of the U.S. on Sunday saying he wishes to remain Trump’s friend and professing that Mexicans are their friends, too.

He closed the letter by saying: “Let nothing and nobody separate our beautiful and sacred friendship.”

___

Associated Press photo journalist Marco Ugarte in Tapachula, Mexico, contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/finance/2019/06/03/mexicans-launch-friendly-defensive-to-deflect-us-tariffs/23740672/

Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. Robert B. Neller at the U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington, Va., in 2017.

Andrew Harnik/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/AP

Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. Robert B. Neller at the U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington, Va., in 2017.

Andrew Harnik/AP

Why did Bob Neller join the Marines?

“I needed a job,” the top Marine officer says nonchalantly.

He went to Officer Candidate School the summer before his senior year at the University of Virginia with the intention of then going to law school.

“The law school thing didn’t work out,” he recalls, “and I wanted to get married, and my parents were getting divorced, and I didn’t have any money. And the Marine Corps said, ‘Hey come do this for 2 1/2 years.’ And I said, ‘Sure.’ “

It stretched to 44 years.

“Stuff happens,” says Neller, who could be a poster boy for the Corps, with his bulldog scowl and compact frame. We sit in the Pentagon’s Marine dining room, decorated with glass cases full of swords, epaulets and the occasional medal.

For the past four years, Neller has been the Marine Corps commandant, the officer charged with equipping, training and maintaining a ready service, as well as being a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He’ll step down this fall after a career that took him from Somalia and Panama to Belgium, Iraq and finally to the Pentagon.

During his tenure, Marines — and the Army — accepted women into ground combat roles. The Army is more than 2.5 times the size of the Marine Corps, but still the numbers are lopsided.

The Army counts 400 female officers and enlisted troops in the infantry, as well as 28 female graduates from Army Ranger School.

The Marines say they have 31 graduates of infantry training and fewer than a handful of female infantry officers.

“The numbers are the numbers,” says Neller. “The Congress has told us to have gender-neutral standards for all [military] occupational specialties [the military’s term for a specific job]. If you want to compete for any MOS, man or woman, you compete, and if you meet the standard you earn the MOS.”

But is Neller surprised by the low numbers?

“No. I’m not,” he says. “We knew this. We testified to this. We’ve told everybody we knew the numbers would be small. Because we didn’t believe there were many women that were interested in doing this.”

In 2015, when the Pentagon was considering opening up ground combat jobs — armor, artillery and infantry — to women, NPR visited the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center at Twentynine Palms, Calif.

It was there, in the Mojave Desert, that an experimental battalion of men and women were training together to help the Marines better understand how women would perform.

Both men and women had to perform the same tasks: Carry a pack of more than 100 pounds, climb over barriers, head out on patrol, drop and shoot at targets.

After the first week, nearly half of the women in the infantry unit dropped out — a much higher dropout rate than for their male counterparts. About a dozen women remained.

Only one of the women dropped out while in the Mojave Desert; the rest dropped out because of injuries — mostly hip and leg fractures — they received at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina while getting ready for the live-fire event in the desert.

Those stories do not surprise Neller.

“Look, we know the human being can bear a load about 60% of their body weight,” he says. “It doesn’t matter if you’re a man or a woman. Being physically large gives you an advantage when you have to carry a heavy load. The biology and genetics are what they are. And there are always going to be people that are outliers who through their determination or whatever are going to be able to do these things.”

Neller quickly points out that there are many more women in the other ground combat jobs — artillery, engineers, light armored reconnaissance, air defense, tanks.

Neller speaks during a discussion at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., earlier this year.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Neller speaks during a discussion at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., earlier this year.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

“The bigger stat is: Right now in the divisions of the Marine Corps — the three active-duty divisions — there’s over 800 women in those divisions in a variety of MOSs,” Neller says. “That wasn’t the case several years ago.”

The largest number of women — at least 211 at last count — are in artillery units, Neller says.

Female Marines, besides moving into ground combat jobs, increasingly are dealing with sexual assault. Last month, a Pentagon report showed a 20% increase in anonymous sexual assault reports in the Marine Corps from the last report in 2016. It was the highest increase among all the services.

