The second night of NBC’s two-day, technical-issue plagued Democratic debate was panned by critics as frenzied and unorganized, with much of the blame being placed at the feet of its me-first moderator, Chuck Todd.

DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News that it “was not a debate and not even a good dueling news conference,” but instead an “unstructured free-for-all that broke no new ground.”

“It featured moderators who were not up to the task in terms of setting direction for content and certainly not for managing the mob of candidates,” McCall said. “NBC clearly had no structure for this tiresome spectacle.”

NBC’s Chuck Todd begged the audience to stay quiet and repeatedly pleaded with candidates to shorten their answers and hurry up during the Democratic debate. (REUTERS/Mike Segar)

MSNBC OPINION HOST RACHEL MADDOW’S DEBATE PRESENCE WAS ‘A LOSS FOR JOURNALISM,’ CRITIC SAYS

Wednesday’s opening night was inundated with technical and audio issues and the second edition featured even more embarrassing moments for the Peacock Network. The gaffes started with another audio glitch when candidates took the stage to stone silence during the pre-debate show on MSNBC.

“Do we have any audio from the room or is this happening in absolute silence?” MSNBC Brian Williams asked the control room on live TV.

“NBC clearly had no structure for this tiresome spectacle.”

— Jeffrey McCall

Things weren’t much better once the debate actually started, and it got particularly awkward when Todd and far-left opinion host Rachel Maddow took the reins at the midway point. The banter between Todd and Maddow resulted in The Ringer editor-at-large Bryan Curtis and media guru David Shoemaker comparing their relationship to stars of a “buddy cop movie” and people “auditioning for morning television” on “The Press Box” podcast.

Maddow – whose presence alone was controversial as debate moderators are typically nonpartisan journalists – kicked off her appearance by scolding the crowd, informing attendees that “the less audience reaction there is, the more time” candidates will have to speak as Todd playfully recreated the “prayer hands” emoji.

Things got particularly awkward when Chuck Todd and far-left opinion host Rachel Maddow took the reins at the midway point.

Once they got around to asking questions, Maddow attempted to toss it to Lester Holt in the audience — but the “Nightly News” anchor wasn’t in position, leading to uncomfortable silence before the liberal pundit laughed off the mistake as a “fake out.”

Todd’s performance was widely panned by people on both sides of the aisle, with the “Meet the Press” host being widely criticized for expecting short answers to long questions. Shareblue Media senior writer Oliver Willis called Todd “the worst” and Slate published a story headlined, “It was almost a good debate until Chuck Todd mucked it up.”

Slate’s Justin Peters nicknamed the NBC News host “logorrheic Chuck Todd” and labeled him the event’s biggest loser.

MSNBC’S RACHEL MADDOW HAS A ONE-SIDED LOVE AFFAIR WITH NEW YORK TIMES

“There is no reason to bring presidential candidates together for a ‘debate’ and then try to force them into one or two-word answers,” McCall said. “Todd was not so much interested in having the candidates differentiate themselves as to place himself in the middle of the event. The best debate moderators blend in seamlessly and only gently referee when needed. Todd wanted to be part of the show.”

Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor told Fox News that viewers “wanted to hear more from the candidates and less from Chuck Todd,” during the two-night debate.

“He’s not running for president, though sometimes I think [Chuck Todd] needs to be reminded of that.”

— Dan Gainor

“He’s not running for president, though sometimes I think he needs to be reminded of that,” Gainor said.

TRUMP MOCKS NBC WITH DOCTORED VIDEO OF MIC GLITCH THAT HAMPERED DEBATE

Ironically, NBC’s own “Nightly News” tweeted a clip of Todd rushing candidates after asking a lengthy question — a moment that resulted in widespread criticism.

The New York Times TV critic James Poniewozik tweeted, “For someone who loves one-word answers, Chuck Todd asks long questions.”

Even liberal “Late Show” host Stephen Colbert made fun of Todd, putting on a faux goatee and begging “please don’t talk too much, OK? You’re not Chuck Todd, I am.”

Liberal comedian Stephen Colbert mocked Chuck Todd’s debate performance.

ANDREW YANG SAYS HE HAD MIC ISSUES DURING NBC DEBATE

Meanwhile, NBC was also accused of playing favorites, as presidential candidate Andrew Yang said his microphone was “not on” when he wanted to speak at various points of debate. It’s unclear if this was another technical issue.

NBC News did not immediately respond to Fox News for comment.

The sister of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-HI, even accused the liberal network of favoring Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass, who received a whopping five questions within the first 30 minutes of Wednesday night’s debate.

“It’s clear who MSNBC wants to be president: Elizabeth Warren,” Vrindavan Gabbard wrote on the congresswoman’s Twitter account.

“Any such forum that allows a few candidates to talk more than triple the amount of time for several other candidates is just not being done fairly,” McCall said.

Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/nbc-chuck-todd-dem-debates

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-29/xi-trump-agree-to-restart-trade-talks-china-says

President Trump declared a national emergency to free up funding for his border wall between the U.S and Mexico. But declaring a national emergency isn’t new — in fact, the use of emergency powers is older than the country itself.
USA TODAY, Just the FAQs

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/06/28/trump-border-wall-funding-federal-judge/1604750001/

Presidential candidate Andrew Yang said his microphone was “not on” when he wanted to speak during Thursday night’s Democratic primary debate.

Speaking to a group of supporters following the debate, Yang expressed his disappointment of the little airtime he received but remained optimistic as the field will narrow down in the debates ahead. He also called it “jarring” when he’d watch other candidates have heated exchanges, saying it was like “watching a ping pong ball” between two people.