At the time, Neller said in a statement: “We cannot truly be loyal to our Nation without first being loyal to each other. All Marines must be involved in preventing and addressing sexual assault and harassment. There is no room in the Marine Corps for either of these behaviors.”

I asked Neller about the increased number in the Pentagon report.

“The fact is, based on our reporting, and I believe it’s underreported, the numbers are going up,” he says. “I would have thought after talking about this for the last five or six years that we would have seen a decline in the behavior.”

The report also said that those units — in all the services — with a prevalence of sexual harassment, gender discrimination or workplace hostility have a greater chance of sexual assault.

“I know where [the allegations] come from just like I know where suicide ideations and suicide attempts come from. I know where there’s issues maybe with safety and other things. And so we go through the chain of command and say, ‘Hey, you need to pay attention to these folks and find out what’s going on. Why is this unit and not that unit, who seem to be in a similar geographic location, why are they having problems and the other one’s not?’ “

And what are you learning?

“They’re all different. It could be command climate. Sometimes it’s other things. People are digging into it, they’re trying. Look, the thing I have to remind myself everyday is there’s 186,000 Marines out there. And the great, great, great majority of them are doing their job, they’re treating each other with dignity and respect. They’re operationally competent, they’re physically fit, they’re looking out for each other. But we have those that either struggle with whatever they’re struggling with and so we’ve got to make sure that we’re paying attention to them. Any commander will tell you they spend the great majority of their time with a small percent of the force. Because you take for granted that everybody else who’s earned the title Marine is going to uphold our values. If it doesn’t make us better, I’m interested in getting rid of it.”

Neller is asked, whether it’s suicide or sexual assault, can he or some other officer go to a unit’s leader and say, “I’m going to give you six months to deal with, particularly, sexual assault, or I’m going to find someone else who can deal with it.”

“Can I do that? No. That’s undue command influence because there could be a violation.”

Meaning Neller, as the top Marine officer, and perhaps ultimately deciding someone’s fate, cannot inject himself into a disciplinary or criminal case and appear to influence the outcome.

Neller adds, “I have confidence in the commanders … they’re aware of what I’m aware of. They see the same data I see. If there’s a concern on their part, if there’s a spike of any sort of behavior that we’re concerned about, that they’re going down there and finding out what’s going on.”

Looking back on his tenure, Neller says he’s proud of the Marines and their families, proud that there are still young men and women out there that “want a challenge and want to work hard to earn the title Marine.”

“Recruiting’s tough. Recruiting’s always been tough because we have high standards,” he says. The Marines made their annual recruiting goal for last year — unlike the Army, which was about 6,000 recruits short.

“It’s not getting any easier. The number of qualified young men and women out there in the nation is right around 30% or less.” That’s because about 7 of 10 young people can’t meet military qualifications, because of physical problems, lack of education or criminal records.

What’s the future look like for the Marine Corps?

“Our environment’s changed, so we have to adjust and anticipate what’s coming in the future,” he says. “I think we’re back to a period of great power competition.”

That means the great powers of Russia and China, a concern that was laid out last year in the National Defense Strategy, in what it termed “long term strategic competition” with those countries.

“In the last 10, 15 years though we didn’t talk about the Russians or the Chinese,” Neller says. “Now we talk about them all the time.”

Neller says the threats from those countries include longer range missiles and other weapons, drones and cyberattacks.

“I believe that whoever can maintain their network and deny the other person theirs may win the whole thing without having to fight,” he says.

So the Marines are beefing up their cyber force, taking part in large exercises that include tanks, aircraft and artillery, the kind of weapons needed to fight a large war with another state.

What does Neller worry about?

“You worry about, are we able to change fast enough? Are we going to have reliable, consistent funding to increase the readiness and the capability of the force? Are we still going to be able to recruit?”

By this fall, those questions will have to be addressed by the next commandant.

Producer Marisa Peñaloza contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/06/04/729300525/the-marines-top-general-talks-about-a-changing-corps

The House of Representatives passed a $19 billion disaster relief bill on Monday night by a vote of 354-58, sending the measure to President Donald Trump’s desk, where he is expected to sign it.

The bill provides funds to hurricane and flood-ravaged areas like the Florida panhandle, Arkansas and Oklahoma, North and South Dakota, and Puerto Rico.

All 58 of the “no” votes came from Republicans.

Among those Republicans who voted no were Reps. Chip Roy (TX) and Thomas Massie (KY), who previously blocked the legislation, which was passed by the Senate in May.

Massie has notably requested federal disaster aid for his home state four times since 2015.

Also among the noes were Tennessee Reps. Tim Burchett (R) and Scott DesJarlais (R), who both signed a letter to the president in March, requesting relief assistance following a wave of severe storms that inundated the state with floodwaters.

The measure was previously set to pass late last month, but was blocked three times by Republicans Roy and Massie, who claimed attempts to approve the bill by unanimous consent (meaning the aid package would pass as long as no one objected to it) were too “swampy,” as well as by Rep. John Rose (R-TN), who objected to passing the measure by a voice vote.

Rose voted in favor of the disaster aid bill Monday night.

Monday’s vote follows weeks of delays by Trump, who wanted funding for his proposed U.S.-Mexico border wall included in the bill and was against Democratic proposals to include addition support for Puerto Rico, which is still recovering from Hurricane Maria two years later.

The Senate later rejected Trump’s demand, passing an emergency aid package devoid of any wall funding by a vote of 85-8 on May 23.

Trump tweeted praise for the measure shortly after that vote, writing, “The U.S. Senate has just approved a 19 Billion Dollar Disaster Relief Bill, with my total approval. Great!”

The constant delays have hit disaster-ridden regions hard. As lawmakers went back and forth on Capitol Hill, many areas of the country were left to deal with broken levees and an additional deluge of floodwaters by themselves. Massive tornadoes struck several cities leaving dozens of fatalities in their wake.

Several House Republicans slammed their colleagues last month, noting that each delay meant further devastation for those who were already struggling.

“Unfortunately, more clowns showed up today to once again delay disaster relief for the states and farmers devastated by the storms of 2018. This bill will pass the House next week, and President Trump will sign it,” Rep. Austin Scott (R-GA) tweeted on May 28, following the second failed vote.

This article will be updated with more details as they become available.


Source Article from https://thinkprogress.org/house-republicans-vote-against-bipartisan-disaster-relief-bill-106b2c2518ee/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/04/politics/trump-family-royal-family-status/index.html

Large crowds of protesters, potentially numbering in the tens of thousands, are expected to gather in central London at 11 a.m. and march toward Downing Street, where Mr. Trump will meet with Prime Minister Theresa May and hold a news conference.

The demonstrators have vowed to disrupt every stage of Mr. Trump’s visit by bringing central London to a standstill. Last year Mr. Trump largely avoided London and the protests that erupted there.

“We are coming out in bigger numbers this time to deliver our message loud and clear,” said Amy Hunter, a protester and member of the Stop Trump campaign. “Trump and his racist, divisive policies are not welcome in our country.”

When Prime Minister Theresa May and President Trump meet on Tuesday, they are widely expected to discuss Huawei, the Chinese company whose 5G technology has been the subject of warnings from Washington to its allies about what it considers to be serious security risks.

Britain’s foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, seemed to expect as much during an interview with the BBC on Monday. As he was waiting for Air Force One to land, Mr. Hunt said he and others were sensitive to Washington’s concerns. “We take careful notice of everything the U.S. says on these issues,” he said.

The Pentagon and American intelligence officials have warned allies that Huawei, which has been lobbying to build the next-generation network, could intercept or secretly divert secure messages to China. They have also warned that Huawei, because of the relationship between the authorities and businesses in China, could be ordered to shut down the networks during any conflict.

Last month, the Trump administration placed the company and dozens of affiliates on a list of firms deemed a risk to national security, a move that prevents it from buying American parts or technologies without first receiving approval from the United States government.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/04/world/europe/trump-uk-visit.html

The second article of impeachment might be that Trump encouraged and benefited from foreign interference in the 2016 election. This, too, is unforgivable. But, again, the broad outlines were known before the election – he invited Russia’s help, he crowed about WikiLeaks’ publication of stolen Democratic emails – and, again, he was elected anyway.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/06/03/fred-hiatt-we-knew-who/

Media captionFive numbers that explain US border crisis

Mexico has warned US President Donald Trump that tariffs on Mexican goods could worsen illegal immigration to the US and end up hurting both countries.