TULSI GABBARD’S SISTER CALLS OUT MSNBC OF FAVORING WARREN IN DEBATE

“There were also a few times, fyi, where I just started talking, being like, ‘Hey, I want to add something there,’ and my mic was, like, not on,” Yang said. “And it’s this sort of thing where- It’s not like if you started talking, it takes over the convo. It’s like I was talking, but nothing was happening. And it was like, ‘Oh f—.’ So that happened a bit too.”

According to the New York Times, Yang received the least amount of speaking time of all 20 participants in both debates, clocking in at two minutes and 58 seconds. Meanwhile, former Vice President Joe Biden topped the field with 13 minutes and 19 seconds of speaking time followed by Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif, with 12 minutes and 16 seconds.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Last night, the sister of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-HI, took to Twitter and accused the liberal news network of favoring Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass, who received a whopping five questions within the first 30 minutes of Wednesday night’s debate.

“It’s clear who MSNBC wants to be president: Elizabeth Warren,” Vrindavan Gabbard wrote on the congresswoman’s Twitter account. “They’re giving her more time than all of the other candidates combined. They aren’t giving any time to Tulsi at all.”

Yang’s campaign nor NBC News did not immediately respond to Fox News for comment.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/andrew-yang-accuses-nbc-of-turning-off-his-mic-during-debate

CLOSE

Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump were heard on camera discussing “fake news” before their talks at the G-20 summit in Osaka on Friday. (June 28)
AP, AP

OSAKA, Japan — President Donald Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping agreed Saturday to resume high-level negotiations for a landmark new trade agreement, according to Chinese state media, a development they hope will end a trade war has roiled markets and raised prices worldwide.

“The U.S. side said it will not add new tariffs on Chinese exports,” the state-run news service Xinhua reported. “The two countries’ economic and trade negotiating teams will discuss specific issues.”

The Trump administration did not make an immediate comment; Trump has a news conference scheduled later in the day. 

The disclosure came after Trump and Xi sat down seeking to re-start talks for a new agreement that could end the trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

“We’re totally open to it … I think this could be a very productive meeting,” Trump told Xi as they began their meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in this ancient Japanese port city.

After the meeting, the president described talks with China as “right back on track” but did not confirm whether an agreement had been reached.

Xi called the talks a potential turning point in the U.S.-Chinese relationship, and told Trump that their two countries “benefit from cooperation and lose in confrontation. Cooperation and dialogue are better than friction and confrontation.”

Hours before his meeting with the Chinese leader, Trump and his aides expressed guarded optimism that the two nations — the largest economies in the world — could at least resume negotiations that broke off in May.

In the meantime, Trump said he is prepared to put more tariffs on Chinese goods if the Xi meeting doesn’t work out well. The Chinese said they are prepared to do much the same thing to American products.

“As to whether or not we can make a deal, time will tell,” Trump told reporters.

Noting that he saw Xi at a G-20 event Friday, Trump said “the relationship itself is really good,” and that he and the Chinese president “have a very good friendship, a very, very good friendship.”

For months, the two countries have taken turns hitting each other with tariffs, raising prices for producers and consumers and slowing growth worldwide.

Related: Trump’s own brand of diplomacy is on display at G-20. How will it fare with Valdimir Putin, Xi Jinping?

Also: Trump arrives in Japan for G-20. What to expect from meetings with China’s Xi Jinping, Russia’s Putin

According to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, tariffs set in 2018 “imposed an annual cost of $419 for the typical household.”

The latest Trump-Xi meeting takes place more than a month after U.S. and Chinese negotiators broke off trade talks, each side accusing the other of seeking to change the details at the last minute.

Now Trump and Xi hope to at least revive serious negotiations on a new arrangement between the global economic giants.

In remarks at the top of his meeting with Trump, Xi traced the up-and-down nature of the U.S.-Chinese relationship that he said began when an American table tennis team visited China for matches in 1971.

“That marked the beginning of what we now know as ping-pong diplomacy,” Trump said.

Trump cited more recent history, saying the U.S. and China were on the verge of a deal little more than a month ago, but then “something happened.”

“It would be historic if we could do a trade deal,” Trump said.

Throughout his presidential campaign and into his presidency, Trump has repeatedly accused China of taking advantage of, even “raping,” the United States with its trade policies.

The United States wants China to change some of its trade policies, particularly its demands that companies give up technology and trade secrets if they are to do business in the Middle Kingdom.

Xi, meanwhile, is making demands of his own. For one thing, he wants Trump to end his administration’s ban on sale of U.S. parts to Huawei Technologies Co., the Chinese telecommunications giant.

In the hours before meeting with Xi, Trump said he is willing to talk about new arrangements for Huawei, and added that “we’ll be discussing a lot of things.”

In the run-up to the meeting, Chinese officials also said they want Trump to postpone the prospect of more tariffs for at least six months as talks continue. The United States is also seeking relief from Chinese tariffs.

More: Donald Trump invites Kim Jong Un to meet him at Korea border

Trade isn’t the only item on the Trump-Xi agenda. There’s also North Korea.

Xi is expected to pitch a plan to revive U.S. negotiations with North Korea over the fate of its nuclear weapons programs.

After the end of the G-20 summit Saturday, Trump will travel to Seoul to meet with South Korean President Moon Jae-in — and possibly North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

Hours before the Xi meeting, Trump tweeted out an invitation to Kim to meet him at the Demilitarized Zone during his visit to Seoul.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/28/donald-trump-xi-jinping-hold-make-break-trade-meeting/1592712001/

President Trump on Friday raised the possibility of meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un while in South Korea over the next few days, tweeting that he’s willing to meet Kim at the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea.