The warning came as Mr Trump tweeted that Mexico could “stop the flow of people and drugs” across the border “if they want”.

Mexican and US officials are in talks while Mr Trump is in the UK.

The president has said he plans to impose a 5% duty on all Mexican goods from next week.

The tariff would then rise by 5% every month until it reached 25% in October if Mexico did not act to halt migrants coming across the southern border.

It comes as the US fights a trade war on several fronts, including with China. Mr Trump has unusually used tariffs in diplomatic disputes since taking office.

What is Mexico’s position on this?

Speaking in Washington DC on Monday, Mexican officials insisted they were acting to stem the flow of people, many of whom are trying to reach the US so they can claim asylum.

Mexico’s Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard told reporters they remained committed to tackling the issue, and warned that if they did “nothing”, a quarter of a million migrants would reach the US this year, according to Reuters news agency.

Media captionCCTV captures the moment hundreds of migrants cross into the US

He also rejected a suggestion Mexico could become a “safe third country” as “unacceptable”. Some US officials want Central American migrants seeking asylum in the US to apply for it in Mexico instead, according to Reuters.

Meanwhile, the country’s agriculture minister said they estimated the cost of the tariffs on the agricultural sector alone to be some $117m (£92m) a month in both countries, Reuters said.

Why is the US doing this?

US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who met with Mexico’s Economy Secretary Graciela Marquez, said he had told her that Mexico needed to step up its efforts to address illegal immigration.

Mexico was the second largest supplier of goods to the US last year, with imports totalling $352bn (£275bn), according to Goldman Sachs.

However, relations have been strained, with President Trump saying Mexico is not doing enough to stop people reaching the southern border.

As a result, Mr Trump declared a national emergency at the US-Mexico border in February.

He said it was necessary in order to tackle what he claimed was a crisis with thousands of undocumented migrants crossing the US southern frontier.

Mr Trump’s tariff threat came as US officials have also been pushing for passage of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, an update to the North American Free Trade Agreement – and US lawmakers have warned the latest moves could hinder its progress.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48507433

President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner said in a rare interview that the meeting he had with his brother-in-law and campaign leadership in June 2016 with a Russian attorney was a “clown show.”

Speaking to Axios’ Jonathan Swan, Kushner was asked about that meeting he attended with Donald Trump Jr. and Paul Manafort in the search for “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from Russian lawyer Natalia V. Veselnitskaya.

“We’re in a place now where people are playing Monday morning quarterback and they’re being so self-righteous. Let me put you in my shoes at that time: OK, I’m running three companies, I’m helping run the campaign. I get an email that says show up at 4 instead of 3 to a meeting that I had been told about earlier that I didn’t know what the hell it was about,” Kushner told Swan.

Swan pushed back on Kushner’s response. “It had Russia in the subject line,” Swan said in the interview. Kushner responded by pointing out that he was overwhelmed by emails during the campaign. Veselnitskaya has since been charged with obstruction of justice in a separate case. She has not entered a plea.

Swan told ABC News on Monday that he believes Kushner remains a resilient force within the White House.

“I think he’s in a very, very strong position,” Swan said on the latest episode of “The Investigation.” “He’s the most powerful family member of a president since Bobby Kennedy, I don’t think you could mount an intellectual argument, intellectually honest argument, to counter that.”

ABC News’ conversation with Swan follows the release of his sit-down interview with Kushner, which aired on HBO Sunday evening.

Stefan Rousseau/Getty Images
Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner look on as President Donald Trump, places a wreath on the Grave of the Unknown Warrior during a visit to Westminster Abbey, June 3, 2019, in London.

Swan’s interview on HBO touched on a broad swath of topics, including the financial dealings of Kushner’s company. Kushner came under fire last year after Citigroup issued a $325 million loan to Kushner’s company just one month after Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat met with Kushner at the White House.

“Look, I would not have come into government had there been anything salacious and nefarious that I was worried about. At this point, I have been fully vetted and I think people see it this way,” Kushner told Swan.

In Swan’s conversation with ABC, he said Kushner was “very sincere” when he said this. “He absolutely believes it, and it’s not the first time he said that,” Swan said.

In response to a letter sent by lawmakers to Corbat in March 2018 questioning the loan, Citigroup told Democratic congressional leaders “The Kushner family has been a client of Citi for decades” and played down the timing of the loan and Corbat’s meeting with Kushner.

“I think I could see from the way he responded that if he, if he had to do it again, he wouldn’t do it again,” Swan told ABC News. “He didn’t say that, but seemed to me that that was a meeting that he realized the optics of it were not great. I mean that was a huge loan that they gave. And he met with the CEO in the White House.”

Kushner told Swan during the interview that can “understand the appearance” of a conflict of interest, but that he didn’t know that Citigroup was discussing business with the Kushner company during the time of the meeting. “I was meeting with a lot of executives when we got here,” Kushner said.

During the interview, Swan also asked Kushner whether Trump’s birtherism movement, which sought to discredit President Barack Obama’s citizenship, was racist. Kushner told Swan repeatedly during that “I wasn’t involved,” also stating, “I know who the president is, and I have not seen anything in him that is racist. So, again, I was not involved in that.”

Swan told ABC News that he thinks “people misunderstand Jared Kushner a little bit” and that Kushner’s political stances are not as far from the president’s as some people believe.

“People who know him well and who work with him,” Swan said on the podcast, “say that he actually agrees with Donald Trump on far more than he disagrees with him.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rare-interview-jared-kushner-calls-infamous-trump-tower/story?id=63459400

Sudan‘s Transitional Military Council (TMC) has decided to cancel all agreements with the main opposition coalition and will move ahead with elections to be held within nine months, its head has said.

The announcement by Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan in the early hours of Tuesday came after security forces fired live ammunition to clear the main protest site outside the military headquarters in Khartoum, the focal point in the demonstrators’ months-long struggle for civilian rule.

Protest groups said at least 35 people were killed and hundreds wounded in the raid by the security forces, calling it a “bloody massacre“.

“The military council decided to stop negotiating with the Alliance for Freedom and Change [group representing protesters in negotiations] and cancel what had been agreed on and to hold general elections within nine months,” al-Burhan said in a televised statement.

Al-Burhan said the TMC would now move to set up an interim government to prepare for elections, which he added would be internationally supervised.


‘Either them or us’

Monday was the worst day of violence since the military overthrow of long-time autocrat Omar al-Bashir on April 11 after months of mass protests against his three-decade rule.


But protesters insisted that al-Bashir’s removal from power was not enough. Tens of thousands remained in place in Khartoum and other camps around the country, pushing the generals who replaced al-Bashir to swiftly hand over power to a civilian-led administration.

The bloody assault and dispersal of the Khartoum sit-in now risk escalating violence even further, making a more intense face-off between the military and protesters more likely.

Pro-democracy protesters vowed to keep up their campaign, suspending talks and calling for “total civil disobedience” to “paralyse public life” across the country.

“This is a critical point in our revolution. The military council has chosen escalation and confrontation,” said Mohamed Yousef al-Mustafa, a spokesman for the Sudanese Professionals’ Association (SPA), which has spearheaded the months-long protests.

“Those are criminals who should have been treated like al-Bashir,” he said. “Now the situation is either them or us, there is no other way.”

For his part, al-Burhan said military leaders would investigate Monday’s violence, but claimed that the coalition representing the demonstrators shared responsibility for the bloodshed.


In his televised statement, the TMC head accused the alliance representing the protesters of “extending the negotiations and seeking to exclude other political and security forces” from being in a transitional government.

The TMC and protest leaders had made progress during talks in May over an interim cabinet and legislative body, but they split over the make-up and leadership of a sovereign council that was being discussed to govern Sudan during a three-year transition.

On Friday, the TMC had called the sit-in “a danger” to the country’s national security and warned that action would be taken against what it said were “unruly elements”.

On the same day, the military had also ordered the office of the Al Jazeera Media Network in Khartoum to be shut down, without giving a reason for the decision, while also withdrawing the work permits for the correspondents and staff of the Qatar-based news organisation.