“After some very important meetings, including my meeting with President Xi of China, I will be leaving Japan for South Korea (with President Moon),” the president tweeted Friday. “While there, if Chairman Kim of North Korea sees this, I would meet him at the Border/DMZ just to shake his hand and say Hello(?)!”

The president, who has been overseas at the G20 summit in Japan, is set to arrive in South Korea on Saturday.

NORTH KOREA LEADER RECEIVES ‘EXCELLENT’ LETTER FROM TRUMP

There have been no public meetings between Washington and Pyongyang since the breakdown of a Vietnam summit between the two leaders earlier this year. But the prospects for a resumption of U.S.-North Korea diplomacy have brightened since Trump and Kim recently exchanged personal letters. Trump called Kim’s letter “beautiful,” while Kim described Trump’s as “excellent,” though the contents of their letters have not been disclosed.

Despite the deadlocked nuclear negotiations, both Trump and Kim have described their personal relationship as good. When asked whether Kim’s recent letter included a mention about another summit, Trump recently said, “Maybe there was.”

In yet another reminder of North Korea’s continued mistrust of the United States, its foreign ministry said earlier Wednesday it won’t surrender to U.S.-led sanctions and accused Washington of trying to “bring us to our knees.”

Kim has said North Korea will seek a “new way” if the United States persists with sanctions and pressure.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-offers-to-meet-kim-jong-un-at-north-korean-border

“It’s a great honor to be with President Putin,” Mr. Trump said as they sat together. “We’ve had great meetings,” he added. “We have had a very, very good relationship. And we look forward to spending some pretty good time together. A lot of very positive things going to come out of the relationship.”

Mr. Putin said they would discuss trade, disarmament and other issues. “All this will be built on a very good relationship that will be between us,” he said. “I think that the results of this meeting will be excellent.” Russian officials later reported that Mr. Putin had invited Mr. Trump to visit Moscow next spring for the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II, and that the American president seemed positive.

The White House summary of the leaders’ meeting indicated that they talked about Mr. Trump’s proposed three-way arms control agreement with China, as well as about disputes in Iran, Syria, Venezuela and Ukraine. The summary made no mention of election interference, nor anything about two Americans who have been arrested by the Russian authorities on disputed charges.

Likewise, it said nothing about an international investigation this month that pointed to Russia in the 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine, which killed all 298 people on board. International prosecutors have indicted three men with ties to Russian military and intelligence agencies in the destruction of the passenger jet and implicated, without charging, a senior aide to Mr. Putin.

Nor did the summary indicate that the leaders talked about Russia’s seizure of three Ukrainian ships and two dozen sailors last November, events that prompted Mr. Trump to cancel a scheduled meeting with Mr. Putin, and that remain unresolved. When a reporter asked about the ships and sailors on Friday, the president said, “We haven’t discussed them.”

While Mr. Putin did not address the election issue with reporters on Friday, he scoffed at the idea of Russian involvement during an interview before flying to Osaka. He advanced the same line of argument that Mr. Trump does: that he won in 2016 because he was in better touch with Americans.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/28/us/politics/trump-putin-election.html

In general, though, the moderation was competent. Todd kept things moving and managed the glitch with a certain amount of grace, but he talked way too much. In fairness, Todd talked so much partly because he had to repeat that question three times and explain the glitch. According to a tally by FiveThirtyEight, he talked more than almost all the candidates, coming in fourth in word count behind Cory Booker, Beto O’Rourke and Elizabeth Warren, in that order.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/06/27/margaret-sullivan-nbcs/

A fisherman’s boat makes its way across Lake Chilwa in Malawi. A large portion of Lake Chilwa dries out every year, and the fishing industry disappears along with it. Most fishermen then head to Lake Malawi, where there is fishing year-round.

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

A fisherman’s boat makes its way across Lake Chilwa in Malawi. A large portion of Lake Chilwa dries out every year, and the fishing industry disappears along with it. Most fishermen then head to Lake Malawi, where there is fishing year-round.

Julia Gunther

“Sex for fish.”

That unlikely phrase is used in some lakefront communities in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world where men catch the fish and women sell the catch to local customers.

In Malawi, for instance, a woman may take a fisherman’s catch and promise to pay him once she’s made her sales. Only she might have trouble selling all the fish. So she might pay off what she owes for the fish by engaging in a sexual encounter.

Either the man or the woman “just suggests, let’s have sex as a way of compensating,” says Benjamin Kachikho, a project officer with the Malawi office of the Timotheos Foundation, which focuses on social issues such as education about HIV.

A crowd of fish traders forms around a boat at Lake Malawi laden with usipa, a species of small sardine-like fish that are dried and sold all over the country.

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

Or if the supply of fish is low because of overfishing, several women may vie for a fisherman’s catch — and transactional sex may be used as a bargaining point.

The practice is “longstanding and quite engrained as a social norm,” says Patrick Higdon, director of programs at the nonprofit group World Connect, which has worked to address this issue in Kenya.

It’s also a practice that a community may not approve of. The fish traders often do not want their neighbors to know if they engage in transactional sex.

Because of the furtive nature of the practice, it’s hard to estimate how many fishermen and fish sellers turn to this type of transactional sex.

A fisherman holds up a chambo — what locals call a type of tilapia native to Lake Malawi. Chambo is one of Malawi’s most popular fish. Once it was plentiful, but now it is listed as “critically endangered” because of overfishing.

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

But it is clear why it happens. “Poverty is the main reason for fish for sex,” Kachikho says. “If you are poor, you are stuck.”

Stuck — and at risk. Kachikho and others in Malawi and Kenya believe that fish for sex is a contributor to the spread of HIV in a part of the world where the rate of HIV is high. In Malawi, approximately 1 in 10 adults ages 15 to 64 is HIV-positive, according to UNAIDS — one of the highest rates in the world.