‘Shooting at everyone randomly’

Activists said the assault in the early hours of Monday appeared to be a coordinated move, with other forces attacking similar sit-ins in Khartoum’s sister city of Omdurman and the eastern city of Gadarif.

Protesters accuse General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, the head of Sudan’s notorious Rapid Support Forces and deputy head of the TMC, of ordering the violent crackdown. Twenty-four hours before the security forces’ raid, Dagalo, who goes by the nickname Hemeti, was filmed making a veiled threat to protesters.

“We must firmly stand up to the ongoing chaos and build a true state,” he said. “As for the civil state the protesters are demanding, to be truly a civil rule with no individuals above it, it must be built on a rule of law. It must be ruled by law and there is no one above the law.”

The attack came on the day before the Eid holiday that ends Ramadan, the holy month when Muslims fast during daylight hours. Large numbers of troops from the military, police and Rapid Support Forces moved in on the gathering after overnight rains, activists said.


Mohammed Elmunir, a protester in Khartoum, said security forces blocked the exits of the sit-in site before opening fire on protesters.

“They were shooting at everyone randomly and people were running for their lives. They blocked all roads and most tents at the sit-in have been set on fire,” Elmunir told Al Jazeera.

In online videos, protesters were seen running and ducking as barrages of gunfire echoed. Activists said hundreds were arrested, with photos posted online showing dozens of men and women lined up on the pavement, sitting or lying face down, under guard by troops.

Demonstrators stood behind low barricades of bricks and dug-up pavement, and some threw stones before being driven back by walls of blue-clad security forces carrying sticks. One video showed police swarming around a protester sprawled on the ground, beating him with sticks. In another video, residents opened their doors to shelter those who ran.

A doctors’ committee linked to the protesters said the death toll had risen to at least 35 by early Tuesday with the killing of five people in the city’s Bahri district. The committee said it was difficult to count deaths in areas outside the military headquarters in Khartoum, adding that hundreds of people were wounded, many by gunfire.

Medical staff and the injured were trapped in clinics as troops overran the area.

“Wounded people are lying on the ground in the reception area as there are not enough beds,” said Azza al-Kamel, a doctor at Royal Care hospital.

International condemnation

The attack against the protesters came days after al-Burhan met with his top foreign allies, including Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who have both been strong supporters of the TMC and deeply oppose movements such as those that swept the region in the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings.

Many analysts said they believed the military rulers were being influenced by powers outside Sudan.

“The latest escalation, and what is already a precarious situation, came after the head of the military council and the deputy head … visited Saudi Arabia,” Awol Allo, a senior lecturer in law at Keele University, told Al Jazeera. “Since then, there is a significant escalation … against the protesters.”


Meanwhile, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the crackdown and called on authorities to allow an independent investigation, according to his spokesman.

“There was use of excessive force by the security forces on civilians,” Stephane Dujarric said.

The UN Security Council is set to discuss Sudan after the United Kingdom and Germany requested a closed-door session, set for Tuesday afternoon.

UN human rights chief, Michelle Bachelet, expressed alarm at reports that live ammunition was used, including “next to, and even inside, medical facilities”.

The embassies of the United States and the UK also expressed concern.

Amnesty International, a London-based rights group, called on the UN Security Council to consider imposing sanctions on TMC members.

The military “has completely destroyed the trust of the Sudanese people and crushed the people’s hope for a new era of respect for human rights and respect for the right to protest without fear,” said Sarah Jackson, Amnesty deputy regional director for East Africa.

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/06/bloody-attack-sudan-army-scraps-agreements-protesters-190604005733226.html

The ministry of education in China warned students and academics Monday about studying in the United States, because of the trade war’s increasing tension.

The ministry urged students to “step up risk assessment and make corresponding preparations,” adding that, “For some time, some of the visas for Chinese students studying in the United States have been restricted, with the review period extended, the period of validity shortened and the refusal rate increased.”

The warning stems from the recent threat from President Trump of another round of tariffs on Chinese imports. The yearlong battle flared up again in May, the Hill reported. If no resolution is reached between the two countries, this could heavily affect the U.S. economy and Trump’s reelection chances.

Hu Xijin, the editor of the Global Times, tweeted the warning is a “response to recent series of discriminatory measures.”

About 360,000 Chinese nationals study in the U.S. and generate about $14 billion from tuition and other expenses, according to Reuters.

Trump fired off a tweet this morning attacking China for subsidizing its products. Xijin responded shortly after, urging Trump to “talk less about China.”

The statement added that the trade war has affected Chinese students in the U.S. and prevents some from “smoothly completing their studies.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ministry-of-education-in-china-warns-students-studying-in-us-as-trade-war-tensions-rise

Chinese propaganda officials once used the image of Tank Man to defend the government’s handling of the protests, arguing that the military had shown restraint by not killing him.

But more recently, the government has worked to eliminate the memory of Tank Man, censoring images of him online and punishing those who have evoked him.

A court convicted four men in southwestern China this year for selling bottles of liquor that referenced him, alongside the words, “Never forget, never give up.”

As a result of the government’s campaign, many people in China, especially younger Chinese, do not recognize his image.

A recent survey of 239 internet users in China by Rutger van der Hoeven, a lecturer at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, found that 37 percent of respondents said they recognized a photo of Tank Man, compared with 49 percent on average across the globe. In a separate question, about one in six Chinese respondents correctly identified the protests at Tiananmen Square as the backdrop for the photo.

Outside China, Tank Man has endured in popular culture, the subject of books, documentaries, television shows and art exhibits.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/03/world/asia/tiananmen-tank-man.html

The House of Representatives approved a $19.1 disaster relief bill Monday, sending the measure to President Trump after conservative Republican lawmakers had blocked three separate attempts to pass the bill by a voice vote last week.

The bill was passed by a vote of 354-58, with 132 Republicans — many from districts hit by hurricanes, floods, tornadoes and fires in recent months — joining 222 Democrats to support the measure. All 58 ‘no’ votes came from GOP lawmakers.

Trump tweeted Monday night: “House just passed the 19.1 Billion Dollar Disaster Aid Bill. Great, now we will get it done in the Senate! Farmers, Puerto Rico and all will be very happy.”

“I am pleased that we have finally rejected the political stunts and grandstanding that have made it difficult to deliver much-needed relief to Americans struck by recent natural disasters,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., said in a statement. “While it has taken far too long, this $19.1 billion bill includes a broad array of measures to help meet the urgent needs of disaster-stricken communities, from health care and nutritional assistance to social services and infrastructure repairs. The bill represents bipartisan compromise that will strengthen communities and make lives better.”

The House vote was the first significant action since lawmakers returned to Washington from a 10-day recess to mark the Memorial Day holiday. The Senate had passed the bill by a sweeping 85-8 vote on its way out of Washington on May 23, a margin that reflected a consensus that the bill was long overdue.

The measure had languished for months over a dispute between the White House and Democrats over aid to hurricane-hit Puerto Rico, as well as Trump’s requests to allocate more than $4 billion to deal with the ongoing migrant crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Members of both parties agreed that another bill will be needed almost immediately to refill nearly empty agency accounts to care for Central American migrants.

Democrats also held firm for what ended up as roughly $1.4 billion for Puerto Rico, letting Trump feud with the U.S. territory’s officials for weeks and deflecting political blame for stalling the bill.

SAN JUAN MAYOR SUGGESTS TRUMP ‘VINDICTIVE’ TOWARD PUERTO RICO BECAUSE HIS GOLF COUSE THERE ‘WENT BANKRUPT’

The measure is largely the same as a version that passed the House last month that Republicans opposed for leaving out the border funding.

“We must work together quickly to pass a bill that addresses the surge of unaccompanied children crossing the border and provides law enforcement agencies with the funding they need,” said House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Kay Granger, R-Texas, earlier Monday. “The stakes are high. There are serious — life or death — repercussions if the Congress does not act.”

In a statement following the vote, Granger said the bill was a “positive step forward for our communities,” but added: “[N]ow that disaster relief is on its way, I hope Congress will turn to addressing the humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border.”

Among the reasons for the failure to reach an agreement on money for the border was a demand by House liberals to block the Department of Homeland Security from getting information from federal social welfare officials to help track immigrants living in the U.S. illegally who took migrant refugee children into their homes.