The fishermen travel to different fishing spots along the lakefront and then bring their catch to the local community fishmonger, says Alfred Banda, an outreach worker with Youth Net Counseling in Malawi’s Zomba district. If they have the virus, they can bring it into a community, or if they become infected in the course of their travels “they will transmit,” Banda says. “The more mobile they are, the more they endanger the health of others.”

“The fishermen want to mostly have unprotected sex,” says a 39-year-old woman in Chisamba Village, Malawi, who sells fish and sometimes engages in transactional sex. “They don’t like condoms.”

She was one of 19 women interviewed about the practice by the German photojournalist Julia Gunther, whose images are featured with this story. Partnering with videographer Nick Schonfeld, Gunther spent nearly a month in several villages in Malawi in 2018 to document the practice of sex for fish. Most of the women asked that their names not be used because of the fear they will face discrimination in their communities.

The 39-year-old woman told Gunther that even when she makes a profit on the fish, sex can enter into the equation. “The fishermen will say, keep the profit and I come to your house in the night. So that they sleep with me.”

Her comments also reveal the precarious life faced by female fish sellers. At one point, “some fishermen took my money and ran away,” she says. And “sometimes the fishermen are violent to me,” she says. “I gave money to a certain fisherman, and he did not give me my fish. I took his fishing net. He was threatening me that if I take the net, I am going to beat you.”

The women told Gunther they are embarrassed by what they do to survive financially. They do not consider themselves sex workers. They are simply women in tough circumstances, trying to eke out a living. Some are single mothers. Others try to sell fish to support a large family.

Gunther did meet several women who had moved on from selling fish.

Chrissy Masala in her hairdressing salon in Mpyupyu, Malawi. For five years, Masala says she would have sex with fisherman and be paid with fish, which she would sell at local markets and big cities. But she felt that the community disapproved. Eventually, she saved enough money to open the salon in 2013.

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

Chrissy Masala saved enough money to open a hair salon in 2013. “I decided to stop because of the stigma and discrimination against me,” she told Gunther of the years when she traded sex for fish. “I was judged by others … my parents, my children. Even I judged myself.”

Catherine Kambanje with her 1-year-old son, photographed in the village of Kachulu on Lake Chilwa in Malawi. She says she traded sex for fish for seven years. Typical payment was a bucket of fish. She’d use some to feed her family and sell the rest. Now she burns wood to make charcoal, which she sells. She says she earns significantly less than she did before.

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

Another woman who gave up the practice is Catherine Kambanje, who now burns wood to make charcoal, which she sells. But “nothing is changing,” she says. “I am still poor.”

Overall, Gunther says she came away from her month in Malawi with a sense of women in despair — and little hope for change.

In other communities where sex for fish occurs, nonprofit groups and entrepreneurs are working on ways to curtail the practice.

About seven years ago, representatives of World Connect met with a group of 30 or so women who are fish traders along Nyamware beach on Kenya’s Lake Victoria, about six miles south of the port city of Kisumu. The women came up with a plan that would enable them to stop offering sex to keep their business going. They wanted their own boats. That way, instead of depending on fishermen and their boats, they could hire men to fish for them, then sell the fish the men bring back to earn a living.

The women came up with an idea: “a project that would allow them to construct their own boats,” says Higdon of World Connect, which offered grants to cover the cost.

When the women had their own boats, “that really flipped the economic dynamic,” Higdon says. They were in charge. They no longer had to consider transactional sex as a way to negotiate for fish to sell or to pay off a debt.

The plan hasn’t been perfect. “Some women are more engaged and successful than others,” Higdon reports.

But he’s encouraged by the results, especially among boat owners who formed a cooperative — the No Sex For Fish Women’s Group. These women pool the money they’ve saved from their earnings to cover repairs on their vessels and to purchase new nets. And in 2017 they came up with a strategy to grow their business. They’ve purchased boats with motors that could go deeper into the lake, where fish would be more plentiful than in the overfished waters close to shore. They hire a crew of eight to do the fishing.

There’s also a new business in Kenya that seeks to stop fish for sex – and help local fish farms as well.

With investments and loans, Dave Okech set up Rio Fish in 2016. His plan is to connect female fish sellers with a different supply source — fish farms. To join his network, fish farms must agree to and sign a code of conduct to follow environmentally sound fish farming techniques and “not to engage in any activity that may lead to sex for fish,” he says. If violations are reported, the fish farm will be dropped from the network.

The fish farmers upload their daily production of fish on the Rio Fish system. Fishmongers can call Rio Fish’s office to locate the nearest supply of farmed fish, which they can purchase with an electronic money transfer service called M-Pesa, commonly used in Kenya. This fall Okech hopes to launch an app that will help people find fish farms.

If all goes according to plan, fish farmers will have an easy way to sell their fish, and fish sellers will have a steady supply and not have to resort to transactional sex to obtain fish or pay off debts. So far, Okech says, he is working with 200 fish sellers. The first year Rio Fish transferred 50 tons of fish and has since gone up to 300 annual tons a year, with fish available for pickup three days a week. His goal is 1,000 tons in 2020.

To earn money, Okech takes a commission from the fees paid, around 10%. He also has his own fish farm as part of the enterprise.

Fisherman Mekius Dominic stands in Lake Malawi. Dominic became a fisherman three years ago. He says he has never engaged in transactional sex but knows plenty of men who do. “My friends have said to me that I must do it. They force me to come with them and drink beer. Then they tell me I have to have sex with a woman there. But I do not do it.”