The bill started out as a modest $7.8 billion measure passed late in 2018, during the final days of Republican control of the House. A $14 billion version advanced in the Pelosi-led chamber in January and ballooned to $19.1 billion by the time it emerged from the floor last month, fed by new funding for community rehabilitation projects, Army Corps of Engineers water and flood protection projects, and rebuilding funds for several military bases, including Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska.

GOP LAWMAKER’S DELAY OF $19B DISASTER BILL DEMONSTRATES THE POWER OF ONE

The legislation initially was spearheaded by lawmakers from Florida and Georgia whose districts were battered by hurricanes this past fall. Flooding in Iowa and Nebraska this spring added to the coalition behind the measure. Recent floods in Arkansas, Iowa and Missouri and tornadoes across Oklahoma, Texas and Ohio added urgency to House leadership’s push to pass the bill.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Following Senate approval, House leadership attempted to pass the measure by unanimous consent during the Memorial Day recess. But, objections were lodged by Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas; Thomas Massie, R-Ky.; and John Rose, R-Tenn. All three members insisted that the legislation be put to a recorded vote.

Roy and Massie voted against the measure Monday, while Rose voted for it.

Fox News’ Mike Arroyo, Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-approves-19-1b-disaster-aid-bill-blocked-three-times-by-republicans


President Donald Trump has threatened to impose broad tariffs on Mexico if it doesn’t curb the number of undocumented crossings into the United States. | Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo

Congress

The president may have to declare another national emergency — putting Republicans in a tough spot if Congress votes to block it.

President Donald Trump could face yet another disapproval vote in Congress if he moves forward with new tariffs on Mexico, potentially setting up a major clash with Senate Republicans.

Trump has threatened to impose broad, increasing tariffs starting at 5 percent on imports from Mexico to force the U.S.’s southern neighbor to help stem the tide of migrants at the border.

Story Continued Below

Officials in both parties as well as trade experts told POLITICO Monday that the president may have to declare a second national emergency in order to invoke trade powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

And just as Congress voted to block Trump’s first national emergency to fund his border wall, lawmakers may be able to vote to overturn any new tariffs that Trump imposes.

The law at issue allows the president to regulate trade to deal with “any unusual or extraordinary threat” to national security that warrants a national emergency. Trump first announced a national emergency in February but did not declare it under that specific statute — which could require him to issue a new national emergency that invokes the IEEPA.

“He does need to declare an emergency in order to act under IEEPA because the earlier emergency declaration involving the US-Mexico border did not reference IEEPA actions. This new declaration of an emergency will allow Congress the opportunity to pass a joint resolution against the declaration of this new emergency,” said Vanessa P. Sciarra, the vice president for legal affairs and trade & investment policy at the National Foreign Trade Council.

A senior administration official argued otherwise. The official said that IEEPA is one of the statutory powers that can be invoked under the existing national emergency, and that administration lawyers have reviewed the matter.

Several Republican aides said that because the White House hasn’t sent official language to the Hill, they were unsure whether a congressional vote to block the tariff increase will be possible.

Such a move would likely originate with House Democrats, who took the first steps to thwart Trump’s first emergency declaration.

And if Congress does take a vote, the result could be a spectacle similar to this winter’s showdown, when 12 Senate Republicans opposed Trump’s national emergency declaration on the southern border to build his wall after he was rebuffed by Congress. That vote was a struggle for many in the Senate GOP, after party leaders failed to head off the conflict with the president by trying to convince him to restrict his executive authority for future emergencies. Ultimately, Republicans fractured, and Congress could not override Trump’s veto.

Given the strong resistance to new tariffs on Mexico, Republican aides said there would likely be a significant number of votes in opposition to a new national emergency declaration, though the party’s preference is clearly to talk Trump out of it.

Senate Republicans spent much of Monday complaining about the president’s new threats to trade with Mexico and said there would likely be more pushback in the coming days to get Trump to change course.

“There are going to be concerns expressed about whether this is the right way to get Mexico’s attention on the border security issue,” said Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) in an interview. “It’s going to not be viewed favorably in my state, for sure.”

Andrew Restuccia, Sabrina Rodriguez, John Bresnahan and Heather Caygle contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/03/vote-tariff-1352662