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

There are lots of questions about these programs to help stop “sex for fish,” says Seema Jayachandran, an economics professor at Northwestern University and the academic chair for gender research and policy work at the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, a research center that studies the effectiveness of programs to reduce poverty. How many women try these strategies but then drop out? Is the boat-building program cost-effective? Are there other ways that women have figured out on their own how to move on from business dealings that involve fish for sex?

Nonetheless, she says, the boat-buying and fish farm interventions sound promising. One way to test their effectiveness would be to scale them up and see what happens: “Bigger reach is a good thing.”

Shortly after dawn, fishermen untangle and lay out their nets at Makawa beach on Lake Malawi.

Julia Gunther


hide caption

toggle caption

Julia Gunther

The fishmongers interviewed by Gunther in Malawi are clearly ready for a solution that will mean they can stop the practice of sex for fish. A 35-year-old woman, divorced and the mother of three, told Gunther that she’ll say to fishermen on the beach, “I don’t have money but I want fish.’ Then we agree to have sex in return for the fish. That happens maybe once per week.” She says she is “HIV-negative” but “it is fate if you catch HIV here. That is normal.”

Reflecting on the way she earns her livelihood, she says: “I feel like there is no future in doing these things.” And she dreams of a life with “a stable family which can provide for me.”

Julia Gunther’s photo project in Malawi was made possible with a grant from the International Women’s Media Foundation.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/06/28/736296041/the-dark-secret-of-lake-malawi-trading-sex-for-fish

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) slammed the version of an emergency border aid bill that passed the House Thursday, railing against what she called the lack of humanitarian provisions in the bill.

Ocasio-Cortez, who voted against a different border aid bill earlier in the week as well, said she opposes giving any more money to agencies who are enforcing President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, namely Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
#CNN #News

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4CrNQYNx3g

Utah police recovered “multiple items of evidence” from a Salt Lake City home after serving a search warrant in connection with the disappearance of University of Utah student Mackenzie Lueck, department Chief Mike Brown told reporters. 

During a Thursday news conference shared on the department’s Facebook page, Brown said the owner of the home is a “person of interest” who has been questioned by detectives. No arrests have been made in connection with Lueck’s case.

“Our detectives collected multiple items of evidence throughout the night that are in the process of being tested and analyzed,” he said. “This will take some time.”

Police said they are also looking for a mattress and box spring given away by the homeowner last week. 

Lueck, 23, landed at Salt Lake City International Airport early on June 17 after visiting family in California. The University of Utah senior took a Lyft to Hatch Park in North Salt Lake and met up with another person in a car, police said. That, according to police, was the last time Lueck was seen.  

Lyft told USA TODAY the route that Lueck’s driver took contained no irregularities and ended at the destination as originally entered by the rider. The driver continued providing rides immediately after Lueck’s ride, Lyft said. 

Brown did not confirm if the owner of the home was the person Lueck met after taking Lyft from the airport. The Salt Lake Tribune reported the owner of the home turned part of the house into a rental he offers through AirBnB, citing a neighbor. 

Lueck took a Lyft to meet someone: Now she’s missing

“This is a digital forensic investigation,” he said. “This is covering computers, cell phones, IP addresses, URLs, texting apps. This is very complicated and it has a digital footprint that our investigators have been following since last Thursday.”

Brown said the warrant executed on the Utah home was “one of many” connected to the case. 

Salt Lake City police investigate a tip that may be connected to the disappearance of Mackenzie Lueck on Wednesday, June 26, 2019, in Salt Lake City. Salt Lake City Assistant Police Chief Tim Doubt said Wednesday night that detectives were serving a search warrant at the home in relation to the case, but refused to provide any more details. Lueck disappeared after taking a Lyft car June 17 from the airport to a park located miles from her apartment. (Francisco Kjolseth/The Salt Lake Tribune via AP)

When Brown was asked Thursday if he believed foul play was involved, he said, “We’re not revealing that right now.” Earlier in the investigation, police had said they didn’t suspect foul play.

Brown added he’s spoken with Lueck’s father, Greg, over the last few days. 

“I can tell you I can feel the heartache and the pain and the suffering in his voice as we spoke,” Brown said. “And my commitment to Greg was that we would do within our power at the Salt Lake City Police Department to bring Mackenzie home. And that is our charge and that is what we’ve committed to do.”

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Police: ‘Multiple items of evidence’ found in home searched in Mackenzie Lueck’s disappearance

Source Article from https://news.yahoo.com/police-apos-multiple-items-evidence-051536463.html

The percentage of Democrats who say they would vote for former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenAtlanta mayor endorses Biden for president Harris claims Iowa momentum after first Democratic debates Sanders: My views on working with GOP ‘a little bit different’ from Biden’s MORE if the presidential race were held tomorrow slipped by 10 points after the first primary debate.

According to a Morning Consult/FiveThirtyEight poll of likely Democratic voters released on Friday, 41.5 percent said before the debates they would vote for Biden tomorrow, but 31.5 percent said the same thing after Thursday night’s debate.

The apparent decline in support comes after Biden was widely seen as having faltered, including engaging in a stark exchange with Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisAtlanta mayor endorses Biden for president Harris claims Iowa momentum after first Democratic debates Booker: Biden can’t ‘fall into a defensive crouch and shift blame’ MORE (D-Calif.) over school busing.

Harris herself got a nearly 9 point bump, with 16.6 percent of Democrats saying they would support her after the debate, up from 7.9 percent before the events.

Other 2020 candidates had marginal increases or decreases.

Biden defended himself Friday during a speech in Chicago, saying that “I fought my heart out to ensure that civil rights and voting rights, equal rights are enforced everywhere” and that he “never, ever opposed voluntary busing.”  

Morning Consult and FiveThirtyEight surveyed, from June 19-26, 7,150 registered voters who say they are likely to vote in their state’s Democratic primary or caucus. That result has a margin of error of 1 percentage point. Then, June 27-28, 1,399 respondents who answered the first round of questioning were surveyed. That result has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/450958-10-percent-fewer-democrats-say-theyd-vote-for-biden-after-first-debate-poll

President Donald Trump at the G-20 economic conference in Osaka, Japan, Friday. He tweeted an invitation for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to meet him after the summit in the demilitarized zone between the Koreas.

Susan Walsh/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Susan Walsh/AP

President Donald Trump at the G-20 economic conference in Osaka, Japan, Friday. He tweeted an invitation for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to meet him after the summit in the demilitarized zone between the Koreas.

Susan Walsh/AP

Updated at 8:20 p.m. ET

President Trump is wrapping up his economic meetings at the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, and thinking about his upcoming visit to Seoul, South Korea. While he’s there, why not meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un?

So Trump tweeted an invitation to meet in the demilitarized zone between the Koreas.

Trump and Kim met in February in Hanoi, Vietnam, to talk about denuclearization. It ended abruptly with no deal.

But since then they’ve said nice things about each other in public. Last week, Kim said he’d received a letter with “excellent content” from Trump. A couple of weeks earlier Trump said Kim had sent him a “beautiful” letter for the president’s 73rd birthday.

Trump told reporters in Osaka that he will go to the North Korean border, and “just put out a feeler [to Kim] because I don’t know where he is right now, he may not be in North Korea.”

He noted that he and Kim could see each other for two minutes. “That’s all we can. But that will be fine,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/06/28/737209058/trump-tweets-an-invitation-to-north-koreas-kim-meet-in-the-dmz

CLOSE

Years after Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election prompted investigations, President Trump asked Vladimir Putin not to do it again in 2020.
USA TODAY

OSAKA, Japan – President Donald Trump expressed exasperation with the media in a conversation with Vladimir Putin on Friday and spoke approvingly of the fact that the Russian president does not have the same problems with the media that he has.  

The president’s remarks drew blowback on social media from critics who noted that journalists in Russia have been killed.    

“Fake news,” Trump said during a meeting with Putin at the G-20 summit in Japan as journalists filled into the room to cover the leaders’ remarks. “You don’t have this problem with Russia, We have. You don’t have it.”

Putin responded in English, according to a raw video feed of the exchange. 

“Yes, yes,” he said. “We have, too. The same.” 

Trump has for years blasted U.S. media as “the enemy of the people.” Still, the praise for the Russian president on the point was a remarkable comment for a U.S. president. More than three dozen journalists have been murdered in Russia since 1992, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. 

No meddling: At G20, Trump tells Putin playfully: ‘Don’t meddle in the election.’ 

Trump made the comments on the one-year anniversary of a shooting at the Capital Gazette newspaper in Annapolis, Maryland, in which five were killed. 

Minutes after the exchange, Trump and Putin joked about Russian meddling in the 2016 election. When a reporter asked if the president would raise that issue during their meeting, Trump turned to Putin and wagged a finger while smiling. 

“Don’t meddle in the election, president,” Trump said in a joking manner. 

When an interpreter translated Trump’s “request,” Putin laughed.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/28/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-joke-reporters-fake-news-g-20/1598685001/

During the Democratic presidential debates on June 27, 2019, U.S. senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) got into a heated discussion about race with fellow 2020 candidate and former vice president Joe Biden.

Harris confronted Biden over remarks he had made about having “civil” working relationships with segregationist lawmakers James O. Eastland and Hermand Talmadge. “It was hurtful,” said Harris, who is the daughter of immigrants from Jamaica and India, “to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and careers on the segregation of race in this country.”

Harris continued by criticizing Biden for working with those lawmakers “to oppose busing” to desegregate schools. She then segued into a personal story about being a “little girl in California who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools. And she was bused to school every day. And that little girl was me”:

Those comments by Harris attracted the attention of junk news and conspiracy sites such as Gateway Pundit, which republished an article of theirs from a nearly a year earlier asserting that Harris had “lied” about being among the early groups of students who integrated Berkeley schools.

“Kamala lied,” Gateway Pundit declared. “Actually the classrooms in Berkeley were already integrated in 1963 — before she was born. Here’s a photo from the 1963 Berkeley yearbook. And here’s a photo from the Berkeley 1964 yearbook — the year Kamala was born.”

Those photographs did document that black students comprised a significant proportion of a Berkeley public school’s student body as early as 1963:

<!–

–>

But the yearbook images posted by Gateway Pundit were from Berkeley High School, not from the area’s lower grade-level schools. And that was a key detail.

Harris was born in 1964, and Berkeley Public Schools didn’t fully integrate until 1968, meaning Harris was still a grade school-aged child when the district was in its early years of ending “de facto segregation” by using buses to transport children, according to contemporaneous news reports. Harris entered the Berkeley public school system in 1969, when she began taking a bus to Thousand Oaks Elementary School in an affluent, predominantly white area.

It was misleading of Gateway Pundit to offer images of Berkeley High School’s yearbooks in the early 1960s as evidence that Harris was allegedly lying about her role in education desegregation, because Berkeley High was (and is) the only public high school in the city, so it was integrated by necessity. But most of the district’s local elementary schools were not integrated back then.

“[Berkeley High] was the only high school, that’s where all the kids in the city would go,” district spokesman Charless Burress told the Associated Press. He confirmed that 14 of the district’s elementary schools weren’t integrated until the beginning of the 1968 school year. Thus if Harris entered the public school system in 1969, she would have indeed been part of the second class of students in a newly integrated district.

According to data published by the school district, in 1963 “Negro” students comprised only 2.5% percent of the student body at Thousand Oaks Elementary School, while “Caucasian” students comprised 95.1% of the student body. Due to the district’s integration efforts, by 1969 those figures had shifted to 40.2% and 53.4%, respectively.

Source Article from https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-berkeley-busing/

If President Donald Trump’s high-stakes trade talks at the G-20 summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping are a bust, the ongoing trade war could become a potent issue for Democrats in the 2020 election.

Trade talks between the world’s two largest economies stalled out last month, and some experts and administration officials are predicting that Trump’s meeting with Xi on Saturday could rekindle the negotiations. A senior White House official told CNBC that Trump might agree to a truce in the trade war without asking for very much from Xi in that meeting.

But current and former administration officials have cautioned that a deal with China likely won’t come at the G-20 itself. Trump has also threatened on multiple occasions to levy duties on $300 billion in Chinese goods that are imported to the U.S., which would result in taxes on nearly all U.S. imports of Chinese products.

The Trump administration has slapped tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods. China has responded with $110 billion in tariffs on U.S. goods, as the two sides grapple over issues including trade deficits, alleged Chinese intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers.

U.S. tariffs on China and other sources have reportedly already raised prices on some goods. The Becker Friedman Institute of Economics at the University of Chicago, for instance, found that the price of washers and dryers rose by 12% in response to tariffs levied in 2018.

Taxing all imports from China would do the same for many more products — and that could be a liability for Trump’s reelection chances.

Trump has long touted the benefits of tariffs as a way to bring companies back to the U.S. and make tax revenue. But tariffs also raise costs on American families by hundreds of dollars: the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that tariffs imposed 2018 led to an annual cost of $419 for the typical household.

When Trump hiked tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods to 25% in May after the trade talks broke down, that annual cost shot up to $831 per year, according to the New York Fed.

Trump could open himself up to more attacks from Democrats on tariffs as the 2020 election nears. And while it was hardly the main focus of the first presidential debates, some candidates have already lashed out.

“The tariffs and the trade war are just punishing businesses and producers and workers on both sides,” entrepreneur Andrew Yang said during the Democratic primary debate Thursday night.

China’s retaliatory tariffs, which hit a wide variety of agricultural products, are already deeply affecting U.S. farmers in states that Trump won in the 2016 election.

Yang recalled an interaction he had with an Iowa farmer “who said he spent six years building up a buying relationship in China that’s now disappeared and gone forever. And the beneficiaries have not been American workers or people in China. It’s been Southeast Asia and other producers that have then stepped into the void.”

The White House in May rolled out a $16 billion farm and ranch aid package for those affected by the trade war. Trump assured farmers that his tariffs on Chinese imports would cover the cost.

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg appeared to be citing the New York Fed’s analysis when he knocked Trump’s tariffs at the debate Thursday night. “Tariffs are taxes. And Americans are going to pay on average $800 more a year because of these tariffs,” Buttigieg said.

“Folks who aren’t in the shadow of a factory are somewhere near a soy field where I live. And manufacturers, and especially soy farmers, are hurting,” Buttigieg added.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/28/if-trump-cant-make-a-deal-with-xi-rising-tariff-impact-could-help-democrats.html

Salt Lake City police have searched the home of a man they call a person of interest in the disappearance of a college student. Mackenzie Lueck, 23, disappeared after taking a Lyft June 17 from an airport to a park. (June 27)
AP, AP

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/06/28/mackenzie-lueck-utah-missing-ayoola-ajayi-arrested-murder-kidnapping/1597546001/

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenAtlanta mayor endorses Biden for president Harris claims Iowa momentum after first Democratic debates Sanders: My views on working with GOP ‘a little bit different’ from Biden’s MORE defended his civil rights record Friday after a bruising exchange with Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisAtlanta mayor endorses Biden for president Harris claims Iowa momentum after first Democratic debates Booker: Biden can’t ‘fall into a defensive crouch and shift blame’ MORE (D-Calif.) during Thursday night’s primary debate, when Harris highlighted Biden’s past stance on school busing and recent comments about working with segregationist senators. 

“I know and you know, I fought my heart out to ensure that civil rights and voting rights, equal rights are enforced everywhere,” Biden told the Rainbow PUSH Coalition convention, hosted by the Rev. Jesse Jackson.

“I want to be absolutely clear about my record and position on racial justice, including busing. I never, never, never ever opposed voluntary busing. And that’s a program that Senator Harris participated in, and it made a difference in her life,” he said.

“I did support federal action to support root causes of segregation in our schools and our communities, including taking on the banks and redlining and trying to change the way in which neighborhoods were segregated,” he added. “In fact, I cast the deciding vote in 1974 against an amendment called the Gurney Amendment, which would have banned the right of the federal courts to use busing as a remedy.”

Biden was on defense Friday after he and Harris clashed the previous night when she slammed his recent remarks recalling a sense of “civility” working with segregationist Sens. James Eastland (D-Miss.) and Herman Talmadge (D-Ga.) in the 1970s.

Harris also blasted Biden’s past opposition to busing black students to predominantly white schools, describing how she herself benefited from school busing as a child.

“I do not believe you are a racist and I agree with you when you commit yourself to the importance of finding common ground,” she told Biden on Thursday night. “But I also believe, and it’s personal and I was actually very — it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country.”

“On this subject, it cannot be an intellectual debate among Democrats, we have to take it seriously, we have to act swiftly,” she added when discussing busing.

Harris on Friday doubled down on her criticism of Biden, who has led nationals polls since formally entering the White House race in April. Harris said the former vice president’s “nostalgia” for working with segregationist senators decades ago was “hurtful” and “misplaced.”

“The characterization and the nostalgia about who they were I find to be misplaced, and it was hurtful to me to hear that they would be nostalgic about people who if they had their way I would not serve in the United States Senate,” she said on MSNBC.

“On the heels of the history of extreme pain and damage, not to mention death, you have to draw the line,” she added.

Biden sought to counter the attacks in the debate, saying he opposed busing ordered by the Department of Education but supported allowing federal courts to intervene in the issue. On Friday, he continued to underline his efforts with former President Obama, who remains popular in the Democratic base, saying they worked together to expand civil rights.

“And by the way, with all due respect, I say to Chicagoans and everyone: My president gets much too little credit for all that he did — he was one of the great presidents of the United States of America. And I’m tired of hearing about what he didn’t do. This man had a backbone like a ram rod,” Biden said.

As the crowded primary field’s frontrunner, Biden was expected to be the target of attacks from the nine other Democrats on stage Thursday night. However, Harris’s attacks seeking to portray the 77-year-old former vice president as out of touch with an increasingly diverse base quickly left a dent and emerged as the debate’s most significant moment.

In an attempt to pivot away from his political past, Biden briefly went on offense against Harris on Friday, saying her attacks during a packed primary debate that covered a litany of topics oversimplified his record.

“I heard and I listened to, and I respect Senator Harris,” he said, arguing that “we all know that 30 seconds to 60 seconds on a campaign debate exchange can’t do justice to a lifetime commitment to civil rights.”

“The discussion in this race today shouldn’t be about the past,” Biden added. “We should be talking about how we can do better. How we can move forward.”

Updated: 3:20 p.m.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/450926-biden-defends-civil-rights-record-after-debate-showdown-with-harris

James Fields was sentenced on Friday to life in prison on federal hate crime charges. Fields rammed his car into a crowd of anti-racism protesters in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer and injuring dozens of others.

Eze Amos/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Eze Amos/AP

James Fields was sentenced on Friday to life in prison on federal hate crime charges. Fields rammed his car into a crowd of anti-racism protesters in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer and injuring dozens of others.

Eze Amos/AP

Updated at 4:30 p.m. ET

The man who drove his car into a crowd of anti-racist protesters in Charlottesville, Va., killing one person and injuring 35 has been sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison.

A federal judge issued the sentence Friday for self-proclaimed neo-Nazi James Alex Fields Jr, 22, of the Toledo, Ohio area.

The judge’s punishment announced in a Charlottesville courtroom came after numerous survivors delivered emotional testimony about the psychological and physical toll the attack caused.

After the hearing, prosecutors described the 2017 attack as heinous.

“It was cold-blooded. It was motivated by deep-seated racial animus,” Thomas Cullen, U.S. attorney for the Western District of Virginia, told reporters. He said Fields’ lethal car plowing was calculated, calling it “a hate-inspired act of domestic terrorism.”

“Charlottesville is never going to be the same,” Cullen said. “It will be with this community, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, and this country, for a long time.”

Survivors who testified included Rosia Parker, a longtime civil rights activist in Charlottesville. She told the court she watched the attack from just feet away.

“You could have done anything else but what you did,” Parker said, according to The Associated Press. “You deserve everything that you get.”

In legal filings presented to the judge on Friday, Fields’ lawyers said while he committed a “terrible crime,” they asked the judge to also consider Fields’ “traumatic childhood and his mental illness, wrote Fields’ federal public defender, Lisa Lorish.

Federal prosecutors had asked the judge for a life sentence for Fields, who is 22. A plea deal brokered in March took away the possibility of the death penalty, and federal prosecutors and Fields’ lawyers agreed that federal sentencing guidelines called for a life sentence. As part of the deal, Fields pleaded guilty to 29 of the 30 federal hate crimes he faced and is not eligible for parole.

Prosecutors had said Fields’ crimes were “so horrendous – and the maiming of innocents so severe – that they outweigh any factors the defendant may argue form a basis for leniency,” according to a sentencing document filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Kavanaugh before the Friday hearing.

Last week, Fields’ attorneys asked for something shorter than a life sentence, citing Fields’ age and history of mental illness.

Fields has already been convicted on separate, state charges for murdering 32-year-old Heather Heyer and injuring dozens of other people. The jury in that case recommended a life sentence plus 419 years and $480,000 in fines. Sentencing in that case is set for July 15.

Heyer’s mother, Susan Bro, said in April that she was satisfied with Fields’ federal guilty plea and was not intent on his getting the death penalty. “There’s no point in killing him. It would not bring back Heather,” she told reporters.

Fields was 20 when he drove his Dodge Challenger through the night from Ohio to attend Unite the Right, a white nationalist rally in August 2017. The weekend turned deadly when Fields accelerated his car into the group of protesters. Two Virginia State Police troopers investigating the day’s events also died when the helicopter they were in crashed.

Before he was sentenced on Friday, Fields’ lawyers wrote the court to say that he used Twitter in search of community and “quickly learned that provocative and hateful comments led to more exposure,” leading him to follow accounts white supremacist accounts, including Richard Spencer and Mike Peinovich.

Fields’ lawyers wrote that he found out about the Unite the Right rally through its organizers’ online recruiting campaign.

His attorneys claim he had no intention to commit a violent act, instead describing the attack as a “impulsive, angry and aggressive decision.”

President Trump said afterward that there was “blame on both sides” for the violence in the college town.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/06/28/736915323/neo-nazi-who-killed-charlottesville-protester-is-sentenced-to-life-in-prison